新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (7): 1580-1588.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.07.003
• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·土壤肥料 • 上一篇 下一篇
林玲1,2,3(), 朱玉洁1, 冯雷1, 唐光木2, 张云舒2, 徐万里2()
收稿日期:
2022-09-27
出版日期:
2023-07-20
发布日期:
2023-07-11
通信作者:
徐万里(1971-),男,陕西宝鸡人,研究员,博士,研究方向为农林废弃物资源化、土壤培肥与改良,(E-mail)wlxu2005@163.com
作者简介:
林玲(1992-),女,重庆丰都人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农林废弃物资源化、土壤培肥与改良,(E-mail)1041782931@qq.com
基金资助:
LIN Ling1,2,3(), ZHU Yujie1, FENG Lei1, TANG Guangmu2, ZHANG Yunshu2, XU Wanli2()
Received:
2022-09-27
Online:
2023-07-20
Published:
2023-07-11
Correspondence author:
XU Wanli (1971-), male, Baoji, Shaanxi, researcher, Doctor, Research direction:Agricultural and forestry waste resources recovery, soil fertilizer cultivation and improvement,(E-mail)wlxu2005@163.com
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究干湿交替、冻融循环、柠檬酸老化棉花秸秆生物炭特性,分析老化棉秆炭对风沙土氨挥发的影响,为干旱区棉花秸秆生物炭利用及其对土壤改良的长期效应提供理论依据。【方法】以棉花秸秆生物炭为试材,设置干湿交替、冻融循环、柠檬酸3种老化试验,分析老化前后棉秆炭的表面形貌、比表面积和孔径、pH值、电导率等理化性质;设置室内静态土壤培养试验,研究老化棉秆炭对土壤氨挥发速率以及氨挥发累积量的影响。【结果】(1) 与新鲜棉秆炭相比,老化棉秆炭的pH值、电导率、全磷、全钾含量均降低,且柠檬酸老化棉秆炭比干湿交替、冻融循环老化棉秆炭下降程度大;柠檬酸老化棉秆炭比表面积、总孔体积和介孔体积显著增加1.88倍、1.37倍和1.36倍,平均孔径减小0.19倍(P>0.05),干湿交替和冻融循环老化棉秆炭比表面积显著减小,但平均孔径显著增大;(2) 与新鲜棉秆炭处理相比,添加各老化棉秆炭处理的氨挥发累积量减少了7.4%~34.7%。【结论】冻融循环、干湿交替、柠檬酸3种老化方式改变棉秆炭特性,抑制风沙土中氨的挥发,有利于土壤氮素的固定,柠檬酸老化棉秆炭对土壤氨挥发抑制效果最好。
中图分类号:
林玲, 朱玉洁, 冯雷, 唐光木, 张云舒, 徐万里. 棉秆炭老化特性及其对风沙土氨挥发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1580-1588.
LIN Ling, ZHU Yujie, FENG Lei, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Features of aged cotton stalk charcoal and its effect on ammonia volatilization from sand soil[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1580-1588.
