新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 1165-1172.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.015
付开赟1(), 李爱梅2, 丁新华1, 贾尊尊1, 吐尔逊·阿合买提1, 冯宏祖2, 郭文超1()
收稿日期:
2021-12-21
出版日期:
2022-05-20
发布日期:
2022-06-09
通信作者:
郭文超
作者简介:
付开赟(1987-),男,浙江人,助理研究员,研究方向为农业害虫综合防治,(E-mail) fukaiyun000@foxmail.com
基金资助:
FU Kaiyun1(), LI Aimei2, DING Xinhua1, JIA Zunzun1, Ahmat Tuerxun1, FENG Hongzu2, GUO Wenchao1()
Received:
2021-12-21
Online:
2022-05-20
Published:
2022-06-09
Correspondence author:
GUO Wenchao
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】分析评价10种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果,为研究番茄潜叶蛾种群的化学防治以及综合治理提供一定的科学参考依据。【方法】测定 10 种药剂在田间喷施后对其防治效果。【结果】34% 乙多·甲氧虫 48 mL/667 m2、6% 乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂50 mL/667 m2 与0.05% 有机硅助剂 15 mL/667 m2 组合、 6% 乙基多杀菌素悬浮剂 50 mL/667 m2 与 20% 氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂 6.7 mL/667 m2 、20% 氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂10 mL/667 m2 在药后 14 d,其田间防治效果分别可达 94.59%、93.10%、90.97%、91.29%。【结论】生产上使用34% 乙多·甲氧虫SC 48 mL/667m2或6% 乙基多杀菌素SC 50 mL/667m2 与 0.05% 有机硅助剂15 mL/667m2 组合交替进行防治。
中图分类号:
付开赟, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 冯宏祖, 郭文超. 10 种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.
FU Kaiyun, LI Aimei, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Ahmat Tuerxun, FENG Hongzu, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.
处理编号 Handling number | 处理 Deal with | 有效成分用量 Active ingredient dosage (gai/hm2) | 制剂用量 Preparation dosage (g/mL /667m2) | 用水量 (kg/ 667m2) Water consumption | 小区面 Community area (m2) | 增效剂用量 Synergist dosage g/mL/ 667m2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 陶氏益农雷通240 g/L甲氧虫酰肼 | 151.2 | 42 | 30 | 124 | - |
2 | 先正达亮泰6% 阿维·氯苯酰 | 54 | 60 | 30 | 124 | - |
3 | 康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | - |
4 | 康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 30 | 10 | 30 | 124 | - |
5 | 禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A | 360×108 IU | 75 | 30 | 124 | - |
6 | 禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A | 480×108 IU | 100 | 30 | 124 | - |
7 | 康邦20×108 PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒 | 2.7万亿PIB | 90 | 30 | 124 | - |
8 | 康邦20×108 PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒 | 3.6万亿PIB | 120 | 30 | 124 | - |
9 | 拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮 | 76.5 | 30 | 30 | 124 | - |
10 | 拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮 | 12 | 40 | 30 | 124 | - |
11 | 瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺 | 22.5 | 15 | 30 | 124 | - |
12 | 瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺 | 37.5 | 25 | 30 | 124 | - |
13 | 陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫 | 204 | 40 | 30 | 124 | - |
14 | 陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫 | 244.8 | 48 | 30 | 124 | - |
15 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂 | 45+0.05% | 50+15 | 30 | 124 | - |
16 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 45+20 | 50+6.7 | 30 | 124 | - |
17 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 45+30 | 50+10 | 30 | 124 | - |
