Analysis of Economic Characters and Fruit Nutrition Components ofArmeniaca vulgaris var.ansu family

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.10.006

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study analyzed the economic characters and fruit nutrition component, in the hope of providing the oretical basis for the selection and comprehensive development and utilization of excellent Armeniaca vulgaris var.ansu families.【Methods】 Taking 38 Armeniaca vulgaris var.ansu families from Ningxia and Gansu Provinces as the material, their economic characters and fruit nutrition components were studied by means of variation analysis,multiple comparison,correlation analysis and principal component analysis.【Results】 The variation coefficient of fruit yield was 0.78, the Shannon index of VC content was 2.02, and the Shannon index of fruit nutrition components was higher than that of economic characters. The variation degree of economic characters and nutrition component of Armeniaca vulgaris var.ansu families was high, and the diversity was rich. There was a strong correlation between the content of nutrition components and fruit traits, among which single fruit mass was positively correlated with the three diameters of fruit. The cumulative contribution rate of principal component analysis was 78.786%, which could represent the main information of characters. 【Conclusion】 Six excellent families, such as No.102, No.119 and No.201, are selected synthetically, among which, No.102 and No.119 families have good taste of fresh fruit, high nutritional value, and No.201 family has the largest fruit yield, which can be used as the type of high yield.

Key words: Armeniaca vulgaris var.ansu; economic characters; nutritional components

摘要：

【目的】研究分析野杏家系经济性状及果实营养成分,为优良野杏家系筛选及综合开发利用提供理论依据。【方法】选取宁夏、甘肃种源的38个野杏家系为材料,采用变异分析、多重比较、相关性分析以及主成分分析等方法,研究其经济性状及果实营养成分。【结果】产果量的变异系数最大,为0.78;VC含量的Shannon指数最大,为2.02,果实营养成分的Shannon指数高于经济性状,野杏家系的经济性状及营养成分变异程度高、多样性丰富。营养成分与果实性状间存在较强的相关性,其中单果质量与果实三径呈极显著正相关。主成分分析累计贡献率达78.786%,能代表性状的主要信息。【结论】102、119、201号等6个优良家系,其中102和119号家系果肉鲜食口感好、营养价值高,201号家系产果量最大,可作为丰产类型。

关键词: 野杏, 经济性状, 营养成分

CLC Number:

S662.2

Shengjun DONG, Ranran WANG, Nan SHENG, Wanjin HU, Yang QU, Jianhua CHEN. Analysis of Economic Characters and Fruit Nutrition Components ofArmeniaca vulgaris var.ansu family[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(10): 1809-1820.

董胜君, 王冉冉, 盛楠, 胡万金, 曲杨, 陈建华. 野杏家系经济性状及果实营养成分分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(10): 1809-1820.

