2010~2021年新疆库鲁斯台草原动态遥感监测变化分析

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.025

新疆农业科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 230-240.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.01.025

• 农业装备工程与机械化·畜牧兽医 • 上一篇下一篇

2010~2021年新疆库鲁斯台草原动态遥感监测变化分析

刘亮¹(), 彭建², 李刚勇², 韩万强¹, 刘玉佳¹, 关靖云¹, 刘程才³, 郑江华¹^,⁴()

1.新疆大学地理与遥感科学学院,乌鲁木齐 830046
2.新疆维吾尔自治区草原总站,乌鲁木齐 830000
3.塔城地区林业和草原局,新疆塔城 834700
4.新疆绿洲生态重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830046

收稿日期:2023-05-05 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-02-21
通信作者: 郑江华(1973-),男,浙江江山人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为地理信息系统与遥感技术应用,(E-mail)zheng_jianghua@xju.edu.cn
作者简介:刘亮(1996-),男,新疆昌吉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植被与环境遥感,(E-mail)liuliang19960423@163.com
基金资助:
库鲁斯台草原生态保护恢复工程遥感监测(202005140017);新疆天山雪松计划项目(2020XS04);新疆国土空间生态修复规划专题研究(二标段)新疆陆地生态系统修复策略和空间布局专题研究(202105140022);新疆重要生态系统保护和修复重大工程规划(202005140014)

Analysis of dynamic remote sensing monitoring changes in Kulusitai grassland in Xinjiang from 2010 to 2021

LIU Liang¹(), PENG Jian², LI Gangyong², HAN Wanqiang¹, LIU Yujia¹, GUAN Jingyun¹, LIU Chengcai³, ZHENG Jianghua¹^,⁴()

1. College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences,Xinjiang University,Urumqi 830046,China
2. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Grassland Station,Urumqi 830000,China
3. Tacheng Forestry and Grassland Bureau,Tacheng Xinjiang 834700,China
4. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology,Urumqi 830046,China

Received:2023-05-05 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-02-21
Correspondence author: ZHENG Jianghua(1973-),man,born in Jiangshan,Zhejiang Province,professor,research interest is geographic information system and remote sensing technology application,(E-mail) zheng_jianghua@xju.edu.cn
Supported by:
Remote Sensing Monitoring of Kulusitai Grassland Ecological Protection and Restoration Project(202005140017);Xinjiang Tianshan Cedar Project(2020XS04);Xinjiang Land Spatial Ecological Restoration Planning Special Project(Section 2) Special Study on Strategies and Spatial Layout of Land Ecosystem Restoration in Xinjiang(202105140022);Xinjiang Important Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Program Project(202005140014)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】监测新疆库鲁斯台草原近12年动态变化状况,为生态系统可持续发展和管理提供理论支撑。【方法】利用新疆库鲁斯台草原2010~2021年Landsat影像,计算7种植被指数,基于野外实测草地高度、盖度及生物量数据构建草地退化指数(Grassland degradation index,GDI),建立基于最优植被指数和GDI的库鲁斯台草原草地退化反演模型;并对库鲁斯台草原草地退化状况进行分等定级,从草地退化等级、变化方向及变化强度综合分析库鲁斯台草原动态变化。【结果】(1)地上生物量、覆盖度及高度3个指标在草地退化监测中的权重由大到小为覆盖度(37.6%)>地上生物量(34.3%)>高度(28.1%)。(2)7种植被指数中NDVI与GDI相关性最高,R²为0.854,基于NDVI的草地退化监测模型为GDI=0.860×NDVI+0.038。(3)2010~2021年库鲁斯台草原重度退化面积有所减少,变化方向主要以退化恢复型和未变化型为主,退化增强型面积为减少趋势,变化强度主要为无变化强度及慢速变化强度。【结论】近12年新疆库鲁斯台草原退化过程减弱。

关键词: 草地退化监测; 植被指数; 监测模型; 库鲁斯台草原

Abstract:

