Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (10): 2514-2526.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.10.019
• Plant Protection · Soil Fertilizer · Water Saving Irrigation · Agricultural Equipment Engineering and Mechanization · Prataculture • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Yan1(), HE Lei1(
), SONG Long1, PAN Yunfei2, WANG Qiang2, SONG Zhenshuai2
Received:
2023-11-02
Online:
2024-10-20
Published:
2024-11-07
Correspondence author:
HE Lei
Supported by:
周艳1(), 何磊1(
), 宋龙1, 潘云飞2, 王强2, 宋振帅2
通讯作者:
何磊
作者简介:
周艳(1970-),女,四川大竹人,研究员,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为农业机械化,(E-mail) zhouyan683886@sina.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHOU Yan, HE Lei, SONG Long, PAN Yunfei, WANG Qiang, SONG Zhenshuai. Design and experiment of self-propelled track flower-thinning machine in orchards[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2514-2526.
周艳, 何磊, 宋龙, 潘云飞, 王强, 宋振帅. 果园履带自走式疏花机的设计与试验[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(10): 2514-2526.
项目 Project | 数值 The numerical |
---|---|
总机尺寸(长×宽×高) Size of switchboard (L×W×H)(m) | 2.2×1.7×3.5 |
配套履带拖拉机动力 Supporting crawler tractor power(KW) | 30~50 |
整机自重 The whole weight of(kg) | 800 |
作业速度 Operating speed (km/h) | 1 |
作业幅宽 Operating range of(m) | 1 |
液压系统工作压力 Working pressure of hydraulic system(MPa) | 10 |
拟定初选液压泵的转速 Formulate the primary hydraulic pump speed (r/min) | 200~2 000 |
疏花轴作业高度 Working height of sparse axis(m) | 3 900 |
Tab.1 main technical parameters of orchard caterpillar flower thinning machine
项目 Project | 数值 The numerical |
---|---|
总机尺寸(长×宽×高) Size of switchboard (L×W×H)(m) | 2.2×1.7×3.5 |
配套履带拖拉机动力 Supporting crawler tractor power(KW) | 30~50 |
整机自重 The whole weight of(kg) | 800 |
作业速度 Operating speed (km/h) | 1 |
作业幅宽 Operating range of(m) | 1 |
液压系统工作压力 Working pressure of hydraulic system(MPa) | 10 |
拟定初选液压泵的转速 Formulate the primary hydraulic pump speed (r/min) | 200~2 000 |
疏花轴作业高度 Working height of sparse axis(m) | 3 900 |
Fig.2 Schematic diagram of crawler type flower dredging machine Note:1.The control box;2.The joystick;3.Hydrophobic flower arm 1;4.Support;5.Slide to guide rail;6.Drain the rachis;7.Strip;8.The hydraulic cylinder1;9.Hydrophobic flower arm 2;10.Hydrophobic flower arm 3;11.The hydraulic cylinder2;12.The hydraulic cylinder 3;13.Crawler tractor
Fig.4 Sparser (left) sparser axis (right) Notes:3.Hydrophobic flower arm;4.stents;5.Slide to guide rail;6.Hydrophobic rachis;7.Strip;14.Hydraulic motor
类型 Type | 叶片马达 Leaf blade motor |
---|---|
型号Model | YM |
额定压力The rated pressure(MPa) | 6MPa |
转速Speed(r/min) | 100~2000 r/min |
排量Displacement(mL/r) | 16.3~93.5 mL/r |
输出转矩The output torque(N) | 11~72 |
Tab.2 Hydraulic motor parameters
类型 Type | 叶片马达 Leaf blade motor |
---|---|
型号Model | YM |
额定压力The rated pressure(MPa) | 6MPa |
转速Speed(r/min) | 100~2000 r/min |
排量Displacement(mL/r) | 16.3~93.5 mL/r |
输出转矩The output torque(N) | 11~72 |
Fig.9 Schematic diagram of hydraulic system Note:1.The fuel tank; 2.Oil filter; 3.Quantitative pump; 4.Check valve;5.Overflow valve; 6.Solenoid valve; 7.Pressure relay; 8.Pressure gauge; 9,10,11,12,21,27 three four-way direction control valve; 13,14,15 double acting hydraulic cylinders; 16,19,22,25,28,30 check valve; 17,18,23,24,29,30adjustable throttle valve; 20,26,31Quantitative motor
水平 The level of | 行进速度 speed(km/h) | 胶条转速 Strip speed (r/min) | 胶条间隔 Strip interval (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
a | 2 | 200~300 | 3 |
b | 3 | 300~400 | 4 |
