

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 2014-2024.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.023
• Plant Protection·Agricultural Product Analysis and Detection·Agricultural Equipment Engineering and Mechanization • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Qingchao1(
), ZHENG Xuan2(
), LIU Jinbao2, YANG Huaijun2, WANG Zilong2, ZHANG Luyun2
Received:2022-03-24
Online:2022-08-20
Published:2022-10-01
Correspondence author:
ZHENG Xuan
Supported by:
李清超1(
), 郑炫2(
), 刘进宝2, 杨怀君2, 王子龙2, 张鲁云2
通讯作者:
郑炫
作者简介:李清超(1996-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业机械,(E-mail) 1123262436@qq.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
LI Qingchao, ZHENG Xuan, LIU Jinbao, YANG Huaijun, WANG Zilong, ZHANG Luyun. Parameter Calibration of Discrete Element Simulation of Farmland Silt in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 2014-2024.
李清超, 郑炫, 刘进宝, 杨怀君, 王子龙, 张鲁云. 新疆农田粉土离散元仿真参数标定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 2014-2024.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.023
| 密度 Density (kg/m3) | 含水率 Moisture content (%) | 泊松比 Poisson's ratio | 粒径分布占比 Size ratio (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 480 | 14.5 | 0.37 | <0.001mm | 0.001~0.05mm | >0.05mm |
| 1.82 | 85.55 | 12.63 | |||
Table 1 Soil constitutive parameters
| 密度 Density (kg/m3) | 含水率 Moisture content (%) | 泊松比 Poisson's ratio | 粒径分布占比 Size ratio (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 480 | 14.5 | 0.37 | <0.001mm | 0.001~0.05mm | >0.05mm |
| 1.82 | 85.55 | 12.63 | |||
Fig. 1 Actual physical test Note:(a)1.Soil block,2.Inclined plane,3.Rotating rod,4.Cant instrument;(b)1.65-Mn slope,2.Steel rulers,3.Soil particle,4.65-Mn plane;(c)1.Universal testing machine,2.Cylinder,3.Plane
| 材料 Material | 参数 Parameter | 数值 The values | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤 Soil | 泊松比 | 0.37 | 测量 |
| 密度 | 1 480 kg/m3 | 测量 | |
| 剪切模量 | 1 MPa | 参考 | |
| 65Mn | 泊松比 | 0.29 | 参考 |
| 密度 | 7 861 kg/m3 | 参考 | |
| 剪切模量 | 7.9×10 000 MPa | 参考 |
Table 2 Constitutive parameters of soil and 65Mn
| 材料 Material | 参数 Parameter | 数值 The values | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 土壤 Soil | 泊松比 | 0.37 | 测量 |
| 密度 | 1 480 kg/m3 | 测量 | |
| 剪切模量 | 1 MPa | 参考 | |
| 65Mn | 泊松比 | 0.29 | 参考 |
| 密度 | 7 861 kg/m3 | 参考 | |
| 剪切模量 | 7.9×10 000 MPa | 参考 |
| 编码 Code | 恢复系数A Recoverycoefficient A | 静摩擦系数B Static friction coefficient B | 动摩擦系数C Dynamic friction coefficient C | JKR表面能D JKR surface energy D(J/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.718 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 7 |
| 1 | 0.558 | 0.675 | 0.167 | 5.746 |
| 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 4 |
| -1 | 0.442 | 0.325 | 0.073 | 2.254 |
| -1.718 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 1 |
Table 3 Factor level coding table of soil-65Mn simulation test
| 编码 Code | 恢复系数A Recoverycoefficient A | 静摩擦系数B Static friction coefficient B | 动摩擦系数C Dynamic friction coefficient C | JKR表面能D JKR surface energy D(J/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.718 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 7 |
| 1 | 0.558 | 0.675 | 0.167 | 5.746 |
| 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.12 | 4 |
| -1 | 0.442 | 0.325 | 0.073 | 2.254 |
| -1.718 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 1 |
| 编码 Code | 恢复系数X1 Recovery coefficient X1 | 静摩擦系数X2 Static friction coefficient X2 | 动摩擦系数X3 Dynamic friction coefficient X3 | JKR表面能X4 JKR surface energy X4(J/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.718 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.45 | 8 |
| 1 | 0.716 | 0.833 | 0.366 | 6.537 |
| 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.25 | 4.5 |
| -1 | 0.484 | 0.367 | 0.134 | 2.463 |
| -1.718 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 1 |
Table 4 Factor level coding table of soil-soil simulation test
| 编码 Code | 恢复系数X1 Recovery coefficient X1 | 静摩擦系数X2 Static friction coefficient X2 | 动摩擦系数X3 Dynamic friction coefficient X3 | JKR表面能X4 JKR surface energy X4(J/m2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.718 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.45 | 8 |
| 1 | 0.716 | 0.833 | 0.366 | 6.537 |
| 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.25 | 4.5 |
| -1 | 0.484 | 0.367 | 0.134 | 2.463 |
| -1.718 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 1 |
