Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 688-695.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.03.018
• Horticultural Special Local Products • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Hao1,2(), ZHANG Zhen2,3, YUAN Yuyao2,3, WANG Chengwei1,2, ZHAO Zhengyu1,2, WEI Jia2,3(
), WU Bin2,3(
)
Received:
2024-08-21
Online:
2025-03-20
Published:
2025-05-14
Correspondence author:
WEI Jia, WU Bin
Supported by:
张浩1,2(), 张政2,3, 袁宇尧2,3, 王成炜1,2, 赵振宇1,2, 魏佳2,3(
), 吴斌2,3(
)
通讯作者:
魏佳,吴斌
作者简介:
张浩(1996-),男,河南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农产品贮藏与加工,(E-mail) 1940229586@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Hao, ZHANG Zhen, YUAN Yuyao, WANG Chengwei, ZHAO Zhengyu, WEI Jia, WU Bin. Control of Plodia interpunctella by hypobaric treatment combined with sulfur dioxide (SO2) fumigation on dried apricot[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 688-695.
张浩, 张政, 袁宇尧, 王成炜, 赵振宇, 魏佳, 吴斌. 减压二氧化硫(SO2)熏蒸对新疆杏干中印度谷螟发生的控制[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(3): 688-695.
Fig.1 Hypobaric fumigation device Notes:1. Vacuum pump; 2. Block valve; 3. Fan; 4. Fumigation room; 5. Temperature and humidity meter; 6. Pressure transmitter; 7. Open the door valve; 8. Fumigation valve; 9. Air intake valve; 10. PLC control cabinet
C×T (μL/(L·h)) | C (μL/L) | T (h) | 印度谷螟死亡率(%平均值±标准误) Mortality of Plodia interpunctella (% mean ± standard error) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卵 | 幼虫 | 蛹 | 成虫 | |||
CK | 0 | 40 | 2.50±1.44 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.67±0.83 | 0.00±0.00 |
减压20 kPa | 0 | 40 | 7.50±2.50 | 0.00±0.00 | 5.83±1.44 | 9.17±1.44 |
2 000 | 250 | 8 | 24.17±2.20e | 11.67±0.83e | 25.00±1.44d | 32.50±2.89d |
4 000 | 250 | 16 | 44.17±1.67d | 29.17±2.20d | 55.83±3.63c | 71.67±0.83c |
6 000 | 250 | 24 | 81.67±2.20c | 60.83±3.00c | 93.33±0.83b | 93.33±1.67b |
8 000 | 250 | 32 | 92.50±2.50b | 76.67±2.20b | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
10 000 | 250 | 40 | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
2 000 | 500 | 4 | 19.17±2.20d | 10.00±1.44e | 18.33±2.20e | 25.83±0.83c |
4 000 | 500 | 8 | 45.00±1.44c | 20.83±2.20d | 34.17±2.20d | 57.50±5.20b |
6 000 | 500 | 12 | 84.17±0.83b | 56.67±2.20c | 72.50±2.50c | 92.50±1.44a |
8 000 | 500 | 16 | 100.00±0.00a | 74.17±3.00b | 90.83±3.63b | 100.00±0.00a |
10 000 | 500 | 20 | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
2 000 | 1000 | 2 | 28.34±2.20d | 17.50±1.44e | 24.17±1.67e | 44.17±2.20c |
4 000 | 1 000 | 4 | 64.17±1.67c | 32.50±2.50d | 51.67±2.20d | 84.17±0.83b |
6 000 | 1 000 | 6 | 92.50±2.89b | 65.83±3.00c | 82.50±2.89c | 100.00±0.00a |
8 000 | 1 000 | 8 | 100.00±0.00a | 79.17±2.20b | 95.00±1.44b | 100.00±0.00a |
10 000 | 10 00 | 10 | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
Tab.2 Changes of C×T value on the mortality of Plodia interpunctella at different life stages under the fumigation treatment of hypobaric SO2 concentration
C×T (μL/(L·h)) | C (μL/L) | T (h) | 印度谷螟死亡率(%平均值±标准误) Mortality of Plodia interpunctella (% mean ± standard error) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
卵 | 幼虫 | 蛹 | 成虫 | |||
CK | 0 | 40 | 2.50±1.44 | 0.00±0.00 | 1.67±0.83 | 0.00±0.00 |
减压20 kPa | 0 | 40 | 7.50±2.50 | 0.00±0.00 | 5.83±1.44 | 9.17±1.44 |
2 000 | 250 | 8 | 24.17±2.20e | 11.67±0.83e | 25.00±1.44d | 32.50±2.89d |
4 000 | 250 | 16 | 44.17±1.67d | 29.17±2.20d | 55.83±3.63c | 71.67±0.83c |