【Objective】 Grassland is an important part of terrestrial ecosystem in the world. Dynamic monitoring of grassland will help to understand grassland status and provide important theoretical support for sustainable development and management of ecosystem. 【Methods】 Using the 2010-2021 Landsat images of the Kulusitai grassland in Xinjiang,seven vegetation indices were calculated,and the grassland degradation index(GDI) was constructed based on field measurements of grassland height,cover and biomass. An inversion model of degradation in Kulusitai grassland was established based on optimal vegetation index and GDI. The grassland degradation status in the study area was graded and graded,and finally the change in Kulusitai grassland was comprehensively analyzed from three aspects of grassland degradation grade,change direction and change intensity. 【Results】 (1) The weight of aboveground biomass,coverage and height in grassland degradation monitoring was determined by factor analysis in descending order:coverage(37.6%) > aboveground biomass(34.3%) > height(28.1%).(2) NDVI had the highest correlation with GDI among the seven vegetation indices,with R² of 0.854,and the model of grassland degradation monitoring based on NDVI was GDI=0.860×NDVI+0.038.(3) From 2010 to 2021,the severely degraded area of Kulusitai grassland decreased,and the change direction was mainly in the degraded recovery type and the unchanged type,while the degraded enhanced type showed a decreasing trend,and the change intensity was mainly in the unchanged intensity and the slow intensity. 【Conclusion】 As a whole,the degradation process of the Xinjiang Kulusitai grassland has been weakening in the past 12 years.

Key words: grassland degradation monitoring; vegetation index; monitoring model; Kulusitai grassland

中图分类号:

S812

刘亮, 彭建, 李刚勇, 韩万强, 刘玉佳, 关靖云, 刘程才, 郑江华. 2010~2021年新疆库鲁斯台草原动态遥感监测变化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 230-240.

LIU Liang, PENG Jian, LI Gangyong, HAN Wanqiang, LIU Yujia, GUAN Jingyun, LIU Chengcai, ZHENG Jianghua. Analysis of dynamic remote sensing monitoring changes in Kulusitai grassland in Xinjiang from 2010 to 2021[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 230-240.

