诱捕器颜色、悬挂高度与位置对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.013

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 1144-1155.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.013

• 植物保护·微生物·贮藏保鲜加工 • 上一篇下一篇

诱捕器颜色、悬挂高度与位置对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果评价

谈钇汐¹(), 付开赟²(), 贾尊尊², 李爱梅¹, 丁新华², 吐尔逊·阿合买提², 冯宏祖¹, 郭文超²()

1.塔里木大学农学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2021-12-01 出版日期:2022-05-20 发布日期:2022-06-09
通信作者: 郭文超( 1966- ),男,河北人,研究员,博士,硕/博士生导师,研究方向为农业害虫综合防治,( E-mail) gwc1966@163. Com;付开赟(1987-),男,浙江人,助理研究员,研究方向为农业害虫综合防治,(E-mail) fukaiyun000@foxmail.com
作者简介:谈钇汐(1997-),男,江苏人,硕士研究生,研究方向为资源利用与植物保护,(E-mail) 657747590@qq.com
基金资助:
自治区创新环境(人才、基地)建设专项—科技创新基地建设(资源共享平台建设)“新疆外来入侵生物监测检测数据共享平台”(PT2028);新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育专项“新疆重大新发农林入侵生物监测预警与综合防控”(xjkcpy-002)

Evaluation of Trap Colour, Hanging Height and Position on the Effectiveness of Trapping Tuta absoluta(meyrick)

TAN Yixi¹(), FU Kaiyun²(), JIA Zunzun², LI Aimei¹, DING Xinhua², Tursun Ahemat², FENG Hongzu¹, GUO Wenchao²()

1. College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar Xinjiang 843300, China
2. Key Laboratory of Intergraded Management of Harmful Crop Vermin of China Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the P.R.C. /Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091,China

Received:2021-12-01 Published:2022-05-20 Online:2022-06-09
Correspondence author: GUO Wenchao (1966-), male, from Hebei, Researcher, doctoral supervisor, research direction is integrated control of agricultural pests, (E-mail) gwc1966@163.com;FU Kaiyun(1987-), male, born in Xinjiang, Assistant researcher, Research direction :Integrated management of Agricultural Pests, (E-mail) fukaiyun000@foxmail.com
Supported by:
The Innovation Environment (Talent, Base) Construction Special Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region-Construction of Science and Technology Innovation Base (Resource-Sharing Platform Construction) "Xinjiang Foreign Invasive Biological Monitoring and Detection Data Sharing Platform"(PT2028);The Key Technology Innovation Incubation Project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjkcpy-002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究诱捕器颜色、悬挂高度、悬挂位置对诱蛾效果的影响,为针对番茄潜叶蛾的绿色防控提供依据。【方法】以专一性引诱剂为材料,采用行为生态学技术方法,在有机蔬菜生产温棚,对比研究性信息素诱捕器(平面式)颜色、诱捕器悬挂高度和诱捕器悬挂位置对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果。【结果】蓝色、绿色、黄色和白色4种颜色性信息素诱捕器均可诱捕到一定数量的番茄潜叶蛾,4种颜色诱捕器41 d平均日诱蛾量从高至低依次为蓝色65.4头、绿色59.7头、白色47.4头、黄色30.9头,逐日诱蛾量中,蓝色诱捕器最高,依次为蓝色和绿色>白色>黄色诱捕器,差异显著。不同颜色诱捕器逐日诱蛾量占比中,4种颜色的诱捕器两两比较均有显著性差异,依次为蓝色>绿色>白色>黄色。3种悬挂高度性信息素诱捕器39 d平均日诱蛾量依次为40~60 cm为125.1头、90~110 cm为96.1头、140~160 cm为65.1头,逐日诱蛾量中,40~60 cm最高,依次为40~60 cm>90~110 cm>140~160 cm,差异明显。不同悬挂高度诱捕器诱蛾量占比中,40~60 cm显著高于其他2种悬挂高度,依次为40~60 cm>90~110 cm>140~160 cm,差异明显。3种悬挂位置性信息素诱捕器35 d平均日诱蛾量依次为悬挂于通风口处为103.0头、出入口处为66.6头、远离通风口处为71.4头/诱捕器,逐日诱蛾量中,通风口处诱蛾量最高,依次为通风口>远离通风口>出入口,差异明显。不同悬挂位置诱捕器诱蛾量占比中,悬挂于通风口处的诱捕器诱蛾量显著高于其他2种悬挂位置,依次为通风口>出入口和远离通风口,差异明显。通风口>远离通风口>出入口。【结论】在设施蔬菜生产中,将蓝色性信息素诱捕器(平面式)于40~60 cm放置通风口处,对番茄潜叶蛾的诱捕效果最好。