Figures/Tables 8

References 27

[1]	张加延, 张钊. 中国果树志·杏卷[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2003.
	ZHANG Jiayan, ZHANG Zhao. Fruit trees of China (Apricot volume) [M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2003.
[2]	张渊, 刘立强, 翟朝阳. 新疆野杏种子贮藏方式和萌发特性的研究[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2016, 39(5):366-372.
	ZHANG Yuan, LIU Liqiang, ZHAI Zhaoyang. Study on Seed Storage and Germination Characteristics of Armeniaca Vulgaris Lam[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016, 39(5):366-372.
[3]	吴月亮, 许淼, 张静涵, 等. 山杏不同无性系的产量性状及种仁营养成分研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 38(6):27-33.
	WU Yueliang, XU Miao, ZHANG Jinghan, et al. Yield Traits and Almonds Nutritional Components of Armeniaca Sibirica Clones[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Science Ed.), 2018, 38(6):27-33.
[4]	张君萍. 新疆若干杏品种果实主要营养成分的测定与分析评价[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2006.
	ZHANG Junping. Determinations, analysis and evaluation of main nutritious composition of fruit in apricot varieties native to Xinjiang [D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2006.
[5]	陈毅琼. 杏不同品种果仁主要营养成分比较[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2015.
	CHEN Yiqiong. Comparison of main nutrient components in different apricot kernel varieties[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2015.
[6]	党美乐. ’瑞雪’、’瑞阳’及其亲本果实主要营养成分的比较分析[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019.
	DANG Meile. Comparative Analysis of Main Nutritional of Apple Varieties ‘Ruiyang’’Ruixue’ and Their Parents[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2019.
[7]	温静, 周兰英, 蒲光兰. 成都地区欧李品种果实品质分析与综合评价[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2020, 38(1):71-78.
	WEN Jing, ZHOU Lanying, PU Guanglan. Fruit Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Cerasus humilis Varieties in Chengdu Area[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020, 38(1):71-78.
[8]	胡琼, 王森, 张自强, 等. 不同批次南方鲜食枣枣吊果实品质对比分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(11):63-68.
	HU Qiong, WANG Sen, ZHANG Ziqiang, et al. Comparison in quality of southern fresh Zizyphus jujube in different batches[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(11):63-68.
[9]	张自强, 王森, 胡琼, 等. 南方鲜食枣正常果与裂果不同时期内含物含量的比较[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(1):37-42.
	ZHANG Ziqiang, WANG Sen, HU Qiong, et al. Cracked jujube and normal internal substance content comparative study in different periods of southern fresh-eat jujube[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry&Technology, 2018, 38(1):37-42.
[10]	邓世荣, 马春梅, 郑兴国. 新疆大果沙棘果实营养成分分析研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019,(22):177,179.
	DENG Shirong, MA Chunmei, ZHENG Xingguo. Analysis of nutritional components of Hippophae rhamnoides L.in Xinjiang [J]. Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 2019,(22):177,179.
[11]	阴芳冉, 李颖, 于宏伟, 等. 不同产地红树莓果实营养成分分析及综合评价[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2019, 42(4):44-48,62.
	YIN Fangran, LI Ying, YU Hongwei, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of nutritional components of red raspberry from different producing areas[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2019, 42(4):44-48,62.
[12]	张雨晴, 斯琴格日勒, 翟蓉, 等. 野生欧李和栽培欧李果实营养成分的比较分析[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2017, 38(8):104-108.
	ZHANG Yuqing, SI Qinggerile, ZHAI Rong, et al. Comparison of Nutrients in Wild and Cultivated Chinese Dwarf Cherry[J]. Food Research and Development, 2017, 38(8):104-108.
[13]	李勋兰, 洪林, 杨蕾, 等. 11个柑橘品种果实营养成分分析与品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(8):228-233.
	LI Xunlan, HONG Lin, YANG Lei, et al. Analysis of Nutritional Components and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruits in Eleven Varieties Cirtus[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(8):228-233.
[14]	王源秀, 何佳佳, 方丹, 等. 常见果蔬VC含量测定方法筛选研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2015, 21(18):20-22,77.