18 | 艾绿士 + 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼 | 45+108 | 50+30 | 30 | 124 | - |
19 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+ 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼 | 45+108 | 40+108 | 30 | 124 | - |
20 | 艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂 | 45 | 50 | 30 | 124 | - |
21 | 艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂 | 54 | 60 | 30 | 124 | - |
22 | 艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂 | 63 | 70 | 30 | 124 | - |
23 | 10% 溴氰虫酰胺油悬剂 | 21 | 14 | 30 | 124 | - |
24 | 康宽 20% 悬浮剂+激健 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | 15 |
25 | 康宽 20% 悬浮剂+杰效利 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | 15 |
26 | 康宽 20% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | 15 |
27 | 清水(UTC) | - | - | - | 124 | - |
表1 试验各处理
Table 1 Details of each treatment in the test
处理编号 Handling number | 处理 Deal with | 有效成分用量 Active ingredient dosage (gai/hm2) | 制剂用量 Preparation dosage (g/mL /667m2) | 用水量 (kg/ 667m2) Water consumption | 小区面 Community area (m2) | 增效剂用量 Synergist dosage g/mL/ 667m2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 陶氏益农雷通240 g/L甲氧虫酰肼 | 151.2 | 42 | 30 | 124 | - |
2 | 先正达亮泰6% 阿维·氯苯酰 | 54 | 60 | 30 | 124 | - |
3 | 康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | - |
4 | 康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 30 | 10 | 30 | 124 | - |
5 | 禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A | 360×108 IU | 75 | 30 | 124 | - |
6 | 禁卫军32 000 IU/mg苏云金杆菌G033A | 480×108 IU | 100 | 30 | 124 | - |
7 | 康邦20×108 PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒 | 2.7万亿PIB | 90 | 30 | 124 | - |
8 | 康邦20×108 PIB/mL甘蓝夜蛾核型多角体病毒 | 3.6万亿PIB | 120 | 30 | 124 | - |
9 | 拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮 | 76.5 | 30 | 30 | 124 | - |
10 | 拜耳极显17% 氟吡呋喃酮 | 12 | 40 | 30 | 124 | - |
11 | 瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺 | 22.5 | 15 | 30 | 124 | - |
12 | 瑞梦得10% 联苯·氟酰胺 | 37.5 | 25 | 30 | 124 | - |
13 | 陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫 | 204 | 40 | 30 | 124 | - |
14 | 陶氏益农斯品诺34% 乙多·甲氧虫 | 244.8 | 48 | 30 | 124 | - |
15 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂 | 45+0.05% | 50+15 | 30 | 124 | - |
16 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 45+20 | 50+6.7 | 30 | 124 | - |
17 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+康宽20% 悬浮剂 | 45+30 | 50+10 | 30 | 124 | - |
18 | 艾绿士 + 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼 | 45+108 | 50+30 | 30 | 124 | - |
19 | 艾绿士6% 悬浮剂+ 240 g/L雷通甲氧虫酰肼 | 45+108 | 40+108 | 30 | 124 | - |
20 | 艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂 | 45 | 50 | 30 | 124 | - |
21 | 艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂 | 54 | 60 | 30 | 124 | - |
22 | 艾绿士 6% 悬浮剂 | 63 | 70 | 30 | 124 | - |
23 | 10% 溴氰虫酰胺油悬剂 | 21 | 14 | 30 | 124 | - |
24 | 康宽 20% 悬浮剂+激健 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | 15 |
25 | 康宽 20% 悬浮剂+杰效利 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | 15 |
26 | 康宽 20% 悬浮剂+有机硅助剂 | 21 | 7 | 30 | 124 | 15 |
27 | 清水(UTC) | - | - | - | 124 | - |
试验 处理 Test treatment | 施药后虫口减退率 Insect population reduction rate after application (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