6 000 | 250 | 24 | 81.67±2.20c | 60.83±3.00c | 93.33±0.83b | 93.33±1.67b |
8 000 | 250 | 32 | 92.50±2.50b | 76.67±2.20b | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
10 000 | 250 | 40 | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
2 000 | 500 | 4 | 19.17±2.20d | 10.00±1.44e | 18.33±2.20e | 25.83±0.83c |
4 000 | 500 | 8 | 45.00±1.44c | 20.83±2.20d | 34.17±2.20d | 57.50±5.20b |
6 000 | 500 | 12 | 84.17±0.83b | 56.67±2.20c | 72.50±2.50c | 92.50±1.44a |
8 000 | 500 | 16 | 100.00±0.00a | 74.17±3.00b | 90.83±3.63b | 100.00±0.00a |
10 000 | 500 | 20 | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
2 000 | 1000 | 2 | 28.34±2.20d | 17.50±1.44e | 24.17±1.67e | 44.17±2.20c |
4 000 | 1 000 | 4 | 64.17±1.67c | 32.50±2.50d | 51.67±2.20d | 84.17±0.83b |
6 000 | 1 000 | 6 | 92.50±2.89b | 65.83±3.00c | 82.50±2.89c | 100.00±0.00a |
8 000 | 1 000 | 8 | 100.00±0.00a | 79.17±2.20b | 95.00±1.44b | 100.00±0.00a |
10 000 | 10 00 | 10 | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a | 100.00±0.00a |
项目 Item | 分数Fraction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-很差 1-Very poor | 2-差 2-Poor | 3-一般 3-General | 4-好 4-Good | 5-很好 5-Very good | |
表观 Apparant | 黑色,色泽不均匀,有坏斑,形状不规则,干缩变形严重 | 深褐色,色泽暗淡,不均匀,表面不平整,皱缩较严重 | 深褐色,色泽较暗,稍有不均匀,表面较平整,有一定皱缩 | 红褐色,色泽明亮,较均匀,表面较平整,较饱满 | 果实饱满、均匀,色泽明亮且为杏黄色,外观完整,无破损,无霉变 |
风味 Local flavour | 无杏香味,有异味 | 杏香味寡淡,过甜或过酸或基本无味 | 杏固有香味略淡,酸度高,无异味 | 具有杏固有的香味,酸度略高,无异味 | 具有杏干固有甜香味,略带酸味,无异味 |
口感 Savory | 组织糜烂,果肉质地很硬,非常干,难咀嚼 | 质地疏松,硬、干,肉与核粘连严重,较难咀嚼 | 质地较疏松,较软或较硬,肉与核粘连,不易咀嚼 | 组织较为致密,质地稍软或稍硬,咀嚼性较好 | 果肉柔软,组织致密,与核易分离,咀嚼性好 |
总体 Population | 十分不喜欢 | 不喜欢 | 一般喜欢 | 比较喜欢 | 非常喜欢 |
Tab.1 Sensory score table
项目 Item | 分数Fraction | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-很差 1-Very poor | 2-差 2-Poor | 3-一般 3-General | 4-好 4-Good | 5-很好 5-Very good | |
表观 Apparant | 黑色,色泽不均匀,有坏斑,形状不规则,干缩变形严重 | 深褐色,色泽暗淡,不均匀,表面不平整,皱缩较严重 | 深褐色,色泽较暗,稍有不均匀,表面较平整,有一定皱缩 | 红褐色,色泽明亮,较均匀,表面较平整,较饱满 | 果实饱满、均匀,色泽明亮且为杏黄色,外观完整,无破损,无霉变 |
风味 Local flavour | 无杏香味,有异味 | 杏香味寡淡,过甜或过酸或基本无味 | 杏固有香味略淡,酸度高,无异味 | 具有杏固有的香味,酸度略高,无异味 | 具有杏干固有甜香味,略带酸味,无异味 |
口感 Savory | 组织糜烂,果肉质地很硬,非常干,难咀嚼 | 质地疏松,硬、干,肉与核粘连严重,较难咀嚼 | 质地较疏松,较软或较硬,肉与核粘连,不易咀嚼 | 组织较为致密,质地稍软或稍硬,咀嚼性较好 | 果肉柔软,组织致密,与核易分离,咀嚼性好 |
总体 Population | 十分不喜欢 | 不喜欢 | 一般喜欢 | 比较喜欢 | 非常喜欢 |
减压SO2 熏蒸浓度 Hypobaric SO2 Fumigation concentration (μL/L) | 印度谷螟 生命阶段 Plodia interpunctella life stage | LT50 (h) | LT95 (h) | 置信区间 Confidence interval (h) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LT50 | LT95 | ||||||||||||||
下限 | 上限 | 下限 | 上限 | ||||||||||||
250 | 卵 | 14.08 | 37.21 | 12.33 | 15.75 | 31.62 | 46.79 | ||||||||
幼虫 | 19.13 | 48.61 | 16.95 | 21.35 | 40.48 | 63.89 | |||||||||
蛹 | 15.80 | 41.72 | 13.98 | 17.58 | 35.39 | 52.62 | |||||||||
成虫 | 10.70 | 25.25 | 9.73 | 11.61 | 22.73 | 28.84 | |||||||||
500 | 卵 | 7.07 | 15.73 | 6.27 | 7.86 | 13.61 | 19.27 | ||||||||
幼虫 | 10.30 | 24.84 | 8.99 | 11.68 | 20.25 | 34.54 | |||||||||
蛹 | 8.08 | 20.29 | 7.02 | 9.11 | 16.92 | 26.59 | |||||||||
成虫 | 6.11 | 13.83 | 5.43 | 6.76 | 12.08 | 16.65 | |||||||||
1 000 | 卵 | 2.90 | 6.68 | 2.65 | 3.12 | 6.03 | 7.60 | ||||||||
幼虫 | 4.38 | 12.24 | 3.80 | 4.95 | 9.97 | 16.75 | |||||||||
蛹 | 3.36 | 8.64 | 3.07 | 3.62 | 7.74 | 9.93 | |||||||||
成虫 | 2.21 | 4.84 | 1.99 | 2.41 | 4.35 | 5.59 |
Tab.3 The LT50 and LT95 values and their confidence intervals of Plodia interpunctella at different life stages hypobaric SO2 fumigation treatment
