Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 2152-2159.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.009
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHANG Keqin(), DU Yanping, MU Lanhai, YANG Chongqing, CHEN Yixin
Received:
2024-02-17
Online:
2024-09-20
Published:
2024-10-09
Correspondence author:
CHANG Keqin
Supported by:
通讯作者:
常克勤
作者简介:
常克勤(1965-),男,宁夏固原人,研究员,研究方向为荞麦和燕麦作物新品种选育及栽培,(E-mail)nxgychkq@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
CHANG Keqin, DU Yanping, MU Lanhai, YANG Chongqing, CHEN Yixin. Analysis of stable yield and adaptability of buckwheat varieties based on AMMI model and GGE double label graph[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2152-2159.
常克勤, 杜燕萍, 穆兰海, 杨崇庆, 陈一鑫. 基于AMMI模型和GGE双标图分析荞麦品种的稳产性及适应性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2152-2159.
试验点 Test points | 代号 Code | 降水量 Annual rainfall (mm) | 平均气温 Annual temperature (℃) | 气候类型区 Climate | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年均值 | 生育期 | 年均值 | 生育期 | |||
原州区Yuanzhou District | E1 | 450.0 | 353.0 | 6.2 | 18.5 | 半干旱区 |
西吉县Xiji County | E2 | 416.6 | 279.2 | 5.9 | 16.7 | |
彭阳县Pengyang County | E3 | 418.3 | 297.5 | 7.2 | 19.4 | |
海原县Haiyuan County | E4 | 350.0 | 331.8 | 7.1 | 18.7 | 半干旱易旱区 |
同心县Tongxin County | E5 | 215.1 | 189.8 | 8.6 | 22.0 | 干旱带 |
盐池县Yanchi County | E6 | 255.6 | 222.9 | 8.6 | 21.3 |
Tab.1 Precipitation and average temperature during the growth period of buckwheat in different
试验点 Test points | 代号 Code | 降水量 Annual rainfall (mm) | 平均气温 Annual temperature (℃) | 气候类型区 Climate | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年均值 | 生育期 | 年均值 | 生育期 | |||
原州区Yuanzhou District | E1 | 450.0 | 353.0 | 6.2 | 18.5 | 半干旱区 |
西吉县Xiji County | E2 | 416.6 | 279.2 | 5.9 | 16.7 | |
彭阳县Pengyang County | E3 | 418.3 | 297.5 | 7.2 | 19.4 | |
海原县Haiyuan County | E4 | 350.0 | 331.8 | 7.1 | 18.7 | 半干旱易旱区 |
同心县Tongxin County | E5 | 215.1 | 189.8 | 8.6 | 22.0 | 干旱带 |
盐池县Yanchi County | E6 | 255.6 | 222.9 | 8.6 | 21.3 |
变异来源 The source of the mutation | 自由度 Degrees of freedom (Df) | 平方和 Sum of square (SS) | 均方 Mean square (MS) | F值 F-value | 占总变异比例 Proportion in the total (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
总变异Total variance | 269 | 146 247 216.30 | 543 669.95 | ||
处理Treatment | 29 | 17 397 882.96 | 599 927.00 | 1.12 | |
基因型Genotype | 4 | 6 620 101.48 | 1 655 025.37 | 3.08 | 38.1 |
环境Environment | 5 | 8 015 794.07 | 1 603 158.81 | 2.99 | 46.1 |
基因型×环境Genotype × Environment | 20 | 2 761 987.41 | 138 099.37 | 0.26 | 15.9 |
PCA1 | 8 | 2 260 898.53 | 282 612.32 | 19.06** | 81.9 |
PCA2 | 6 | 3 30 476.19 | 55 079.36 | 3.71** | 12.0 |
PCA3 | 4 | 140 955.99 | 35 239.00 | 2.38* | 5.1 |
残差Residual | 2 | 29 656.69 | 14 828.35 |
Tab.2 Analysis of genotypic and environmental interaction variance and AMMI for of test varieties
变异来源 The source of the mutation | 自由度 Degrees of freedom (Df) | 平方和 Sum of square (SS) | 均方 Mean square (MS) | F值 F-value | 占总变异比例 Proportion in the total (SS) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
总变异Total variance | 269 | 146 247 216.30 | 543 669.95 | ||
处理Treatment | 29 | 17 397 882.96 | 599 927.00 | 1.12 | |
基因型Genotype | 4 | 6 620 101.48 | 1 655 025.37 | 3.08 | 38.1 |
环境Environment | 5 | 8 015 794.07 | 1 603 158.81 | 2.99 | 46.1 |
基因型×环境Genotype × Environment | 20 | 2 761 987.41 | 138 099.37 | 0.26 | 15.9 |
PCA1 | 8 | 2 260 898.53 | 282 612.32 | 19.06** | 81.9 |