图/表 12

参考文献 35

[1]	Houghton R A. The worldwide extent of land-use change[J]. BioScience, 1994, 44(5):305-313. DOI URL
[2]	黄麟, 翟俊, 祝萍, 等. 中国草畜平衡状态时空演变指示的草地生态保护格局[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(11):2396-2407. DOI
	HUANG Lin, ZHAI Jun, ZHU Ping, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of livestock-carrying pressure in China and its implications for grassland ecosystem conservation pattern[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(11):2396-2407. DOI
[3]	Ahlström A, Raupach M R, Schurgers G, et al. The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO₂ sink[J]. Science, 2015, 348(6237):895-899. DOI PMID
[4]	WANG Yuhui, ZHOU Guangsheng, JIA Bingrui. Modeling SOC and NPP responses of meadow steppe to different grazing intensities in Northeast China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2008, 217(1-2):72-78. DOI URL
[5]	李玉强, 陈云, 曹雯婕, 等. 全球变化对资源环境及生态系统影响的生态学理论基础[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3):603-612. DOI
	LI Yuqiang, CHEN Yun, CAO Wenjie, et al. Theoretical basis of ecology for the influence of global change on resources,environment,and ecosystems[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(3):603-612. DOI
[6]	Asrar G, Weiser R L, Johnson D E, et al. Distinguishing among tallgrass prairie cover types from measurements of multispectral reflectance[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1986, 19(2):159-169. DOI URL
[7]	李博. 中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J]. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(6):27-29.
	LI Bo. The rangeland degradation in North China and its preventive strategy[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1997, 30(6):27-29.
[8]	Lu D, Batistella M, Mausel P, et al. Mapping and monitoring land degradation risks in the Western Brazilian Amazon using multitemporal Landsat TM/ETM⁺ images[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2007, 18(1):41-54. DOI URL
[9]	Taylor B F, Dini P W, Kidson J W. Determination of seasonal and interannual variation in New Zealand pasture growth from NOAA-7 data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1985, 18(2):177-192. DOI URL
[10]	Sun B, Li Z, Gao Z, et al. Grassland degradation and restoration monitoring and driving forces analysis based on long time-series remote sensing data in Xilin Gol League[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(4):219-228. DOI URL
[11]	Liu B, You G Y, Li R, et al. Spectral characteristics of alpine grassland and their changes responding to grassland degradation on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74(3):2115-2123. DOI URL
[12]	Yeganeh H, Seyed jamale Khajedein, Amiri F, et al. Monitoring rangeland ground cover vegetation using multitemporal MODIS data[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2014, 7(1):287-298. DOI URL
[13]	Wiesmair M, Feilhauer H, Magiera A, et al. Estimating vegetation cover from high-resolution satellite data to assess grassland degradation in the Georgian Caucasus[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 2016, 36(1):56-65. DOI URL
[14]	徐剑波, 陈进发, 胡月明, 等. 青海省玛多县草地退化现状及动态变化研究[J]. 草业科学, 2011, 28(3):359-364.
	XU Jianbo, CHEN Jinfa, HU Yueming, et al. Research on the status and the dynamic of grassland degradation in Maduo County,Qinghai Province[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(3):359-364.
[15]	李辉霞, 刘淑珍. 基于ETM+影像的草地退化评价模型研究——以西藏自治区那曲县为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(3):412-418.
	LI Huixia, LIU Shuzhen. Research on grassland degradation assessment model based on ETM+ image:A case study in Naqu County of Tibet[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(3):412-418.
[16]	朱宁, 王浩, 宁晓刚, 等. 草地退化遥感监测研究进展[J]. 测绘科学, 2021, 46(5):66-76.
	ZHU Ning, WANG Hao, NING Xiaogang, et al. Advances in remote sensing monitoring of grassland degradation[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2021, 46(5):66-76.
[17]	陈长生, 丁启斌. 论库鲁斯台草原生态系统的可持续发展[J]. 新疆畜牧业, 2012,(1):58-61.
	CHEN Changsheng, DING Qibin. On the sustainable development of Kurustai grassland ecosystem[J]. Xinjiang Animal Husbandry, 2012,(1):58-61.
[18]	朱玉华. 新疆库鲁斯台草原植被数量特征研究[J]. 环境影响评价, 2019, 41(2):44-47.
	ZHU Yuhua. Study on the quantitative characteristics of vegetation in Xinjiang Kulusitai grassland[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment, 2019, 41(2):44-47.