关键词: 番茄潜叶蛾; 性诱芯; 色板; 诱捕器颜色; 诱捕器悬挂高度; 诱捕器悬挂位置; 诱捕效果

Abstract:

【Objective】 To investigate the effects of trap color, hanging height and hanging position on the trapping effect, and to provide a basis for the green prevention and control of tomato leaf diving moth. 【Methods】 In this study, specific sex attractants were used as experimental materials, and behavioral ecology techniques were adopted to conduct a comparative study on the trapping effects of sex pheromone traps (plane traps) on tomato leaf miner moth in organic vegetable production shed. 【Results】 4 kinds of color: blue, green, yellow and white sex pheromone traps could trap a certain quantity of tomato leaf moth, 1 d average daily trap quantity among the 4 kinds of color traps from high to low in turn was blue 65.4, green 59.7, white 47.4, yellow 30.9. In terms of daily amount of trap, the highest was blue trap. The order was blue and green > white > yellow trap, and the difference was significant. There were significant differences in the proportion of the daily amount of traps with different colors, and the order was blue > green > white > yellow. The average daily trapping quantity of the three kinds of high hanging sex pheromone traps was 125.1 at 40 - 60 cm, 96.1 at 90 - 110 cm and 65.1 at 140 - 160 cm, respectively, with the highest daily trapping quantity at 40 - 60 cm. The order was 40-60 cm > 90-110 cm > 140-160 cm, the difference was obvious. The proportion of moths captured by traps at different hanging heights at 40 - 60 cm was significantly higher than at the other two hanging heights, and the order was 40 - 60 cm > 90 - 110 cm > 140 - 160 cm. The 35 d average daily trapping quantity of the three kinds of traps was 103.0 at the air vent, 66.6 at the exit and 71.4 at the place far from the air vent. The highest daily trapping quantity was at the air vent, which was in the order of air vent > far from the air vent > the entrance and exit, and the difference was obvious. The proportion of the trapping amount of the traps in different hanging positions was significantly higher than those in the other two hanging positions, which was in the order of air outlet > entrance and exit and far away from air outlet. Comprehensive analysis of the hazard status (number of holes, number of larvae) of the three suspension positions showed: the ventilation outlet > away from the ventilation outlet > entrance and exit. 【Conclusion】 The blue sex pheromone trap (planar traps) placed at 40-60 cm vents has the best trapping effect on tomato leaf miner in vegetable production.

Key words: tomato leaf miner moth; lure core; color plate; trap color; trap hanging height; trap hanging position; trapping effect

中图分类号:

S436.412

谈钇汐, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 冯宏祖, 郭文超. 诱捕器颜色、悬挂高度与位置对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1144-1155.

TAN Yixi, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, LI Aimei, DING Xinhua, Tursun Ahemat, FENG Hongzu, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of Trap Colour, Hanging Height and Position on the Effectiveness of Trapping Tuta absoluta(meyrick)[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1144-1155.

图/表 13

图1 4种诱捕器颜色的诱蛾量占比注:每种颜色诱捕器日诱蛾量占比(平均值±标准误,n=4),诱捕器颜色旁小写字母不同表示在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析),粉色线表示日诱蛾量占比理论值(25%)

Fig.1 Proportion of lured T.absoluta adults of four different colors of sex pheromone traps Note:Proportion of trapped adults per sex pheromone trap per day (mean±SE, n=4).Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among colors of sex pheromone traps at P<0.05 level (One-way ANOVA); Pink line indicates theoretical value (25%) of percent of trapped adults

图2 4种诱捕器颜色诱捕器下日平均诱蛾量变化注:每种颜色诱捕器日诱蛾数量(平均值±标准误,n=4),诱捕器颜色旁小写字母不同表示不同颜色间在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析)

Fig.2 Number of trapped T.absoluta adults of four different colors of sex pheromone traps Note:Number of trapped adults per sex pheromone trap per day (mean±SE, n=5×3); Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among colors of sex pheromone traps at P<0.05 level (One-way ANOVA)

