不同水盐生境下小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数特征及其对土壤因子的响应

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.026

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (2): 485-494.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.026

• 微生物·生理生化·畜牧兽医 • 上一篇下一篇

不同水盐生境下小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数特征及其对土壤因子的响应

热依汗·阿布力孜¹^,²(), 何学敏¹^,²(), 杨欢¹^,², 黄鹏程¹^,², 冯海鹏¹^,², 王勇志¹^,²

1.新疆大学生态与环境学院/绿洲生态教育部重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐 830017
2.新疆精河温带荒漠生态系统教育部野外科学观测研究站, 新疆精河 833300

收稿日期:2023-06-05 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-03-19
通信作者: 何学敏(1986-),男,河南新蔡人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为荒漠植物生理生态,(E-mail)hxm@xju.edu.cn
作者简介:热依汗·阿布力孜(1996-),女,新疆吐鲁番人,硕士,研究方向为荒漠植物生理生态,(E-mail)2454459083@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32101360);国家自然科学基金项目(31760168);新疆维吾尔自治区创新环境建设专项-科技创新基地建设项目(PT2107);新疆维吾尔自治区中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(ZYYD2023A03)

Characteristics of chlorophyll-fluorescence parameters of Suaeda microphylla Pall.and their responses to soil factors in different water-salt habitats

Reyihan Abulizi¹^,²(), HE Xuemin¹^,²(), YANG Huan¹^,², HUANG Pengcheng¹^,², FENG Haipeng¹^,², WANG Yongzhi¹^,²

1. College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University/Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830017, China
2. Xinjiang Jinghe Observation and Research Station of Temperate Desert Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Jinghe Xinjiang 833300, China

Received:2023-06-05 Published:2024-02-20 Online:2024-03-19
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32101360);National Natural Science Foundation of China(31760168);Innovation Environment Construction Special Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region-Science and Technology Innovation Base Construction Project(PT2107);Central Government Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Fund Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(ZYYD2023A03)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究干旱区盐生植物光合响应机理,为土壤盐渍化生物修复技术提供理论和科学支撑。【方法】以新疆艾比湖湿地国家级自然保护区典型盐生植物小叶碱蓬(Suaeda microphylla Pall.)为研究对象,选取保护区内高水高盐(生境Ⅰ)、低水中盐(生境Ⅱ)和高水中盐(生境Ⅲ)三种生境类型,测定其小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数,分析三种生境下小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数特性变化,研究三种生境下土壤因子对小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光特性的影响。【结果】三种生境下小叶碱蓬各叶绿素荧光参数存在显著差异(P<0.05)。其中F_o、F_m和NPQ随着生境的变化逐渐升高,最大值出现在生境Ⅲ(142.95、609.42和1.65),最小值出现在生境Ⅰ(87.6、358.06和0.96)。F_v'/F_m'呈先升高再下降的趋势,最大值出现在生境Ⅱ(0.53),最小值出现在生境Ⅲ(0.39);F_o与F_m、NPQ呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),其中F_m的相关系数最大,为0.99;筛选出F_o、F_m和NPQ三个与逆境胁迫相关性较好的叶绿素荧光参数,其公因子方差为0.947、0.969、0.824;盐分、速效磷和pH对小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数变异起到了较好的解释,其解释量为17.2%、24.2%、13.5%,而水分未起解释作用。【结论】在高盐生境下,小叶碱蓬叶片PSⅡ的结构和生理状态受到损伤,光合作用受阻,最终植物生长受到抑制。

关键词: 土壤盐渍化; 不同生境; 小叶碱蓬; 叶绿素荧光参数

Abstract:

