新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (S1): 19-27.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.S1.003
张帅1,2(), 高国文1,2, 吴莉莉3, 赵海燕4, 王小武2, 付开赟2, 贾尊尊2, 吐尔逊·阿合买提2, 丁新华2(
), 李克梅1(
), 郭文超2
收稿日期:
2024-07-05
出版日期:
2024-10-10
发布日期:
2024-11-15
通信作者:
丁新华(1984-),男,河南人,研究员,硕士生导师,研究方向为玉米病虫害综合防治,(E-mail)dingxinhua1984@163.com;作者简介:
张帅(2000-),男,河北唐山人,硕士研究生,研究方向为玉米病害防治,(E-mail)13230830827@163.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Shuai1,2(), GAO Guowen1,2, WU Lili3, ZHAO Haiyan4, WANG Xiaowu2, FU Kaiyun2, JIA Zunzun2, Tuerxun Ahemaiti2, DING Xinhua2(
), LI Kemei1(
), GUO Wenchao2
Received:
2024-07-05
Published:
2024-10-10
Online:
2024-11-15
Correspondence author:
DING Xinhua (1984-), male, from Ili, Xinjiang, is a researcher with a research focus on comprehensive prevention and control of corn diseases and pests,(E-mail)dingxinhua1984@163.com; LI Kemei (1972-), female,from Rugao, Jiangsu, is a professor and master's supervisor with a research focus on forage diseases and their prevention and control,(E-mail)likemei@xjau.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】测定增效剂、微肥及茎叶喷雾与种衣剂包衣协同施用对玉米茎腐病防效的实际提升效果,为新疆玉米茎腐病高效防治提供依据。【方法】以种子包衣用药为基础,采用田间小区防治试验,分别测定其与2种增效剂、2种微肥及5种茎叶杀菌剂协同施用对玉米茎腐病的田间防效。【结果】使用18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL、5 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL对每100 kg种子包衣时,添加激健4 000倍液/大消3 000倍液可使防效较未添加增效剂相比,分别提高5.49%~5.84%和5.03%~6.54%;使用种衣剂+农用硫酸锌5 mL/150 mL或可溶性硅5 mL/150 mL底肥处理后的防效较种衣剂单独使用时增加2.05%~4.86%或2.60%~2.96%;使用种衣剂+茎叶喷雾联合处理后的防效较种衣剂单独使用亦均有一定程度的提高,分别增加1.06%~6.53%。【结论】在种衣剂拌种防治的基础上,结合添加激健4 000倍液/大消3 000倍液,或使用硫酸锌作为底肥,或使用10%苯醚甲环唑2 000倍液进行茎叶喷雾处理均可作为新疆玉米镰刀茎腐病田间防效提升的配套方法。
中图分类号:
张帅, 高国文, 吴莉莉, 赵海燕, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 丁新华, 李克梅, 郭文超. 增效剂及微肥与种衣剂协同施用评价玉米茎腐病的防效[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 19-27.
ZHANG Shuai, GAO Guowen, WU Lili, ZHAO Haiyan, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, DING Xinhua, LI Kemei, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of the synergistic application of seed coating agents, synergists, and micro fertilizers for the prevention and control of corn stem rot disease[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 19-27.