药后 3 d 3 d after medicine | 药后 7 d 7 days after medicine | 药后 10 d 10 days after medicine | 药后 14 d 14 days after medicine | |
1 | -6.000 0±0.372 3ab | -127.000 0±0.626 8abcde | -175.000 0±0.858 8ab | -573.333 3±0.998 1abc |
2 | 61.746 0±0.136 4a | 19.444 4±0.121 1abc | 16.706 3±0.245 8ab | -129.801 6±0.638 7a |
3 | -5.000 0±0.360 9ab | -175.000 0±0.423 4abcd | -118.333 3±0.408 6ab | -350.000 0±0.941 3abc |
4 | 45.333 3±0.166 5a | 32.000 0±0.142 0ab | -56.000 0±0.286 4ab | -38.666 7±0.363 0a |
5 | 46.476 2±0.265 1a | -45.381 0±0.394 6abcd | -110.761 9±0.439 3ab | -124.190 5±0.341 5a |
6 | -83.333 3±0.866 0ab | -80.000 0±0.958 0abcd | -300.000 0±1.766 2abc | -356.666 7±1.726 1abc |
7 | -65.694 6±0.348 3ab | -223.193 8±0.523 1cde | -443.096 6±0.992 3abc | -1 281.646 4±1.670 1cde |
8 | -138.752 1±1.268 7bc | -31.287 9±0.302 8abcd | -314.228 6±2.033 2abc | -279.141 1±1.014 7abc |
9 | -139.239 5±0.877 0bc | -328.920 0±1.873 1e | -124.233 3±5.295 3cd | -1 251.393 3±4.574 5bcde |
10 | -38.362 4±0.371 7ab | -242.331 4±0.530 5de | -126.429 9±4.194 2cd | -1 018.021 0±2.922 1abcd |
11 | -8.495 7±0.377 8ab | -141.184 0±0.614 7abcde | -994.602 6±2.325 0bc | -1 084.241 5±2.587 0abcd |
12 | -76.350 6±0.898 7ab | -103.219 1±0.645 2abcde | -1 986.819 8±10.958 9d | -1 747.367 0±10.034 6def |
13 | 50.571 3±0.160 5a | 49.380 8±0.177 4ab | -16.238 4±0.620 6ab | -194.714 9±0.947 0abc |
14 | 78.534 3±0.078 8a | 79.520 6±0.050 5a | 74.987 6±0.226 7a | 0.245 5±0.283 4a |
15 | 79.238 1±0.061 9a | 58.254 0±0.161 6a | 92.952 4±0.055 3a | -27.968 3±0.483 3a |
16 | 24.285 7±0.275 8ab | 37.619 0±0.361 1ab | 57.619 0±0.127 0a | -61.904 8±0.484 2a |
17 | 2.698 4±0.359 6ab | -59.523 8±0.759 8abcd | -45.952 4±0.954 2ab | -728.651 0±1.630 9abcd |
18 | 13.168 5±0.145 2ab | -8.758 2±0.549 8abcd | -152.718 0±1.025 7ab | -529.963 3±1.224 6abc |
19 | 61.976 8±0.186 6a | 83.026 3±0.105 1a | 18.013 1±0.391 9ab | -143.183 1±0.313 0a |
20 | 73.029 8±0.071 3a | 59.239 4±0.167 6a | -5.305 3±0.242 1ab | -203.929 7±0.593 2abc |
21 | 76.452 4±0.051 0a | 72.904 8±0.098 8a | 11.904 8±0.294 7ab | -433.023 8±3.070 2abc |
22 | 49.532 5±0.054 8a | 2.722 9±0.299 8abcd | 29.588 7±0.186 2ab | -170.580 0±0.376 7ab |
23 | 25.777 8±0.172 2ab | 17.333 3±0.257 1abc | -31.111 1±0.360 7ab | -229.333 3±0.301 6abc |
24 | -1.261 9±0.150 7ab | -140.357 1±0.282 1abcde | -600.761 9±1.003 7abc | -814.809 5±1.033 1abcd |
25 | -30.000 0±0.435 9ab | -200.000 0±0.900 6bcde | -1 266.666 7±4.604 3cd | -2 226.666 7±7.366 1ef |
26 | 0.000 0±0.235 7ab | -243.333 3±0.348 0de | -436.666 7±0.901 2abc | -973.333 3±1.720 5abcd |
27 | -233.166 7±1.029 7c | -727.833 3±2.425 3f | -2 019.833 3±6.197 8d | -2 379.500 0±7.763 8f |
表2 不同药剂处理下番茄潜叶蛾虫口减退率变化
Table 2 Effects of different pesticide treatments on the rate of decrease of tomato leafminer insect population
试验 处理 Test treatment | 施药后虫口减退率 Insect population reduction rate after application (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
药后 3 d 3 d after medicine | 药后 7 d 7 days after medicine | 药后 10 d 10 days after medicine | 药后 14 d 14 days after medicine | |
