Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2824-2832.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.026
Previous Articles Next Articles
HOU Yurong(), KE Mei, LI Chao, LAN Jiyong, KANG Shuai, JIN Junpeng, WEI Peng(
)
Received:
2023-03-21
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-12-07
Correspondence author:
WEI Peng(1989-),male, native place:Qitai, Xinjiang.Research field:Ecological restoration of grassland,(E-mail)xkyweipeng@163.com
Supported by:
侯钰荣(), 柯梅, 李超, 兰吉勇, 康帅, 靳俊鹏, 魏鹏(
)
通讯作者:
魏鹏(1989-),男,新疆奇台人,助理研究员,博士,研究方向为草地生态修复,(E-mail)xkyweipeng@163.com
作者简介:
侯钰荣(1982-),女,新疆玛纳斯人,研究员,博士,研究方向为草地生态修复,(E-mail)houyurong0994@126.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
HOU Yurong, KE Mei, LI Chao, LAN Jiyong, KANG Shuai, JIN Junpeng, WEI Peng. Effects of fencing and free grazing on growth patterns and endogenous hormones of Seriphidium transiliense[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2824-2832.
侯钰荣, 柯梅, 李超, 兰吉勇, 康帅, 靳俊鹏, 魏鹏. 围栏封育和自由放牧对伊犁绢蒿生长规律和内源激素的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2824-2832.
项目 Items | 高度 PH (cm) | 盖度 PC (%) | 密度 PD (株/m2) | 生物量 B (g/m2) | 一级分枝 PBN (个/株) | 二级分枝 SBN (个/株) | 叶片干重 (g/株) | 茎干重 (g/株) | 根系干重 (g/株) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
围栏封育 Enclosure | 17.50±2.07 | 45±5.10 | 16±1.07 | 174.83±5.88 | 14±1.14 | 19±1.52 | 2.44±0.10 | 9.12±1.01 | 11.44±1.01 |
自由放牧 Free-grazing | 6.81±0.77 | ≤1±0.01 | 2±0.42 | 1.20±0.11 | 2±0.02 | 0±0.00 | 0.31±0.02 | 1.75±0.03 | 2.03±0.04 |
显著性(P) Significance | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Tab.1 Effects of fenced enclosure and free grazing on growth trend of Seriphidium transiliense
项目 Items | 高度 PH (cm) | 盖度 PC (%) | 密度 PD (株/m2) | 生物量 B (g/m2) | 一级分枝 PBN (个/株) | 二级分枝 SBN (个/株) | 叶片干重 (g/株) | 茎干重 (g/株) | 根系干重 (g/株) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
围栏封育 Enclosure | 17.50±2.07 | 45±5.10 | 16±1.07 | 174.83±5.88 | 14±1.14 | 19±1.52 | 2.44±0.10 | 9.12±1.01 | 11.44±1.01 |
自由放牧 Free-grazing | 6.81±0.77 | ≤1±0.01 | 2±0.42 | 1.20±0.11 | 2±0.02 | 0±0.00 | 0.31±0.02 | 1.75±0.03 | 2.03±0.04 |
显著性(P) Significance | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Fig.1 Effects of fencing and free grazing on endogenous hormones in leaves of Seriphidium transiliense Note: different lowercase letters represent significant difference (P < 0.05),Different uppercase letters represent extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).The same as below
[1] |
侯钰荣, 安沙舟. 不同刈割强度下伊犁绢蒿体内可溶性糖的变化及其地上与地下营养物质的关系[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4):48-56.
DOI |
HOU Yurong, AN Shazhou. Temporal variation of water soluble carbohydrate in Seriphidium transiliense under different mowing intensities and it how to transfer during seasonal change[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(4):48-56.
DOI |
|
[2] | 孙宗玖, 安沙舟, 许鹏. 不同利用方式下伊犁绢蒿贮藏营养物质的比较[J]. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(5):110-115. |
SUN Zongjiu, AN Shazhou, XU Peng. Comparison of Nutrition Substance Stored in Seriphidium transiliense under Different Utilization Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008, 30(5):110-115. | |
[3] |
孙宗玖, 安沙舟, 许鹏. 伊犁绢蒿构件动态变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2007, 15(5):454-459.
DOI |
SUN Zongjiu, AN Shazhou, XU Peng. Studies on Dyna mic Characteristics of Seriphidium transiliense Modules[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(5):454-459.