	WANG Yuanxiu, HE Jiajia, FANG Dan, et al. Exploration of the Methods by Quantitative Determination of VC in Common Fruits and Vegetables[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 21(18):20-22,77.
[15]	马玉杰, 陈伟, 王仕玉, 等. 云南省5种野生猕猴桃的果实种子形态和营养成分分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(12):193-196.
	MA Yujie, CHEN Wei, WANG Shiyu, et al. Analysis of Nutritional Components and Seed morphology of Fruit in Five Wild Actinidia of Yunnan[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2019, 47(12):193-196.
[16]	刘丽, 郭俊英, 陈海燕, 等. 5个果桑品种(系)的经济性状和果实营养成分的分析与评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2018, 36(3):151-155.
	LIU Li, GUO Junying, CHEN Haiyan, et al. Analysis and evaluation on nutritional composition and economic characteristics of five varieties (Lines)of mulberry[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2018, 36(3):151-155.
[17]	李瑞芳, 曾继娟, 王娅丽, 等. 十四种灌木植物果实营养成分分析与评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2019,(6):42-48.
	LI Ruifang, ZENG Jijuan, WANG Yali, et al. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Nutritional Components of 14 Kinds of Shurb Plant Fruits[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019,(6):42-48.
[18]	董胜君, 陈建华, 刘立新, 等. 不同种源西伯利亚杏表型性状多样性研究[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2018, 49(6):686-696.
	DONG Shengjun, CHEN Jianhua, LIU Lixin, et al. Research on Phenotypic Trait Diversity of Armeniaca sibirica from Different Provenances[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018, 49(6):686-696.
[19]	夏乐晗, 回经涛, 陈玉玲, 等. 不同品种(系)李果实外观和内在品质的比较[J]. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(1):125-132.
	XIA Lehan, HUI Jingtao, CHEN Yuling, et al. Comparison of appearance and internal qualities of different varieties(accessions)of Prunus salicina fruits[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2019, 37(1):125-132.
[20]	陈汉鑫, 李晓庆, 王林, 等. 山西野生沙棘结实性状和营养成分研究[J]. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(3):153-160.
	CHEN Hanxin, LI Xiaoqing, WANG Lin, et al. Fruiting characters and nutrient components of wild Hippophae rhamnoides in Shanxi[J]. Non-wood forest Research, 2019, 37(3):153-160.
[21]	宋永宏, 杨晓华, 李静江, 等. 不同杏品种果实营养成分分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(23):65-71.
	SONG Yonghong, YANG Xiaohua, LI Jingjiang, et al. Fruits of Apricot Cultivars:Nutritional Components Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(23):65-71.
[22]	Jayarajan S, Sharma R R, Sethi S, et al. Chemical and nutritional evaluation of major genotypes of nectarine (Prunus persica var nectarina) grown in Northwestern Himalayas[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, Food Sci Technol, 2019, 56(9):4266-4273. DOI URL
[23]	Mercedes Lozano M.Carmen Vidal-Aragón, M.Teresa Hernández, et al. Physicochemical and nutritional properties and volatile constituents of six Japanese plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) cultivars[J]. European Food Research & Technology, 2009,(228):403-410.
[24]	谢国芳, 王玉波, 孔德银, 等. 金刺梨果实发育期间营养成分及抗氧化能力变化[J]. 食品与机械, 2018, 34(9):73-76.
	XIE Guofang, WANG Yubo, KONG Deyin, et al. Analysis of changes in the nutrients and the antioxidant activities for Rosa sterilis D.Shi during development[J]. Food & Machinery, 2018, 34(9):73-76.
[25]	刘春艳, 谢岳, 李栋梅, 等. 基于主成分分析的酿酒葡萄果实评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(11):13-17.
	LIU Chunyan, XIE Yue, LI Dongmei, et al. Evaluation on Fruit Quality of Wine Grape Based on Principal Component Analysis[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(11):13-17.
[26]	薛晓芳, 赵爱玲, 王永康, 等. 不同枣品种果实品质分析及综合评价[J]. 中国果树, 2016,(3):11-15.
	XUE Xiaofang, ZHAO Ailing, WANG Yongkang, et al. Fruit Quality Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation in different Ziziphus jujuba Mill. Varieties[J]. China Fruit, 2016,(3):11-15.
[27]	王建超, 陈志峰, 刘鑫铭, 等. 不同品种余甘子果实营养成分分析与评价[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(1):108-117.
	WANG Jianchao, CHEN Zhifeng, LIU Xinming, et al. Nutritional analysis and evaluation of fruits of Phyllanthus emblica[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(1):108-117.