PCA2 | 6 | 3 30 476.19 | 55 079.36 | 3.71** | 12.0 |
PCA3 | 4 | 140 955.99 | 35 239.00 | 2.38* | 5.1 |
残差Residual | 2 | 29 656.69 | 14 828.35 |
品种 Varieties | 平均产量 Average production (kg/hm2) | 位次 Order of seats | 互作主成分 Reciprocal principal component | 稳定性参数 Stability parameters Dg | 位次 Order of seats | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCA1 | PCA2 | PCA3 | |||||
固荞1号Guqiao 1 | 1 656.3 | 2 | -0.32 | 0.53 | 7.95 | 7.97 | 1 |
固原红花荞Guyuanhonghuaqiao | 1 276.3 | 5 | -13.49 | -4.02 | -3.06 | 14.41 | 5 |
定荞3号Dingqiao 3 | 1 620.9 | 3 | 11.29 | -6.53 | -2.26 | 13.23 | 4 |
固荞3号Guqiao 3 | 1 719.6 | 1 | 3.80 | 9.43 | -3.03 | 10.61 | 2 |
信农1号Xinnong 1 | 1 498.3 | 4 | -12.27 | -1.42 | -4.60 | 13.19 | 3 |
Tab.3 Average yield, interaction principal components, and stability parameters of varieties
品种 Varieties | 平均产量 Average production (kg/hm2) | 位次 Order of seats | 互作主成分 Reciprocal principal component | 稳定性参数 Stability parameters Dg | 位次 Order of seats | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCA1 | PCA2 | PCA3 | |||||
固荞1号Guqiao 1 | 1 656.3 | 2 | -0.32 | 0.53 | 7.95 | 7.97 | 1 |
固原红花荞Guyuanhonghuaqiao | 1 276.3 | 5 | -13.49 | -4.02 | -3.06 | 14.41 | 5 |
定荞3号Dingqiao 3 | 1 620.9 | 3 | 11.29 | -6.53 | -2.26 | 13.23 | 4 |
固荞3号Guqiao 3 | 1 719.6 | 1 | 3.80 | 9.43 | -3.03 | 10.61 | 2 |
信农1号Xinnong 1 | 1 498.3 | 4 | -12.27 | -1.42 | -4.60 | 13.19 | 3 |
品种 Varieties | 平均产量 Average production (kg/hm2) | 位次 Order of seats | 互作主成分 Reciprocal principal component | 稳定性参数 Stability parameters De | 位次 Order of seats | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCA1 | PCA2 | PCA3 | |||||
原州区Yuanzhou District | 1634.6 | 2 | 2.83 | 3.99 | 9.27 | 10.48 | 3 |
西吉县Xiji County | 1 770.2 | 1 | 16.24 | 4.58 | -4.19 | 17.39 | 1 |
彭阳县Pengyang County | 1 211.3 | 6 | -12.55 | 2.29 | -0.83 | 12.79 | 2 |
海原县Haiyuan County | 1 616.6 | 3 | 5.09 | -6.14 | 1.70 | 8.15 | 6 |
同心县Tongxin County | 1 504.2 | 5 | -7.65 | 5.49 | -2.55 | 9.76 | 5 |
盐池县Yanchi County | 1 591.9 | 4 | -1.95 | 9.07 | -3.41 | 9.88 | 4 |
Tab.4 Average yield, interaction principal component values, and stability parameters of each pilot project
品种 Varieties | 平均产量 Average production (kg/hm2) | 位次 Order of seats | 互作主成分 Reciprocal principal component | 稳定性参数 Stability parameters De | 位次 Order of seats | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCA1 | PCA2 | PCA3 | |||||
原州区Yuanzhou District | 1634.6 | 2 | 2.83 | 3.99 | 9.27 | 10.48 | 3 |
西吉县Xiji County | 1 770.2 | 1 | 16.24 | 4.58 | -4.19 | 17.39 | 1 |
彭阳县Pengyang County | 1 211.3 | 6 | -12.55 | 2.29 | -0.83 | 12.79 | 2 |
海原县Haiyuan County | 1 616.6 | 3 | 5.09 | -6.14 | 1.70 | 8.15 | 6 |
同心县Tongxin County | 1 504.2 | 5 | -7.65 | 5.49 | -2.55 | 9.76 | 5 |
盐池县Yanchi County | 1 591.9 | 4 | -1.95 | 9.07 | -3.41 | 9.88 | 4 |
品种 Varieties | 半干旱区 Semiarid region | 半干旱区易旱区 Semiarid and drought prone areas | 中部干旱带 Central arid zone | 宁南山区6县(区) 6 counties in the southern mountainous areas of Ningxia | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 排名 | 稳定性 排名 | ||
AMMI模型 AMMI model | 固荞1号 Guqiao 1 | 1 623 | 9.3 | 1 707 | 13.9 | 1 681 | 10.8 | 1 656 | 10.5 | 2 | 1 |
固荞3号 Guqiao 3 | 1 681 | 13.2 | 1 873 | 25.0 | 1 700 | 12.0 | 1 720 | 14.8 | 1 | 2 | |
平均值 Average value | 1 652 | 11.2 | 1 790 | 19.4 | 1 691 | 11.4 | 1 688 | 12.7 | |||
信农1号 Xinnong 1 | 1 485 | 1 499 | 1518 | 1498 | |||||||
生产示范 Demonstration | 固荞1号、固荞3号 Guqiao 1、3 | 1 687 | 13.7 | 1 484 | 10.0 | 1 038 | 8.5 | ||||