【Objective】 This project aims to study the photosynthetic response mechanism of halophyte in arid region in order to provide theoretical and scientific support for soil salinization bioreremediation technology.【Methods】 In this paper, the typical halophyte Suaeda microphylla Pall.in the National Nature Reserve was studied and three types of habitats:high water salt(habitat Ⅰ)salt(habitat Ⅱ), low water and high salt water(habitat Ⅲ)were selected to measure and analyze its Suaeda microphylla Pall.chlorophyll fluorescence parameters under three habitat Suaeda microphylla Pall.characteristics of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, thus clarifying the effects of soil factors on the fluorescence characteristics of the three habitats.【Results】 The results showed that there were significant differences in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters among the three habitats(P<0.05).F_o, F_m and NPQ gradually increased with the change of habitat, with the maximum values in the habitat Ⅲ(142.95, 609.42 and 1.65)and the minimum values in the habitat Ⅰ(87.6, 358.06 and 0.96).F_v'/F_m' increased first and then decreased, the maximum value occurs in environment Ⅲ(0.53),the minimum value appears in scenario Ⅱ(0.39), respectively; F_o was positively correlated with F_m and NPQ(P<0.01), the correlation coefficient of F_m was the largest, which was 0.99; Three key chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, F_o, F_m and NPQ, were screened out by principal component analysis, and their common factor variances were 0.947, 0.969 and 0.824; Salt, available phosphorus and pH could explain 17.2%, 24.2% and 13.5% of the variation of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, while water did not.【Conclusion】 In conclusion, in the high-salt habitat, the structure and physiological state of leaves PSⅡ were damaged, photosynthesis was blocked, and plant growth was inhibited eventually.

Key words: soil salinization; different habitats; Suaeda microphylla Pall.; chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

中图分类号:

热依汗·阿布力孜, 何学敏, 杨欢, 黄鹏程, 冯海鹏, 王勇志. 不同水盐生境下小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数特征及其对土壤因子的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 485-494.

Reyihan Abulizi, HE Xuemin, YANG Huan, HUANG Pengcheng, FENG Haipeng, WANG Yongzhi. Characteristics of chlorophyll-fluorescence parameters of Suaeda microphylla Pall.and their responses to soil factors in different water-salt habitats[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 485-494.

图/表 6

表1 不同生境下小叶碱蓬土壤因子的差异性

Tab.1 Differences of soil factors in Suaeda microphylla Pall.in different habitats

生境 Habitat	pH	电导率 Electrical conductivity (mS/cm)	土壤含盐量 Soil salinity (g/kg)	土壤含水率 Soil water content (%)	土壤有机质 Soil organic matter (g/kg)	土壤全氮 Soil total nitrogen (g/kg)	土壤速效磷 Soil available phosphorus (mg/kg)
Ⅰ	8.1±0.07^a	8.9±0.68^bc	8.62±0.65^bc	13.59±0.51^b	9.46±0.9^b	1.49±0.7^a	13.59±0.51^b
Ⅱ	8.12±0.03^a	5.17±0.47^a	5.05±0.45^a	7.98±0.68^a	6.61±0.31^ab	0.94±0.42^a	7.98±0.68^a
Ⅲ	7.95±0.06^a	6.8±0.61^ab	6.61±0.58^ab	12.82±0.45^b	8.57±1.37^ab	0.97±0.56^a	12.82±0.45^b

图1 不同生境下小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数的差异及变异性

Fig.1 Differences and variability of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Suaeda microphylla Pall

图2 不同生境下小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数间的相关性注:P<0.01**,P<0.05*。Fo:初始荧光; Fm:最大荧光; Fv/Fm:PSⅡ最大光化学效率; Fv/Fo:光合效率潜能; Fv'/Fm':PSⅡ反应中心的激发能捕获效率; ΦPSⅡ:PSⅡ实际的光化学量子效率; ETR:电子传递效率; qP:光化学淬灭系数; NPQ:非光化学淬灭系数。

Fig.2 Correlation between chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Suaeda microphylla Pall.in different habitats Note:P<0.01**,P<0.05*.Fo:Initial fluorescence; Fm:Maximum fluorescence; Fv/Fm:PSⅡ maximum photochemical efficiency; Fv/Fo:Photosynthetic efficiency potential; Fv'/Fm':PSⅡ reflects the excitation energy capture efficiency of the center; ΦPSⅡ:Actual photochemical quantum efficiency of PSⅡ; ETR:Electron transport efficiency; qP:Photo chemical quenching coefficient; NPQ:Non-photochemical quenching.