[19]	闫俊杰, 崔东, 夏倩倩. 库鲁斯台草原植被盖度变化及其与TVDI相关性分析[J]. 伊犁师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2018, 12(1):43-49.
	YAN Junjie, CUI Dong, XIA Qianqian. Analysis of the covered vegetation changes and its correlation with TVDI in Kulusitai steppe from 2000 to 2015[J]. Journal of Yili Normal University(Natural Science Ed.), 2018, 12(1):43-49.
[20]	余晓光, 吴海山, 陈卫国. 新疆库鲁斯台草原退化现状分析及发展对策[J]. 中国草食动物, 2008,(3):58-61.
	YU Xiaoguang, WU Haishan, CHEN Weiguo. Status analysis and development countermeasures of grassland degradation in Kulusitai,Xinjiang[J]. China Herbivores, 2008,(3):58-61.
[21]	GUAN Jingyun, YAO Junqiang, LI Moyan, et al. Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of anthropogenic impacts on remotely sensed vegetation dynamics in Xinjiang,China[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(22):4651. DOI URL
[22]	赵鹏, 陈桃, 王茜, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对新疆草地生态系统NPP影响的定量分析[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2020, 37(1):51-62. DOI
	ZHAO Peng, CHEN Tao, WANG Qian, et al. Quantitative analysis of the impact of climate change and human activities on grassland ecosystem NPP in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 37(1):51-62. DOI
[23]	李辉霞, 刘国华, 傅伯杰. 基于NDVI的三江源地区植被生长对气候变化和人类活动的响应研究[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19):5495-5504.
	LI Huixia, LIU Guohua, FU Bojie. Response of vegetation to climate change and human activity based on NDVI in the Three-River Headwaters region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(19):5495-5504.
[24]	柴立夫, 田莉, 奥勇, 等. 人类活动干扰对青藏高原植被覆盖变化的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(6):382-388.
	CHAI Lifu, TIAN Li, AO Yong, et al. Influence of human disturbance on the change of vegetation cover in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(6):382-388.
[25]	Liu J G, Li S X, Ouyang Z Y, et al. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services[J]. PNAS, 2008, 105(28):9477-9482. DOI PMID
[26]	Wang S, Wilkes A, Zhnag Z, et al. Management and land use change effects on soil carbon in northern China's grasslands:a synthesis[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 2011, 142(3/4):329-340.
[27]	Tong C, Wu J, Yong S, et al. A landscape-scale assessment of steppe degradation in the Xilin River Basin,Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2004, 59(1):133-149. DOI URL
[28]	Jiang Y, Guo J, Peng Q, et al. The effects of climate factors and human activities on net primary productivity in Xinjiang[J]. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2020, 64(5):765-777. DOI PMID
[29]	王嘉蓉. 新疆塔城市库鲁斯台草原牧民生计变化影响因素研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2018.
	WANG Jiarong. Study on the influencing factors of livelihood changes of the herdsmen on the Kulusitai steppe in Xinjiang Tacheng City[D].. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2018.
[30]	杨坤, 郭雅婷, 马金龙, 等. 塔城地区库鲁斯台萨孜草原蝗虫种类分布调查分析[J]. 新疆林业, 2021,(6):12-13.
	YANG Kun, GUO Yating, MA Jinlong, et al. Investigation and analysis of grasshopper species distribution in Kurustai Sazi grassland in Tacheng area[J]. Forestry of Xinjiang, 2021,(6):12-13.
[31]	Zhang Y, Zhang C, Wang Z, et al. Vegetation dynamics and its driving forces from climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region,China from 1982 to 2012[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,563-564:210-220.
[32]	Piao S, Yin G, Tan J, et al. Detection and attribution of vegetation greening trend in China over the last 30 years[J]. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21(4):1601-1609. DOI URL
[33]	Zhang Q T, Li J, et al. Spatiotemporal variations of pan evaporation in China during 1960-2005:changing patterns and causes[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2015, 35(6):903-912. DOI URL
[34]	周妍妍, 朱敏翔, 郭晓娟, 等. 疏勒河流域气候变化和人类活动对植被NPP的相对影响评价[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(14):5127-5137.
	ZHOU Yanyan, ZHU Minxiang, GUO Xiaojuan, et al. Relative effects of climate change and human activities on net primary productivity in Shule River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(14):5127-5137.
[35]	Chen T, Tang G, Yuan Y, et al. Unraveling the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on grassland productivity in Central Asia over last three decades[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 743:140649. DOI URL