编号 Number | 减药水平 Drug reduction level (%) | 种衣剂及使用量 Seed coating agent and usage amount | 增效剂 Synergist |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
2 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
3 | 无 | ||
4 | 0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
5 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
6 | 无 | ||
7 | -15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
8 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
9 | 无 | ||
10 | -15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
11 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
12 | 无 | ||
13(CK) | 清水对照 | - |
表1 增效剂与种衣剂协同施用用量
Tab.1 Experimental treatment group for synergistic application of synergists and seed coating agents
编号 Number | 减药水平 Drug reduction level (%) | 种衣剂及使用量 Seed coating agent and usage amount | 增效剂 Synergist |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
2 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
3 | 无 | ||
4 | 0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
5 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
6 | 无 | ||
7 | -15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
8 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
9 | 无 | ||
10 | -15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子 | 激健4 000倍液 |
11 | 大消3 000倍液 | ||
12 | 无 | ||
13(CK) | 清水对照 | - |
编号 Number | 种衣剂及使用量 Seed coating agent and usage amount | 微肥及使用量 Microfertilizer and usage amount |
---|---|---|
1 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子 | 农用硫酸锌5 mL/150 mL |
2 | 可溶性硅5 mL/150 mL | |
3 | 无 | |
4 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子 | 农用硫酸锌5 mL/150 mL |
5 | 可溶性硅5 mL/150 mL | |
6 | 无 | |
7(CK) | 清水对照 | - |
表2 微肥与种衣剂协同施用用量
Tab.2 Experimental treatment group for synergistic application of micro fertilizers and seed coating agents
编号 Number | 种衣剂及使用量 Seed coating agent and usage amount | 微肥及使用量 Microfertilizer and usage amount |
---|---|---|
1 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子 | 农用硫酸锌5 mL/150 mL |
2 | 可溶性硅5 mL/150 mL | |
3 | 无 | |
4 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子 | 农用硫酸锌5 mL/150 mL |
5 | 可溶性硅5 mL/150 mL | |
6 | 无 | |
7(CK) | 清水对照 | - |
编号 Number | 种衣剂及 使用量 Seed coating agent and usage amount | 茎叶喷雾 Stem and leaf spray | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 35 g/L咯菌· 精甲霜FS 150 mL/ 100 kg种子 | 250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 3 000倍液 | |
2 | 250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 500倍液 | ||
3 | 250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 000倍液 | ||
4 | 75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 10 g/667m2 | ||
5 | 75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 15 g/667m2 | ||
6 | 75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 20 g/667m2 | ||
7 | 30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 3 000倍液 | ||
8 | 30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 500倍液 | ||
9 | 30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 000倍液 | ||
10 | 12.5%四氟醚唑EW 20 mL/667m2 | ||
11 | 12.5%四氟醚唑EW 25 mL/667m2 | ||
12 | 12.5%四氟醚唑EW 30 mL/667m2 | ||
13 | 500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 1 000倍液 | ||
14 | 500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 900倍液 | ||
15 | 500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 800倍液 | ||
16(CK) | 清水对照 |
表3 茎叶喷雾与种衣剂包衣协同施用用量
Tab.3 Experimental treatment group of stem leaf spray and seed coating agent coating
编号 Number | 种衣剂及 使用量 Seed coating agent and usage amount | 茎叶喷雾 Stem and leaf spray | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 35 g/L咯菌· 精甲霜FS 150 mL/ 100 kg种子 | 250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 3 000倍液 | |
2 | 250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 500倍液 | ||
3 | 250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 000倍液 | ||
4 | 75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 10 g/667m2 | ||
5 | 75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 15 g/667m2 | ||
6 | 75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 20 g/667m2 | ||
7 | 30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 3 000倍液 | ||
8 | 30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 500倍液 | ||
9 | 30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 000倍液 | ||
10 | 12.5%四氟醚唑EW 20 mL/667m2 | ||
11 | 12.5%四氟醚唑EW 25 mL/667m2 | ||
12 | 12.5%四氟醚唑EW 30 mL/667m2 | ||
13 | 500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 1 000倍液 | ||
14 | 500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 900倍液 | ||
15 | 500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 800倍液 | ||
16(CK) | 清水对照 |
序号 Number | 减药水平 Drug reduction level(%) | 施药处理 Pesticide treatment | 防效 Control effect (%) |
---|---|---|---|
18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 未减药增效处理 The treatment of 18% thiacloprid·chlorpromazine FS without drug reduction or efficacy enhancement | 0 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 80.56±4.01a |