1 | -6.000 0±0.372 3ab | -127.000 0±0.626 8abcde | -175.000 0±0.858 8ab | -573.333 3±0.998 1abc |
2 | 61.746 0±0.136 4a | 19.444 4±0.121 1abc | 16.706 3±0.245 8ab | -129.801 6±0.638 7a |
3 | -5.000 0±0.360 9ab | -175.000 0±0.423 4abcd | -118.333 3±0.408 6ab | -350.000 0±0.941 3abc |
4 | 45.333 3±0.166 5a | 32.000 0±0.142 0ab | -56.000 0±0.286 4ab | -38.666 7±0.363 0a |
5 | 46.476 2±0.265 1a | -45.381 0±0.394 6abcd | -110.761 9±0.439 3ab | -124.190 5±0.341 5a |
6 | -83.333 3±0.866 0ab | -80.000 0±0.958 0abcd | -300.000 0±1.766 2abc | -356.666 7±1.726 1abc |
7 | -65.694 6±0.348 3ab | -223.193 8±0.523 1cde | -443.096 6±0.992 3abc | -1 281.646 4±1.670 1cde |
8 | -138.752 1±1.268 7bc | -31.287 9±0.302 8abcd | -314.228 6±2.033 2abc | -279.141 1±1.014 7abc |
9 | -139.239 5±0.877 0bc | -328.920 0±1.873 1e | -124.233 3±5.295 3cd | -1 251.393 3±4.574 5bcde |
10 | -38.362 4±0.371 7ab | -242.331 4±0.530 5de | -126.429 9±4.194 2cd | -1 018.021 0±2.922 1abcd |
11 | -8.495 7±0.377 8ab | -141.184 0±0.614 7abcde | -994.602 6±2.325 0bc | -1 084.241 5±2.587 0abcd |
12 | -76.350 6±0.898 7ab | -103.219 1±0.645 2abcde | -1 986.819 8±10.958 9d | -1 747.367 0±10.034 6def |
13 | 50.571 3±0.160 5a | 49.380 8±0.177 4ab | -16.238 4±0.620 6ab | -194.714 9±0.947 0abc |
14 | 78.534 3±0.078 8a | 79.520 6±0.050 5a | 74.987 6±0.226 7a | 0.245 5±0.283 4a |
15 | 79.238 1±0.061 9a | 58.254 0±0.161 6a | 92.952 4±0.055 3a | -27.968 3±0.483 3a |
16 | 24.285 7±0.275 8ab | 37.619 0±0.361 1ab | 57.619 0±0.127 0a | -61.904 8±0.484 2a |
17 | 2.698 4±0.359 6ab | -59.523 8±0.759 8abcd | -45.952 4±0.954 2ab | -728.651 0±1.630 9abcd |
18 | 13.168 5±0.145 2ab | -8.758 2±0.549 8abcd | -152.718 0±1.025 7ab | -529.963 3±1.224 6abc |
19 | 61.976 8±0.186 6a | 83.026 3±0.105 1a | 18.013 1±0.391 9ab | -143.183 1±0.313 0a |
20 | 73.029 8±0.071 3a | 59.239 4±0.167 6a | -5.305 3±0.242 1ab | -203.929 7±0.593 2abc |
21 | 76.452 4±0.051 0a | 72.904 8±0.098 8a | 11.904 8±0.294 7ab | -433.023 8±3.070 2abc |
22 | 49.532 5±0.054 8a | 2.722 9±0.299 8abcd | 29.588 7±0.186 2ab | -170.580 0±0.376 7ab |
23 | 25.777 8±0.172 2ab | 17.333 3±0.257 1abc | -31.111 1±0.360 7ab | -229.333 3±0.301 6abc |
24 | -1.261 9±0.150 7ab | -140.357 1±0.282 1abcde | -600.761 9±1.003 7abc | -814.809 5±1.033 1abcd |
25 | -30.000 0±0.435 9ab | -200.000 0±0.900 6bcde | -1 266.666 7±4.604 3cd | -2 226.666 7±7.366 1ef |
26 | 0.000 0±0.235 7ab | -243.333 3±0.348 0de | -436.666 7±0.901 2abc | -973.333 3±1.720 5abcd |
27 | -233.166 7±1.029 7c | -727.833 3±2.425 3f | -2 019.833 3±6.197 8d | -2 379.500 0±7.763 8f |
试验处理 Test treatment | 施药后的田间校正防效 Field correction control effect after application (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 d | 7 d | 10 d | 14 d | |
1 | 60.378 9±0.114 9ab | 66.868 2±0.110 8abcde | 84.490 2±0.056 9a | 65.213 5±0.087 4a |
2 | 83.083 1±0.068 5a | 85.442 8±0.046 6abcd | 94.801 8±0.019 8a | 85.100 7±0.070 9a |
3 | 63.322 8±0.155 8ab | 86.446 3±0.032 4abc | 85.541 7±0.038 5a | 78.742 0±0.033 8a |
4 | 81.235 1±0.063 5ab | 90.534 4±0.021 5ab | 90.150 3±0.024 4a | 91.289 7±0.042 0a |
5 | 75.639 2±0.135 4ab | 75.857 9±0.066 9abcde | 85.036 4±0.058 1a | 87.851 9±0.036 2a |