| 试验号 Number | 恢复系数A Recoverycoefficient A | 静摩擦 系数B Static friction coefficient B | 动摩擦系数C Dynamic friction coefficient C | JKR表面能D JKR surface energy D (J/m2) | 滚动 距离 (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 250.48 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 247.36 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 245.52 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 251.77 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 57.05 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 52.21 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 54.65 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 52.39 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 192.34 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 213.16 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 203.35 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 217.54 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 27.76 |
| 14 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 41.09 |
| 15 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 39.51 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 41.58 |
| 17 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 105.32 |
| 18 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.15 |
| 19 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 99.64 |
| 20 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 98.71 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 328.36 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 27.67 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 122.65 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 78.32 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 156.4 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 142.99 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 163.86 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 138.19 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 152.97 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 159.41 |
Table 5 Slope simulation test design and results
| 试验号 Number | 恢复系数A Recoverycoefficient A | 静摩擦 系数B Static friction coefficient B | 动摩擦系数C Dynamic friction coefficient C | JKR表面能D JKR surface energy D (J/m2) | 滚动 距离 (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 250.48 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 247.36 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 245.52 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 251.77 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 57.05 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 52.21 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 54.65 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 52.39 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 192.34 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 213.16 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 203.35 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 217.54 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 27.76 |
| 14 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 41.09 |
| 15 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 39.51 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 41.58 |
| 17 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 105.32 |
| 18 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100.15 |
| 19 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 99.64 |
| 20 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 98.71 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 328.36 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 27.67 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 122.65 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 78.32 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 156.4 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 142.99 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 163.86 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 138.19 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 152.97 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 159.41 |
| 方差来源 Variance source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 mean square | F值 F value | P值 P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 Model | 1.930E+005 | 14 | 13 789.05 | 63.93 | <0.000 1 | ** |
| A | 64.37 | 1 | 64.37 | 0.3 | 0.592 9 | |
| B | 24.7 | 1 | 24.7 | 0.11 | 0.739 8 | |