处理 Treatment | 比表面积 Specific surface area (m2/ g) | 总孔体积 The total pore volume (cm3/g) | 平均孔径 The average pore diameter (nm) | 介孔体积 Mesoporous volume (cm3/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
BC | 17.76±0.25b | 0.030±0.004b | 6.83±0.84b | 0.025±0.004b |
DBC | 9.03±2.04c | 0.026±0.002b | 11.51±1.57a | 0.024±0.002b |
EBC | 10.22±0.70c | 0.028±0.003b | 11.32±0.25a | 0.026±0.001b |
CBC | 51.09±6.67a | 0.071±0.014a | 5.56±0.73b | 0.059±0.013a |
表1 不同老化处理下棉秆炭的比表面积和孔径变化
Tab.1 Specific surface area and pore size of different aged cotton stalk charcoal
处理 Treatment | 比表面积 Specific surface area (m2/ g) | 总孔体积 The total pore volume (cm3/g) | 平均孔径 The average pore diameter (nm) | 介孔体积 Mesoporous volume (cm3/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
BC | 17.76±0.25b | 0.030±0.004b | 6.83±0.84b | 0.025±0.004b |
DBC | 9.03±2.04c | 0.026±0.002b | 11.51±1.57a | 0.024±0.002b |
EBC | 10.22±0.70c | 0.028±0.003b | 11.32±0.25a | 0.026±0.001b |
CBC | 51.09±6.67a | 0.071±0.014a | 5.56±0.73b | 0.059±0.013a |
处理 Treatment | pH | 电导率 Electrical conductivity (mS/cm) |
---|---|---|
BC | 10.30±0.03a | 8.08±0.07a |
DBC | 10.21±0.00a | 6.71±0.16b |
EBC | 10.29±0.02a | 7.75±0.21a |
CBC | 5.16±0.20b | 0.77±0.08c |
表2 不同老化处理下棉秆炭的pH值和电导率变化
Tab.2 pH value and electrical conductivity of different aged cotton stalk charcoal
处理 Treatment | pH | 电导率 Electrical conductivity (mS/cm) |
---|---|---|
BC | 10.30±0.03a | 8.08±0.07a |
DBC | 10.21±0.00a | 6.71±0.16b |
EBC | 10.29±0.02a | 7.75±0.21a |
CBC | 5.16±0.20b | 0.77±0.08c |
[1] | 陈温福, 张伟明, 孟军, 等. 生物炭应用技术研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2011, 13(2):83-89. |
CHEN Wenfu, ZHANG Weiming, MENG Jun, et al. Researches on biochar application technology[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2011, 13(2):83-89. | |
[2] |
Colantoni, Evic, Lord, et al. Characterization of biochar produced from pyrolysis of pelletized agricultural residues[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 64:187-194.
DOI URL |
[3] | 张云舒, 唐光木, 葛春辉, 等. 生物炭对灌耕风沙土土壤性质及玉米产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(6):180-183. |
ZHANG Yunshu, TANG Guangmu, GE Chunhui, et al. Effects of biochar on soil properties and corn yield of irrigated sandy soil[J]. AgriculturalResearch in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(6):180-183. | |
[4] | 顾美英, 徐万里, 唐光木, 等. 生物炭对灰漠土和风沙土土壤微生物多样性及与氮素相关微生物功能的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014, 51(5):926-934. |
GU Meiying, XU Wanli, TANG Guangmu, et al. Effects of Biochar on Soil Microbial Diversity and Function Related with N Transformation in Grey Desert Soil and Aeolian Sandy Soil in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 51(5):926-934. | |
[5] | 李涛, 王小国, 胡廷旭. 生物炭对紫色土农田土壤NO排放的影响[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(5):879-886. |
LI Tao, WANG Xiaoguo, HU Yanxu. Impact of Biochar on NO Emission from Cropland of Purple Soil[J]. Soils, 2016, 48(5):879-886. | |
[6] |
许云翔, 何莉莉, 陈金媛, 等. 生物炭对农田土壤氨挥发的影响机制研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12):4312- 4320.
DOI |
XU Yunxiang, HE Lili, CHEN Jinyuan, et al. Effects of biochar on ammonia volatilization from farmland soil:A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(12):4312- 4320.
DOI |
|
[7] |
WANG Liuwei, O'Connor David, Rinklebe Jorg, et al. Biochar Aging:Mechanisms, Physicochemical Changes, Assessment, And Implications for Field Applications[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 54(23):14797-14814.
DOI PMID |
[8] | 朱影, 庄国强, 吴尚华, 等. 农田土壤氨挥发的过程和控制技术研究[J]. 环境保护科学, 2020, 46(6):88-96. |
ZHU Ying, ZHUANG Guoqiang, WU Shanghua, et al. Ammonia Volatilization Process and Control Technology of Farmland Soil[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2020, 46(6):88-96. | |
[9] | 卢丽丽, 吴根义. 农田氨排放影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(1):149-162. |
LU Lili, WU Genyi. Advances in affecting factors of ammonia emission in farmland[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24(1):149-162. | |
[10] | 肖其亮, 朱坚, 彭华, 等. 稻田氨挥发损失及减排技术研究进展[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(1):16-25. |
XIAO Qiliang, ZHU Jian, PENG Hua, et al. Ammonia volatilization loss and emission reduction measures in paddy fields[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2021, 40(1):16-25. | |
[11] |
YANG Fan, CAO Xinde, GAO Bin, et al. Short-term effects of rice straw biochar on sorption, emission, and transformation of soil NH4+-N[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22:9184-9192.