表2 初始因子载荷矩阵及主成分贡献率

Tab.2 Initial factor loading matrix and principal component contribution rate

叶绿素荧光参数 Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameter	主成分1 Principal Component 1	主成分2 Principal Component 2	主成分3 Principal Component 3	综合得分 Comprehensive score	综合位次 Comprehensive ranking	公因子方差 Communality
初始荧光F_o	0.900	0.252	0.270	0.552	2	0.947
最大荧光F_m	0.876	0.393	0.216	0.579	1	0.969
PSⅡ最大光化学效F_v/F_m	0.362	0.862	-0.034	0.448	4	0.875
光合效率潜能F_v/F_o	0.305	0.920	-0.134	0.426	5	0.958
PSⅡ反应中心的激发能捕获效率F_v'/F_m'	-0.686	0.622	-0.231	-0.164	8	0.911
PSⅡ实际的光化学量子效率Φ_PS _Ⅱ	-0.757	0.578	0.255	-0.152	7	0.972
电子传递效率ETR	-0.772	0.564	0.224	-0.168	9	0.965
光化学淬灭系数qP	-0.397	-0.167	0.874	-0.139	6	0.949
非光化学淬灭系数NPQ	0.882	0.079	0.198	0.479	3	0.824
特征值Eigenvalues	4.379	2.881	1.110
贡献率Contribution(%)	48.655	32.007	12.338
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution(%)	48.655	80.662	93.000

图3 小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数与土壤因子的RDA排序注:STN:土壤全氮含量; SA:土壤含盐量; SOM:土壤有机质含量; SAP:土壤速效磷含量, 叶绿素荧光参数同图2

Fig.3 RDA ranking of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and soil factors of Suaeda microphylla Pall. Note:STN:Soil total nitrogen; SA:Soil salinity; SOM:Soil organic matter; SAP:Soil available phosphorus, Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters are as shown in Fig.2

表3 土壤因子蒙德卡罗检验

Tab.3 Monde Carlo test for soil factors

土壤因子 Soil factors	解释量 Explains (%)	贡献率 Contribution (%)	F	P
土壤速效磷 Soil available phosphorus	17.2	24.3	1.5	0.254
土壤含盐量 Soil salinity	24.2	34.2	2.5	0.076
pH	13.5	19.1	1.5	0.216
土壤全氮 Soil total nitrogen	6.7	9.4	0.7	0.63
土壤有机质 Soil organic matter	9.2	13.0	0.9	0.474