c | 4 | 300~400 | 5 |
350~400 |
Tab.3 Experimental factors and levels
水平 The level of | 行进速度 speed(km/h) | 胶条转速 Strip speed (r/min) | 胶条间隔 Strip interval (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
a | 2 | 200~300 | 3 |
b | 3 | 300~400 | 4 |
c | 4 | 300~400 | 5 |
350~400 |
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
27 | 23 | 13 |
32 | 27 | 17 |
33 | 29 | 12 |
30 | 26 | 13 |
32 | 28 | 14 |
26 | 22 | 16 |
21 | 17 | 19 |
34 | 30 | 11 |
43 | 38 | 12 |
33 | 29 | 11 |
38 | 32 | 14 |
39 | 32 | 16 |
41 | 34 | 17 |
27 | 23 | 13 |
37 | 31 | 15 |
32 | 28 | 11 |
49 | 39 | 20 |
Tab.4 Data under the condition of test B
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
27 | 23 | 13 |
32 | 27 | 17 |
33 | 29 | 12 |
30 | 26 | 13 |
32 | 28 | 14 |
26 | 22 | 16 |
21 | 17 | 19 |
34 | 30 | 11 |
43 | 38 | 12 |
33 | 29 | 11 |
38 | 32 | 14 |
39 | 32 | 16 |
41 | 34 | 17 |
27 | 23 | 13 |
37 | 31 | 15 |
32 | 28 | 11 |
49 | 39 | 20 |
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c)(%) |
---|---|---|
37 | 25 | 32 |
29 | 25 | 35 |
41 | 26 | 36 |
43 | 27 | 37 |
28 | 17 | 39 |
34 | 23 | 31 |
38 | 25 | 36 |
32 | 22 | 30 |
33 | 22 | 33 |
39 | 24 | 37 |
41 | 26 | 35 |
30 | 20 | 32 |
28 | 18 | 33 |
24 | 17 | 30 |
49 | 33 | 33 |
32 | 21 | 34 |
35 | 23 | 35 |
Tab.5 Data under the condition of test B
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c)(%) |
---|---|---|
37 | 25 | 32 |
29 | 25 | 35 |
41 | 26 | 36 |
43 | 27 | 37 |
28 | 17 | 39 |
34 | 23 | 31 |
38 | 25 | 36 |
32 | 22 | 30 |
33 | 22 | 33 |
39 | 24 | 37 |
41 | 26 | 35 |
30 | 20 | 32 |
28 | 18 | 33 |
24 | 17 | 30 |
49 | 33 | 33 |
32 | 21 | 34 |
35 | 23 | 35 |
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
23 | 14 | 37 |
29 | 18 | 39 |
32 | 18 | 43 |
42 | 24 | 42 |
47 | 28 | 40 |
38 | 25 | 35 |
33 | 21 | 35 |
18 | 12 | 34 |
23 | 15 | 38 |
32 | 19 | 40 |
42 | 27 | 36 |
25 | 16 | 37 |
19 | 12 | 35 |
33 | 21 | 36 |
35 | 22 | 36 |
41 | 25 | 39 |
29 | 18 | 37 |
Tab.6 Data under the condition of test C
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
23 | 14 | 37 |
29 | 18 | 39 |
32 | 18 | 43 |
42 | 24 | 42 |
47 | 28 | 40 |
38 | 25 | 35 |
33 | 21 | 35 |
18 | 12 | 34 |
23 | 15 | 38 |
32 | 19 | 40 |
42 | 27 | 36 |
25 | 16 | 37 |
19 | 12 | 35 |
33 | 21 | 36 |
35 | 22 | 36 |
41 | 25 | 39 |
29 | 18 | 37 |
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
33 | 26 | 21 |
35 | 26 | 27 |
27 | 19 | 28 |
26 | 20 | 24 |
32 | 25 | 22 |
41 | 30 | 26 |
38 | 30 | 21 |
36 | 29 | 19 |
25 | 19 | 22 |
27 | 20 | 24 |
32 | 26 | 18 |
39 | 29 | 25 |
33 | 24 | 29 |
34 | 24 | 30 |
23 | 18 | 23 |
45 | 34 | 25 |
39 | 29 | 25 |
Tab.7 Data under the condition of test D
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
33 | 26 | 21 |
35 | 26 | 27 |
27 | 19 | 28 |
26 | 20 | 24 |
32 | 25 | 22 |
41 | 30 | 26 |
38 | 30 | 21 |
36 | 29 | 19 |
25 | 19 | 22 |
27 | 20 | 24 |
32 | 26 | 18 |
39 | 29 | 25 |
33 | 24 | 29 |
34 | 24 | 30 |
23 | 18 | 23 |
45 | 34 | 25 |
39 | 29 | 25 |
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
19 | 13 | 33 |
36 | 24 | 32 |
47 | 33 | 30 |
39 | 28 | 29 |
42 | 32 | 25 |
28 | 19 | 32 |
33 | 21 | 38 |
35 | 21 | 39 |
43 | 29 | 33 |
27 | 17 | 35 |
39 | 27 | 31 |
32 | 22 | 30 |
29 | 19 | 35 |
38 | 27 | 29 |
42 | 28 | 33 |
27 | 18 | 34 |
30 | 20 | 33 |
Tab.8 Data under the condition of test E
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
19 | 13 | 33 |
36 | 24 | 32 |
47 | 33 | 30 |
39 | 28 | 29 |
42 | 32 | 25 |
28 | 19 | 32 |
33 | 21 | 38 |
35 | 21 | 39 |
43 | 29 | 33 |
27 | 17 | 35 |
