

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (5): 1159-1169.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.05.013
袁玉婷1(
), 刘德粉1, 孙万金3, 贾文昭4, 马生军1(
), 康露2(
)
收稿日期:2024-10-14
出版日期:2025-05-20
发布日期:2025-07-09
通信作者:
马生军(1977-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,副教授,博士,研究方向为中药质量与安全评价、药食两用功能性食品开发,(E-mail)wlmqmsj@sina.com;作者简介:袁玉婷(1999-),女,新疆喀什人,硕士研究生,研究方向为食品加工与安全,(E-mail)1486361352@qq.com
基金资助:
YUAN Yuting1(
), LIU Defen1, SUN Wanjin3, JIA Wenzhao4, MA Shengjun1(
), KANG Lu2(
)
Received:2024-10-14
Published:2025-05-20
Online:2025-07-09
Supported by:摘要:
【目的】研究亚硒酸钠、纳米硒和有机硒3种不同形态硒对灰枣外观形态、抗氧化能力及硒代谢的影响,为分析不同形态硒在植物体内的积累机制提供理论依据。【方法】以灰枣为研究对象,设置亚硒酸钠、纳米硒和有机硒共3个处理,测定处理前后灰枣叶片和果实的外观形态,抗氧化酶活性及基因表达量,硒代氨基酸及硒代谢相关基因表达水平。【结果】施用纳米硒、亚硒酸钠和有机硒后,灰枣的外观形态,抗氧化酶活性及基因表达量,硒代氨基酸含量及硒代谢相关基因表达水平均显著增加,其中灰枣硬度增长14.40%~19.59%,可溶性固形物增长23.77%~37.43%,谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)及基因表达量分别增长了10.23%~110.41%和8.18%~123.91%,总硒含量提高3.09~34.14倍,硒代蛋氨酸(SeMet)增长100.00%~346.15%,半胱氨酸脱硫酶(CysD)基因表达量增长18.13%~195.43%。【结论】喷施纳米硒、亚硒酸钠和有机硒后转化为硒代氨基酸,且不同形态硒对灰枣的外观形态、抗氧化能力、硒代氨基酸均有影响。有机硒处理优于亚硒酸钠和纳米硒处理。
中图分类号:
袁玉婷, 刘德粉, 孙万金, 贾文昭, 马生军, 康露. 不同形态硒调控灰枣抗氧化能力和硒代谢的机理分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(5): 1159-1169.
YUAN Yuting, LIU Defen, SUN Wanjin, JIA Wenzhao, MA Shengjun, KANG Lu. Study on the mechanism of different forms of selenium on antioxidant ability and selenium metabolism of Hui jujube[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(5): 1159-1169.
| 化合物 Compound | CAS | 母离子 Parent ion (m/z) | 子离子 Ions (m/z) | 锥孔电压 Cone voltage (V) | 碰撞能量 Collision energy (V) | 保留时间 Retention time (min) | 标准曲线 standard curve | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 甲基硒代半胱氨酸 MeSeCys | 26046-90-2 | 198.00 | 56.10*,88.10 | 20 | 15,10 | 0.98 | y=341 830x-373.20 | 0.999 8 |
| 硒代胱氨酸 SeCys | 29621-88-3 | 240 | 56.10*,98.10 | 20 | 20,15 | 1.01 | y=225.67x-0.40 | 0.999 2 |
| 硒代蛋氨酸 SeMet | 3211-76-5 | 184.2 | 166.90*,94.90 | 25 | 10,16 | 0.72 | y=49605x-59.80 | 0.998 4 |
表1 3种硒代氨基酸的质谱条件及线性方程
Tab.1 Mass spectrum conditions and linear equations of three selenoamino acids
| 化合物 Compound | CAS | 母离子 Parent ion (m/z) | 子离子 Ions (m/z) | 锥孔电压 Cone voltage (V) | 碰撞能量 Collision energy (V) | 保留时间 Retention time (min) | 标准曲线 standard curve | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 甲基硒代半胱氨酸 MeSeCys | 26046-90-2 | 198.00 | 56.10*,88.10 | 20 | 15,10 | 0.98 | y=341 830x-373.20 | 0.999 8 |
| 硒代胱氨酸 SeCys | 29621-88-3 | 240 | 56.10*,98.10 | 20 | 20,15 | 1.01 | y=225.67x-0.40 | 0.999 2 |
| 硒代蛋氨酸 SeMet | 3211-76-5 | 184.2 | 166.90*,94.90 | 25 | 10,16 | 0.72 | y=49605x-59.80 | 0.998 4 |
| 基因名称Gene name | Forward primer(5' to 3') | Reverse primer(5' to 3') |
|---|---|---|
| SOD | ACGGGTAATGTTTCTGGTCTCA | TGTTGTTTTCCAGCAGGGTT |
| POD | GTTCTGGGGTGTGATGC | GTATTCGGTTTGCGGTT |
| CAT | GCCATTCTATCGTCGTATCCA | ATCACAGTCACGCCACTCAGG |
| GSH-Px | CGTCTTCCATCATCGCTTCTTCA | AACAGCATACATTGTAGCTCCTC |
| APS | CCGATTGTGCTCGCCATTGA | GCCGGAACCTGTCAAGACCATC |
| APR | ATGGCTTTGRCTTTCACTTCTTC | CAACCTCCCAGTATCAAGGCTGA |
| SMT | GACGGCGGACTTGCGACGGA | GGCACCAGCTTCAAGGTAATC |