指标 Index	综合得分模型系数 Comprehensive score model coefficient	指标权重 Index weight
高度Height	0.335	0.281
生物量Biomass	0.408	0.343
覆盖度Coverage	0.447	0.376

指标 Index	综合得分模型系数 Comprehensive score model coefficient	指标权重 Index weight
高度Height	0.335	0.281
生物量Biomass	0.408	0.343
覆盖度Coverage	0.447	0.376

方程 Equation	模型摘要 Model summary					参数估算值 Parameter estimation
方程 Equation	R²	F	df1	df2	显著性 Significance	常量 Constant	b₁	b₂	b₃
线性Linear	0.854 1	146.315	1	25	0.000	0.038	0.860
对数Logarithm	0.633 0	43.126	1	25	0.000	0.433	0.113
逆Contrary	0.297 0	10.553	1	25	0.003	0.285	-0.004
二次Secondary	0.854 0	70.319	2	24	0.000	0.043	0.821	0.073
三次Three times	0.854 0	45.000	3	23	0.000	0.039	0.911	-0.363	0.565
复合Composite	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	0.074	76.540
幂Cloth cover	0.853 0	157.420	1	25	0.000	0.727	0.755
S	0.755 0	76.991	1	25	0.000	-1.230	-0.033
增长Increase	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	-2.599	4.338
指数Index	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	0.074	4.338
Logistic	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	13.446	0.013

方程 Equation	模型摘要 Model summary					参数估算值 Parameter estimation
方程 Equation	R²	F	df1	df2	显著性 Significance	常量 Constant	b₁	b₂	b₃
线性Linear	0.854 1	146.315	1	25	0.000	0.038	0.860
对数Logarithm	0.633 0	43.126	1	25	0.000	0.433	0.113
逆Contrary	0.297 0	10.553	1	25	0.003	0.285	-0.004
二次Secondary	0.854 0	70.319	2	24	0.000	0.043	0.821	0.073
三次Three times	0.854 0	45.000	3	23	0.000	0.039	0.911	-0.363	0.565
复合Composite	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	0.074	76.540
幂Cloth cover	0.853 0	157.420	1	25	0.000	0.727	0.755
S	0.755 0	76.991	1	25	0.000	-1.230	-0.033
增长Increase	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	-2.599	4.338
指数Index	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	0.074	4.338
Logistic	0.665 0	49.573	1	25	0.000	13.446	0.013

等级 Grade	程度 Degree	GDI Grassland degradation index	NDVI Normalized difference vegetation index
1	无明显退化	GDI>0.404	NDVI>0.425
2	轻度退化	0.404>GDI>0.254	0.425>NDVI>0.251
3	中度退化	0.254>GDI>0.201	0.251>NDVI>0.189
4	重度退化	GDI<0.201	NDVI<0.189

2010~2021年新疆库鲁斯台草原动态遥感监测变化分析

Analysis of dynamic remote sensing monitoring changes in Kulusitai grassland in Xinjiang from 2010 to 2021

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

年份 Year	无明显退化面积 No obvious degradation area (km²)	轻度退化面积 Slightly degraded area (km²)	中度退化面积 Moderately degraded area (km²)	重度退化面积 Severely degraded area (km²)
2010	209.756 9	631.38	968.87	35.89
2011	60.76	701.82	940.79	20.49
2012	1.4	657.85	1 032.49	5
2013	231.35	674.01	825.53	89.19
2014	75.01	700.86	818.21	57.98
2015	173.61	806.78	590.39	104.02
2016	410.97	496.91	473.62	123.94
2017	391.39	588.07	645.1	167.73
2018	301.73	610.33	690.78	134.75
2019	357.26	654.14	738.87	125.16
2020	271.68	767.75	689.66	63.86
2021	481.51	599.58	590.49	22.46

变化趋势 Change trend	退化等级 Degradation level
退化增强型 Degenerate enhanced type	1→2、1→3、1→4、2→3、2→4、3→4
退化恢复型 Degenerative recovery type	4→3、4→2、4→1、3→2、3→1、2→1
未变化型 Unchanged type	1→1、2→2、3→3、4→4

年份 Year	退化恢复型 Degenerate restorative (km²)	退化增强型 Degenerate enhanced (km²)	未变化型 Unchanged type (km²)
2010~2011	181.63	316.23	1 078.28
2011~2012	133.38	242.80	1 169.80
2012~2013	511.33	117.35	905.21
2013~2014	193.74	206.63	1 073.96
2014~2015	761.14	90.33	554.21
2015~2016	377.53	151.34	765.39
2016~2017	218.55	285.62	767.75
2017~2018	301.75	290.19	965.55
2018~2019	220.03	265.48	1 084.23
2019~2020	241.70	230.29	1 157.90
2020~2021	387.08	146.96	1 042.54
2010~2021	668.45	199.67	642.97