减压SO2 熏蒸浓度 Hypobaric SO2 Fumigation concentration (μL/L) | 印度谷螟 生命阶段 Plodia interpunctella life stage | LT50 (h) | LT95 (h) | 置信区间 Confidence interval (h) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LT50 | LT95 | ||||||||||||||
下限 | 上限 | 下限 | 上限 | ||||||||||||
250 | 卵 | 14.08 | 37.21 | 12.33 | 15.75 | 31.62 | 46.79 | ||||||||
幼虫 | 19.13 | 48.61 | 16.95 | 21.35 | 40.48 | 63.89 | |||||||||
蛹 | 15.80 | 41.72 | 13.98 | 17.58 | 35.39 | 52.62 | |||||||||
成虫 | 10.70 | 25.25 | 9.73 | 11.61 | 22.73 | 28.84 | |||||||||
500 | 卵 | 7.07 | 15.73 | 6.27 | 7.86 | 13.61 | 19.27 | ||||||||
幼虫 | 10.30 | 24.84 | 8.99 | 11.68 | 20.25 | 34.54 | |||||||||
蛹 | 8.08 | 20.29 | 7.02 | 9.11 | 16.92 | 26.59 | |||||||||
成虫 | 6.11 | 13.83 | 5.43 | 6.76 | 12.08 | 16.65 | |||||||||
1 000 | 卵 | 2.90 | 6.68 | 2.65 | 3.12 | 6.03 | 7.60 | ||||||||
幼虫 | 4.38 | 12.24 | 3.80 | 4.95 | 9.97 | 16.75 | |||||||||
蛹 | 3.36 | 8.64 | 3.07 | 3.62 | 7.74 | 9.93 | |||||||||
成虫 | 2.21 | 4.84 | 1.99 | 2.41 | 4.35 | 5.59 |
贮藏时间 Storage time (d) | 0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | 90 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理组 Treatment group | 减压SO2 250 μL/L | 50.33±1.53a | 39.47±1.85a | 32.00±1.92a | 25.67±1.53a | 20.91±1.61a | 14.45±1.27a | 10.53±1.29a |
减压SO2 500 μL/L | 46.33±2.08a | 32.67±2.28a | 25.39±0.98b | 19.00±1.00b | 16.37±1.39b | 12.67±1.53b | 8.32±1.69ab | |
减压SO2 1 000 μL/L | 43.00±3.36b | 29.93±1.96b | 22.19±1.61c | 16.19±1.61c | 12.17±1.59c | 8.79±2.10b | 6.03±0.64b |
Tab.4 Changes of hypobaric SO2 fumigation on sulfur dioxide residue in dried apricots
贮藏时间 Storage time (d) | 0 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 75 | 90 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
处理组 Treatment group | 减压SO2 250 μL/L | 50.33±1.53a | 39.47±1.85a | 32.00±1.92a | 25.67±1.53a | 20.91±1.61a | 14.45±1.27a | 10.53±1.29a |
减压SO2 500 μL/L | 46.33±2.08a | 32.67±2.28a | 25.39±0.98b | 19.00±1.00b | 16.37±1.39b | 12.67±1.53b | 8.32±1.69ab | |
减压SO2 1 000 μL/L | 43.00±3.36b | 29.93±1.96b | 22.19±1.61c | 16.19±1.61c | 12.17±1.59c | 8.79±2.10b | 6.03±0.64b |
[1] | Han G D, Kwon H, Na J, et al. Sensitivity of different life stages of Indian meal moth Plodia interpunctella to gaseous chlorine dioxide[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2016, 69: 217-220. |
[2] | Azab M, Darwish A, Mohamed R, et al. Comparative efficacy of controlled atmospheres against two stored product insects[J]. Journal of Crop Protection, 2010, 2: 343-353. |
[3] | Suleiman R, Rosentrater K A, Chove B. Periodic physical disturbance: an alternative method for controlling Sitophilus zeamais (maize weevil) infestation[J]. Insects, 2016, 7(4): 51. |
[4] | Daniel Cline L. Penetration of seven common flexible packaging materials by larvae and adults of eleven species of stored-product insects[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1978, 71(5): 726-729. |
[5] | Graham Bowditch T. Penetration of polyvinyl chloride and polypropylene packaging films by Ephestia cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae, and Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) adults[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1997, 90(4): 1028-1031. |
[6] | Scheff D S, Arthur F H. Fecundity of Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum adults after exposure to deltamethrin packaging[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2018, 91(2): 717-725. |