39 | 27 | 31 |
32 | 22 | 30 |
29 | 19 | 35 |
38 | 27 | 29 |
42 | 28 | 33 |
27 | 18 | 34 |
30 | 20 | 33 |
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
43 | 25 | 43 |
38 | 22 | 43 |
37 | 22 | 42 |
45 | 27 | 41 |
36 | 22 | 39 |
28 | 18 | 37 |
33 | 19 | 42 |
39 | 22 | 43 |
41 | 23 | 45 |
40 | 24 | 39 |
46 | 28 | 40 |
32 | 18 | 45 |
29 | 15 | 47 |
27 | 16 | 42 |
33 | 19 | 41 |
35 | 20 | 42 |
37 | 19 | 49 |
Tab.9 Data under the condition of test F
作业前 花朵数(a)(朵) Number of flowers before homework (a) (flower) | 作业后 花朵数(b)(朵) Number of flowers after homework (b) (flower) | 疏除率(c) Hydrophobic besides rate (c) (%) |
---|---|---|
43 | 25 | 43 |
38 | 22 | 43 |
37 | 22 | 42 |
45 | 27 | 41 |
36 | 22 | 39 |
28 | 18 | 37 |
33 | 19 | 42 |
39 | 22 | 43 |
41 | 23 | 45 |
40 | 24 | 39 |
46 | 28 | 40 |
32 | 18 | 45 |
29 | 15 | 47 |
27 | 16 | 42 |
33 | 19 | 41 |
35 | 20 | 42 |
37 | 19 | 49 |
序号 The serial number | 前进 速度 Forward speed (Km/h) | 胶条 转速 Speed of the rubber strip (r/min) | 胶条 间隔 Rubber strip spacing (cm) | 疏除率 Hydrophobic rate (%) | 平均 疏除率 Mean thinning rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 2 | 200~300 | 3 | 10~20 | 14.35 |
B | 3 | 300~400 | 4 | 30~40 | 34.01 |
C | 4 | 300~400 | 4 | 35~45 | 37.58 |
D | 4 | 300~400 | 5 | 20~28 | 24.05 |
E | 3 | 300~400 | 5 | 29~35 | 32.41 |
F | 3 | 350~400 | 5 | 40~45 | 42.35 |
Tab.10 Experimental design scheme and response value
序号 The serial number | 前进 速度 Forward speed (Km/h) | 胶条 转速 Speed of the rubber strip (r/min) | 胶条 间隔 Rubber strip spacing (cm) | 疏除率 Hydrophobic rate (%) | 平均 疏除率 Mean thinning rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 2 | 200~300 | 3 | 10~20 | 14.35 |
B | 3 | 300~400 | 4 | 30~40 | 34.01 |
C | 4 | 300~400 | 4 | 35~45 | 37.58 |
D | 4 | 300~400 | 5 | 20~28 | 24.05 |
E | 3 | 300~400 | 5 | 29~35 | 32.41 |
F | 3 | 350~400 | 5 | 40~45 | 42.35 |
方差来源 Source | 果树疏除率 Thinning rate of fruit trees | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | F | 显著水平 Significant level | |
模型 Mesidual | 43.38 | 9 | 13.50 | <0.001 2 |
X1 | 4.50 | 1 | 12.60 | 0.000 93 |
X2 | 18.00 | 1 | 50.40 | 0.000 2 |
X3 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.001 | 1.000 0 |
X1X2 | 1 | 1 | 2.80 | 0.138 2 |
X1X3 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 1.000 0 |
X2X3 | 1 | 1 | 2.80 | 0.138 2 |
6.58 | 1 | 18.42 | 0.003 6 | |
12.89 | 1 | 36.11 | 0.000 5 | |
0.26 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.419 1 | |
残差 Residual | 2.50 | 7 | ||
失拟项 Lack of fit | 0.50 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.803 2 |
误差 Pure error | 2.00 | 4 | ||
总和 Total | 45.88 | 16 |
Tab.11 Analysis of variance of regression equation
方差来源 Source | 果树疏除率 Thinning rate of fruit trees | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | F | 显著水平 Significant level | |
模型 Mesidual | 43.38 | 9 | 13.50 | <0.001 2 |
X1 | 4.50 | 1 | 12.60 | 0.000 93 |
X2 | 18.00 | 1 | 50.40 | 0.000 2 |
X3 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.001 | 1.000 0 |
X1X2 | 1 | 1 | 2.80 | 0.138 2 |
X1X3 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 1.000 0 |
X2X3 | 1 | 1 | 2.80 | 0.138 2 |
6.58 | 1 | 18.42 | 0.003 6 | |
12.89 | 1 | 36.11 | 0.000 5 | |
0.26 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.419 1 | |
残差 Residual | 2.50 | 7 | ||
失拟项 Lack of fit | 0.50 | 3 | 0.33 | 0.803 2 |
误差 Pure error | 2.00 | 4 | ||
总和 Total | 45.88 | 16 |
项目 Items | 疏除率 Hydrophobic besides the rate(%) |
---|---|
理论优化值 Theoretical optimum value | 35~40 |
第 1 次试验 First test value | 34~38 |
