新疆南疆四地州“三生空间”功能耦合协调度分析

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.06.030

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 1553-1560.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.06.030

• 畜牧兽医•农业经济 • 上一篇

新疆南疆四地州“三生空间”功能耦合协调度分析

曹健(), 阿依加玛力·阿帕尔, 宋玉兰()

新疆农业大学经济管理学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2023-10-11 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-08-08
通信作者: 宋玉兰(1979-),女,山西闻喜人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为区域经济政策,(E-mail)59677869@qq.com
作者简介:曹健(1983-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为区域经济,(E-mail)59423111@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区“十四五”重大专项项目(2020A01003-4);新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项“智慧灌区与现代农业产业绿色发展模式研究与示范”;新疆维吾尔自治区2022年第三批次重大科技专项项目;新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项“现代灌区生态农业发展模式与水土资源高效利用技术研究与示范”

Analysis of the coordination of the functions of the "production-living-ecological spaces" in four southern Xinjiang Prefectures

CAO Jian(), Ayijiamali Apaer, SONG Yulan()

College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2023-10-11 Published:2024-06-20 Online:2024-08-08
Correspondence author: SONG Yulan(1979-),female,from Wenxi,Shanxi,professor,Ph.D.,doctoral supervisor,research direction: Regional Economic Policy,(E-mail)59677869@qq.com
Supported by:
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 14th Five-Year Plan Major Special Project;Major Science and Technology Special Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region;Research and Demonstration of Green Development Model of Intelligent Irrigation District and Modern Agricultural Industry;The Third batch of major science and technology special projects in 2022 in Autonomous Regions;Major Science and Technology Spacial Projects in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Regions; Modern irrigation ecological agricultural development model and efficient utilization of water resources technology and demonstration

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究新疆南疆四地州“三生空间”功能耦合协调度。【方法】采集《新疆统计年鉴》及《中国县域统计年鉴》(2001~2021面板数据)为主要数据来源,构建新疆南疆四地州“三生空间”功能评价指标体系,采用耦合协调度模型对研究区“三生空间”功能耦合协调度进行测度,利用Tobit模型探测影响因素。【结果】新疆阿克苏地区的“三生空间”功能耦合协调度最好,其耦合协调平均值为0.532,耦合协调度为勉强协调,而其余三地州按耦合协调度平均值从高到低依次为喀什地区、和田地区、克孜勒苏柯尔克孜自治州。【结论】新疆南疆四地州整体“三生空间”耦合协调度处于较低水平,耦合协调等级为濒临失调,其中地均固定资产投资总额和人均社会消费品总额在1%显著的水平上正向影响,对新疆南疆四地州“三生空间”功能耦合协调度有一定的促进作用。

关键词: “三生空间”; 耦合协调度; Tobit模型

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the degree of functional coupling and coordination of the "three living spaces" in the four southern Xinjiang prefectures. 【Methods】 Eleven years of Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook and China County Statistical Yearbook (2001-2021 panel data) were collected as the main data sources and the evaluation index system of the function of the "three living spaces" in the four southern Xinjiang prefectures was constructed by using relevant indicators.On this basis, the Tobit model was then used to detect the influencing factors. 【Results】 Aksu region has the best coupling coordination of the "three living spaces “functions, with an average coupling coordination value of 0.532, which was barely coordinated, while the remaining three prefectures were Kashgar, Hotan and Kizilsu in descending order of coupling coordination. 【Conclusion】 The overall coupling coordination degree of the "production-living-ecological space" in the four southern prefectures is at a low level, and the coupling coordination level is on the verge of disorder, among which the total fixed asset investment and total social consumption goods per capita are positively influenced at the level of 1%, which has a certain influence on the "three living spaces" in the four southern regions.

Key words: “production-living-ecological space”; coupling coordination degree; Tobit model

曹健, 阿依加玛力·阿帕尔, 宋玉兰. 新疆南疆四地州“三生空间”功能耦合协调度分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1553-1560.