| CysD | TGGGCTTGGAGCTGCAATTGA | AGGCTAGCTCGTGCACTTGCA |
| ACT1 | AGCCTTCCTGCCAACGAGT | TTGCTTCTCACCCTTGATGC |
表2 引物序列
Tab.2 Primer sequence
| 基因名称Gene name | Forward primer(5' to 3') | Reverse primer(5' to 3') |
|---|---|---|
| SOD | ACGGGTAATGTTTCTGGTCTCA | TGTTGTTTTCCAGCAGGGTT |
| POD | GTTCTGGGGTGTGATGC | GTATTCGGTTTGCGGTT |
| CAT | GCCATTCTATCGTCGTATCCA | ATCACAGTCACGCCACTCAGG |
| GSH-Px | CGTCTTCCATCATCGCTTCTTCA | AACAGCATACATTGTAGCTCCTC |
| APS | CCGATTGTGCTCGCCATTGA | GCCGGAACCTGTCAAGACCATC |
| APR | ATGGCTTTGRCTTTCACTTCTTC | CAACCTCCCAGTATCAAGGCTGA |
| SMT | GACGGCGGACTTGCGACGGA | GGCACCAGCTTCAAGGTAATC |
| CysD | TGGGCTTGGAGCTGCAATTGA | AGGCTAGCTCGTGCACTTGCA |
| ACT1 | AGCCTTCCTGCCAACGAGT | TTGCTTCTCACCCTTGATGC |
| 处理 Treatments | 纵径 Vertical diameter (cm) | 横径 Transverse diameter (cm) | 硬度 Hardness (kg/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.61±0.18a | 2.34±0.20ab | 9.65±0.75a |
| T1 | 3.64±1.34a | 2.38±0.59a | 10.19±1.16a |
| T2 | 3.49±0.33a | 2.25±0.26c | 11.54±1.30a |
| T3 | 3.75±1.50a | 2.29±0.40bc | 11.45±1.50a |
表3 不同形态硒处理下灰枣纵径、横径和硬度的变化
Tab.3 Changes of different forms of selenium on Longitudinal diameter, transverse diameter and hardness of Hui jujube
| 处理 Treatments | 纵径 Vertical diameter (cm) | 横径 Transverse diameter (cm) | 硬度 Hardness (kg/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CK | 3.61±0.18a | 2.34±0.20ab | 9.65±0.75a |
| T1 | 3.64±1.34a | 2.38±0.59a | 10.19±1.16a |
| T2 | 3.49±0.33a | 2.25±0.26c | 11.54±1.30a |
| T3 | 3.75±1.50a | 2.29±0.40bc | 11.45±1.50a |
图1 不同形态硒处理下灰枣可溶性固形物含量的变化 注:CK:对照组,T1:亚硒酸钠,T2:纳米硒,T3:有机硒。图中数据均为3组重复的平均值±标准差(n=3);同一行右上角不同字母代表差异显著(P<0.05),下同
Fig.1 Changes of different forms of selenium on soluble solid content of Hui jujube Notes: CK: control group, T1: sodium selenite, T2: nano-selenium, T3: organic selenium, The data in the figure are the mean ± standard deviation of the three groups (n=3) ; different letters in the upper right corner of the same line represented significant differences (P<0.05),the same as below
图4 不同形态硒处理下灰枣叶片和果实总硒含量的变化 注:A:叶片;B:果实
Fig.4 Changes of different forms of selenium on the content of total selenium in leaves and fruits of Hui jujube Notes:A:Leaf;B:Fruit
| 时间 Time (d) | 处理 Treat- ments | 灰枣叶片硒代氨基酸含量 Content of selenoamino acids in leaves of Hui jujube(μg/L) | 灰枣果实硒代氨基酸含量 Content of selenoamino acids in Hui jujube fruit(μg/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeSeCys | SeCys | SeMet | MeSeCys | SeCys | SeMet | ||
| 1 | CK | 0.002 4±0.000 1a | 0.006 2±0.000 1b | 0.018 3±0.003 0c | 0.001 4±0.000 1ab | 0.002 3±0.000 1c | 0.014 3±0.000 8a |
| T1 | 0.002 1±0.000 1b | 0.007 7±0.002 6b | 0.030 3±0.000 3b | 0.001 2±0.000 2b | 0.016 5±0.005 1ab | 0.009 8±0.000 7c | |
| T2 | 0.001 6±0.000 1c | 0.010 6±0.000 1a | 0.029 1±0.001 8b | 0.001 4±0.000 2b | 0.010 6±0.004 4b | 0.013 1±0.001 3a | |
| T3 | 0.002 0±0.000 1b | 0.006 2±0.000 0b | 0.041 2±0.000 6a | 0.001 2±0.000 1c | 0.022 5±0.002 6a | 0.010 0±0.000 5a | |
| 3 | CK | 0.002 0±0.000 1c | 0.012 1±0.002 6a | 0.027 3±0.001 9b | 0.001 4±0.000 0a | 0.007 7±0.002 6c | 0.013 5±0.000 6b |