0 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 80.21±2.57a | |
0 | 18噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子+无 | 74.72±3.40b | |
3.5%咯菌腈·精甲霜灵FS 未减药增效处理 3.5% chloramphenicol · methylprednisolone FS without reducing drug dosage and increasing efficacy | 0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 81.65±0.92a |
0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 80.14±1.89a | |
0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+无 | 75.11±3.38b | |
18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 减药15%后的增效处理 18% Thiamethasone · Chloramphenicol · Metformin FS by 15% | -15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 74.94±2.17a |
-15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 75.53±5.01a | |
-15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子+无 | 59.11±5.75b | |
3.5%咯菌腈·精甲霜灵FS 减药15%后的增效处理 3.5% Chloramphenicol · Metformin FS by 15% | -15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 75.64±5.37a |
-15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 75.17±3.02a | |
-15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子+无 | 65.62±3.84b |
表4 增效剂与种衣剂协同施用下玉米茎腐病田间防效的变化
Tab.4 Changes of field control effect of synergistic application of synergists and seed coating agents on corn stem rot disease
序号 Number | 减药水平 Drug reduction level(%) | 施药处理 Pesticide treatment | 防效 Control effect (%) |
---|---|---|---|
18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 未减药增效处理 The treatment of 18% thiacloprid·chlorpromazine FS without drug reduction or efficacy enhancement | 0 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 80.56±4.01a |
0 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 80.21±2.57a | |
0 | 18噻灵·咯·精甲FS 200 mL/100 kg种子+无 | 74.72±3.40b | |
3.5%咯菌腈·精甲霜灵FS 未减药增效处理 3.5% chloramphenicol · methylprednisolone FS without reducing drug dosage and increasing efficacy | 0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 81.65±0.92a |
0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 80.14±1.89a | |
0 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+无 | 75.11±3.38b | |
18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 减药15%后的增效处理 18% Thiamethasone · Chloramphenicol · Metformin FS by 15% | -15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 74.94±2.17a |
-15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 75.53±5.01a | |
-15 | 18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS 170 mL/100 kg种子+无 | 59.11±5.75b | |
3.5%咯菌腈·精甲霜灵FS 减药15%后的增效处理 3.5% Chloramphenicol · Metformin FS by 15% | -15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子+激健4 000倍液 | 75.64±5.37a |
-15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子+大消3 000倍液 | 75.17±3.02a | |
-15 | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 128mL/100 kg种子+无 | 65.62±3.84b |
图1 微肥与种衣剂协同施用下玉米茎腐病田间防效的变化 注:A为18%噻灵·咯·精甲FS与微肥协同增效处理;B为3.5%咯菌腈·精甲霜灵FS与微肥协同增效处理
Fig.1 Changes of field control effect of synergistic application of micro fertilizer and seed coating agent on corn stem rot disease Notes: A represents the synergistic effect of 18% thiacloprid · chlorpromazine FS and micronutrient fertilizer treatment; B is treated with a synergistic effect of 3.5% chloramphenicol · methylprednisolone FS and micronutrient fertilizer
编号 Number | 施药处理 Pesticide treatment | 防效 Control effect(%) |
---|---|---|
250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 与种衣剂协同增效处理 250 g/L benzofeniconazole EC and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+清水对照 | 75.11±2.69b |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 3 000倍液 | 79.46±1.85b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 500倍液 | 79.14±1.29b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 000倍液 | 81.64±2.99a | |
75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG与 种衣剂协同增效处理 75% oxime bacteria · tebuconazole WG and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 10 g/667m2 | 76.75±3.38b |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 15 g/667m2 | 76.51±1.18b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 20 g/667m2 | 80.48±1.07a | |
30%吡唑醚菌酯SC与 种衣剂协同增效处理 30% pyrazole ether fungicide SC and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 3 000倍液 | 77.26±1.21b |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 500倍液 | 79.72±2.92b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 000倍液 | 81.11±0.94a | |
12.5%四氟醚唑EW与 种衣剂协同增效处理 12.5% tetrafluoroetherazole EW and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+12.5%四氟醚唑EW 20 mL/667m2 | 76.49±2.01a |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+12.5%四氟醚唑EW 25 mL/667m2 | 77.78±1.06a | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+12.5%四氟醚唑EW 30 mL/667m2 | 80.90±2.77a | |
500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC与 种衣剂协同增效处理 500 g/L methylthiophanate SC and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 1000倍液 | 76.17±1.21a |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 900倍液 | 79.00±2.45a | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 800倍液 | 80.77±1.61a |