DOI |
|
[4] | 江沙沙, 孙宗玖, 崔雨萱, 等. 伊犁绢蒿个体功能性状对短期禁牧的可塑性响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(6):1528-1536. |
JIANG Shasha, SUN Zongjiu, CUI Yuxuan. Response of Short-term Grazing Exclusion to Individual Functional Traits of Seriphidium transiliense[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(6):1528-1536. | |
[5] |
刘慧敏, 董乙强, 安沙舟, 等. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠群落特征及植物多样性对短期封育的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(7) : 1319-1325.
DOI |
LIU Huimin, DONG Yiqiang, AN Shazhou, et al. Response of Community Characteristics and Plant Diversity of Seriphidium transillense Desertsto Short-term Fencing[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(7) : 1319-1325.
DOI |
|
[6] | 安景源, 李西良, 丁勇, 等. 不同放牧强度对糙隐子草功能性状的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(1):50-57. |
AN Jingyuan, LI Xiliang, Ding Yong, et al. Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Functional Traits of Cleistogenes squarrosa[J]. Chinese Journal Grassland, 2021, 43(1):50-57. | |
[7] | 李芳, 安景源, 李西良, 等. 冰草地上-地下性状对放牧强度的非对称性响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(11):18-25. |
LI Fang, AN Jingyuan, LI Xiliang, et al. Asymmetrical Response of Aboveground and Belowground Traits of Agropyron cristatumto Grazing Intensities[J]. Chinese Journal Grassland, 2021, 43(11):18-25. | |
[8] | 安景源, 李西良, 丁勇, 等. 克氏针茅功能性状对放牧强度的响应及其异速生长分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(6):50-57. |
AN Jingyuan, LI Xiliang, DING Yong, et al. The Response of Stipa krylovii Functional Traits to Different Grazing Intensities and Allometric Growth Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal Grassland, 2020, 42(6):50-57. | |
[9] | 余婷, 张望梅. 6-苄基腺嘌呤对香云幼苗淹水胁迫下内源激素平衡的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2020, 14(6):124-125. |
YU Ting, ZHANG Wangmei. Effects of 6-benzyl adenine on endogenous hormone balance in Xiangyun seedlings under waterlogging stress[J]. South China Agriculture, 2020, 14(6):124-125. | |
[10] | 谢旭桃, 华中一, 李晓琳, 等. 千里香叶片性状的数量分类与内源激素含量分析[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2021, 27(21):167-173. |
XIE Xutao, HUA Zhongyi, LI Xiaolin, et al. Quantitative Classification of Murraya paniculata Leaf Traits and Endogenous Hormone Contents Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae, 2021, 27(21):167-173. | |
[11] | 胡勇军, 韩德复, 高红伟, 等. 脱落酸对羊草人工草地产量及其品质的影响[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2007, 39(3):102-105. |
HU Yongjun, HAN Defu, GAO Hongwei, et al. Effect of abscisic acid(ABA)on the quality and the yield of Leymus chinensis growing in the sown grassland[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University(Natural Science Ed.), 2007, 39(3):102-105. | |
[12] |
LI Yiman, LI Shuhao, HE Xinrui, et al. CO2 enrichment enhanced drought resistance by regulating growth, hydraulic conductivity and phytohormone contents in the root of cucumber seedlings[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 152:62-71.
DOI PMID |
[13] | 陈玉萍, 孙宗玖, 李培英, 等. 放牧干扰对伊犁绢蒿表型性状特征的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2017, 37(4):81-87. |
CHEN Yuping, SUN Zongjiu, LI Peiying, et al. Effects of grazingdisturbance gradients on morphological characters of Seriphidium transiliense[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2017, 37(4):81-87. | |
[14] | Kinga Dziurka, Micha Dziurka, Marzena Warchol, et al. Endogenous phytohormone profile during oat (Avena sativa L.) haploid embryo development[J]. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 2019, 55(2):221-229. |
[15] |
Xiao F Y, Han Z, Qiu Y X, et al. Effects of day and night temperature on photosynthesis, antioxidant enzyme activities, and endogenous hormones in tomato leaves during the flowering stage[J]. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2018, 93(3):306-315.