表1 不同颜色诱捕器对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果

Table 1 Effects of traps with different colors on T.absoluta

颜色 Colour	诱蛾量 Moth trapping quantity(头)	诱蛾量占比 Proportion of moth trapping quantity(%)
蓝色 Blue	65.4±10.5^a	33.09±1.03^a
绿色 Green	59.7±10.4^a	28.88±1.24^b
黄色 Yellow	30.9±5.6^b	16.52±0.86^d
白色 White	47.4±8.8a^b	21.52±1.05^c

图3 3种悬挂高度的诱蛾量占比注:每种悬挂高度诱捕器日诱蛾量占比(平均值±标准误,n=4),诱捕器悬挂高度旁小写字母不同表示在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析),粉色线示诱蛾量占比理论值(33.3%)

Fig.3 Proportion of lured T.absoluta adults of sex pheromone traps placed in three different heights Note:Proportion of trapped adults per sex pheromone trap per day (mean±SE, n=5).Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among heights of sex pheromone trap placement at P<0.05 level (One-way ANOVA); Pink line indicates theoretical value (33.3%) of percent of trapped adults

图4 3种悬挂高度的日平均诱蛾量注:每种悬挂高度诱捕器的日诱蛾量(平均值±标准误,n=4),诱捕器悬挂高度旁小写字母不同表示在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析)

Fig.4 Number of trapped T.absoluta adults of three different heights of sex pheromone traps Note:Number of trapped adults per sex pheromone trap per day (mean±SE, n=4);Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among heights of sex pheromone trap placement at P<0.05 level (One-way ANOVA)

表2 不同高度诱捕器对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果

Table 2 Effects of traps with different heights on T.absoluta

高度 (m)	诱蛾量 Moth trapping quantity(头)	诱蛾量占比 Proportion of moth trapping quantity(%)
0.5	125.1±22.4^a	46.96±1.59^a
1.0	96.1±18.5a^b	31.11±1.09^b
1.5	65.1±12.7^b	22.24±1.35^c

图5 3种悬挂位置的诱蛾量占比注:每种悬挂位置诱捕器日诱蛾量占比(平均值±标准误,n=4),诱捕器悬挂位置旁小写字母不同表示在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析),粉色线示诱蛾量占比理论值(33.3%)

Fig.5 Proportion of lured T.absoluta adults of sex pheromone traps placed in three different position Note:Proportion of trapped adults per sex pheromone trap per day (mean±SE, n=5).Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among positions of sex pheromone trap placement at P<0.05 level (One-way ANOVA); Pink line indicates theoretical value (33.3%) of percent of trapped adults

图6 3种悬挂位置诱捕器下逐日诱蛾量变化注:每种悬挂位置诱捕器的日诱蛾量(平均值±标准误,n=4),诱捕器悬挂位置旁小写字母不同表示在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析)

Fig.6 Number of trapped T.absoluta adults of three different positions of sex pheromone traps Note:Number of trapped adults per sex pheromone trap per day (mean±SE, n=4);Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among positions of sex pheromone trap placement at P<0.05 level (One-way ANOVA)

表3 不同位置诱捕器下番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果

Table 3 Effects of traps with different positions on T.absoluta

悬挂位置 Suspension	诱蛾量 Moth trapping quantity(头)	诱蛾量占比 Proportion of moth trapping quantity(%)
通风口 Vent	103.0±15.8^a	41.90±1.01^a
出入口 Entrance and exit	66.6±10.0^b	28.19±1.06^b
远离通风口 Farfrom vent	71.4±10. ${3^{a}}^{b}$	29.91±1.09^b

表3 不同位置诱捕器下番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果

Table 3 Effects of traps with different positions on T.absoluta

悬挂位置 Suspension	诱蛾量 Moth trapping quantity(头)	诱蛾量占比 Proportion of moth trapping quantity(%)
通风口 Vent	103.0±15.8^a	41.90±1.01^a
出入口 Entrance and exit	66.6±10.0^b	28.19±1.06^b
远离通风口 Farfrom vent	71.4±10. ${3^{a}}^{b}$	29.91±1.09^b

图7 3种位置受到番茄潜叶蛾的危害程度注:每种位置调查两个对象:孔洞数量、幼虫数量(平均值±标准误,n=9),上方小写字母不同表示诱捕器悬挂高度间在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析)