6 | 21.191 6±0.405 2abc | 71.228 2±0.158 9abcde | 64.825 6±0.234 4abc | 64.500 1±0.192 7a |
7 | 29.855 1±0.273 9abc | 45.096 3±0.170 9de | 62.527 0±0.112 5abc | 25.360 8±0.165 9a |
8 | -24.174 0±0.730 1c | 77.242 5±0.082 4abcde | 74.343 1±0.137 4ab | 77.165 7±0.078 1a |
9 | 2.383 2±0.442 9bc | 37.528 4±0.297 0e | 27.705 6±0.210 1bcd | 25.749 1±0.343 5a |
10 | 44.005 6±0.252 9abc | 45.390 0±0.174 9de | 21.034 3±0.322 2cd | 26.616 9±0.348 4a |
11 | 62.275 9±0.114 0ab | 55.351 5±0.218 9bcde | 28.242 6±0.201 0bcd | 24.297 0±0.320 3a |
12 | 37.224 1±0.246 9abc | 74.383 0±0.038 2abcde | 4.096 1±0.280 7c | 31.533 5±0.162 4a |
13 | 78.707 6±0.106 3ab | 93.090 2±0.016 7ab | 93.418 5±0.026 4a | 83.170 4±0.052 1a |
14 | 89.422 7±0.046 0a | 96.931 1±0.006 7a | 98.331 8±0.014 9a | 94.586 0±0.013 4a |
15 | 92.122 3±0.035 3a | 94.547 1±0.018 0ab | 99.243 0±0.007 2a | 93.097 8±0.025 5a |
16 | 71.297 2±0.150 0ab | 94.615 1±0.019 7ab | 96.683 2±0.014 2a | 90.969 6±0.040 7a |
17 | 62.672 3±0.190 3ab | 73.331 5±0.142 0abcde | 86.617 2±0.084 9a | 47.006 1±0.201 9a |
18 | 62.488 4±0.127 8ab | 76.100 0±0.167 7abcde | 83.405 6±0.083 3a | 59.503 8±0.144 2a |
19 | 82.321 4±0.102 0ab | 96.232 5±0.023 3ab | 93.489 3±0.040 4a | 87.414 7±0.026 3a |
20 | 89.297 7±0.027 9a | 91.950 0±0.048 3ab | 92.700 0±0.024 6a | 79.266 1±0.087 3a |
21 | 88.691 5±0.034 6a | 96.441 9±0.009 9ab | 94.045 1±0.023 7a | 60.666 1±0.312 2a |
22 | 78.849 6±0.006 1ab | 83.550 5±0.072 9abcd | 94.685 5±0.027 6a | 84.690 5±0.051 4a |
23 | 74.894 0±0.044 2ab | 84.347 0±0.079 7abcd | 91.577 0±0.025 5a | 81.019 6±0.057 7a |
24 | 62.463 8±0.089 3ab | 58.928 7±0.114 7abcde | 51.128 2±0.144 8abc | 43.919 0±0.195 9a |
25 | 39.756 0±0.301 2abc | 49.610 0±0.163 3cde | 1.809 4±0.400 7c | -70.490 0±0.810 2b |
26 | 61.987 9±0.139 6ab | 47.795 3±0.115 4cde | 62.723 4±0.137 1abc | 33.017 0±0.253 8a |
表 3 不同药剂处理下番茄潜叶蛾田间防效变化
Table 3 Effects of different pesticide treatments on the field control effectof tomato leaf miner
试验处理 Test treatment | 施药后的田间校正防效 Field correction control effect after application (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 d | 7 d | 10 d | 14 d | |
1 | 60.378 9±0.114 9ab | 66.868 2±0.110 8abcde | 84.490 2±0.056 9a | 65.213 5±0.087 4a |
2 | 83.083 1±0.068 5a | 85.442 8±0.046 6abcd | 94.801 8±0.019 8a | 85.100 7±0.070 9a |
3 | 63.322 8±0.155 8ab | 86.446 3±0.032 4abc | 85.541 7±0.038 5a | 78.742 0±0.033 8a |
4 | 81.235 1±0.063 5ab | 90.534 4±0.021 5ab | 90.150 3±0.024 4a | 91.289 7±0.042 0a |
5 | 75.639 2±0.135 4ab | 75.857 9±0.066 9abcde | 85.036 4±0.058 1a | 87.851 9±0.036 2a |
6 | 21.191 6±0.405 2abc | 71.228 2±0.158 9abcde | 64.825 6±0.234 4abc | 64.500 1±0.192 7a |
7 | 29.855 1±0.273 9abc | 45.096 3±0.170 9de | 62.527 0±0.112 5abc | 25.360 8±0.165 9a |
8 | -24.174 0±0.730 1c | 77.242 5±0.082 4abcde | 74.343 1±0.137 4ab | 77.165 7±0.078 1a |
9 | 2.383 2±0.442 9bc | 37.528 4±0.297 0e | 27.705 6±0.210 1bcd | 25.749 1±0.343 5a |
10 | 44.005 6±0.252 9abc | 45.390 0±0.174 9de | 21.034 3±0.322 2cd | 26.616 9±0.348 4a |
11 | 62.275 9±0.114 0ab | 55.351 5±0.218 9bcde | 28.242 6±0.201 0bcd | 24.297 0±0.320 3a |
12 | 37.224 1±0.246 9abc | 74.383 0±0.038 2abcde | 4.096 1±0.280 7c | 31.533 5±0.162 4a |