CAO Jian, Ayijiamali Apaer, SONG Yulan. Analysis of the coordination of the functions of the "production-living-ecological spaces" in four southern Xinjiang Prefectures[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1553-1560.

图/表 9

参考文献 26

[1]	黄金川, 林浩曦, 漆潇潇. 面向国土空间优化的三生空间研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(3): 378-391. DOI
	HUANG Jinchuan, LIN Haoxi, QI Xiaoxiao. A literature review on optimization of spatial development pattern based on ecological-production-living space[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(3): 378-391. DOI
[2]	扈万泰, 王力国. 重庆市总体生态城市格局构建及其发展规划策略[J]. 规划师, 2014, 30(5): 37-41.
	HU Wantai, WANG Liguo. Chongqing city layout and development measure[J]. Planners, 2014, 30(5): 37-41.
[3]	柳玉梅, 李九一. 水资源与粮食生产耦合关系研究现状与展望[J]. 节水灌溉, 2014,(12): 54-56, 59.
	LIU Yumei, LI Jiuyi. Current situation and prospect of research on relationship between water resources and food production[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2014,(12): 54-56, 59.
[4]	刘苗苗, 潘佩佩, 任佳璇, 等. 京津冀粮食安全与农业用水安全耦合协调研究[J/OL]. 中国农业资源与区划:1-14[2022-09-30].https://kns-cnki-net--bjmu.jitui.me/kcms/detail/11.3513.s.20220525.0947.002.html
	LIU Miaomiao, PAN Peipei, REN Jiaxuan, et al. Study on the coupling and coordination of food security and agricultural water use in Beijing-Tianjin Wing[J/OL]. Agricultural Resources and Zoning in China: 1-14[2022-09-30].https://kns-cnki-net--bjmu.jitui.me/kcms/detail/11.3513.s.20220525.0947.002.html
[5]	梁静晖, 杨钢桥, 黄丹, 等. 产业融合背景下农村土地多功能利用水平及耦合协调度[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(3): 244-252.
	LIANG Jinghui, YANG Gangqiao, HUANG Dan, et al. Land use functional levels and coupling coordination degrees under the background of rural industry convergence[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(3): 244-252.
[6]	于辰, 王占岐, 杨俊, 等. 土地整治与农村“三生” 空间重构的耦合关系[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(7): 447-451.
	YU Chen, WANG Zhanqi, YANG Jun, et al. Coupling relationship between land consolidation and rural “Sansheng” spatial reconstruction[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(7): 447-451.
[7]	史丹, 白骏骄. 产业结构早熟对经济增长的影响及其内生性解释——基于互联网式创新力视角[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2019,(6): 105-118.
	SHI Dan, BAI Junjiao. The impact of structure precocity on economic growth and its endogenous explanation: from a view of Internet innovation power[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics, 2019,(6): 105-118.
[8]	江曼琦, 刘勇. “三生” 空间内涵与空间范围的辨析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(4): 43-48, 61.
	JIANG Manqi, LIU Yong. Discussion on the concept definition and spatial boundary classification of “production-living-ecological” space[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(4): 43-48, 61.
[9]	李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1): 49-65. DOI
	LI Guangdong, FANG Chuanglin. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1): 49-65. DOI
[10]	邹艳, 张绍良, 谢译诣, 等. 徐州市三生空间分布格局与时空演化特征分析[J]. 测绘科学, 2020, 45(7): 154-162.
	ZOU Yan, ZHANG Shaoliang, XIE Yiyi, et al. Spatial distribution and evolution characters of production-living-ecological spaces in Xuzhou city[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 45(7): 154-162.
[11]	吴艳娟, 杨艳昭, 杨玲, 等. 基于“三生空间” 的城市国土空间开发建设适宜性评价——以宁波市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(11): 2072-2081. DOI
	WU Yanjuan, YANG Yanzhao, YANG Ling, et al. Land spatial development and suitability for city construction based on ecological-living-industrial space—take Ningbo City as an example[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(11): 2072-2081. DOI
[12]	扈万泰, 王力国. 重庆市总体生态城市格局构建及其发展规划策略[J]. 规划师, 2014, 30(5):37-41
	HU Wantai, WANG Liguo. Chongqing City Layout And Development Measure[J]. Planners, 2014, 30(5):37-41
[13]	周浩, 金平, 夏卫生. 省级国土空间“三生” 功能评价及其分区研究——以河南省为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(8): 10-17.
	ZHOU Hao, JIN Ping, XIA Weisheng. Functional zoning of territorial space in provincial level based on the production-living-ecological functions: a case of Henan Province[J]. China Land Science, 2020, 34(8): 10-17.