| T1 | 0.001 9±0.000 1c | 0.009 2±0.002 6a | 0.032 7±0.000 3a | 0.001 3±0.000 2a | 0.022 5±0.002 6b | 0.009 8±0.000 7c | |
| T2 | 0.002 4±0.000 1a | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.032 4±0.000 6a | 0.001 3±0.000 1b | 0.026 9±0.002 6b | 0.014 6±0.001 8b | |
| T3 | 0.002 2±0.000 1b | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.034 3±0.000 4a | 0.001 3±0.000 1b | 0.034 3±0.002 6a | 0.016 8±0.000 7a | |
| 6 | CK | 0.001 7±0.000 2b | 0.012 4±0.001 6a | 0.028 9±0.000 7c | 0.001 4±0.000 1ab | 0.004 7±0.002 6c | 0.012 5±0.000 3b |
| T1 | 0.001 8±0.000 2b | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.032 1±0.001 1b | 0.001 2±0.000 1b | 0.035 7±0.002 6a | 0.013 4±0.000 3b | |
| T2 | 0.002 1±0.000 1a | 0.006 2±0.000 1b | 0.037 7±0.013 8a | 0.001 8±0.000 5a | 0.018 0±0.002 6b | 0.012 7±0.000 8b | |
| T3 | 0.001 7±0.000 2b | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.024 0±0.000 2d | 0.001 2±0.000 1b | 0.020 0±0.000 9b | 0.014 9±0.000 9ab | |
| 10 | CK | - | 0.001 3±0.000 1a | 0.003 2±0.002 6b | 0.011 4±0.000 7b | ||
| T1 | 0.001 2±0.000 1a | 0.016 5±0.002 6a | 0.013 4±0.000 3a | ||||
| T2 | 0.001 7±0.000 9a | 0.012 1±0.002 6a | 0.012 6±0.000 7b | ||||
| T3 | 0.001 2±0.000 1a | 0.016 5±0.002 6a | 0.013 6±0.000 4a | ||||
表4 不同形态硒处理下灰枣叶片和果实硒代氨基酸含量的变化
Tab.4 Changes of different forms of selenium on the contents of selenoamino acids in leaves and fruits of Hui jujube
| 时间 Time (d) | 处理 Treat- ments | 灰枣叶片硒代氨基酸含量 Content of selenoamino acids in leaves of Hui jujube(μg/L) | 灰枣果实硒代氨基酸含量 Content of selenoamino acids in Hui jujube fruit(μg/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeSeCys | SeCys | SeMet | MeSeCys | SeCys | SeMet | ||
| 1 | CK | 0.002 4±0.000 1a | 0.006 2±0.000 1b | 0.018 3±0.003 0c | 0.001 4±0.000 1ab | 0.002 3±0.000 1c | 0.014 3±0.000 8a |
| T1 | 0.002 1±0.000 1b | 0.007 7±0.002 6b | 0.030 3±0.000 3b | 0.001 2±0.000 2b | 0.016 5±0.005 1ab | 0.009 8±0.000 7c | |
| T2 | 0.001 6±0.000 1c | 0.010 6±0.000 1a | 0.029 1±0.001 8b | 0.001 4±0.000 2b | 0.010 6±0.004 4b | 0.013 1±0.001 3a | |
| T3 | 0.002 0±0.000 1b | 0.006 2±0.000 0b | 0.041 2±0.000 6a | 0.001 2±0.000 1c | 0.022 5±0.002 6a | 0.010 0±0.000 5a | |
| 3 | CK | 0.002 0±0.000 1c | 0.012 1±0.002 6a | 0.027 3±0.001 9b | 0.001 4±0.000 0a | 0.007 7±0.002 6c | 0.013 5±0.000 6b |
| T1 | 0.001 9±0.000 1c | 0.009 2±0.002 6a | 0.032 7±0.000 3a | 0.001 3±0.000 2a | 0.022 5±0.002 6b | 0.009 8±0.000 7c | |
| T2 | 0.002 4±0.000 1a | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.032 4±0.000 6a | 0.001 3±0.000 1b | 0.026 9±0.002 6b | 0.014 6±0.001 8b | |
| T3 | 0.002 2±0.000 1b | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.034 3±0.000 4a | 0.001 3±0.000 1b | 0.034 3±0.002 6a | 0.016 8±0.000 7a | |
| 6 | CK | 0.001 7±0.000 2b | 0.012 4±0.001 6a | 0.028 9±0.000 7c | 0.001 4±0.000 1ab | 0.004 7±0.002 6c | 0.012 5±0.000 3b |
| T1 | 0.001 8±0.000 2b | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.032 1±0.001 1b | 0.001 2±0.000 1b | 0.035 7±0.002 6a | 0.013 4±0.000 3b | |
| T2 | 0.002 1±0.000 1a | 0.006 2±0.000 1b | 0.037 7±0.013 8a | 0.001 8±0.000 5a | 0.018 0±0.002 6b | 0.012 7±0.000 8b | |