表5 茎叶喷雾与种衣剂协同施用下玉米茎腐病田间防效的变化
Tab.5 Changes of field control effect of stem leaf spray and seed coating agent on corn stem rot
编号 Number | 施药处理 Pesticide treatment | 防效 Control effect(%) |
---|---|---|
250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 与种衣剂协同增效处理 250 g/L benzofeniconazole EC and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+清水对照 | 75.11±2.69b |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 3 000倍液 | 79.46±1.85b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 500倍液 | 79.14±1.29b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+250 g/L苯醚甲环唑EC 2 000倍液 | 81.64±2.99a | |
75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG与 种衣剂协同增效处理 75% oxime bacteria · tebuconazole WG and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 10 g/667m2 | 76.75±3.38b |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 15 g/667m2 | 76.51±1.18b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+75%肟菌·戊唑醇WG 20 g/667m2 | 80.48±1.07a | |
30%吡唑醚菌酯SC与 种衣剂协同增效处理 30% pyrazole ether fungicide SC and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 3 000倍液 | 77.26±1.21b |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 500倍液 | 79.72±2.92b | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+30%吡唑醚菌酯SC 2 000倍液 | 81.11±0.94a | |
12.5%四氟醚唑EW与 种衣剂协同增效处理 12.5% tetrafluoroetherazole EW and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+12.5%四氟醚唑EW 20 mL/667m2 | 76.49±2.01a |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+12.5%四氟醚唑EW 25 mL/667m2 | 77.78±1.06a | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+12.5%四氟醚唑EW 30 mL/667m2 | 80.90±2.77a | |
500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC与 种衣剂协同增效处理 500 g/L methylthiophanate SC and seed coating agent | 35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 1000倍液 | 76.17±1.21a |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 900倍液 | 79.00±2.45a | |
35 g/L咯菌·精甲霜FS 150 mL/100 kg种子+500 g/L甲基硫菌灵SC 800倍液 | 80.77±1.61a |
[1] |
陆晏天, 桑志勤, 徐灿, 等. 历年新疆和宁夏审定玉米品种主要性状的演化及品种审定现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6):1379-1388.
DOI |
LU Yantian, SANG Zhiqin, XU Can, et al. Analysis of the evolution of the main traits of maize varieties approved in Xinjiang and Ningxia over the years and the current status of variety approval[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60 (6) : 1379-1388.
DOI |
|
[2] | 巩雪花, 王小武, 丁新华, 等. 新疆绿洲灌溉区玉米田杂草群落演替及其驱动因素分析[J]. 植物保护, 2024. |
GONG Xuehua, WANG Xiaowu, DING Xinhua, et al. Analysis of weed community succession and its driving factors in corn field in oasis irrigation area of Xinjiang[J]. Plant protection, 2024. | |
[3] | 丁新华, 王小武, 付开赟, 等. 新疆亚洲玉米螟暴发成灾驱动机制分析及其治理对策[J]. 植物保护, 2024, 50(3):24-36. |
DING Xinhua, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, et al.. Analysis of the driving mechanism of Ostrinia furnacalis outbreak in Xinjiang and its control countermeasures[J]. Plant Protection, 2024, 50 (3) : 24-36. | |
[4] |
宋子硕, 杨杰, 丁新华, 等. 荒漠绿洲生态区玉米茎腐病发生分布与危害[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4):950-956.
DOI |
SONG Zishuo, YANG Jie, DING Xinhua, et al. The distribution and harm of corn stem rot in desert oasis ecological areas[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 2022, 59 (4): 950-956. | |
[5] | 丁新华, 宋子硕, 蒋旭东, 等. 新疆绿洲灌溉玉米产区玉米茎腐病优势病原菌分离与鉴定[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(3):733-743. |
DING Xinhua, SON Zishuo, JIANG Xudong, et al. Isolation and Identification of Dominant Pathogens of Corn Stem Rot in Oasis Irrigation Maize Production Areas in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Plant Protection, 2023, 50 (3): 733-743. | |
[6] | 郭宁, 王彦军, 陈丹, 等. 含吡唑醚菌酯成分种子处理悬浮剂的研制及对玉米茎腐病的防效评价[J]. 农药, 2024, 63(3):181-184. |
GUO Ning, WANG Yanjun, CHEN Dan, et al. Preparation of pyraclostrobin-containing seed treatment suspension concentrate and evaluation of its control effect on corn stalk rot[J]. Pesticides, 2024, 63 (3) : 181-184. | |
[7] | 马新智, 张艳丽, 邵帅, 等. 12种种衣剂对玉米成株期镰孢菌茎腐病的田间防治效果评价[J/OL]. 菌物研究,1-8[2024-07-15]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1352.S.20230913.1847.004.html. |
MA Xinzhi, ZHANG Yanli, SHAO Shuai, et al. Evaluation of the Field Control Effect of Various Coating Agents on Fusarium Stem Rot in Maize during the Adult Stage[J/OL]. Microbial Research, 2023:1-8. | |
[8] | 董智, 王丽娟, 刘可杰, 等. 种衣剂和微肥对玉米茎腐病发生为害的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(3):151-155. |
DONG Zhi, WANG Lijuan, LIU Kejie, et al. The effects of seeds coating agents and micro fertilizers on the occurrence of corn stem rot disease[J]. Corn Science, 2022, 30 (3): 151-155. | |
[9] | 张金影, 黄蓉, 王美美, 等. 四种杀菌剂防治玉米茎腐病的田间药效及产量效应研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(8):66-68,72. |
ZHANG Jinying, HUANG Rong, WANG Meimei, et al. Field efficacy and yield effects of four fungicides against corn stem rot[J]. Hubei Agricultural Science, 2022, 61 (8): 66-68,72. | |
[10] |
郭宁, 孙华, 马红霞, 等. 玉米腐霉茎腐病生防木霉菌株的筛选、鉴定及防治效果分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(22):4453-4466.