参考文献 42

[1]	朱海强, 李艳红, 李发东. 近10年艾比湖湿地不同植物群落土壤水分-盐分-养分变化特征[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(3):535-543.
	ZHU Haiqiang, LI Yanhong, LI Fadong. Characteristics of soil moisture, salinity and nutrients in different plant communities of ebinur lake wetland during the past decade[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(3):535-543.
[2]	张立华, 陈小兵. 盐碱地怪柳“盐岛”和“肥岛”效应及其碳氮磷生态化学计量学特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(3):653-658.
	ZHANG Lihua, CHEN Xiaobing. Characteristics of ‘salt island’ and ‘fertile island’ for Tamarix chinensis and soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry in saline-alkali land[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(3):653-658. PMID
[3]	张立华, 陈沛海, 李健, 等. 黄河三角洲怪柳植株周围土壤盐分离子的分布[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(18):5741-5749.
	ZHANG Lihua, CHEN Peihai, LI Jian, et al. Distribution of soil salt ions around Tamarix chinensis individuals in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(18):5741-5749.
[4]	Mishara A, Tanna B. Halophytes:potential resources for salt stress tolerance genes and promoters[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8:829. DOI URL
[5]	陈海银, 沈晖, 田军仓, 等. 植物叶绿素荧光参数对水盐胁迫的响应机制综述[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021, (19):168-169,176.
	CHEN Haiyin, SHEN Hui, TIAN Juncang, et al. Review on response mechanism of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters to water and salt stress in plants[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, (19):168-169,176.
[6]	李永梅, 张学俭. 基于光谱指数的构祀叶片水分含量遥感监测研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2019, 35(5):16-21.
	LI Yongmei, ZHANG Xuejian. Remote sensing monitoring of leaf water content in Lycium barbarum based on spectral index[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2019, 35(5):16-21.
[7]	Borawska-Jarmułowicz B, Mastalerczuk G, Pietkiewicz S, et al. Low temperature and hardening effects on photosynthetic apparatus efficiency and survival of forage grass varieties[J]. Plant Soil and Environment, 2014, 60(4):177-183. DOI URL
[8]	Zushi K, Matsuzoe N. Using of chlorophyll a fluorescence OJIP transients for sensing salt stress in the leaves and fruits of tomato[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 219:216-221. DOI URL
[9]	殷元峰, 胡宇凯, 胡守林. 不同栽培模式下棉花花铃期叶绿素荧光参数分析[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(16):6-10.
	YIN Yuanfeng, HU Yukai, HU Shoulin. Analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters at flowering boll stage of cotton under different cultivation modes[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2022, 42(16):6-10.
[10]	杨淑萍, 危常州, 梁永超. 盐胁迫对不同基因型海岛棉光合作用及荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(8):1585-1593. DOI
	YANG Shuping, WEI Changzhou, LIANG Yongchao. Effects of NaCl stress on the characteristics of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence at seedlings stage in different sea island cotton genotypes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(8):1585-1593.
[11]	Mehta P, Jajoo A, Mathur S, et al. Chlorophyll a fluorescence study revealing effects of high salt stress on Photosystem II in wheat leaves[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2010, 48(1):16-20. DOI PMID
[12]	Kumari A, Kumar A, Wany A, et al. Identification and annotation of abiotic stress responsive candidate genes in peanut ESTs[J]. Bioinformation, 2012, 8(24):1211-1219. DOI PMID
[13]	孙文君, 江晓慧, 付媛媛, 等. 盐分胁迫对棉花幼苗叶片叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2021, 40(7):23-28,121.
	SUN Wenjun, JIANG Xiaohui, FU Yuanyuan, et al. The effects of salt stress on chlorophyll fluorescence of cotton seeding leaves[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2021, 40(7):23-28,121.
[14]	张玲, 王华, 周静, 等. NaCl胁迫对两个辣椒品种幼苗叶绿素荧光参数等生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(4):597-604. DOI
	ZHANG Ling, WANG Hua, ZHOU Jing, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and other physiological characteristics in seedlings of two pepper cultivars[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(4):597-604. DOI
[15]	杜美娥, 王红霞, 张伟, 等. 盐胁迫对金叶榆幼苗叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019, (5):90-94.
	DU Meie, WANG Hongxia, ZHANG Wei, et al. Effects of different concentration of salt stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Ulmus pumila seedlings[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019, (5):90-94.
[16]	刘莉娜, 张卫强, 黄芳芳, 等. 盐胁迫对银叶树幼苗光合特性与叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2019, 39(6):601-607.
	LIU Lina, ZHANG Weiqiang, HUANG Fangfang, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence of Heritiera littoralis seedlings[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2019, 39(6):601-607.
[17]	孙璐, 周宇飞, 李丰先, 等. 盐胁迫对高粱幼苗光合作用和荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(16):3265-3272. DOI
	SUN Lu, ZHOU Yufei, LI Fengxian, et al. Impact of salt stress on characteristics of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Sorghum seedlings[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(16):3265-3272. DOI
[18]	陈蜀江, 侯平, 李文华. 新疆艾比湖湿地自然保护区综合科学考察[M]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆科学技术出版社, 2006.
	CHEN Shujiang, HOU Ping, LI Wenhua. Comprehensive scientific investigation of ebinur lake wetland nature reserve in Xinjiang[M]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Science and Technology Press, 2006.
[19]	王水献, 董新光, 杜卫东. 新疆阿瓦提灌区土壤盐渍化现状及特征分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2006,(5):170-175
	Wang Shuixian, Dong Xinguang, Du Weidong. Present situation and characteristic analysis of soil salinization in Awati irrigation area of Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2006,(5):170-175.
[20]	秦娟, 孔海燕, 刘华. 马尾松不同林型土壤C、N、P、K的化学计量特征[J] .西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(2):68-76,82.
	QIN Juan, KONG Haiyan, LIU Hua. Stoichiometric characteristics of soil C, N, P and K in different Pinus types massonianaforests[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(2):68-76,82.
[21]	周帅, 林富平, 王玉魁, 等. 樟树幼苗机械损伤叶片对挥发性有机化合物及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(7):671-680. DOI
	ZHOU Shuai, LIN Fuping, WANG Yukui, et al. Effects of mechanical damage of leaves on volatileorganic compounds and chlorophyll flourescence parameters in seedlings of Cinnamomun camohora[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(7):671-680. DOI