Fig. 7 Three parts of the plant at the vent are endangered by the tomato leaf moth Note:Two objects were investigated for each position: the number of holes and the number of larvae (mean ± SE, n=9).The difference of upper lowercase letters indicated significant difference between the hanging height of the trap at P< 0.05 (One-way ANOVA)

表4 番茄潜叶蛾对不同位置番茄植株危害状况的评价

Table 4 Evaluation of damage status of tomato plants by T.absoluta at different locations

悬挂位置 Suspension	评价指标Eraluation index		综合评价指标 Comprehensive evaluation index
悬挂位置 Suspension	孔洞数量 Hole(个)	幼虫数量 Larva(头)	综合评价指标 Comprehensive evaluation index
通风口 Vent	11.51±1.19^a	2.86±0.40^a	32.92
出入口 Entrance and exit	6.83±0.60^b	0.49±0.15^b	3.35
远离通风口 Farfrom vent	11.90±8.96^a	1.19±0.29^b	14.16

表5 番茄潜叶蛾对通风口处植株的不同位置危害状况的评价

Table 5 Evaluation of hazard status of tomato leaf moth at different positions at the vent site

不同部位 Position	评价对象Evaluation		综合评价指标 Comprehensive evaluation index
不同部位 Position	孔洞数量 Hole(个)	幼虫数量 Larva(头)	综合评价指标 Comprehensive evaluation index
上部 Upper part	4.05±0.63^c	0.62±0.30^b	2.51
中部 Central section	10.19±1.63^b	0.81±0.3 ${6^{a}}^{b}$	8.25
下部 Lower part	20.76±1.74^a	2.67±1.06^a	55.43

表5 番茄潜叶蛾对通风口处植株的不同位置危害状况的评价

Table 5 Evaluation of hazard status of tomato leaf moth at different positions at the vent site

不同部位 Position	评价对象Evaluation		综合评价指标 Comprehensive evaluation index
不同部位 Position	孔洞数量 Hole(个)	幼虫数量 Larva(头)	综合评价指标 Comprehensive evaluation index
上部 Upper part	4.05±0.63^c	0.62±0.30^b	2.51
中部 Central section	10.19±1.63^b	0.81±0.3 ${6^{a}}^{b}$	8.25
下部 Lower part	20.76±1.74^a	2.67±1.06^a	55.43

图8 通风口处植株的3个部位受到番茄潜叶蛾的危害程度注:通风口处选择3个植株,分别于上中下3个部位调查两个对象:孔洞数量、幼虫数量(平均值±标准误,n=3),上方小写字母不同表示诱捕器悬挂高度间在P<0.05 水平差异显著(单因素方差分析)

Note:Three plants were selected at the vent, and two objects were investigated at the upper, middle and lower parts respectively: the number of holes and larvae (mean ± SE, n=3).The difference of upper lowercase letters indicated significant difference between the hanging height of the trap at P< 0.05 (one-way ANOVA)