| T3 | 0.001 7±0.000 2b | 0.013 6±0.002 6a | 0.024 0±0.000 2d | 0.001 2±0.000 1b | 0.020 0±0.000 9b | 0.014 9±0.000 9ab | |
| 10 | CK | - | 0.001 3±0.000 1a | 0.003 2±0.002 6b | 0.011 4±0.000 7b | ||
| T1 | 0.001 2±0.000 1a | 0.016 5±0.002 6a | 0.013 4±0.000 3a | ||||
| T2 | 0.001 7±0.000 9a | 0.012 1±0.002 6a | 0.012 6±0.000 7b | ||||
| T3 | 0.001 2±0.000 1a | 0.016 5±0.002 6a | 0.013 6±0.000 4a | ||||
图5 不同形态硒处理下灰枣叶片(A-D)和果实(E-H)硒代谢相关基因相表达量的变化
Fig.5 Changes of different forms of selenium on expression levels of selenium metabolism related genes in leaves (A-D) and fruits (E-H) of Hui jujube
| [1] | 刘丰鸣. 施肥对新疆骏枣果实品质和枣园土壤—树体养分及化学计量特征的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2022. |
| LIU Fengming. Effects of fertilization on fruit quality and soil-tree nutrient and stoichiometric characteristics of Jun jujube in Xinjiang[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022. | |
| [2] | 迟岩. 干制灰枣贮藏褐变控制技术的研究与应用[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021. |
| CHI Yan. Research and application of storage Browning control technology of dry hui jujube[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021. | |
| [3] | 刘虎. 不同硒源及水平对蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质、蛋硒含量及血液生化指标的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2017. |
| LIU Hu. Effects of different selenium sources and levels on performance, egg quality, egg selenium content and Blood biochemical indexes of laying hens[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2017. | |
| [4] | 王雪儿, 王玲, 杨欣宇, 等. 不同化学形态硒的毒理学研究[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 40(2): 150-156. |
| WANG Xueer, WANG Ling, YANG Xinyu, et al. Toxicological studies on different chemical forms of selenium[J]. Journal of Hubei Minzu University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 40(2): 150-156. | |
| [5] | 杨聪聪. 黄芪多糖纳米硒的制备及其对乳腺癌细胞的生长抑制作用研究[D]. 太原: 山西医科大学, 2020. |
| YANG Congcong. Preparation of Astragalus polysaccharide nano-selenium and its inhibitory effect on breast cancer cells[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi Medical University, 2020. | |
| [6] | 张骞丰. 纳米硒对茶菊“乳荷”生长发育和营养成分的影响[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2021. |
| ZHANG Qianfeng. Effects of nano-selenium on growth, development and nutritional composition of "milk lotus" of Tea chrysanthemum[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2021. | |
| [7] | 曹丽霞, 李文栓, 蔺昕, 等. 叶面施硒对水稻砷吸收积累影响的研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(7): 271-276. |
| CAO Lixia, LI Wenshuan, LIN Xin, et al. Effects of selenium application on arsenic uptake and accumulation in rice[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2023, 41(7): 271-276. | |
| [8] | Gui J Y, Rao S, Gou Y Y, et al. Comparative study of the effects of selenium yeast and sodium selenite on selenium content and nutrient quality in broccoli florets (Brassica oleracea L. var. Italica)[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2022, 102(4): 1707-1718. |
| [9] | Xiang J, Rao S, Chen Q W, et al. Research progress on the effects of selenium on the growth and quality of tea plants[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(19): 2491. |