家系编号 Family No.	种质来源 Germplasm sources	家系编号 Family No.	种质来源 Germplasm sources
101号	宁夏彭阳县	164号	宁夏彭阳县
102号	宁夏彭阳县	165号	宁夏彭阳县
104号	宁夏彭阳县	166号	宁夏彭阳县
105号	宁夏彭阳县	167号	宁夏彭阳县
107号	宁夏彭阳县	170号	宁夏彭阳县
108号	宁夏彭阳县	194号	宁夏彭阳县
111号	宁夏彭阳县	196号	宁夏彭阳县
112号	宁夏彭阳县	201号	宁夏彭阳县
118号	宁夏彭阳县	204号	宁夏海原县
119号	宁夏彭阳县	205号	宁夏海原县
120号	宁夏彭阳县	209号	宁夏海原县
141号	宁夏彭阳县	210号	宁夏海原县
142号	宁夏彭阳县	211号	宁夏海原县
143号	宁夏彭阳县	234号	宁夏海原县
144号	宁夏彭阳县	243号	甘肃会宁县
152号	宁夏彭阳县	252号	甘肃镇原县
161号	宁夏彭阳县	253号	甘肃镇原县
162号	宁夏彭阳县	258号	甘肃镇原县
163号	宁夏彭阳县	260号	甘肃会宁县