| C | 1.775E+005 | 1 | 1.775E+005 | 823.04 | <0.000 1 | ** |
| D | 4423.12 | 1 | 4 423.12 | 20.51 | 0.000 4 | ** |
| AB | 2.21 | 1 | 2.21 | 0.01 | 0.920 8 | |
| AC | 55.65 | 1 | 55.65 | 0.26 | 0.618 9 | |
| AD | 184.82 | 1 | 184.82 | 0.86 | 0.369 3 | |
| BC | 1.45 | 1 | 1.45 | 6.732E-003 | 0.935 7 | |
| BD | 57.76 | 1 | 57.76 | 0.27 | 0.612 4 | |
| CD | 655.10 | 1 | 655.10 | 3.04 | 0.101 8 | |
| A2 | 1 693.57 | 1 | 1 693.57 | 7.85 | 0.013 4 | * |
| B2 | 2 133.29 | 1 | 2 133.29 | 9.89 | 0.006 7 | * |
| C2 | 4 265.27 | 1 | 4 265.27 | 19.78 | 0.000 5 | ** |
| D2 | 1 965.59 | 1 | 1 965.59 | 9.11 | 0.008 6 | * |
| 残差 | 3 235.34 | 15 | 215.69 | |||
| 失拟项 | 2 748.12 | 10 | 274.81 | 2.82 | 0.1320 | |
| 误差 | 487.21 | 5 | 97.44 | |||
| 总和 | 1.963E+005 | 29 |
Table 6 Variance analysis of slope simulation test
| 方差来源 Variance source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 mean square | F值 F value | P值 P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 Model | 1.930E+005 | 14 | 13 789.05 | 63.93 | <0.000 1 | ** |
| A | 64.37 | 1 | 64.37 | 0.3 | 0.592 9 | |
| B | 24.7 | 1 | 24.7 | 0.11 | 0.739 8 | |
| C | 1.775E+005 | 1 | 1.775E+005 | 823.04 | <0.000 1 | ** |
| D | 4423.12 | 1 | 4 423.12 | 20.51 | 0.000 4 | ** |
| AB | 2.21 | 1 | 2.21 | 0.01 | 0.920 8 | |
| AC | 55.65 | 1 | 55.65 | 0.26 | 0.618 9 | |
| AD | 184.82 | 1 | 184.82 | 0.86 | 0.369 3 | |
| BC | 1.45 | 1 | 1.45 | 6.732E-003 | 0.935 7 | |
| BD | 57.76 | 1 | 57.76 | 0.27 | 0.612 4 | |
| CD | 655.10 | 1 | 655.10 | 3.04 | 0.101 8 | |
| A2 | 1 693.57 | 1 | 1 693.57 | 7.85 | 0.013 4 | * |
| B2 | 2 133.29 | 1 | 2 133.29 | 9.89 | 0.006 7 | * |
| C2 | 4 265.27 | 1 | 4 265.27 | 19.78 | 0.000 5 | ** |
| D2 | 1 965.59 | 1 | 1 965.59 | 9.11 | 0.008 6 | * |
| 残差 | 3 235.34 | 15 | 215.69 | |||
| 失拟项 | 2 748.12 | 10 | 274.81 | 2.82 | 0.1320 | |
| 误差 | 487.21 | 5 | 97.44 | |||
| 总和 | 1.963E+005 | 29 |
| 参数Parameter | 数值The values |
|---|---|
| 土壤-65Mn恢复系数 | 0.51 |
| Soil-65Mn Recovery coefficient | |
| 土壤-65Mn静摩擦系数 | 0.56 |
| Soil-65MnStatic friction coefficient | |
| 土壤-65Mn滚动摩擦系数 | 0.08 |
| Soil-65MnDynamic friction coefficient | |
| 土壤-65Mn JKR表面能 | 4.12 |
| Soil-65MnJKR surface energy |
Table 7 Parameters of soil-65mn contact model
| 参数Parameter | 数值The values |
|---|---|
| 土壤-65Mn恢复系数 | 0.51 |
| Soil-65Mn Recovery coefficient | |
| 土壤-65Mn静摩擦系数 | 0.56 |
| Soil-65MnStatic friction coefficient | |
| 土壤-65Mn滚动摩擦系数 | 0.08 |
| Soil-65MnDynamic friction coefficient | |
| 土壤-65Mn JKR表面能 | 4.12 |
| Soil-65MnJKR surface energy |
| 试验号 Number | 恢复 系数X1 | 静摩擦 系数X2 | 动摩擦 系数X3 | 表面能X4(J/m2) | 堆积角(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 33.82 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 44.08 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 38.18 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 32.92 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 33.4 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 31.02 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 31.35 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 52.39 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 45.2 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 37.43 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 40.1 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 36.1 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 44.98 |
| 14 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 42.53 |
| 15 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 43.58 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 41.75 |
| 17 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.18 |
| 18 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.29 |
| 19 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 45.13 |
| 20 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 42.55 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 39.5 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 37.92 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 27.85 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 42.2 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.43 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.52 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36.73 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.93 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.88 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.58 |