13 | 78.707 6±0.106 3ab | 93.090 2±0.016 7ab | 93.418 5±0.026 4a | 83.170 4±0.052 1a |
14 | 89.422 7±0.046 0a | 96.931 1±0.006 7a | 98.331 8±0.014 9a | 94.586 0±0.013 4a |
15 | 92.122 3±0.035 3a | 94.547 1±0.018 0ab | 99.243 0±0.007 2a | 93.097 8±0.025 5a |
16 | 71.297 2±0.150 0ab | 94.615 1±0.019 7ab | 96.683 2±0.014 2a | 90.969 6±0.040 7a |
17 | 62.672 3±0.190 3ab | 73.331 5±0.142 0abcde | 86.617 2±0.084 9a | 47.006 1±0.201 9a |
18 | 62.488 4±0.127 8ab | 76.100 0±0.167 7abcde | 83.405 6±0.083 3a | 59.503 8±0.144 2a |
19 | 82.321 4±0.102 0ab | 96.232 5±0.023 3ab | 93.489 3±0.040 4a | 87.414 7±0.026 3a |
20 | 89.297 7±0.027 9a | 91.950 0±0.048 3ab | 92.700 0±0.024 6a | 79.266 1±0.087 3a |
21 | 88.691 5±0.034 6a | 96.441 9±0.009 9ab | 94.045 1±0.023 7a | 60.666 1±0.312 2a |
22 | 78.849 6±0.006 1ab | 83.550 5±0.072 9abcd | 94.685 5±0.027 6a | 84.690 5±0.051 4a |
23 | 74.894 0±0.044 2ab | 84.347 0±0.079 7abcd | 91.577 0±0.025 5a | 81.019 6±0.057 7a |
24 | 62.463 8±0.089 3ab | 58.928 7±0.114 7abcde | 51.128 2±0.144 8abc | 43.919 0±0.195 9a |
25 | 39.756 0±0.301 2abc | 49.610 0±0.163 3cde | 1.809 4±0.400 7c | -70.490 0±0.810 2b |
26 | 61.987 9±0.139 6ab | 47.795 3±0.115 4cde | 62.723 4±0.137 1abc | 33.017 0±0.253 8a |
试验处理Test treatment | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | AB | A | C | C | BC | A | A | ABC | A |
表4 低浓度药剂对番茄潜叶蛾虫口减退率差异水平
Table 4 Differences in the population decline rate of tomato leafminer with low concentrations of pesticides
试验处理Test treatment | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | AB | A | C | C | BC | A | A | ABC | A |
试验处理Test treatment | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | A | AB | AB | AB | B | A | AB | A | A |
表5 高浓度药剂对番茄潜叶蛾虫口减退率差异水平
Table 5 Differences in the population decline rate of tomato leafminer with high concentrations of pesticides
试验处理Test treatment | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | A | AB | AB | AB | B | A | AB | A | A |
试验处理Test treatment | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
表 6 低浓度药剂对番茄潜叶蛾防效差异水平
Table 6 Different levels of low-concentration pesticides against tomato leaf miner
试验处理Test treatment | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 20 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
试验处理Test treatment | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | A | AB | AB | B | B | A | AB | A | A |
表 7 高浓度药剂对番茄潜叶蛾防效差异水平
Table 7 Different levels of control effects of high concentrations of pesticides on tomato leaf miner
试验处理Test treatment | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
差异水平Significant level | A | AB | AB | B | B | A | AB | A | A |
[1] | 张润志. 番茄潜麦蛾Tuta absoluta(Povolny)危害状(叶片)[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019, 56(6):1271. |
ZHANG Runzhi. Tomato moth Tuta absoluta (Povolny) damage (leaves)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2019, 56(6):1271. | |
[2] |
Batalla-Carrera L, Morton A, Fernando García-del-Pino. Efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes against the tomato leafminer Tuta absolutain laboratory and greenhouse conditions[J]. BioControl, 2010, 55(4):523-530.