参考文献 37

[1]	Campos R G. Control químico del ''minador de hojas ytallos de la papa'' (Scrobipalpula absoluta Meyrick) en elvalle del Ca ete[J]. La Revista Peruana de Entomologia, 1976, 19: 102-106.
[2]	Diondi A, Narciso C G R, Wan F H, et al. Ecology, worldwide spread, and management of the invasive SouthAmerican tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta: past, present, and future[J]. Annual Review Entomology, 2017, 63 (1) :239-258. DOI URL
[3]	张桂芬, 刘万学, 万方浩, 等. 世界毁灭性检疫害虫番茄潜叶蛾的生物生态学及危害与控制[J]. 生物安全学报, 2018, 27(3):155-163.
	ZHANG Guifen, LIU Wanxue, WAN Fanghao, et al. Bioecology, damage and control of tomato leaf miner, a devastating quarantine pest in the world[J]. Chinese Journal of Biosafety, 2018, 27 (3) : 155-163.
[4]	Campos M R, Biondi A, Adiga A, et al. From the western palaearctic region to beyond: Tuta absoluta 10 years after invading Europe[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2017, 90(3): 787-796. DOI URL
[5]	马菲, 张俊华, 于艳雪, 等. 番茄麦蛾[J]. 植物检疫, 2011, 25(5): 55-58.
	MA Fei, ZHANG Junhua, YU Yanxue, et al. Tuta absoluta(Meyricr)[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2011, 25 (5) : 55-58.
[6]	李晓维, 李栋, 郭文超, 等. 番茄潜叶蛾对4种茄科植物的适应性研究[J]. 植物检疫, 2019, 33(3):1-5.
	LI Xiaowei, LI Dong, GUO Wenchao, et al. Study on adaptability of tomato leaf miner moth to four species of solanaceae[J]. Plant quarantine, 2019, 33(3):1-5.
[7]	Araya J E, Salazar E R. Respuesta de la polilla del tomate, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick), a insecticidas en Arica, Chile.[J]. Chileanjar, 2001, 61(4):429-435.
[8]	张桂芬, 马德英, 刘万学, 等. 中国新发现外来入侵害虫-南美番茄潜叶蛾(鳞翅目:麦蛾科)[J]. 生物安全学报, 2019, 28(3):200-203.
	ZHANG Guifen, MA Deying, LIU Wanxue, et al. A new invasive pest, The Tomato Leaf Miner (Lepidoptera: Mycidae), was discovered in China[J]. Chinese journal of biosafety, 2019, 28(3):200-203.
[9]	ZHANG G F, Ma D Y, WANG Y S, et al. First report of the South American tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick), in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(7): 1912-1917. DOI URL
[10]	张桂芬, 冼晓青, 张毅波, 等. 警惕南美番茄潜叶蛾 Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) 在中国扩散[J]. 植物保护, 2020, 46(2):281-286.
	ZHANG Guifen, XIAN Xiaoqing, ZHANG Yibo, et al. Be alert for the spread of Tuta Absoluta (Meyrick), a South American tomato leaf miner, in China[J]. Plant Protection, 2020, 46(2):281-286.
[11]	阿米热·牙生江, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 付开赟, 等. 9种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12):2291-2298. DOI
	Amirre Yasj, Adil Satar, FU Kaiun, et al. Evaluation on the control effect of nine insecticides on the leaf pothionidae of Tomato[J]. Xinjiang agricultural sciences, 2020, 57(12):2291-2298.
[12]	张桂芬, 张毅波, 张杰, 等. 苏云金芽孢杆菌G033A对新发南美番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力及田间防效[J]. 中国,生物防治学报, 2020, 36(2):175-183.
	ZHANG Guifen, ZHANG Yibo, ZHANG Jie, et al. Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis G033A on the virulence of bacillus thuringiensis against the newly found Leaf miner Moth of South America[J]. Chinese journal of biological control, 2020, 36 (2) : 175-183.
[13]	马琳, 李晓维, 王树明, 等. 6种杀虫剂对云南地区番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力测定[C]// .中国植物保护学会2019 年学术年会论文集, 2019. MALin, LIXiaowei, WANGShumin, et al. Indoor toxicity test of six insecticides against Tomato Leaf potholeiths in Yunnan area [C]// . Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Conference of Chinese Society for Plant Protection,2019.
[14]	Desneux N, Luna M G, Guillemaud T, Urbaneja A. The invasive South American tomato pinworm,Tuta absoluta,continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond:the new threat to tomato world production[J]. Journal of Pest Science, 2011, 84(4):403-408. DOI URL