Table 8 Design and results of soil-soil parameter calibration test
| 试验号 Number | 恢复 系数X1 | 静摩擦 系数X2 | 动摩擦 系数X3 | 表面能X4(J/m2) | 堆积角(°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 33.82 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 44.08 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 38.18 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 32.92 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 33.4 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 31.02 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 31.35 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 52.39 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 45.2 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 37.43 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 40.1 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 36.1 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 44.98 |
| 14 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 42.53 |
| 15 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 43.58 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 41.75 |
| 17 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.18 |
| 18 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.29 |
| 19 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 0 | 45.13 |
| 20 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 0 | 42.55 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 0 | 39.5 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 0 | 37.92 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.719 | 27.85 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.719 | 42.2 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.43 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.52 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36.73 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.93 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.88 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38.58 |
| 堆积角 Angle of repose | 方差来源 Variance source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 mean square | F 值 F value | P 值 P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 545 | 14 | 38.93 | 9.76 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
| X1 | 2.46 | 1 | 2.46 | 0.62 | 0.444 9 | ||
| X2 | 25.82 | 1 | 25.82 | 6.47 | 0.022 5 | * | |
| X3 | 3.72 | 1 | 3.72 | 0.93 | 0.349 6 | ||
| X4 | 282.24 | 1 | 282.24 | 70.75 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
| X1X2 | 0.037 | 1 | 0.037 | 9.289E-003 | 0.924 5 | ||
| X1X3 | 3.25 | 1 | 3.25 | 0.81 | 0.381 1 | ||
| X1X4 | 65.49 | 1 | 65.49 | 16.42 | 0.001 0 | ** | |
| X2X3 | 3.14 | 1 | 3.14 | 0.79 | 0.388 8 | ||
| X2X4 | 0.28 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.071 | 0.793 4 | ||
| X3X4 | 73.66 | 1 | 73.66 | 18.47 | 0.000 6 | ** | |
| X12 | 2.68 | 1 | 2.68 | 0.67 | 0.424 9 | ||
| X22 | 59.33 | 1 | 59.33 | 14.87 | 0.001 6 | ** | |
| X32 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.825 7 | ||
| X42 | 22.69 | 1 | 22.69 | 5.69 | 0.030 7 | * | |
| 残差 | 59.84 | 15 | 3.99 | ||||
| 失拟项 | 53.55 | 10 | 5.36 | 4.26 | 0.061 6 | ||
| 误差 | 6.28 | 5 | 1.26 | ||||
| 总和 | 604.84 | 29 |
Table 9 Analysis of variance of soil-soil parameter calibration test
| 堆积角 Angle of repose | 方差来源 Variance source | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Freedom | 均方 mean square | F 值 F value | P 值 P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 模型 | 545 | 14 | 38.93 | 9.76 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
| X1 | 2.46 | 1 | 2.46 | 0.62 | 0.444 9 | ||
| X2 | 25.82 | 1 | 25.82 | 6.47 | 0.022 5 | * | |
| X3 | 3.72 | 1 | 3.72 | 0.93 | 0.349 6 | ||
| X4 | 282.24 | 1 | 282.24 | 70.75 | <0.000 1 | ** | |
| X1X2 | 0.037 | 1 | 0.037 | 9.289E-003 | 0.924 5 | ||
| X1X3 | 3.25 | 1 | 3.25 | 0.81 | 0.381 1 | ||
| X1X4 | 65.49 | 1 | 65.49 | 16.42 | 0.001 0 | ** | |
| X2X3 | 3.14 | 1 | 3.14 | 0.79 | 0.388 8 | ||
| X2X4 | 0.28 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.071 | 0.793 4 | ||
| X3X4 | 73.66 | 1 | 73.66 | 18.47 | 0.000 6 | ** | |
| X12 | 2.68 | 1 | 2.68 | 0.67 | 0.424 9 | ||
| X22 | 59.33 | 1 | 59.33 | 14.87 | 0.001 6 | ** | |
| X32 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.825 7 | ||
| X42 | 22.69 | 1 | 22.69 | 5.69 | 0.030 7 | * | |
| 残差 | 59.84 | 15 | 3.99 | ||||
| 失拟项 | 53.55 | 10 | 5.36 | 4.26 | 0.061 6 | ||
| 误差 | 6.28 | 5 | 1.26 | ||||
| 总和 | 604.84 | 29 |
| 参数Parameter | 数值The values |