DOI |
GUO Ning, SUN Hua, MA Hongxia, et al. Screening, identification and control effect analysis of biocontrol Trichoderma strains against corn stalk rot[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56 (22) : 4453-4466.
DOI |
|
[11] | 刘冰, 周红霞, 赵美茜, 等. 玉米茎腐病生防菌株的筛选及抑菌作用研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(6):164-168. |
LIU Bing, ZHOU Hongxia, ZHAO Meixi, et al. Screening of biocontrol strains against corn stalk rot and their antibacterial effects[J]. Maize Science, 2021, 29 (6) : 164-168. | |
[12] | 刘彦策. 抗玉米茎腐病符合菌剂CAP的创制与应用效果[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2020. |
LIU Yance. Resistance to corn stalk rot is in line with the creation and application effect of bacterial agent CAP[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[13] | 杨克泽, 汪亮芳, 马金慧, 等. 硅与杀菌剂配施对玉米叶片代谢、产量及茎腐病防治效果的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2024, 32(1):168-175. |
YANG Keze, WANG Liangfang, MA Jinhui, et al. Effects of combined application of silicon and fungicides on leaf metabolism, yield and stem rot control effect of maize[J]. Maize Science, 2024, 32 (1) : 168-175. | |
[14] | 郭宁, 孙华, 马红霞, 等. 木霉微生物菌肥的制备及对玉米茎腐病的应用评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(9):121-124,186. |
GUO Ning, SUN Hua, MA Hongxia, et al. Preparation of Trichoderma microbial fertilizer and its application evaluation on corn stalk rot[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science, 2024, 52 (9) : 121-124,186. | |
[15] | 沙月霞, 沈瑞清. 微生物菌剂浸种联合生物菌肥防控玉米茎腐病的应用效果[J]. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(3):156-161. |
SHA Yuexia, SHEN Ruiqing. The application effect of microbial agent soaking combined with biological fertilizer on preventing and controlling corn stem rot disease[J]. Corn Science, 2022, 30 (3): 156-161. | |
[16] | 许蓉, 姚佳欢, 邱新月, 等. 木霉菌对玉米茎腐病的田间防治效果及玉米产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2024, 52(4):133-141. |
XU Rong, YAO Jiahuan, Qiu Xinyue, et al. Effects of Trichoderma spp.on field control of maize stalk rot and maize yield [J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52 (4) : 133-141. | |
[17] | 樊伟民. 玉米茎腐病的研究现状及防治策略[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022,(3):76-79,80. |
FAN Weimin. Research status and control strategies of corn stalk rot[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, (3) : 76-79,80. | |
[18] | 高国文, 王小武, 付开赟, 等. 种衣剂对新疆地区玉米茎腐病优势致病菌拟轮枝镰孢菌的室内毒力测定与田间防效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024. |
GAO Guowen, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, et al. Indoor toxicity determination and field control effect evaluation of seed coating agent on Fusarium verticillioides, the dominant pathogen of corn stalk rot in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 2024. | |
[19] | 柳茂. 钾肥对玉米茎腐病发生及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程技术, 2023, 43 (10): 34-35. |
LIU Mao. The effect of potassium fertilizer on the occurrence and yield of corn stem rot disease[J]. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2023, 43 (10): 34-35. | |
[20] |
刘树森, 马红霞, 郭宁. 黄淮海夏玉米主产区茎腐病主要病原菌剂优势种分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(2):262-272.