DOI URL |
[3] | Osa A, Hill M P, Zalucki M P, et al. The South America Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta(Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), Spreads Its Wings in Eastern Africa: Distribution and Socioeconomic Impacts[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019(6):6. |
[4] | 张桂芬, 马德英, 刘万学, 等. 中国新发现外来入侵害虫--南美番茄潜叶蛾(鳞翅目:麦蛾科)[J]. 生物安全学报, 2019, 28(3):200-203. |
ZHANG Guifen, MA Deying, LIU Wanxue, et al. A Newly Discovered Invasive Pest in China--South American Tomato Leaf Miner (Lepidoptera: Triticidae)[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2019, 28(3):200-203. | |
[5] | 陆永跃. 警惕番茄潜叶蛾Tuta absoluta(Meyrick)在我国持续扩散入侵[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 43(2):526-528. |
LU Yongyue. Beware of the continuous proliferation and invasion of the tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in my country[J]. Entomology of the Environment, 2021, 43(2):526-528. | |
[6] | 李栋, 李晓维, 马琳, 等. 温度对番茄潜叶蛾生长发育和繁殖的影响[J]. 昆虫学报, 2019, 62(12):1417-1426. |
LI Dong, LI Xiaowei, MA Lin, et al. Effects of temperature on the growth, development and reproduction of tomato leaf miners[J]. Acta Entomology, 2019, 62(12):1417-1426. | |
[7] | 李晓维, 李栋, 郭文超, 等. 番茄潜叶蛾对4种茄科植物的适应性研究[J]. 植物检疫, 2019, 33(3):1-5. |
LI Xiaowei, LI Dong, GUO Wenchao, et al. Adaptation of Tomato Leaf Miner to Four Solanaceae Plants[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2019, 33(3):1-5. | |
[8] | 张桂芬. 南美番茄潜叶蛾Tuta absoluta,a.幼虫及为害状,b.蛹,c.成虫,d.卵[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(2):1. |
ZHANG Guifen. South American tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta, a. larvae and damage, b. pupa, c. adult, d. egg[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(2): 1. | |
[9] | 张桂芬, 刘万学, 万方浩, 等. 世界毁灭性检疫害虫番茄潜叶蛾的生物生态学及危害与控制[J]. 生物安全学报, 2018, 27(3):155-163. |
ZHANG Guifen, LIU Wanxue, WAN Fanghao, et al. Bioecology, damage and control of tomato leafminer, the world's devastating quarantine pest[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2018, 27(3):155-163. | |
[10] | 王俊, 高建诚, 管辉. 番茄潜叶蛾在新疆的发生情况与防控建议[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2021, 41(12):83-84,79. |
WANG Jun, GAO Jiancheng, GUAN Hui. Occurrence of Tomato Leaf Miner in Xinjiang and Suggestions for Prevention and Control[J]. China Plant Protection Guide, 2021, 41(12): 83-84,79. | |
[11] | 张继峯, 王振华, 张金珠, 等. 滴灌下氮盐交互对加工番茄荧光特性及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(5):990-1003. |
ZHANG Jifeng, WANG Zhenhua, ZHANG Jinzhu, et al. Effects of nitrogen-salt interaction under drip irrigation on fluorescence characteristics and yield and quality of processed tomatoes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5):990-1003. | |
[12] | 林兴华, 杨子林, 韦丽莉, 等. 临沧市番茄潜麦蛾动态监测与防控技术研究[J]. 云南农业科技, 2021,(1):9-11. |
LIN Xinghua, YANG Zilin, WEI Lili, et al. Research on dynamic monitoring and prevention and control technology of tomato moth in Lincang City[J]. Yunnan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021,(1):9-11. | |
[13] | Zhang Y, Tian X, Wang H, et al. Host selection behavior of the host-feeding parasitoid Necremnus tutae on Tuta absoluta[J]. Entomologia Generalis, 2021. |
[14] | 杨桂群, 范苇, 张倩, 等. 异色瓢虫和龟纹瓢虫幼虫对番茄潜叶蛾低龄幼虫的捕食功能反应[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2021,(9):1-12. |