|---|---|
| 土-土恢复系数 | 0.57 |
| Soil-65Mn Recovery coefficient | |
| 土-土静摩擦系数 | 0.65 |
| Soil-65MnStatic friction coefficient | |
| 土-土滚动摩擦系数 | 0.23 |
| Soil-65MnDynamic friction coefficient | |
| 土-土JKR表面能 | 4.49 |
| Soil-65MnJKR surface energy |
Table 10 Parameters of soil-soil contact model
| 参数Parameter | 数值The values |
|---|---|
| 土-土恢复系数 | 0.57 |
| Soil-65Mn Recovery coefficient | |
| 土-土静摩擦系数 | 0.65 |
| Soil-65MnStatic friction coefficient | |
| 土-土滚动摩擦系数 | 0.23 |
| Soil-65MnDynamic friction coefficient | |
| 土-土JKR表面能 | 4.49 |
| Soil-65MnJKR surface energy |
| 项目 Project | 仿真值 Simulation value | 实际值 Actual value | 相对误差 Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 滚动距离Rolling distance(mm) | 241.05 | 227.29 | 6.05 |
| 堆积角Angle of repose(°) | 37.16 | 37.64 | 1.28 |
Table 11 comparison of test results
| 项目 Project | 仿真值 Simulation value | 实际值 Actual value | 相对误差 Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 滚动距离Rolling distance(mm) | 241.05 | 227.29 | 6.05 |
| 堆积角Angle of repose(°) | 37.16 | 37.64 | 1.28 |
| 编号 Test | 作业速度 (km/h) | 仿真试验 结果(N) Simulation value | 田间试验 结果(N) Field experiment | 相对误差(%) Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 787 9.28 | 832 7.46 | 5.69 |
| 2 | 9 | 809 3.18 | 857 4.41 | 5.95 |
| 3 | 10 | 886 4.49 | 944 0.16 | 6.49 |
Table 12 Resistance comparison
| 编号 Test | 作业速度 (km/h) | 仿真试验 结果(N) Simulation value | 田间试验 结果(N) Field experiment | 相对误差(%) Relative error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 787 9.28 | 832 7.46 | 5.69 |
| 2 | 9 | 809 3.18 | 857 4.41 | 5.95 |
| 3 | 10 | 886 4.49 | 944 0.16 | 6.49 |
| [1] | 黄昌永. 土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010:156-157. |
| HUANG Changyong. Soil Science,3.[M]. Bei Jing: China Agricultural Press, 2010:156-157. | |
| [2] | 马君, 崔建平, 金亮, 等. 新疆滴灌棉田深松后土壤理化性质及产量的变化特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(32):82-87. |
| MA Jun, CUI Jianping,. JIN Liang, et al. Variation Characteristics of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Yield After Subsoiling in Drip Irrigated Cotton Fields in Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(32):82-87. | |
| [3] | 虎胆•吐马尔白, 赵永成, 马合木江•艾合买提, 等. 北疆常年膜下滴灌棉田土壤盐分积累特征研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2016, 35(1):1-5. |
| HUDAN•Wenmaerbai, ZHAO Yongcheng, MAHEMUJIANG•Aihemaiti, et al. Study on Characteristics of Cotton Field Soil Salt Accumulation under Perennial Mulched Drip Irrigation in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2016, 35(1):1-5. | |
| [4] | 薛忠, 赵亮, 王凤花, 等. 基于EDEM的螺旋式排肥器排肥性能研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2020, 42(6):87-95. |
| XUE Zhong, ZHAO Liang, WANG Fenghua, et al. Study on the Performance of Spiral Fertilizer Distributor Based on EDEM[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2020, 42(6):87-95. | |
| [5] | 马晨, 蒙贺伟, 坎杂, 等. 葡萄深施有机肥开沟装置设计及仿真[J]. 农机化研究, 2019, 41(12):7-13,21. |
| MA Chen, MENG Hewei, KAN Za, et al. Design and Simulation of Deep Application of Organic Fertilizer Ditching Device for Grape[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2019, 41(12):7-13,21. | |
| [6] | 何永强, 贺俊林, 杨作梅. 犁体曲面离散元仿真试验与参数优化[J]. 农机化研究, 2019, 41(12):189-193+257. |
| HE Yongqiang, HE Junlin, YANG Zuomei, et al. Discrete Element Simulation and Parameter Optimization of Plow Surface[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2019, 41(12):189-193+257. | |
| [7] | 何晓宁, 张学军, 赵壮, 等. 基于离散元法的油莎豆降阻挖掘装置设计与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(12):124-133. |
| HE Xiaoning, ZHANG Xuejun, ZHAO Zhuang, et al. Design and Test of Resistance-reducing Excavation Device of Cyperus edulis Based on Discrete Element Method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(12):124-133. | |
| [8] | 赵淑红, 刘汉朋, 侯磊涛, 等. 基于离散元法的免耕深施肥分段式玉米播种开沟器研制[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(13):1-10. |
| ZHAO Shuhong, LIU Hanpeng, HOU Leitao, et al. Development of deep fertilizing no-segmented maize sowing opener using discrete element method[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(13):1-10. | |
| [9] | Bo Li, Ying Chen, Jun Chen. Modeling of soil-claw interaction using the discrete element method(DEM)[J]. Soil&Tillage Research, 2016, 158:177-185. |
| [10] |
Zhiwei Zeng, Ying Chen. Simulation of straw movement by discrete element modelling of straw-sweep-soil interaction[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2019, 180:25-35.