[7] | Ahmed S S, Hashem M Y. Susceptibility of different life stages of Indian meal moth Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) And Almond Moth Ephestia Cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to modified atmospheres enriched with carbon dioxide[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2012, 51: 49-55. |
[8] |
Mullen M A, Dowdy A K. A pheromone-baited trap for monitoring the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2001, 37(3): 231-235.
PMID |
[9] | Rajendran S, Sriranjini V. Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insect control[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2008, 44(2): 126-135. |
[10] | Riudavets J, Castañé C, Alomar O, et al. The use of carbon dioxide at high pressure to control nine stored-product pests[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2010, 46(4): 228-233. |
[11] | 倪泽洋, 刘育森, 张孟华, 等. 浅圆仓准低温低氧状态低剂量硫酰氟熏蒸杀虫试验[J]. 粮食储藏, 2022, 51(5): 28-32. |
NI Zeyang, LIU Yusen, ZHANG Menghua, et al. Low dose sulfuryl fluoride fumigation and insecticidal test under quasi low temperature and low oxygen in squat depot[J]. Grain Storage, 2022, 51(5): 28-32. | |
[12] | 胡恒志, 牛平, 刘娟, 等. 两种植物精油对印度谷螟的熏蒸活性研究[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2022, 30(6): 190-197. |
HU Hengzhi, NIU Ping, LIU Juan, et al. Research on the fumigation activity of two plant essential oils against Plodia interpunctlla(Hübner)[J]. Science and Technology of Cereals, Oils and Foods, 2022, 30(6): 190-197. | |
[13] | Liu Y B. Sulfur dioxide fumigation for postharvest control of mealybugs on harvested table grapes[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019, 112(2): 597-602. |
[14] | Abeli P J, Fanning P D, Isaacs R, et al. Blueberry fruit quality and control of blueberry maggot (Rhagoletis mendax Curran) larvae after fumigation with sulfur dioxide[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2021, 179: 111568. |
[15] | Mitcham E J, Zhou S. Control of grape mealybug using carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide[C]// Proc Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternative and Emissions Reductions, December. 1998: 7-9. |
[16] | Mitcham E, Simpson T, Biasi W, et al. Quality of ‘thompson seedless’ table grapes fumigated with CO2+SO2 and methyl bromide[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2005(687): 209-212. |
[17] | Vishwakarma R K, Bashir A A, Kumar Y, et al. Development of automated fumigation chamber for treatment of grapes with SO2 and CO2[J]. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 2022, 45(4): e13991. |
[18] | Navarro S, Finkelman S, Donahaye E, et al. Integrated storage pest control methods using vacuum or CO2 in transportable systems[J]. Iobc Wprs Bulletin, 2002, 25(3): 207-214. |
[19] | Finkelman S, Navarro S, Rindner M, et al. The use of portable systems to control insect pests by low pressures[J]. Compte Rendu de la Réunion, 2004, 27: 233. 233. |
[20] | Jiao S, Johnson J A, Tang J, et al. Tolerance of codling moth, and apple quality associated with low pressure/low temperature treatments[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2013, 85: 136-140. |
[21] | GB 5009.34—2022.食品安全国家标准食品中二氧化硫的测定[S]. |
GB 5009.34—2022.National Food Safety Standard Determination of Sulfur Dioxide in Food[S]. | |