[14]	冯晓菁, 罗志军, 许巾, 等. 基于“三生空间”的城乡建设用地开发适宜性及空间格局匹配评价——以江西省乐平市为例[J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(9): 2014-2024.
	FENG Xiaojing, LUO Zhijun, XU Jin, et al. Suitability evaluation of urban-rural construction land development and evaluation of spatial pattern matching based on ‘production-living-ecological’ space: case study of Leping city in Jiangxi Province[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(9): 2014-2024.
[15]	樊杰. 我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J]. 地理学报, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.
	FAN Jie. The scientific foundation of major function oriented zoning in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(4): 339-350.
[16]	赖国华, 胡宝清, 李敏, 等. 桂西南-北部湾地区“三生空间”适宜性评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(6): 221-227, 331.
	LAI Guohua, HU Baoqing, LI Min, et al. Evaluation on spatial suitability of ecological-living-industrial in southwestern guangxi-beibu gulf region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(6): 221-227, 331.
[17]	唐常春, 孙威. 长江流域国土空间开发适宜性综合评价[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1587-1598.
	TANG Changchun, SUN Wei. Comprehensive evaluation of land spatial development suitability of the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(12): 1587-1598. DOI
[18]	张引, 杨庆媛, 闵婕. 重庆市新型城镇化质量与生态环境承载力耦合分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(5): 817-828. DOI
	ZHANG Yin, YANG Qingyuan, MIN Jie. An analysis of coupling between the bearing capacity of the ecological environment and the quality of new urbanization in Chongqing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(5): 817-828. DOI
[19]	李玲慧, 赵锐锋, 明思雨, 等. 黄河上游地区(陕甘宁青)“三生空间” 功能的演变特征及耦合协调分析[J]. 地球环境学报, 2022, 13(4): 449-464.
	LI Linghui, ZHAO Ruifeng, MING Siyu, et al. Evolvement characteristics and coupling coordination analysis of “production-living-ecological space” function in the upper reaches of the Yellow River[J]. Journal of Earth Environment, 2022, 13(4): 449-464.
[20]	陈斌, 徐尚昭, 周阳阳, 等. “三生空间” 视角下宜昌市景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(4): 344-351.
	CHEN Bin, XU Shangzhao, ZHOU Yangyang, et al. Evaluation and coupling coordination analysis of landscape ecological security of Yichang from the perspective of production-life-ecological space[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(4): 344-351.
[21]	张雪松, 徐梓津. 少数民族聚集区“三生空间” 功能耦合协调度时空演变及与人类活动强度关系——以贵州省少数民族自治州为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6): 268-273.
	ZHANG Xuesong, XU Zijin. Spatial temporal evolution of functional coupling coordination degree of production-living-ecological space and its relationship with human activity intensity in ethnic minority areas—taking minority autonomous prefecture of Guizhou as an example[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(6): 268-273.
[22]	康庆, 郭青霞, 秦明星, 等. 山西省“三生” 功能耦合协调度时空分异[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(7): 209-216.
	KANG Qing, Guo Qingxia, Qin Mingxing, et al. Spatio-temporal difference of coupling coordination degree of “production-living-ecological” functions in Shanxi Province[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(7): 209-216.
[23]	王成, 唐宁. 重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114. DOI
	WANG Cheng, TANG Ning. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural productionliving-ecological space function coupling coordination in Chongqing Municipality[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.
[24]	国家统计局. 2010-2020年中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
	National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook2010-2020[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
[25]	国家统计局. 2010-2020年中国县域统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社.
	National Bureau of Statistics. China County Statistical Yearbook 2010-2020[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
[26]	倪维秋, 夏源, 赵宁宁. 乡村地域“三生空间” 功能演化与耦合协调度研究——以黑龙江省为例[J]. 中国土地科学, 2022, 36(9): 111-119.
	NI Weiqiu, XIA Yuan, ZHAO Ningning. Functional evolution and coupling coordination measurement of production-living-ecological space in rural areas: taking Heilongjiang Province as an example[J]. China Land Science, 2022, 36(9): 111-119.