[22]	李佳, 江洪, 余树全, 等. 模拟酸雨胁迫对青冈幼苗光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(9):2092-2096.
	LI Jia, JIANG Hong, YU Shuquan, et al. Effects of simulated acid rain stress on Quercus glauca seeding photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 20(9):2092-2096. PMID
[23]	Murata N, Takahashi S, Nishiyama Y, et al. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta(BBA)-Bioenergetics, 2007,(6):414-421. DOI PMID
[24]	方怡然, 薛立. 盐胁迫对植物叶绿素荧光影响的研究进展[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(3):225-234.
	FANG Yiran, XUE Li. Research advances in the effects of salt stress on plant chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Ecological Science, 2019, 38(3):225-234.
[25]	蔡建国, 韦孟琪, 章毅, 等. 遮阴对绣球光合特性和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(5):570-576. DOI
	CAI Jianguo, WEI Mengqi, ZHANG Yi, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of Hydrangea macrophylla[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(5):570-576. DOI
[26]	Oukarroum A, Bussotti F, Goltsev V, et al. Correlation between reactive oxygen species production and photochemistry of photosystems I and Ⅱ in Lemna gibbal[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2015, 109:80-88. DOI URL
[27]	Zhang J F, Wan L, Igathinathane C, et al. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of chlorophyll content and fluorescence response within rice(Oryza sativa L.) canopies under different nitrogen treatments[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12:645977. DOI URL
[28]	dos Santos V, VAHR Nelson B W, Rodrigues J V F C, et al. Fluorescence parameters among leaf photosynthesis-related traits are the best proxies for CO2 assimilation in Central Amazon trees[J]. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 2019, 42(2):239-247. DOI
[29]	姚春娟, 郭圣茂, 马英超, 等. 干旱胁迫对4种决明属植物光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2017, 34(9):1880-1888.
	YAO Chunjuan, GUO Shengmao, MA Yingchao, et al. Effects of drought stress on characteristics of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence four species of Cassia[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(9):1880-1888.
[30]	孙敏, 李树斌, 唐飘, 等. 干旱胁迫对杉木无性系叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2018, 38(2):202-208.
	SUN Min, LI Shubin, TANG Piao, et al. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Chinese fir clones[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2018, 38(2):202-208.
[31]	李磊, 李向义, 林丽莎, 等. 两种生境条件下6种牧草叶绿素含量及荧光参数的比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6):672-680. DOI
	LI Lei, LI Xiangyi, LIN Lisha, et al. Comparison of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters of six pasture spescies in two habitats in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(6):672-680. DOI
[32]	李灿, 曾凤, 赵阳阳, 等. 水涝胁迫对4种姜科植物叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2019, 39(2):45-50.
	LI Can, ZENG Feng, ZHAO Yangyang, et al. Effects of waterlogging stress on chlorophyll fluorescence of four Zingiberaceae species[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2019, 39(2):45-50.
[33]	刘丙花, 赵登超, 梁静, 等. 4个品种核桃砧木幼苗干旱生理响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2020, 38(1):11-19.
	LIU Binghua, ZHAO Dengchao, LIANG Jing, et al. Physiological response to drought stress and resistances evaluation of four cultivars of walnut rootstock seedlings[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2020, 38(1):11-19.
[34]	Yang Z F, Tian J C, Feng K P, et al. Application of a hyperspectral imaging system to quantify leaf-scale chlorophyll, nitrogen and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in grapevine[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 166:723-737. DOI PMID
[35]	金祎婷, 刘文辉, 刘凯强, 等. 全生育期干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6):112-126. DOI
	JIN Yiting, LIU Wenhui, LIU Kaiqiang, et al. Effects of water deficit stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Avena sativa 'Qingyan No.1' over the whole crop growth period[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6):112-126. DOI
[36]	杨程, 杜思梦, 张德奇, 等. 基于叶绿素荧光参数的小麦叶片叶绿素相对含量估算方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1):175-181. DOI
	YANG Cheng, DU Simeng, ZHANG Deqi, et al. Method for estimating relative chlorophyll content in wheat leaves based on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1):175-181. DOI
[37]	Yamane K, Kawasaki M, Taniguchi M, et al. Correlation between chloroplast ultrastructure and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in the leaves of rice(Oryza sativa L.) grown under salinity[J]. Plant Production Science, 2008, 11(1):139-145. DOI URL
[38]	Shin Y K, Bhandari S B, Cho M C, et al. Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and proline content in tomato seedlings grown under different salt stress conditions[J]. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2020, 61(3):433-443.
[39]	刘雷震, 武建军, 周洪奎, 等. 叶绿素荧光及其在水分胁迫监测中的研究进展[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2017, 37(9):2780.
	LIU Leizhen, WU Jianjun, ZHOU Hongkui, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence and its progress in detecting water stress[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2017, 37(9):2780.
[40]	Gan T T, Zhao N J, Yin G F, et al. Optimal chlorophyll fluorescence parameter selection for rapid and sensitive detection of lead toxicity to marine microalgae Nitzschia closterium based on chlorophyll fluorescence technology[J]. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, B:Biology, 2019, 197:111551.
[41]	孙云飞, 张文明, 巢建国, 等. 盐胁迫对茅苍术叶绿素含量及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(4):146-149.
	SUN Yunfei, ZHANG Wenming, CHAO Jianguo, et al. Impact of salt stress on chlorophyll contents and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Atractylodes lancea[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(4):146-149.
[42]	贾婷婷, 常伟, 范晓旭, 等. 盐胁迫下AM真菌对沙枣苗木光合与叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(4):1337-1347.
	JIA Tingting, CHANG Wei, FAN Xiaoxu, et al. Effects of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Elaeagnes angustifolia seedlings under salt stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(4):1337-1347.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	4	0	0	29