[15]	Biondi A, Guedes R N C, Wan F H, Desneux N. Ecology, worldwide spread,and management of the invasive South American tomato pinworm,Tuta absoluta:past,present,and future[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2017, 63(1):239-258. DOI URL
[16]	孙猛, 郅军锐, 姚加加, 等. 不同颜色粘虫板对切花月季上西花蓟马诱集效果[J]. 北方园艺, 2010,(10):186-188.
	SUN Meng, ZHI Junrui, YAO Jiajia, et al. Trapping effect of different colors of Armyworm boards on Thrips occidentalis on cut Rose[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010,(10) :186-188.
[17]	于法辉, 夏长秀, 李春玲, 等, 不同色板对柑橘园蓟马的诱集效果及蓝板的诱捕效果[J]. 昆虫知识, 2010, 47(5):945-949.
	YU Fahui, XIA Changxiu, LI Chunling, et al. Trapping effects of different color boards and blue boards on Thrips in citrus gardens[J]. Entomological knowledge, 2010, 47(5):945-949.
[18]	欧善生, 简峰, 苏桂花, 等. 丽花蓟马对不同颜色的趋性及田间诱杀效果研究[J]. 植物保护, 2012, 38(6):174-177.
	OU Shansheng, JIAN Feng, SU Guihua, et al. Study on the effect of different color of thrips flower on the trapping and killing effect in field[J]. Plant protection, 2012, 38(6) :174-177.
[19]	宫亚军, 石宝才, 魏书军, 等, 不同色板对Q型烟粉虱成虫的诱杀效果研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2011,(6):157-158.
	GONG Yajun, SHI Baocai, WEI Shujun, et al. Effects of different color boards on the trapping and killing of bemisia tabaci adults[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2011,(6) : 157-158.
[20]	郝立武, 穆鸿雁, 刘保申, 等, 不同颜色色板对春玉米田灰飞虱的诱集效果[J]. 山东农业科学, 2012, 44(1):99-102.
	HAO Liwu, MU Hongyan, LIU Baoshen, et al. Effects of different color boards on trapping effect of grey planthopper in spring maize field[J]. Journal of shandong agricultural sciences, 2012, 44(1) : 99-102.
[21]	江春, 程建伟, 许飞云. 不同黄板处理对美洲斑潜蝇诱杀效果比较[J]. 晋中学院学报, 2013,(3):6265.
	JIANG Chun, CHENG Jianwei, XU Feiyun. Comparison of trapping and killing effects of different yellow plate treatments on Libria sativa[J]. Journal of Jinzhong University, 2013,(3) : 6265.
[22]	刘欢欢, 黄海棠, 朱金峰, 等. 不同黄板悬挂高度及密度对防治烟蚜及烟草病毒病的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015, 27(7):76-79.
	LIU Huanhuan, HUANG Haitang, ZHU Jinfeng, et al. Effects of hanging height and density of yellow plate on the control of tobacco aphid and tobacco virus disease[J]. Acta agriculturae jiangxi, 2015, 27(7):76-79.
[23]	武海斌, 孙杨, 宫庆涛, 等, 不同颜色色板对樱桃园果蝇成虫的田间诱集效果研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(1):99-102.
	WU Haibin, SUN Yang, GONG Qintao, et al. Effects of different color boards on field trapping of drosophila melanogaster adults in Cherry orchard[J]. Shandong agricultural sciences, 2016, 48(1):99-102.
[24]	隋学良, 许志春, 田呈明, 不同颜色粘虫板对多毛小蠹和皱小意的诱集效果[J]. 生态科学, 2011, 30(2):107-110.
	SUI Xueliang, XU Zhichun, TIAN Chengming, Trapping effect of different colors of Armyworm board on Tomonicus hirsutum and Tomonicus hirsutum[J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2011, 30(2):107-110.
[25]	孙晓玲, 蔡晓明, 王国昌, 等. 茶园中广翅蜡蝉成虫对不同颜色的趋向选择[J]. 茶叶科学, 2011, 31(2):95-99.
	SUN Xiaoling, CAI Xiaoming, WANG Guochang, et al. Trend selection of different colors by adults of cerascicada in tea garden[J]. Tea science, 2011, 31(2) : 95-99.
[26]	秦焕荣, 刘珠珠, 贺亚红, 等. 粘虫板不同颜色和悬挂高度对葡萄园绿盲蝽的诱集效果[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2020, 40(8):57-59.
	QIN Huanrong, LIU Zhuzhu, HE Yahong, et al. Trapping effect of different color and hanging height of Armyworm board on Lygus lucorum in vineyard[J]. Plant Protection Guide of China Publication, 2020, 40 (8) : 57-59.
[27]	王玮, 王胜永, 李宝辉, 等. 粘虫板不同挂板方式对苹果绣线菊蚜诱杀效果的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2019,(5):77-81.
	WANG Wei, WANG Shengyong, LI Baohui, et al. Effects of Different hanging boards of Armyworm on the trapping effect of Helicoid aphid[J]. Chinese fruit Trees, 2019,(5) : 77-81.
[28]	陈哲, 徐芳玲, 谢莉华, 等. 粘虫板颜色和悬挂方式对蓝莓果蝇引诱效果分析[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2017, 36(2):13-15.
	CHEN Zhe, XU Fangling, XIE Lihua, et al. Effects of color and hanging pattern of armyworm plate on the attraction effect of blueberry drosophila[J]. Chinese journal of forest diseases and insect pests, 2017, 36(2):13-15.