目标层 Target layer	指标层 Indicator layer	指标性质 The nature of the indica- tors
生产空间功能(X) Production space function	人均耕地面积(X₁)	正向
	人均GDP(X₂)	正向
	地区生产总值(X₃)	正向
	年降水量(X₄)	正向
	年日照数(X₅)	正向
	红枣年总产量(X₆)	正向
	核桃年总产量(X₇)	正向
生活空间功能(Y) Living space function	农业机械总动力(X₈)	正向
	农牧民人均纯收入(Y₁)	正向
	城乡居民人均可支配(Y₂)	正向
	居民拥有病床位数(Y₃)	正向
	人均用水量(Y₄)	正向
	普通中学专任教师数(Y₅)	正向
生态空间功能(Z) Function of ecological space	化肥使用量(Z₁)	正向
	森林覆盖率(Z₂)	正向
	湿地覆盖率(Z₃)	正向
	水土流失治理面积(Z₄)	正向
	有效灌溉面积(Z₅)	正向
	地膜覆盖面积(Z₆)	正向

目标层 Target layer	指标层 Indicator layer	指标性质 The nature of the indica- tors
生产空间功能(X) Production space function	人均耕地面积(X₁)	正向
	人均GDP(X₂)	正向
	地区生产总值(X₃)	正向
	年降水量(X₄)	正向
	年日照数(X₅)	正向
	红枣年总产量(X₆)	正向
	核桃年总产量(X₇)	正向
生活空间功能(Y) Living space function	农业机械总动力(X₈)	正向
	农牧民人均纯收入(Y₁)	正向
	城乡居民人均可支配(Y₂)	正向
	居民拥有病床位数(Y₃)	正向
	人均用水量(Y₄)	正向
	普通中学专任教师数(Y₅)	正向
生态空间功能(Z) Function of ecological space	化肥使用量(Z₁)	正向
	森林覆盖率(Z₂)	正向
	湿地覆盖率(Z₃)	正向
	水土流失治理面积(Z₄)	正向
	有效灌溉面积(Z₅)	正向
	地膜覆盖面积(Z₆)	正向

耦合协调度 D值区间 Coupling degree of coordination D part	协调等级 Coordination level	耦合协调度 Level of coupling coordination
(0.0~0.1)	1	极度失调
[0.1~0.2)	2	严重失调
[0.2~0.3)	3	中度失调
[0.3~0.4)	4	轻度失调
[0.4~0.5)	5	濒临失调
[0.5~0.6)	6	勉强协调
[0.6~0.7)	7	初级协调
[0.7~0.8)	8	中级协调
[0.8~0.9)	9	良好协调
[0.9~1.0)	10	优质协调

耦合协调度 D值区间 Coupling degree of coordination D part	协调等级 Coordination level	耦合协调度 Level of coupling coordination
(0.0~0.1)	1	极度失调
[0.1~0.2)	2	严重失调
[0.2~0.3)	3	中度失调
[0.3~0.4)	4	轻度失调
[0.4~0.5)	5	濒临失调
[0.5~0.6)	6	勉强协调
[0.6~0.7)	7	初级协调
[0.7~0.8)	8	中级协调
[0.8~0.9)	9	良好协调
[0.9~1.0)	10	优质协调