YANG Guiqun, FAN Wei, ZHANG Qian, et al. Predatory functional responses of La. axyridis and La. tortoise larvae to young larvae of Tomato leaf miner[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2021,(9):1-12. | |
[15] | 马琳, 李晓维, 王树明, 等. 6种杀虫剂对云南地区番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力测定[C]// 北京:中国植物保护学会2019年学术年会论文集, 2019. MALin, LIXiaowei, WANGShuming, et al. Indoor virulence determination of six insecticides against tomato leafminers in Yunnan[C]// Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Academic Conference of the Chinese Society for Plant Protection. |
[16] | Ingegno B L, Messelink G J, Bodino N, et al. Functional response of the mirid predators Dicyphus bolivari and Dicyphus errans and their efficacy as biological control agents of Tuta absoluta on tomato[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2019. |
[17] |
阿米热·牙生江, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 付开赟, 等. 9种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12):2291-2298.
DOI |
Amire Yashengjiang, Adili Shatar, FU Kaiyun, et al. Control of Tomato Leaf Miner by 9 Insecticides Effect evaluation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(12):2291-2298.
DOI |
|
[18] | 余细红, 李韶山. 我国生物入侵现状与防制分析[J]. 生物学教学, 2022,(1):1-2. |
YU Xihong, LI Shaoshan. Analysis of the current situation and prevention of biological invasion in my country[J]. Biology Teaching, 2022,(1):1-2. | |
[19] | 高峰. 不得不防的灾害-物种污染[J]. 环境保护与循环经济, 2016, 36(4):23. |
GAO Feng. Disasters that must be prevented-species pollution[J]. Environmental Protection and Circular Economy, 2016, 36(4): 23. | |
[20] | 高建诚, 王俊, 马丽娟, 等. 警惕番茄潜叶蛾威胁新疆加工番茄产业安全[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2021,(5):37-39. |
GAO Jiancheng, WANG Jun, MA Lijuan, et al. Beware of tomato leaf miners threatening the safety of processed tomato industry in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021,(5):37-39. | |
[21] | 张桂芬, 张毅波, 张杰, 等. 苏云金芽胞杆菌G033A对新发南美番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):175-183. |
ZHANG Guifen, ZHANG Yibo, ZHANG Jie, et al. Indoor virulence and field control of Bacillus thuringiensis G033A against newly emerged South American tomato leaf miners Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control, 2020, 36(2):175-183. |
[1] | 赵莹莹, 张军高, 李进, 梁晶, 高翔宇, 顾爱星, 雷斌. 枯草芽孢杆菌KXZ-33与化学药剂协同防控棉花枯萎病的效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1216-1222. |
[2] | 李艳兵, 郭小虎, 努尔什瓦克·阿达力别克, 帕提玛·乌木尔汗, 马德英. 人工助迁多异瓢虫和化防2种模式对棉蚜的防效及天敌种群动态影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1173-1179. |
[3] | 谈钇汐, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 冯宏祖, 郭文超. 诱捕器颜色、悬挂高度与位置对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1144-1155. |
[4] | 李娜, 刘冰, 陆宴辉. 氟啶虫胺腈对新疆棉田棉蚜及其天敌种群的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2062-2068. |
[5] | 阿米热·牙生江, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 付开赟, 丁新华, 何江, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 郭文超, 李晓维. 9种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12): 2291-2298. |
[6] | 朱晓华;丁瑞丰;阿克旦·吾外士;阿曼古丽·卡尔瓦木;牛站平;丁爱华;王乐;艾买提·艾则孜;帕提古丽·瓦依提. 不同防治方法对瓜棉套作田棉蚜及其主要天敌种群的影响[J]. , 2015, 52(11): 2097-2102. |
[7] | 杨安沛;王锁牢;张航;曹禹;孙桂荣. 5种杀虫剂对甜菜茎象甲的防治效果研究[J]. , 2015, 52(11): 2093-2096. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||