DOI |
| [11] | Rongqing Liang, Xuegeng Chen, Peng Jiang, et al. Calibration of the simulation parameters of the particulate materials in film mixed materials[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2020, 13(4):29-36. |
| [12] | 戴飞, 宋学锋, 赵武云, 等. 全膜双垄沟覆膜土壤离散元接触参数仿真标定[J]. 农业机械学报, 2019, 50(2):49-56. |
| DAI Fei, SONG Xuefeng, ZHAO Wuyun, et al. Simulative Calibration on Contact Parameters of Discrete Elements for Covering Soil on Whole Plastic Film Mulching on Double Ridges[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2019, 50(2):49-56. | |
| [13] | 谢方平, 吴正阳, 王修善, 等. 基于无侧限抗压强度试验的土壤离散元参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(13):39-47. |
| XIE Fangping, WU Zhengyang, WANG Xiushan, et al. Calibration of Discrete Element Parameters of Soils Based on Unconfined Compressive Strength Test[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(13):39-47. | |
| [14] | 赵淑红, 刘汉朋, 杨超, 等. 玉米秸秆还田交互式分层深松铲设计与离散元仿真[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(3):75-87. |
| ZHAO Shuhong, LIU Hanpeng, YANG Chao, et al. Design and Discrete Element Simulation of Interactive Layered Subsoiler with Maize Straw Returned to Filed[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(3):75-87. | |
| [15] | 田辛亮, 丛旭, 齐江涛, 等. 黑土区玉米秸秆-土壤混料离散元模型参数标定[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(10):100-108,242. |
| TIAN Xinliang, CONG Xu, QI Jiangtao, et al. Parameter Calibration of Discrete Element Model for Corn Straw and Soil Mixture in Black Soil Areas[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(10):100-108,242. | |
| [16] |
Mohsin Ajmal, Thomas Roessler, Christian Richter, André Katterfeld. Calibration of cohesive DEM parameters under rapid flow conditions and low consolidation stresses[J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 374:22-32.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Rui Xia, Bo Li, Xuewen Wang, Tiejun Li, Zhaojian Yang. Measurement and calibration of the discrete element parameters of wet bulk coal[J]. Measurement, 2019, 142:84-95.
DOI |
| [18] | Lyu Jaehee, Park Junyoung. Analysis of Particle Packing Process by Contact Model in Discrete Element Method[J]. The Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers, 2019, 18(3):56-65. |
| [19] |
Sheng Chen, Wenwei Liu, Shuiqing Li. A fast adhesive discrete element method for random packings of fine particles[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 193:346-345.
DOI URL |
| [20] | 李俊伟, 佟金, 胡斌, 等. 不同含水率黏重黑土与触土部件互作的离散元仿真参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(6):130-140. |
| LI Junwei, TONG Jin, HU Bin, et al. Calibration of Parameters of Interaction between Clayey Black Soil with Different Moisture Content and Soil-engaging Component in Northeast China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(6):130-140. | |
| [21] | 马帅, 徐丽明, 袁全春, 等. 葡萄藤防寒土与清土部件相互作用的离散元仿真参数标定[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(1):40-49. |
| MA Shuai, XU Liming, YUAN Quanchun, et al. Calibration of Discrete Element Simulation Parameters of Grapevine Antifreezing Soil and Its Interaction with Soil-cleaning Components[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(1):40-49. | |
| [22] | 王宪良, 胡红, 王庆杰, 等. 基于离散元的土壤模型参数标定方法[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(12):78-85. |
| WANG Xianliang, HU Hong, WANG Qingjie, et al. Calibration Method of Soil Contact Characteristic Parameters Based on DEM Theory[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2017, 48(12):78-85. |
| No related articles found! |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||