| [10] | 杜玉潇, 李亚男, 陈大清. 植物硒代谢积累及相关酶的研究进展[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2007, 15(3): 269-276. |
| DU Yuxiao, LI Yanan, CHEN Daqing. Progress in selenium metabolism and accumulation and key enzymes in plants[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2007, 15(3): 269-276. | |
| [11] | 谢文文. 芸薹属主要蔬菜作物富硒比较研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2017. |
| XIE Wenwen. Comparative study on selenium enrichment in main vegetable crops of Brassica[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017. | |
| [12] | Zhou B Q, Cao H R, Wu Q Q, et al. Agronomic and genetic strategies to enhance selenium accumulation in crops and their influence on quality[J]. Foods, 2023, 12(24): 4442. |
| [13] |
Kang L, Wu Y L, Jia Y J, et al. Nano-selenium enhances melon resistance to Podosphaera xanthii by enhancing the antioxidant capacity and promoting alterations in the polyamine, phenylpropanoid and hormone signaling pathways[J]. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2023, 21(1): 377.
DOI PMID |
| [14] | 程红, 吴习宇, 徐丹, 等. 壳聚糖涂膜处理对猪腰枣保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(9): 113-116. |
| CHENG Hong, WU Xiyu, XU Dan, et al. Effect of chitosan coating on the quality of Wulong loin jujube fruit during storage[J]. Food & Machinery, 2016, 32(9): 113-116. | |
| [15] | GB5009.93-2017. 食品中硒的测定[S]. |
| GB 5009.93-2017. Determination of Selenium in food[S]. | |
| [16] | 董亚蕾, 刘文婧, 曹进, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联三重四级杆质谱法测定富硒食品中的硒代氨基酸[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2017, 8(7): 2401-2406. |
| DONG Yalei, LIU Wenjing, CAO Jin, et al. Determination of selenoaminoacid in selenium enriched foods by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2017, 8(7): 2401-2406. | |
| [17] | Kang L, Wu Y L, Zhang J B, et al. Nano-selenium enhances the antioxidant capacity, organic acids and cucurbitacin B in melon (Cucumis melo L.) plants[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2022, 241: 113777. |
| [18] | 张明中. 番茄施硒的生理和品质效应及分子调控研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2014. |
| ZHANG Mingzhong. Physiological and quality effects and molecular regulation of selenium application in tomato[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2014. | |
| [19] | 石春兰, 叶舜, 朱立辉, 等. 施硒对火龙果果实品质及总硒含量的影响[J]. 江西农业, 2019(22): 36-37. |
| SHI Chunlan, YE Shun, ZHU Lihui, et al. Effects of selenium application on fruit quality and total Selenium content of Pitaya[J]. Jiangxi Agriculture, 2019(22): 36-37. | |
| [20] | 宋会明, 贺敬芝, 梁军, 等. 叶面喷施纳米硒肥对金丝小枣产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(4): 203-207. |
| SONG Huiming, HE Jingzhi, LIANG Jun, et al. Effect of foliar nano meter selenium fertilizer application on yield and quality of Ziziphus jujuba[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(4): 203-207. | |
| [21] | 邓小芳, 吕臣浩, 黄立强, 等. 喷施时期和硒源对‘金桃’猕猴桃硒吸收累积及主要品质指标的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(11): 1385-1392. |