信农1号 Xinnong 1 | 1 484 | 1 349 | 957 |
Tab.5 Analysis of AMMI Models for Varieties in Different Climate Types and Comparison of Production Demonstration Results
品种 Varieties | 半干旱区 Semiarid region | 半干旱区易旱区 Semiarid and drought prone areas | 中部干旱带 Central arid zone | 宁南山区6县(区) 6 counties in the southern mountainous areas of Ningxia | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 平均 产量 (kg/hm2) | 增产 (%) | 排名 | 稳定性 排名 | ||
AMMI模型 AMMI model | 固荞1号 Guqiao 1 | 1 623 | 9.3 | 1 707 | 13.9 | 1 681 | 10.8 | 1 656 | 10.5 | 2 | 1 |
固荞3号 Guqiao 3 | 1 681 | 13.2 | 1 873 | 25.0 | 1 700 | 12.0 | 1 720 | 14.8 | 1 | 2 | |
平均值 Average value | 1 652 | 11.2 | 1 790 | 19.4 | 1 691 | 11.4 | 1 688 | 12.7 | |||
信农1号 Xinnong 1 | 1 485 | 1 499 | 1518 | 1498 | |||||||
生产示范 Demonstration | 固荞1号、固荞3号 Guqiao 1、3 | 1 687 | 13.7 | 1 484 | 10.0 | 1 038 | 8.5 | ||||
信农1号 Xinnong 1 | 1 484 | 1 349 | 957 |
[1] | 谢锐, 路战远, 金晓蕾, 等. 基于AMMI模型的内蒙古中西部地区马铃薯品种(系)稳定性和适应性分析[J]. 北方农业学报, 2022, 50(1): 18-24. |
XIE Rui, LU Zhanyuan, JIN Xiaolei, et al. Analysis of potato varieties(lines) stability and adaptability in Midwestern Inner Mongolia base onAMMI model[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2022, 50(1): 18-24. | |
[2] | 黄大明, 谢雄泽, 白桂萍, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图在湖北省油菜区域试验中的应用[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(12): 24-29. |
HUANG Daming, XIE Xiongze, BAI Guiping, et al. Application of AMMI model and GGE biplot in rape regional trial of Hubei[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 57(12): 24-29. | |
[3] | 步清, 鲁月, 郝德荣, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图在江苏省糯玉米品种区域试验中的应用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(22):7628-7636. |
BU Qing, LU Yue, HAO Derong, et al. Application of AMMI model and GGE double label plot in regional trials of glutinous corn varieties in Jiangsu Province[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(20):7628-7636. | |
[4] | 吴曹阳, 梁诗涵, 邱军, 等. 基于连续12年国家苦荞区域试验的中国苦荞品种选育现状分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 3878-3894. |
WU Caoyang, LIANG Shihan, QIU Jun, et al. An examination on breeding status quo of Chinese Tartary buckwheat varieties based on the national cross-country tests of Tartary buckwheat varieties in China over 12 consecutive years[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 3878-3894. | |
[5] | 魏常敏, 许卫猛, 邢永锋, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图在黄淮海甜玉米中的应用[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(17): 5909-5916. |
WEI Changmin, XU Weimeng, XING Yongfeng, et al. Application ofAMMI model and GGE biplot of sweet maize varieties in Huang-Huai-Hai regional[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(17): 5909-5916. | |
[6] | 王迪. GGE双标图分析黑龙江省甜瓜区域试验品种适应性和稳定性[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2021, (10): 64-68. |
WANG Di. Analysis of adaptability and stability of melon varieties in Heilongjiang regional test by GGE biplot[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, (10): 64-68. | |
[7] | 宋慧, 刘金荣, 王素英, 等. GGE双标图评价谷子'豫谷18'的丰产稳产性和适应性[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(1): 29-38. |
SONG Hui, LIU Jinrong, WANG Suying, et al. Evaluation of foxtail millet yield stability and adaptability using GGE-biplot analysis: a case study of 'Yugu18' foxtail millet cultivar[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(1): 29-38. | |
[8] | 昝凯, 陈亚光, 徐淑霞, 等. 基于R语言的GGE双标图在大豆区试中的应用[J]. 大豆科技, 2019, (4): 16-20. |