年份 Years	耦合度 C值 Coupling C	协调指数 T值 Harmonis- ation index T	耦合协调度 D值区间 Coupling degree of coordination D part	协调等级 Coordin- ation level	耦合协调度 Level of coupling coordination
2010	0.165	0.196	0.18	2	严重失调
2011	0.593	0.247	0.383	4	轻度失调
2012	0.766	0.268	0.453	5	濒临失调
2013	0.626	0.251	0.397	4	轻度失调
2014	0.827	0.3	0.568	6	勉强协调
2015	0.764	0.38	0.539	6	勉强协调
2016	0.667	0.352	0.485	5	濒临失调
2017	0.888	0.441	0.626	7	初级协调
2018	0.868	0.0458	0.631	7	初级协调
2019	0.861	0.586	0.711	8	中级协调
2020	0.928	0.833	0.879	9	良好协调

新疆南疆四地州“三生空间”功能耦合协调度分析

Analysis of the coordination of the functions of the "production-living-ecological spaces" in four southern Xinjiang Prefectures

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 26

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

年份 Years	耦合度 C值 Coupling C	协调指数 T值 Harmonis- ation index T	耦合协调度 D值区间 Coupling degree of coordination D part	协调等级 Coordin- ation level	耦合协调度 Level of coupling coordination
2010	0.183	0.283	0.228	3	中度失调
2011	0.594	0.234	0.373	4	轻度失调
2012	0.818	0.583	0.69	7	初级协调
2013	0.799	0.346	0.526	6	勉强协调
2014	0.872	0.629	0.741	8	中级协调
2015	0.666	0.363	0.492	5	濒临失调
2016	0.699	0.378	0.514	6	勉强协调
2017	0.7	0.405	0.533	6	勉强协调
2018	0713	0.574	0.64	7	初级协调
2019	0.717	0.547	0.626	7	初级协调
2020	0.575	0.499	0.535	6	勉强协调

年份 Years	耦合度 C值 Coupling C	协调指数 T值 Harmonis- ation index T	耦合协调度 D值区间 Coupling degree of coordination D part	协调等级 Coordin- ation level	耦合协调度 Level of coupling coordination
2010	0.169	0.171	0.17	2	严重失调
2011	0.537	0.192	0.321	4	轻度失调
2012	0.559	0.201	0.335	4	轻度失调
2013	0.664	0.283	0.433	5	濒临失调
2014	0.789	0.393	0.557	6	勉强协调
2015	0.807	0.327	0.514	6	勉强协调
2016	0.746	0.408	0.552	6	勉强协调
2017	0.711	0.618	0.663	7	初级协调
2018	0.613	0.618	0.616	7	初级协调
2019	0.606	0.728	0.664	7	初级协调
2020	0.598	0.757	0.673	7	初级协调

年份 Years	耦合度 C值 Coupling C	协调指数 T值 Harmonis- ation index T	耦合协调度 D值区间 Coupling degree of coordination D part	协调等级 Coordin- ation level	耦合协调度 Level of coupling coordination
2010	0.272	0.521	0.377	4	轻度失调
2011	0.235	0.064	0.122	2	严重失调
2012	0.609	0.111	0.261	3	中度协调
2013	0.633	0.195	0.351	4	轻度失调
2014	0.803	0.268	0.464	5	濒临失调
2015	0.826	0.335	0.526	6	勉强协调
2016	0.776	0.324	0.501	6	勉强协调
2017	0.775	0.365	0.532	6	勉强协调
2018	0.824	0.422	0.59	6	勉强协调
2019	0.822	0.511	0.648	7	初级协调
2020	0.754	0.536	0.636	7	初级协调

影响因素 Impact factors	面板Tobit随机效应模型 Kneading board tobit random effects model
影响因素 Impact factors	Coef	P值
产业结构 Industrial structure	-0.386^*(-1.83)	0.067
地均固定资产投资总额 Total investment in fixed assets on average	0.053^***(4.83)	0.000
人均社会消费品总额 Per capita social consumption goods	0.147^***(3.34)	0.001
森林覆盖率 Forest coverage	-0.836(-1.00)	0.319
年均降水量 Average annual precipitation	-0.201(-1.38)	0.169
_—Cons	-1.025^***(-2.82)	0.005
Wald chi2	56.54
P	0.0000
N	44