| DENG Xiaofang, LYU Chenhao, HUANG Liqiang, et al. Effects of spraying selenium in different forms and at different stages on selenium absorption and accumulation and main quality indexes of 'Jintao’kiwifruit[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(11): 1385-1392. | |
| [22] | Luo L P, Zhang J P, Zhang K Y, et al. Peanut selenium distribution, concentration, speciation, and effects on proteins after exogenous selenium biofortification[J]. Food Chemistry, 2021, 354: 129515. |
| [23] | 汪园. 富硒豇豆的生理生化特性及ABC转运蛋白基因对硒的响应[D]. 武汉: 武汉轻工大学, 2022. |
| WANG Yuan. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of selenium-rich cowpea and response of ABC transporter gene to selenium[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Light Industry, 2022. | |
| [24] | 郭安娜. 外源硒肥对燕麦产量及土壤肥力的影响[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2019. |
| GUO Anna. Effects of exogenous selenium fertilizer on Oat yield and soil fertility[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2019. | |
| [25] | 李慧敏, 黄秋岚, 秦玉燕, 等. 叶面喷施硒肥对滑皮金柑果实品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(22): 178-182, 187. |
| LI Huimin, HUANG Qiulan, QIN Yuyan, et al. Effect of foliar aplication of selenium fertilizer on Huapi kumquat(Fortunella crassifolia Swingle) fruit quality[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(22): 178-182, 187. | |
| [26] | Chen P, Shaghaleh H, Hamoud Y A, et al. Selenium-containing organic fertilizer application affects yield, quality, and distribution of selenium in wheat[J]. Life, 2023, 13(9): 1849. |
| [27] | 李瑜, 张军, 张百忍, 等. 不同土壤硒浓度对辣椒产量及硒含量的影响研究[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2024, 70(1): 76-80 |
| LI Yu, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Bairen, et al. Effects of different soil selenium concentrations on pepper yield and selenium content[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 70(1): 76-80. | |
| [28] | 万玲, 朱国鹏, 陈艳丽, 等. 菜用型甘薯中硒的累积及分布规律研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2019(13): 59-60. |
| WAN Ling, ZHU Guopeng, CHEN Yanli, et al. Study on selenium accumulation and distribution in vegetable sweet potato[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(13): 59-60. | |
| [29] | 冯拓. 纳米硒提高酱油有机硒含量和品质初步机制研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2022. |
| FENG Tuo. Preliminary mechanism of nano-selenium improving organic selenium content and quality of soy sauce[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2022. | |
| [30] | Nazari M R, Abdossi V, Hargalani F Z, et al. Antioxidant potential and essential oil properties of Hypericum perforatum L. assessed by application of selenite and nano-selenium[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 6156. |
| [31] | de Brito Mateus M P, Tavanti R F R, Tavanti T R, et al. Selenium biofortification enhances ROS scavenge system increasing yield of coffee plants[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 209: 111772. |
| [32] |
Wang Q, Yu Y, Li J X, et al. Effects of different forms of selenium fertilizers on Se accumulation, distribution, and residual effect in winter wheat-summer maize rotation system[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2017, 65(6): 1116-1123.