ZAN Kai, CHEN Yaguang, XU Shuxia, et al. Application of GGE double plot in soybean regional tests based on R language[J]. Soybean Science & Technology, 2019, (4): 16-20. | |
[9] | 崔顺立, 何美敬, 侯名语, 等. 利用GGE双标图分析花生品质性状的基因型-环境互作[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(4): 617-626. |
CUI Shunli, HE Meijing, HOU Mingyu, et al. Genotype × environment interactions for the quality traits of peanut varieties based on GGE biplot analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2021, 43(4): 617-626. | |
[10] | 王育才, 王化俊, 李葆春, 等. 基于GGE双标图对青稞区试点代表性及品系稳定性的分析[J]. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(5): 22-27. |
WANG Yucai, WANG Huajun, LI Baochun, et al. GGE-biplot based study on cultivar stability and representativeness of test sites for highland barley[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(5): 22-27. | |
[11] | 张大爱, 赵绪明, 钱一萍, 等. 用GGE双标图分析苦荞品种的产量稳定性及试验地点相似性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(7): 101-108. |
ZHANG Daai, ZHAO Xuming, QIAN Yiping, et al. GGE biplot based yield stability and test site similarity of Tartary buckwheat varieties[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43(7): 101-108. | |
[12] | 唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统: 实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007. |
TANG Qiyi, FENG Mingguang. DPS data processing system[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007. | |
[13] | 袁金海, 贾多英, 刘续汉, 等. GGE双标图在马铃薯产量及试验点评价分析中的应用[J]. 中国种业, 2018, (8): 56-59. |
YUAN Jinhai, JIA Duoying, LIU Xuhan, et al. Application of GGE double plot in evaluation and analysis of potato yield and test site[J]. China Seed Industry, 2018, (8): 56-59. | |
[14] | 李亚杰, 李德明, 范士杰, 等. GGE双标图在马铃薯品种适应性及产量稳定性分析中的应用评价[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 52(5): 617-622. |
LI Yajie, LI Deming, FAN Shijie, et al. Analysis of variety adaptability and yield stability of potato for evaluating GGE-biplot application[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2016, 52(5): 617-622. | |
[15] | 张志芬, 任长忠, 杨海顺, 等. 基于SD-GGE双标图进行饲草燕麦品种归类和区域划分[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(5): 10-21. |
ZHANG Zhifen, REN Changzhong, YANG Haishun, et al. Variety classification and region division of forage oat varieties based on SD-GGE Biplot[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(5): 10-21. | |
[16] | 李琴琴, 高乙萍, 张志芬, 等. 甜荞品种稳定性和试验地点相似性的GGE双标图分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(1): 67-70, 121. |
LI Qinqin, GAO Yiping, ZHANG Zhifen, et al. Stability and testing-site similarity for common buckwheat lines based on GGE-biplot analysis[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2013, 31(1): 67-70, 121. | |
[17] | 柳娜, 曹东, 王世红, 等. 基于GGE双标图的甘肃春小麦区试品系稳产性和试点代表性分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(4): 39-48. |
LIU Na, CAO Dong, WANG Shihong, et al. Yield stability and testing-site representativeness of regional trials for spring wheat lines in Gansu based on GGE-biplot[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(4): 39-48. | |
[18] | 丁逸帆, 许明, 许如根, 等. 基于GGE双标图对江苏省大麦鉴定试验品种的高产稳产和适应性分析[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 40(3): 22-26. |
DING Yifan, XU Ming, XU Rugen, et al. Analyses for high-yield, stability and adaptability of barley varieties in identification test of Jiangsu Province using GGE biplot[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2019, 40(3): 22-26. | |