DOI URL |
[16] | 张吉玲, 叶义全, 黄樱, 等. 不同埋土深度杉木无性系萌蘖及内源激素含量的差异[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2021, 41(5):36-41. |
ZHANG Jiling, YE Yiquan, HUANG Ying, et al. Differences of Tillering and Endogenous Hormone Content of Cunninghamia lanceolata Clones in Different Soil Depth[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2021, 41(5):36-41. | |
[17] | 姚曼红, 刘琳, 曾幼玲, 等. 五大类传统植物激素对植物响应盐胁迫的调控[J]. 生物技术通报, 2011,(11):1-5,25. |
YAO Manhong, LIU Lin, ZENG Youling, et al. Several Kinds of Phytohormone in Plants Responses to Salt-stress[J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2011,(11):1-5,25. | |
[18] | 韩德复. 松嫩盐碱化草地羊草生长及种群建成与内源激素关系的研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2015. |
HAN Defu. The correlations analysis between endogenoushormones and growth, population building of Leyimus chinesis in the Songnen salinity-alkalinity grassland[D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2015. | |
[19] | 韩德复, 胡勇军, 郭继勋, 等. 油菜素内酯对羊草抗旱性的影响[J]. 长春师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2007, 26(6):51-53. |
HAN Defu, HU Yongjun, GUO Jixun, et al. The Effection of Brassinolide for the Drought Resistance of Chinensis[J]. Journal of Changchun Normal University(Natural Science Ed.), 2007, 26(6):51-53. | |
[20] | 宋吉轩, 吕俊, 宗学凤, 等. 干旱胁迫下ALA对羊草生长、内源激素及转录组的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(7):73-83. |
SONG Jixuan, LYU Jun, ZONG Xuefeng, et al. Effects of ALA Application on Plant Growth, Hormone Levels, and Transcriptome in Leymus Chinensis under Drought Stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(7):73-83. | |
[21] | 于敏, 徐恒, 张华, 等. 植物激素在种子休眠与萌发中的调控机制[J]. 植物生理学报, 2016, 52 (5):599-606. |
YU Min, XU Heng, ZHANG Hua, et al. Regulation of plant hormones on seed dormancy and germination[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2016, 52 (5): 599-606. | |
[22] | 吴一鸣. 围封对退化草地地上植被影响的综述[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2021,(8):75-76. |
WU Yiming. A review of the effects of enclosure on aboveground vegetation in degraded grassland[J]. Agricultural Development and Equipment, 2021,(8):75-76. | |
[23] | 吴建波, 包晓影, 李洁, 等. 不同围封年限对典型草原群落及大针茅种群特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2010,(4):18-23. |
WU Jianbo, BAO Xiaoying, LI Jie, et al. Influence of Fencing Duration on Community and Population of Stipa grandis in a Typical Steppe[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010,(4):18-23. | |
[24] | 殷国梅, 张英俊, 王明莹, 等. 短期围封对草甸草原群落特征与物种多样性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014,(3):61-66. |
YIN Guomei, ZHANG Yingjun, WANG Mingying. Influences of Short-term Enclosure on Characteristics of Community and Species Diversity on Meadow Steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014,(3):61-66. | |
[25] | 董乙强, 孙宗玖, 安沙舟, 等. 禁牧对中度退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(8):1460-1468. |
DONG Yiqiang, SUN Zongjiu, AN Shazhou, et al. Effects of Grazing Exclusion on Soil Nutrition in Moderate Degraded Desert Grassland ofSeriphidium transiliense[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(8):1460-1468. | |
[26] | 杨静, 孙宗玖, 董乙强. 封育年限对伊犁绢蒿荒漠土壤有机氮组分的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2017, 34(9):1778-1786. |
YANG Jing, SUN Zongjiu, DONG Yiqiang, et al. Effect of Grazing Exclusion length on Soil Organic nitrogen in Seriphidium transiliense[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(9):1778-1786. | |
[27] | 杨静, 孙宗玖, 杨合龙, 等. 封育年限对蒿类荒漠土壤有机碳组分及其碳、氮特征的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(4):564-572. |
YANG Jing, SUN Zongjiu, YANG Helong, et al. Effect of enclosure period on carbon and Nitrogen Characteristics and Components of Soil Organic Carbon in Artemisia desert[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(4):564-572. | |
[28] | 侯向阳, 李西良, 高新磊. 中国草原管理的发展过程与趋势[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(7):1-10. |
HOU Xiangyang, LI Xiliang, GAO Xinlei. The Process and Future tend of Grassland Management in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(7):1-10. | |