家系编号 Family No.	种质来源 Germplasm sources	家系编号 Family No.	种质来源 Germplasm sources
101号	宁夏彭阳县	164号	宁夏彭阳县
102号	宁夏彭阳县	165号	宁夏彭阳县
104号	宁夏彭阳县	166号	宁夏彭阳县
105号	宁夏彭阳县	167号	宁夏彭阳县
107号	宁夏彭阳县	170号	宁夏彭阳县
108号	宁夏彭阳县	194号	宁夏彭阳县
111号	宁夏彭阳县	196号	宁夏彭阳县
112号	宁夏彭阳县	201号	宁夏彭阳县
118号	宁夏彭阳县	204号	宁夏海原县
119号	宁夏彭阳县	205号	宁夏海原县
120号	宁夏彭阳县	209号	宁夏海原县
141号	宁夏彭阳县	210号	宁夏海原县
142号	宁夏彭阳县	211号	宁夏海原县
143号	宁夏彭阳县	234号	宁夏海原县
144号	宁夏彭阳县	243号	甘肃会宁县
152号	宁夏彭阳县	252号	甘肃镇原县
161号	宁夏彭阳县	253号	甘肃镇原县
162号	宁夏彭阳县	258号	甘肃镇原县
163号	宁夏彭阳县	260号	甘肃会宁县

性状 Traits	最小值 MIN	最大值 MAX	极差 Range	平均数 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV	多样性指数 DI
果实纵径 Fruit vertical diameter (cm)	1.72	3.26	1.54	2.22	0.36	0.16	1.90
果实横径 Fruit horizontal diameter (cm)	1.61	3.13	1.52	2.18	0.36	0.16	1.91
果实侧径 Fruit side diameter (cm)	1.21	2.69	1.48	1.82	0.37	0.20	1.94
果形指数 Fruit shape index (%)	0.92	1.25	0.33	1.02	0.07	0.07	1.90
单果质量 Single fruit mass (g)	5.14	13.11	7.97	8.28	1.67	0.20	1.66
产果量 Fruit yield (g)	50.53	1 152.69	1 102.16	323.79	252.39	0.78	1.75
总糖含量 Total sugar content (%)	5.26	13.66	8.40	8.79	1.72	0.20	1.96
还原糖含量 Reducing sugar content (%)	4.32	11.75	7.43	7.02	1.44	0.21	1.91
总酸含量 Total acid content (%)	0.75	1.27	0.52	0.92	0.12	0.13	1.79
可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solids content (%)	8.34	12.82	4.48	10.37	1.23	0.12	1.89
VC含量 VC content (mg/g)	8.50	13.76	5.26	11.13	1.31	0.12	2.02
糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio	5.18	16.43	11.25	9.88	2.56	0.26	1.94

性状 Traits	最小值 MIN	最大值 MAX	极差 Range	平均数 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV	多样性指数 DI
果实纵径 Fruit vertical diameter (cm)	1.72	3.26	1.54	2.22	0.36	0.16	1.90
果实横径 Fruit horizontal diameter (cm)	1.61	3.13	1.52	2.18	0.36	0.16	1.91
果实侧径 Fruit side diameter (cm)	1.21	2.69	1.48	1.82	0.37	0.20	1.94
果形指数 Fruit shape index (%)	0.92	1.25	0.33	1.02	0.07	0.07	1.90
单果质量 Single fruit mass (g)	5.14	13.11	7.97	8.28	1.67	0.20	1.66
产果量 Fruit yield (g)	50.53	1 152.69	1 102.16	323.79	252.39	0.78	1.75
总糖含量 Total sugar content (%)	5.26	13.66	8.40	8.79	1.72	0.20	1.96
还原糖含量 Reducing sugar content (%)	4.32	11.75	7.43	7.02	1.44	0.21	1.91
总酸含量 Total acid content (%)	0.75	1.27	0.52	0.92	0.12	0.13	1.79
可溶性固形物含量 Soluble solids content (%)	8.34	12.82	4.48	10.37	1.23	0.12	1.89
VC含量 VC content (mg/g)	8.50	13.76	5.26	11.13	1.31	0.12	2.02
糖酸比 Sugar-acid ratio	5.18	16.43	11.25	9.88	2.56	0.26	1.94