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	14	19
比例	42%	58%

摘要

151

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	151

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	40	111
比例	26%	74%

不同水盐生境下小叶碱蓬叶绿素荧光参数特征及其对土壤因子的响应

Characteristics of chlorophyll-fluorescence parameters of Suaeda microphylla Pall.and their responses to soil factors in different water-salt habitats

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

[1]	姚宇翔, 王国强, 王可, 伊莎, 杨欣雅, 罗晓霞. 塔里木河上游不同生境细菌群落结构及多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 708-718.
[2]	马新超, 轩正英, 闵昊哲, 齐志文, 成宏宇, 谭占明, 王旭峰. 水氮耦合对沙培黄瓜光合日变化及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1966-1974.
[3]	丁宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 刘洪波, 郑明, 赵经华, 肖军, 韩政宇. 双膜条件下不同干播湿出水分处理对棉花生理、生长特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 810-822.
[4]	吕齐, 蒋宇, 赵丰云, 雷叶, 于坤, 姚东东, 李旭娇, 沙日叶, 王芳霞. 施加生物炭对盐胁迫下无花果生物量叶绿素荧光参数及离子分配的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 574-581.
[5]	秦国礼, 王为然, 王萌, 杨静, 黄幸磊, 刘志清, 朱家辉, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 孔杰, 陈国栋. 草甘膦对海岛棉农艺性状及光合作用的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2861-2868.
[6]	户金鸽, 白世践, 陈光, 蔡军社. 15个葡萄砧木耐热性差异评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 86-95.
[7]	罗文芳, 何伟, 孙晓军, 许建军. 5种植物免疫诱导剂在黄瓜上应用效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(1): 107-114.
[8]	宋羽, 曲继松, 张丽娟, 朱倩楠. 氮素用量对设施韭菜气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5): 852-858.
[9]	李笑佳, 张倩, 张淑英. 外源硅对盐胁迫下棉花幼苗光合、荧光及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(5): 873-881.
[10]	张琦, 李鹏, 田嘉, 李疆. 转扁桃AcCBF1基因对烟草光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(2): 267-277.
[11]	付园园, 蒋萍, 刘爱华, 张静文, 岳朝阳, 田呈明. 不同景观尺度对杨盾蚧种群空间分布的影响分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(11): 2043-2053.
[12]	刘金宇,迪丽努尔,贾海英,蒋萍. 核桃叶斑病病菌菌丝体及孢子越冬存活研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1870-1878.
[13]	李小东;张凤华;朱煜. 新疆南疆典型地区农业灌溉水质与土壤盐渍化关系的研究[J]. , 2016, 53(7): 1260-1267.
[14]	王强;帕提古丽;张常荣;王浩;杨涛;杨生保;王柏柯;李宁;唐亚萍. 不同砧木嫁接对辣椒光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. , 2015, 52(4): 660-666.
[15]	买买提·沙吾提;塔西甫拉提·特依拜;丁建丽;张飞. BP神经网络在渭干河流域土壤盐渍化预测中的应用[J]. , 2013, 50(4): 774-779.