[29] | 玛纳斯县土地志编纂委员会. 玛纳斯县土地志[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2001,49-88. |
Manas County Land Chronicle Compilation Committee. Land Records of Manas County[M]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2001, 49-88. | |
[30] | 荣浩, 何京丽, 张欣, 等. 荒漠草原不同植被恢复模式的水土保持生态效益[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(5):295-300. |
RONG Hao, HE Jingli, ZHANG Xin, et al. Ecological Benefits of Soil and Water Conservation in Different Vegetation Restoration Patterns on Desert Steppe[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5):295-300. | |
[31] | 胡金娇, 周青平, 吕一河, 等. 青藏高原东缘半湿润沙地典型生态恢复模式的效果比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7410-7418. |
HU Jinjiao, ZHOU Qingping, LYU Yihe, et al. Comparison study to the effectiveness of typical ecological restoration measures in semi-humid sandy land in eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(20):7410-7418. | |
[32] | 刘泓言, 任德, 向春阳. 水杨酸对盐胁迫下草木樨种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 天津农林科技, 2022,(1):18-20. |
LIU Hongyan, REN De, XIANG Chunyang. Effects of salicylic acid on seed germination and seedling growth of Sweet clover under salt stress[J]. Tianjin Agriculture and Forestry Technology, 2022,(1):18-20. | |
[33] |
韩召奋, 王秋苹, 褚越洋, 等. 农杆菌GV3101中反式玉米素合成基因促进烟草再生[J]. 中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2017, 33(11):1134-1142.
DOI |
HAN Zhaofen, WANG Qiuping, CHU Yueyang, et al. Trans-zeatin Synthesizing Gene in Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101Strain Stimulates the Explant Regeneration of Nicotiana[J]. Chinese Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2017, 33(11):1134-1142.
DOI |
|
[34] | 杨艳红, 付志玲, 兰海楠, 等. 生长激素激活受体机理的研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2013, 40(10):148-151. |
YANG Yanhong, FU Zhiling, LAN Hainan, et al. Research Progress on the Mechanism of Growth Hormone-activated Receptor[J]. Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinarian, 2013, 40(10):148-151. | |
[35] |
高双红, 李媛英, 刘博文, 等. H2S对弱光胁迫下高羊茅幼苗生理特性和内源激素的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10):2233-2239.
DOI |
GAO Shuanghong, LI Yuanying, LIU Bowen, et al. Effects of H2S on Physiologica Characteristics and Endogenous Hormones in Tall Fescue Seedlings under Low-light Stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10):2233-2239.
DOI |
[1] | QIN Yekangyang, LI Jiaxin, JIN Guili, LIU Wenhao, MA Jian, LI Wenxiong, CHEN Mentian. Identification of main plants in desert grassland Seriphidium transiliense based on UAV remote sensing and CNN ResNet 18 [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2547-2556. |
[2] | HAN Wanqiang, JIN Guili, YUE Yonghuan, WANG Huining, GONG Ke, WU Xueer, Wulupa Ardererkali. Spectral Characteristics and Modified Vegetation Index of ihree Main Plants of Seriphidium transiliense Desert Grassland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(5): 950-957. |
[3] | YANG Jing-jing, Tuerxunnayi Reyimu, ZHANG Qing-qing, Amanula Yimingniyazi, Xueretijiang Maitinuri. Effects of Grazing Intensity on Plant Community Characteristics of Seriphidium transiliense Desert Grassland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(8): 1542-1550. |
[4] | FAN Yan-min, WU Hong-qi, HOU Yan-na, Aikebaer Anwar, Gulbostan Erken. Study on Ecological Stoichiometry of Two Plants in Seriphidium transiliense Desert Grassland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(12): 2305-2311. |
[5] | ZHANG Xiao-xia, DONG Yi-qiang, AN Sha-zhou, LI Kun. Analysis of Community Characteristics and Plant Diversity in Different Degraded Stages of Seriphidium transillense Desert [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(9): 1721-1729. |
[6] | HE Jun-min;ZHANG Yan-hua;Hanikezi Tulafu;YU Li-juan;TIAN Yue-zhen;XU Xin-ming;FU Xue-feng;TIAN Ke-chuan;HUANG Xi-xia. Study on the Growth Rule of Lamb of 0-60 days old in Xinji Fine-Wool Sheep [J]. , 2017, 54(4): 775-781. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 38
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 136
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||