家系 Family	果实纵经 Fruit vertical diameter(cm)	果实横径 Fruit horizontal diameter(cm)	果实侧径 Fruit side diameter(cm)	果形指数 Fruit shape index (%)	单果质量 Single fruit mass (g)	产果量 Fruit yield (g)
101	2.56±0.18^bcdefg	2.40±0.23^bcdefg	1.99±0.24^bcde	1.07±0.05^bcdefg	8.22±0.21^defghijk	461.08±32.7^fg
102	3.26±0.40^a	3.13±0.45^a	2.69±0.68^a	1.04±0.03^bcdefg	11.31±0.06^b	234.51±31.78^ijkl
104	2.15±0.29^defghijkl	2.13±0.39^cdefghijk	1.84±0.57^bcdefg	1.02±0.07^cdefg	8.49±0.26^cdefghi	255.57±21.13^ij
105	1.87±0.37^ijkl	1.83±0.33^hijk	1.50±0.25^efgh	1.03±0.11^bcdefg	7.36±0.28^ghijkl	162.94±17.47^klmn
107	1.89±0.34^ijkl	1.90±0.33^fghijk	1.61±0.32^defgh	1.00±0.13^defg	7.25±0.10^hijkl	140.37±7.96^lmnop
108	2.03±0.17^efghijkl	1.84±0.06^hijk	1.30±0.12^gh	1.10±0.11^bcde	6.74±0.48^lm	145.65±15.71^lmno
111	1.79±0.24^kl	1.94±0.45^efghijk	1.68±0.29^cdefg	0.94±0.13^fg	5.14±0.88ⁿ	538.61±21.45^def
112	1.85±0.14^kl	1.92±0.09^fghijk	1.64±0.06^defg	0.96±0.03^efg	7.21±0.02^hijkl	589.26±126.74^de
118	2.44±0.15^cdefghij	2.56±0.28^bcd	2.25±0.10^abc	0.95±0.05^efg	9.10±0.19^cdef	821.47±71.94^b
119	3.08±0.39^ab	3.10±0.26^a	2.60±0.49^a	0.99±0.06^efg	12.78±0.78^a	614.51±71.53^d
120	2.45±0.16^cdefghi	2.33±0.06^bcdefgh	2.00±0.11^bcde	1.05±0.04^bcdefg	8.42±0.39^cdefghij	253.08±14.69^ijk
141	1.80±0.07^kl	1.69±0.05^ijk	1.38±0.15^fgh	1.07±0.07^bcdefg	6.95±0.05^klm	794.07±53.23^bc
142	1.87±0.12^jkl	1.62±0.08^k	1.21±0.04^h	1.16±0.05^abc	7.75±0.24^fghijkl	724.23±101.81^c
143	2.11±0.08^efghijl	1.83±0.07^hijk	1.35±0.14^gh	1.15±0.04^abcd	8.27±0.30^defghijk	320.73±98.49^hi
144	2.77±0.36^abc	2.22±0.41^cdefghi	2.05±0.41^bcde	1.25±0.07^a	9.75±0.51^c	261.87±35.86ⁱ
152	2.47±0.19^cdefgh	2.56±0.11^bcd	2.19±0.11^abcd	0.97±0.05^efg	9.25±0.69^cde	228.48±37.48^ijklm
161	2.22±0.73^cdefghijkl	2.14±0.47^cdefghijk	1.79±0.53^bcdefg	1.03±0.11^bcdefg	11.23±0.98^b	267.23±22.68ⁱ
162	2.11±0.13^efghijkl	2.09±0.19^cdefghijk	1.68±0.19^cdefg	1.02±0.08^cdefg	8.29±0.37^defghijk	69.97±4.65^nop
家系 Family	果实纵经 Fruit vertical diameter(cm)	果实横径 Fruit horizontal diameter(cm)	果实侧径 Fruit side diameter(cm)	果形指数 Fruit shape index (%)	单果质量 Single fruit mass (g)	产果量 Fruit yield (g)
163	2.03±0.38^efghijkl	2.04±0.31^defghijk	1.67±0.24^defg	0.99±0.06^efg	8.29±0.58^defghijk	153.84±15.81^lmno
164	1.95±0.02^hijkl	1.93±0.05^fghijk	1.36±0.05^gh	1.01±0.02^cdefg	8.72±0.22^cdefg	155.93±36.82^lmno
165	2.57±0.12^bcdef	2.49±0.37^bcde	1.95±0.33^bcdef	1.06±0.19^bcdefg	8.91±0.96^cdef	154.11±38.56^lmno
166	2.60±0.1^3bcde	2.45±0.14^bcdef	2.34±0.11^ab	1.06±0.07^bcdefg	8.56±0.45^cdefgh	624.2±25.65^d
167	1.77±0.11^kl	1.66±0.06^jk	1.31±0.13^gh	1.06±0.03^bcdefg	7.15±1.38^ijklm	506.4±136.41^efg
170	2.01±0.07^fghijkl	2.16±0.28^cdefghijk	1.69±0.07^cdefg	0.94±0.09^fg	9.20±0.39^cde	165.76±6.57^jklmn
194	2.71±0.33^bcd	2.81±0.16^ab	2.30±0.27^ab	0.96±0.09^efg	13.11±0.59^a	273.35±27.73ⁱ
196	1.73±0.10^l	1.84±0.22^hijk	1.40±0.09^fgh	0.94±0.08^fg	8.01±0.93^efghijkl	366.42±78.05^h
201	2.48±0.06^cdefgh	2.60±0.29^bc	2.28±0.36^ab	0.96±0.09^efg	7.41±0.27^ghijkl	1152.69±33.54^a
204	1.99±0.09^ghijkl	2.01±0.16^efghijk	1.62±0.03^defg	0.99±0.06^efg	7.16±0.71^ijklm	50.53±7.63^p
205	2.27±0.36^cdefghijk	2.27±0.31^cdefgh	2.00±0.37^bcde	1.00±0.03^defg	7.14±1.17^ijklm	153.3±23.76^lmno
209	2.03±0.41^efghijkl	1.86±0.28^ghijk	1.77±0.29^bcdefg	1.09±0.05^bcdef	6.64±0.56^lm	451.63±16.2^g
210	2.19±0.33^defghijkl	2.31±0.28^bcdefgh	2.29±0.14^ab	0.95±0.03^fg	7.94±0.64^efghijkl	130.03±24.8^nop
211	2.33±0.27^cdefghijk	2.32±0.27^bcdefgh	2.03±0.09^bcde	1.00±0.01^defg	8.42±1.89^cdefghij	134.3±28.92^mnop
234	2.60±0.49^bcde	2.20±0.34^cdefghij	2.03±0.44^bcde	1.17±0.05^ab	5.87±0.89^mn	231.14±17.35^ijkl
243	1.98±0.07^hijkl	1.96±0.16^efghijk	1.48±0.12^efgh	1.02±0.06^cdefg	7.04±0.78^jklm	118.08±25.07^nop
252	2.17±0.50^defghijkl	2.05±0.50^defghijk	1.87±0.38^bcdefg	1.06±0.11^bcdefg	6.84±0.59^lm	279.64±29.54ⁱ
253	2.03±0.43^efghijkl	2.18±0.27^cdefghij	1.63±0.36^defg	0.92±0.09^g	7.74±1.08^fghijkl	97.88±1.34^nop
258	2.22±0.25^cdefghijkl	2.27±0.27^cdefgh	1.86±0.31^bcdefg	0.98±0.03^efg	9.46±0.41^cd	156.37±20.26^lmno
260	2.15±0.14^defghijkl	2.16±0.19^cdefghijk	1.69±0.26^cdefg	1.00±0.02^defg	7.36±0.46^ghijkl	64.98±4.14^op