DOI |
LIUShusen, MA Hongxia, GUO ning, et al. Analysis of main pathogens and dominant species of maize stalk rot in the main summer maize producing areas of Huang-Huai-Hai[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2):262-272. | |
[21] | 李颖, 王耀生, 杨宁. 滴灌施药对覆膜玉米茎腐病防效及产量影响[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(1):282-286. |
LI Ying, WANG Yaosheng, YANG ning, et al. Effect on stalk rot control and yield of mulching film maize by drip irrigation system with fungicides[J]. Plant Protection, 2021, 47(1):282-286. | |
[22] |
刘春来. 中国玉米茎腐病研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(30):130-134.
DOI |
LIU Chunlai. Research process of maize stalk rot in china[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(30):130-134. | |
[23] | 崔智博, 陶烨, 王丽娟, 等. 玉米种质对镰孢菌茎腐病的表型抗性鉴定[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2019,(1):75-77. |
CUI Zhibo, TAO Ye, WANG Lijuan, et al. Phenotypic resistance identification of maize germplasm to Fusarium stem rot disease[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2019,(1):75-77. | |
[24] | 郭成, 王宝宝, 杨洋, 等. 玉米茎腐病研究进展[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(5):1118-1128. |
GUO Cheng, WANG Baobao, YANG Yang, et al. Advances in studies of maize stalk rot[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(5):1118-1128. | |
[25] | 石明亮, 黄小兰, 陆虎华, 等. 玉米抗茎腐病研究进展及其鉴定与育种方法探讨[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(4):1-4. |
SHI Mingliang, HUANG Xiaolan, LU Huhua, et al. Research progress and identification of corn resistance to stem rot and exploration of breeding methods[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(4):1-4. | |
[26] | 沈广爽, 于淑晶, 郭宁, 等. 玉米茎基腐病防治研究进展[J]. 农药, 2021, 60(4):235-238. |
SHEN Guangshuang, YU Shujing, GUO Ning, et al. Research progress on control of maize stalk rot[J]. Agrochemicals, 2021, 60(4):235-238. | |
[27] | 魏毅. 农药增效剂杰效利对杀菌剂防治马铃薯晚疫病的影响[J]. 东方园艺, 2023, 11(6):415-420. |
WEI Yi. Effect of pesticide synergist jiexiaoli on control of potato late blight by Fungicide[J]. Southeast Horticulture, 2023, 11(6):415-420. | |
[28] | 李楠, 黄淑敏, 李洪来, 等. 4种增效剂与化学农药混用对花生叶斑病防治效果的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2023, 48(6):86-89. |
LI Nan, HUANG Shumin, LI Honglai, et al. The effect of four synergists on the control of peanut leaf spot disease with Fungicides[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 48(6):86-89. | |
[29] | 依明江·图尔迪, 郭佩佩, 马少军, 等. 防治葡萄白粉病新型杀菌剂的筛选及增效剂的增效作用[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(3):276-287. |
Yimingjiang Tuerdi, GUO Peipei, MA Shaojun, et al. Screening of novel fungicides for controlling powdery mildew of grapes and synergistic effects of synergists[J]. Plant Protection, 2021, 47(3):276-287. |
[1] | 袁梓涵, 赵雯慧, 王小武, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 丁新华, 张帅, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 郭文超. 玉米茎腐病生防菌的筛选及生防效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 35-48. |
[2] | 付开赟, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 冯宏祖, 郭文超. 10 种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172. |
[3] | 宋子硕, 杨杰, 丁新华, 付开赟, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 何江, 郭文超. 荒漠绿洲生态区玉米茎腐病发生分布与危害[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 950-956. |
[4] | 丁新华, 宋子硕, 杨杰, 高国文, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 郭文超. 玉米种质对腐霉茎腐病和镰孢茎腐病抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 3047-3056. |
[5] | 李娜, 刘冰, 陆宴辉. 氟啶虫胺腈对新疆棉田棉蚜及其天敌种群的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2062-2068. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||