[19] | 陈新, 吴斌, 张宗文. 燕麦种质资源重要农艺性状适应性和稳定性评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4): 577-585. |
CHEN Xin, WU Bin, ZHANG Zongwen. Evaluation of adaptability and stability for important agronomic traits of oat(Avena spp.) germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(4): 577-585. | |
[20] | 陈四龙, 李玉荣, 程增书, 等. 用GGE双标图分析种植密度对高油花生生长和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(7): 1328-1335. |
CHEN Silong, LI Yurong, CHENG Zengshu, et al. GGE biplot analysis of effects of planting density on growth and yield components of high oil peanut[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(7): 1328-1335. | |
[21] | 王星宇, 程静, 高生, 等. 应用AMMI模型和GGE双标图评价裸燕麦品种在华北高寒区的适应性[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(12): 76-84. |
WANG Xingyu, CHENG Jing, GAO Sheng, et al. Evaluation of adaptability of naked oat varieties in the alpine region of North China based on the AMMI model and GGE Biplot[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(12): 76-84. | |
[22] | 朱艳彬, 孙九超, 王显, 等. 基于Genstat的AMMI模型和GGE双标图在玉米区域试验分析中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(6): 49-53. |
ZHU Yanbin, SUN Jiuchao, WANG Xian, et al. Application of AMMI model and GGE-biplot based on genstat in the analysis of maize regional experiment[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(6): 49-53. | |
[23] | 黄大明, 谢雄泽, 白桂萍, 等. AMMI模型和GGE双标图在湖北省油菜区域试验中的应用[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2018, 57(12): 24-29. |
HUANG Daming, XIE Xiongze, BAI Guiping, et al. Application of AMMI model and GGE biplot in rape regional trial of Hubei[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 57(12): 24-29. | |
[24] | 周启龙, 多吉顿珠, 刘云飞, 等. 应用AMMI模型分析饲用燕麦干草产量稳定性和适应性[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(6): 79-82. |
ZHOU Qilong, DUO Jidunzhu, LIU Yunfei, et al. Analysis of yield stability and adaptability of forage oat hay based onAMMI model[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(6): 79-82. | |
[25] | 柴继宽, 慕平, 赵桂琴. 8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107. |
CHAI Jikuan, MU Ping, ZHAO Guiqin. Study on yield stability and test site representativeness of eight oat varieties in Gansu Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107. | |
[26] | 方彦杰, 张绪成, 于显枫, 等, 施肥对半干旱区旱地全膜覆土穴播苦荞产量及水肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报. 2020, 22(9):143-152 |
FANG Yanjie, ZHANG Xucheng, YU Xianfeng, et aI. Impacts of Fertilization on Yield and Water-fertilizer Use Efficiency of Tartary Buckwheat with Whole Field Soil-plastic Mulching in Semiarid Area[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 22(9):143-152 | |
[27] | 周花, 戴丽君, 李永平, 等. 不同覆膜穴播种植方式对谷子和糜子生长发育及水分利用率的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2021, 52(4): 29-36. |
ZHOU Hua, DAI Lijun, LI Yongping, et al. Effects of different mulching hole-planting methods on growing development and water use efficiency of foxtail millet andPanicum miliaceum L[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 52(4): 29-36. |
[1] | WANG Xian, LUO Zhengqian, XU Linli, ZHOU Zhiling, TANG Jun, GAO Haifeng, LIU Enliang, JIN Ping. AMMI Model Analysis of Yield Data of Xinjiang Sweet Potato Region Test [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1093-1098. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 27
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 97
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||