第2次试验 Second test value | 36~42 |
第 3 次试验 Third test value | 35~40 |
平均值 Average value | 35.33~40 |
相对误差 Relative error(%) | ≤4 |
Tab.12 Test validation values
项目 Items | 疏除率 Hydrophobic besides the rate(%) |
---|---|
理论优化值 Theoretical optimum value | 35~40 |
第 1 次试验 First test value | 34~38 |
第2次试验 Second test value | 36~42 |
第 3 次试验 Third test value | 35~40 |
平均值 Average value | 35.33~40 |
相对误差 Relative error(%) | ≤4 |
[1] | 苹果产业技术体系. 果产业经济发展年度报告[R]. 北京: 农业部苹果产业经济研究室, 2018. |
Apple Industrial Technology System. Annual Report on Economic Development of fruit industry[R]. Beijing: Research Office of Apple Industry Economy, Ministry of Agriculture, 2018. | |
[2] | 佚名. 我国水果产业发展状况及柑橘产销形势分析[J]. 果农之友, 2011,(1): 3-5. |
Unknown author. Analysis on the development status of China's fruit industry and the situation of citrus production and marketing[J]. Fruit Growers’ Friends, 2011,(1): 3-5. | |
[3] | 赵鹏飞, 邵建柱, 孙建设. 现代化苹果园的技术构成与益分析[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2015. |
ZHAO Pengfei, SHAO Jianzhu, SUN Jianshe. Technical structure and benefit analysis of modern apple orchards[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2015. | |
[4] | 薛晓敏, 王金政, 丛培建, 等. 苹果花果管理技术研究进[J]. 江西农业学报, 2013, 25(12): 36-39. |
XUE Xiaomin, WANG Jinzheng, CONG Peijian, et al. Research advances in flower and fruit management for apple tree[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2013, 25(12): 36-39. | |
[5] | 王学府, 孟玉平, 曹秋芬, 等. 苹果化学疏花疏果研究进展[J]. 果树学报, 2006, 23(3): 437-441. |
WANG Xuefu1 MENG Yuping, CAO Qiufen, et al. Advances in research on chemical thinning for apple trees[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2006, 23(3): 437-441. | |
[6] | 苏红波, 郭新宇, 陆声链, 等. 苹果花序几何造型及可视化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(2): 272-276. |
SU Hongbo, GUO Xinyu, LU Shenglian, et al. The Study for agriculture machinery vision guidance system technique[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(2): 272-276. | |
[7] | Martin-Gorriz B, Torregrosa A, Brunton J G. Feasibility of peach bloom thinning with hand-held mechanical devices[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2011, 129(1): 91-97. |
[8] | Mcclure K A, Cline J A. Mechanical blossom thinning of apples and influence on yield, fruit quality and spur leaf area[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2014, 95(5): 150608044237005. |
[9] | Schupp J R, Baugher T A, Miller S S, et al. Mechanical Thinning of Peach and Apple Trees Reduces Labor Input and Increases Fruit Size[J]. Hort Technology, 2008, 18(4): 660-670. |
[10] | Assirelli A, Giovannini D, Cacchi M, et al. Evaluation of a New Machine for Flower and Fruit Thinning in Stone Fruits[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(11). |
[11] | 102217492. 便于手调作业高度与角度的电动疏花疏果机及其使用方法[P]. |
102217492. Southern Agricultural University. An electric flower thinning and fruit thinning machine convenient for manual adjustment of working height and Angle and its application method[P]. | |
[12] | 李君, 陆华忠, 杨洲, 等. 荔枝柔性疏花器设计与试验研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2013, 34(3): 431-435. |
LI Jun, LU Huazhong, YANG Zhou, et al. Design and experimental study of litchi flexible thinning mechanism[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2013, 34(3): 431-435. | |
[13] | 汪强. 矮密果树疏花装置设计及研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2018. |
WANG Qiang. Design and research of mechanical blossom thinning device for the dwarf dense fruit trees[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2018. | |