DOI PMID |
| [33] | 姜英, 曾昭海, 杨麒生, 等. 植物硒吸收转化机制及生理作用研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(12): 4067-4076. |
| JIANG Ying, ZENG Zhaohai, YANG Qisheng, et al. Selenium (Se) uptake and transformation mechanisms and physiological function in plant: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(12): 4067-4076. | |
| [34] | 熊信果, 熊婧, 邹小云, 等. 植物硒代谢及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 江西农业学报, 2022, 34(1): 63-70. |
| XIONG Xinguo, XIONG Jing, ZOU Xiaoyun, et al. Research progress in selenium metabolism in plants and its influencing factors[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2022, 34(1): 63-70. | |
| [35] | 匡娜. 接种丛枝菌根真菌对辣椒硒积累及转化的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2023. |
| KUANG Na. Effect of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on selenium accumulation and transformation of capsicum[D]. Ya an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2023 | |
| [36] | 罗金水, 陈在杰, 潘迎芬, 等. 不同浓度硒对辣木生长及硒反应基因表达的影响[J]. 福建热作科技, 2020, 45(4): 5-8. |
| LUO Jinshui, CHEN Zaijie, PAN Yingfen, et al. Effect of different concentration of Na2SeO4 on the growth and expression of selenium-responsive genes of Moringa oleifra[J]. Fujian Science & Technology of Tropical Crops, 2020, 45(4): 5-8. |
| [1] | 孟伊娜, 陈竞, 王梓名, 张婷, 郝庆, 吴斌, 张平, 过利敏. 灰枣贮藏期处理方式筛选及其预测模型建立[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 2997-3005. |
| [2] | 靳娟, 苏比娜·肖克来提, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 杨磊, 郝庆, 樊丁宇. 灰枣扩展蛋白基因ZjEXPA8的克隆及序列分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2223-2230. |
| [3] | 王文军, 陈奇凌, 郑强卿, 王晶晶, 张桂兵, 李海霞. 模式改造对灰枣树个体和群体冠层特性及机械适应性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 925-934. |
| [4] | 李爽, 谢丹露, 吴继周, 马瑞, 谢艾迪, 邵蕾, 高娟娟, 韩海霞. 不同炮制方法下若羌灰枣主要功能成分及抗氧化活性的对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 935-942. |
| [5] | 安世杰, 支金虎, 郑强卿, 王文军, 宋伞伞, 张迪. 氮磷配施对灰枣光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2514-2523. |
| [6] | 张洋, 马英杰. 不同生育期成龄灰枣树茎流速率与气象因子的关系[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1712-1722. |
| [7] | 王文军, 陈奇凌, 郑强卿, 王晶晶, 王振东. 不同树形对灰枣叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(4): 616-624. |
| [8] | 宋亚伟, 陈虹, 张述斌, 崔炜杰, 胡安鸿, 龙建春. 不同药剂对灰枣光合特性及果实外观品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(8): 1443-1449. |
| [9] | 杨磊, 樊丁宇, 靳娟, 徐叶挺, 周晓明, 冯贝贝, 郝庆. 环剥对灰枣果实中糖积累及蔗糖代谢相关酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7): 1244-1252. |
| [10] | 王文军, 林敏娟, 王振磊. 灰枣主干形和小冠疏层形产量及品质对比分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(6): 1041-1051. |
| [11] | 董亚菲, 孟军, 王建文, 曾亚琦, 孔麒森, 褚洪忠, 姚新奎, 葛世萌, 张凯丽, 任湘, 黄晶晶. 不同剂量原花青素对两岁伊犁马抗氧化的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(6): 1159-1165. |
| [12] | 哈地尔·依沙克, 木合塔尔·扎热, 马合木提·阿不来提, 吴正保, 史彦江. 不同土壤条件下灰枣叶片与果实营养品质的相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(7): 1236-1244. |
| [13] | 艾尔买克·才卡斯木,钟海霞,张雯,张付春. EM菌对NaCl胁迫下核桃幼苗生长、光合特性及抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1803-1808. |
| [14] | 何伟忠, 王成, 庄宇, 陶永霞, 张红艳, 陈贺, 赵馨馨, 朱靖蓉. 新疆灰枣中15种营养组分的质量分析及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(9): 1644-1650. |
| [15] | 康露;朱靖蓉;赵多勇;刘河疆;王成. 锶同位素溯源若羌灰枣产地的可行性研究[J]. , 2017, 54(6): 1066-1075. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||