[22] | 陈燕. 一氧化氮熏蒸对干果贮期病害抑制及毒素清除作用的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2020. |
CHEN Yan. Study on the effect of nitric oxide fumigation on disease inhibition and toxin clearance of dried fruits during storage[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2020. | |
[23] | Stejskal V, Vendl T, Aulicky R, et al. Synthetic and natural insecticides: gas, liquid, gel and solid formulations for stored-product and food-industry pest control[J]. Insects, 2021, 12(7): 590. |
[24] | Liu Y B. Efficacy and sorption of sulfur dioxide as a fumigant for control of navel orangeworm (Amyelois transitella) on stored pistachios[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2023, 102: 102109. |
[25] | Xinyi E, Subramanyam B, Li B B. Efficacy of ozone against phosphine susceptible and resistant strains of four stored-product insect species[J]. Insects, 2017, 8(2): 42. |
[26] | 李双宇, 王殿轩, 黄依林, 等. 不同温度下充氮低氧对赤拟谷盗各虫态致死效果与时间研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2023, 38(1): 8-14. |
LI Shuangyu, WANG Dianxuan, HUANG Yilin, et al. Research on lethal effects and exposure time of different stages of Tribolium castaneum herbst in high nitrogen with low oxygen at different temperatures[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2023, 38(1): 8-14. | |
[27] | 黄依林, 王殿轩, 朱毓斌, 等. 温度对高氮气调中米象各虫态致死时间和发育的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2020, 35(6): 98-104. |
HUANG Yilin, WANG Dianxuan, ZHU Yubin, et al. Comparison on lethal time and development duration of different stages of Sitophilus oryzae(L.) influenced by temperature in controlled nitrogen atmosphere[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2020, 35(6): 98-104. | |
[28] | Bell C H. Toxicity of phosphine to the diapausing stages of Ephestia elutella, Plodia interpunctella and other Lepidoptera[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 1977, 13(4): 149-158. |
[29] | Garcia-Fuentes A, Wirtz S, Vos E, et al. Short review of sulphites as food additives[J]. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety, 2015, 5(2): 113-120. |
[30] | 吴忠红, 马晓芬, 张婷, 等. 二氧化硫保鲜纸对无核白葡萄果实采后品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014, 51(8): 1512-1518. |
WU Zhonghong, MA Xiaofen, ZHANG Ting, et al. Effects of sulphur dioxide preservation paper on postharvest quality of Thompson seedless grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 51(8): 1512-1518. | |
[31] |
常雪花, 闫波雯, 翟荣臻, 等. 二氧化硫对木纳格葡萄采后糖含量及糖代谢途径的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1216-1225.
DOI |
CHANG Xuehua, YAN Bowen, ZHAI Rongzhen, et al. Effects of sulfur dioxide on sugar content and sugar metabolism pathway in Munage grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1216-1225.
DOI |
|
[32] |
Mbata G N, Phillips T W, Payton M. Mortality of eggs of stored-product insects held under vacuum: effects of pressure, temperature, and exposure time[J]. Journal of economic entomology, 2004, 97(2): 695-702.
PMID |
[33] |
Mbata G N, Phillips T W. Effects of temperature and exposure time on mortality of stored-product insects exposed to low pressure[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2001, 94(5): 1302-1307.
PMID |
[1] | YAN Bowen, WEI Jia, ZHANG Zheng, WU Zhonghong, WU Bin. Effect of Nitric Oxide (NO) with Hypobaric Treatment on Postharvest Quality of Grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(1): 54-62. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||