年份 Year	无变化 Unchanged (km²)	慢速 Slow (km²)	中速 Medium (km²)	快速 Fast (km²)
2010~2011	1 078.28	458.13	39.61	0.12
2011~2012	1 169.80	371.65	4.53	0.10
2012~2013	905.21	600.31	28.33	0.04
2013~2014	1 073.96	393.13	7.06	0.16
2014~2015	554.21	847.69	3.75	0.03
2015~2016	765.39	512.90	15.76	0.21
2016~2017	767.75	465.66	38.22	0.29
2017~2018	965.55	546.14	45.22	0.58
2018~2019	1 084.23	470.36	15.01	0.13
2019~2020	1 157.90	461.66	10.28	0.05
2020~2021	1 042.54	520.42	13.55	0.06
2010~2021	642.97	727.10	139.92	1.09

[1]	石志钰, 裴雅琨, 朱玉涛, 贾玉姣, 胡晓倩, 侯士聪, 侯玉霞. 基于数字图像棉花黄萎病诊断与防治的管理远程监测[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(6): 1166-1174.
[2]	韩万强, 靳瑰丽, 岳永寰, 王惠宁, 宫珂, 吴雪儿, 吾鲁帕·阿得尔卡里. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地3种主要植物光谱及植被指数改进[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(5): 950-957.
[3]	武文丽, 袁也, 李园园, 楚光明, 张昊. 荒漠林高光谱与光学影像植被指数(VI)的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(1): 149-156.
[4]	李娜, 王新军, 常梦迪, 闫立男, 徐晓龙. 基于Landsat影像稀疏植被斑块格局对降水响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(10): 1895-1903.
[5]	李天胜, 崔静, 王海江, 杨晋. 基于高光谱特征波长的冬小麦水分含量估测模型[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(10): 1772-1782.
[6]	田春燕;黄春燕;郭晓飞;刘馨月;王登伟. 基于植被指数的棉花冠层光合有效辐射截获量和叶片净光合速率估算研究[J]. , 2017, 54(6): 981-987.
[7]	郭晓飞;黄春燕;田春燕;刘馨月;王登伟. 不同水分处理条件下棉花高光谱植被指数与光合参数的相关分析[J]. , 2017, 54(1): 20-26.
[8]	肖莉娟;王登伟;黄春燕;赵鹏举;程麒. 基于冠层温度棉花水分胁迫指数与高光谱植被指数的关系[J]. , 2013, 50(9): 1577-1582.
[9]	程乙峰;贡璐;张雪妮;何学敏;吕光辉. 新疆北疆棉花多元复合遥感估产模型研究[J]. , 2012, 49(8): 1497-1502.
[10]	王曼;吕光辉;刘卫国. 基于Quick Bird的阿其克苏河植被覆盖度研究[J]. , 2012, 49(2): 347-353.
[11]	古丽给娜·塔依尔江;塔西甫拉提·特依拜;阿依提拉·吾加布都拉. 基于表观反射率的植被指数遥感监测[J]. , 2010, 47(9): 1828-1831.
[12]	余博;朱进忠;范燕敏;鲁为华;王东江. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤养分和植被指数的空间异质性研究[J]. , 2009, 46(6): 1294-1300.
[13]	马媛;塔西甫拉提·特依拜;刘新春;吕光辉. 多时相卫星影像在2008年新疆特大干旱监测中的应用[J]. , 2009, 46(5): 1098-1102.
[14]	王新欣;朱进忠;范燕敏;武鹏飞. 利用EOS/MODIS植被指数建立草地估产模型的研究[J]. , 2008, 45(5): 843-846.
[15]	王登伟;黄春燕;马勤建;赵鹏举;郑学勤. 棉花高光谱植被指数与LAI和地上鲜生物量的相关关系研究[J]. , 2008, 45(5): 787-790.