[29]	黄鹏, 陈汉鑫, 姚锦爱, 等. 香蕉花蓟马对不同颜色的敏感性及色板田间悬挂组合选择[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(1):141-145.
	HUANG Peng, CHEN Hanxin, YAO Jinai, et al. Sensitivity of Banana flower thrips to different colors and selection of color plate combination in field suspension[J]. China Agricultural Science TongIn 2016, 32 (1) : 141-145.
[30]	李智念, 陈力, 向苹苇, 等. 粘虫板不同颜色和悬挂高度对桑椹瘿蚊诱集效果的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018,(22):86-87.
	LI Zhinian, CHEN Li, XIANG Pingwei, et al. Effects of different colors and hanging height of armyworm plate on trapping effect of Mulberry gall midge[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018,(22):86-87.
[31]	周淑香, 李丽娟, 鲁新, 等. 诱捕器类型和悬挂高度对二化螟诱集效果的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2020, 45(2):32-35.
	ZHOU Shuxiang, LI Lijuan, LU Xin, et al. Effects of trap type and suspension height on trapping effect of Chilo suppressalis[J]. Northeast Agricultural Division Science, 2020, (2) : 32-35
[32]	陈利民, 何天骏, 吴全聪, 等. 诱捕器设置高度对豆野螟诱捕效果的影响[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2018, 38(5):48-50.
	CHEN Limin, HE Tianjun, WU Quancong, et al. Effect of height of trap on trapping effect of medinia furnacalis[J]. Plant protection guide of China, 2018, 38(5):48-50.
[33]	王玉兰, 唐丽, 岳朝阳, 等. 性诱剂不同悬挂高度及田间风向对梨小食心虫诱集效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(7):1283-1286.
	WANG Yulan, TANG Li, YUE Chaoyang, et al. Effects of different suspension heights of sexual attractants and field wind direction on the attractant effect of Pyrus pyrrhiza[J]. Xinjiang agricultural sciences, 2011, 48(7):1283-1286.
[34]	蒋耀智, 曾玲, 梁广文, 等. 悬挂高度和位置对性诱剂诱集柑桔潜叶蛾雄虫效果的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2011, 48(1):207-211.
	JIANG Yaozhi, ZENG Ling, LIANG Guangwen, et al. Effects of suspension height and position on the effect of sexual attractant on male Citrus leaf miner moth[J]. Applied Entomology Report, 2011, 48(1) :207-211.
[35]	汪燕琴, 戚利潮, 李晓刚, 等. 桔小实蝇诱捕器悬挂高度对诱捕效果的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2009,(3):548-550.
	WANG Yanqin, QI Lichao, LI Xiaogang, et al. Effects of suspension height on trapping effect of Bactrocera dorsalis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2009,(3):548-550.
[36]	李青梅, 任平太. 日光温室通风口覆盖防虫网对几种害虫的控制效果[J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2007,(1):14-16.
	LI Qingmei, REN Pingtai. Effect of insect control net covering the vent of solar greenhouse on several pests[J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2007,(1):14-16.
[37]	张桂芬, 张毅波, 刘万学, 等. 诱捕器颜色和悬挂高度对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(11):2343-2354.
	ZHANG Guifen, ZHANG Yibo, LIU Wanxue, et al. Effects of trap color and suspension height on the trapping effect of Tomato leaf miner Moth (Lycidoptera: Lycidoptera)[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11):2343-2354.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	17	0	0	59

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	48	28
比例	63%	37%

摘要

834

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	834

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	289	545
比例	35%	65%

诱捕器颜色、悬挂高度与位置对番茄潜叶蛾诱捕效果评价

Evaluation of Trap Colour, Hanging Height and Position on the Effectiveness of Trapping Tuta absoluta(meyrick)

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 37

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	付开赟, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 冯宏祖, 郭文超. 10 种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.
[2]	阿米热·牙生江, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 付开赟, 丁新华, 何江, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 郭文超, 李晓维. 9种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12): 2291-2298.
[3]	张新平;岳朝阳;刘爱华;杨明禄;盛承发;阿里木;张静文. 不同诱捕方法对苹果蠢蛾和梨小食心虫的诱捕效果[J]. , 2011, 48(2): 306-310.