[14] | 雷晓晖, 吕晓兰, 张美娜, 等. 电动甩绳式疏花装置在翠冠梨园中的试验研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2020, 41(9): 47-52. |
LEI Xiaohui, LV Xiaolan, ZHANG Meina, et al. Test and research on electric rotating rope blossom thinner in‘Cuiguan’pear orchard[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2020, 41(9): 47-52. | |
[15] | 胡彩旗, 孙传海, 纪晶. 果树机械疏花装置执行机构性能试验研究与分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2015, 36(5): 24-28. |
HU Caiqi, SUN chuanhai, JI Jing. Performance experiment and analysis on mechanical thinning flower actuator[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2015, 36(5): 24-28. | |
[16] | 孙传海, 胡彩旗, 侯庆松, 等. 基于ADAMS的机械柔性疏花装置执行机构仿真分析[J]. 农机化研究, 2015, 37(12): 70-73. |
SUN Chuanhai, HU Caiqi, HOU Qingsong, et al. Simulation of mechanical thinning flower actuator based on ADAMS[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2015, 37(12): 70-73. | |
[17] | 陈国帅, 陈艳艳, 罗红卫, 等. 不同花穗疏剪方法对桂味荔枝花果发育的影响[J]. 中国热带农业, 2017,(1): 65-68,45. |
CHEN Guoshuai, CHEN Yanyan, LUO Hongwei, et al. Effect of different flower ear thinning methods on fruit development of Mandarin litchi[J]. China Tropical Agriculture, 2017,(1): 65-68,45. | |
[18] | 聂佩显, 路超, 薛晓敏, 等. 不同时期一次性疏花疏果对苹果花序坐果率和果实品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2013, 17(2): 27-29. |
NIE Peixian, LU Chao, XUE Xiaomin, et al. Effects of one-time-thinning flowers and fruits of different periods on fruit setting rate and fruit quality of apple[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 17(2): 27-29. | |
[19] | Schupp J R, Kon, et al. Mechanical Blossom Thinning of 'GoldRush'/M.9 Apple Trees with Two String Types and Two Timings[J]. Journal American Pomological Society, 2014, 2014, 68(1): 24-31. |
[20] | Solomakhin A A, Blanke M M. Mechanical flower thinning improves the fruit quality of apples[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010, 90(5). |
[21] | Impact of a mechanical flower thinning on growth, yield, diseases and fruit quality of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) under organic growing conditions[J]. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 2014, 30(1): 24-31. |
[22] | 张宇文, 毋万来, 赵保平, 等. 新型果树疏花疏果双口剪和双体剪[J]. 落叶果树, 2020, 52(2): 68. |
ZHANG Yuwen, WU Wanlai, ZHAO Baoping, et al. Two -mouth shears and two - body shears for thinning flower and fruit in fruit trees[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2020, 52(2): 68. | |
[23] | 全朋坤, 李艳聪, 张帅杰, 等. 苹果成熟季树枝力学特性研究[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2016, 10(10): 44-47. |
QUAN Pengkun, LI Yancong, ZHANG Shuanijie, et al. Research Advances in flower and fruit management for apple tree study on mechanical properties of apple ripened tree branch[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2016, 10(10): 44-47 | |
[24] | 周艳, 潘云飞, 何磊. 牵引式疏花机设计与试验[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2022, 43(11):43-49 |
ZHOU Yan, PAN Yunfei, HE Lei, et al. Design and experiment of Tractor flower-thinning machine[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Mechanization, 2022, 43(11):43-49 | |
[25] | 袁常伟. 桃树疏花机的设计与性能试验[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2021. |
YUAN Changwei. Design and performance test of peach flower thinning machine[D]. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei, 2021. |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 53
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 107
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||