DOI URL |
[12] | SUN Haijun, LU Haiying, CHU Liu, et al. Biochar applied with appropriate rates can reduce N leaching, keep N retention and not increase NH3 volatilization in a coastal saline soil[J]. Science of the Total EnvironmentVolume, 2017, 575:820-825. |
[13] |
Mandal Sanchita, Thangarajan Ramya, Bolan Nanthi S, et al. Biochar-induced concomitant decrease in ammonia volatilization and increase in nitrogen use efficiency by wheat[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 142:120-127.
DOI PMID |
[14] |
SHA Zhipeng, LI Qianqian, LV Tianian, et al. Response of ammonia volatilization to biochar addition:A meta-analysist[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 655:1387-1396.
DOI URL |
[15] | 鞠文亮, 荆延德. 陈化处理对棉花秸秆生物炭理化性质的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37(10):3853-3861. |
JU Wenliang, JIN Yande. Efectof aging treatm ent on physicochemical characteristics of cotton straw biochar[J]. Acta Science Circumstantiae, 2017, 37(10):3853-3861. | |
[16] | 闵露娟, 柳金明, 张鹏, 等. 不同老化过程对生物炭理化性质及吸附邻苯二甲酸酯的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(4):806-814. |
MIN Lujuan, LIU Jinming, ZHANG Peng, et al. Influences of different aging processes on biochar physicochemical properties and the adsorption of phthalic acid esters[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2021, 40(4):806-814. | |
[17] | Rosa José María de la, Rosado Mario, Paneque Marina, et al. Effects of aging under field conditions on biochar structure and composition:Implications for biochar stability in soils[J]. Science of the Total Environmen, 2018, 613-614:969-976. |
[18] |
TAN Lianshuai, MA Zhanghua, YANG Kaiqi, et al. Effect of three artificial aging techniques on physicochemical properties and Pb adsorption capacities of different biochars[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 699:134223.
DOI URL |
[19] | 汪艳如, 侯杰发, 郭建华, 等. 冻融循环对牦牛粪生物炭吸附氨氮的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(3):566-573. |
WANG Yanru, HOU Jiefa, GUO Jianhua, et al. Effects of freeze-thaw cycles on ammonium-nitrogen adsorption of yak dung biochip[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2017, 36(3):566-573.
DOI URL |
|
[20] | 张雪, 刘笑生, 沈露露, 等. 老化作用对巨菌草茎生物炭内源铜镉活性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(3):563-571. |
ZHANG Xue, LIU Xiaosheng, SHENG Lulu, et al. Effects of ageing on the availability of endogenous copper and cadmium in biochar derived from Pennisetum sp.stems[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(3):563-571. | |
[21] |
SUN Lei, CHEN Dongmei, WAN Shungang, et al. Performance, kinetics, and equilibrium of methylene blue adsorption on biochar derived from eucalyptus saw dust modified with citric, tartaric, and acetic acids[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 198:300-308.
DOI PMID |
[22] | XU Yan, LIU Yunguo, LIU Shaobo, et al. Enhanced adsorption of methylene blue by citric acid modification of biochar derived from water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes)[J]. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 2016, 23(23):1-13. |
[23] | 阴文敏, 关卓, 刘琛, 等. 生物炭施用及老化对紫色土中抗生素吸附特征的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40(6):2920-2929. |
YIN Wenmin, GUAN Zhuo, LIU Chen, et al. Effects of Biochar Application and Ageing on the Adsorption of Antibiotics in Purple Soil[J]. Environmental Science, 2019, 40(6):2920-2929. | |
[24] | 姚红宇, 唐光木, 葛春辉, 等. 炭化温度和时间与棉秆炭特性及元素组成的相关关系[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(7):199-206. |
YAO Hongyu, TANG Guangmu, GE Chunhui, et al. Characteristics and elementary composition of cotton stalk-char in different carbonization temperature and time[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(7):199-206. | |
[25] | 林志锋, 黄忠泊, 刘长风. 有机肥料氮、磷、钾的化学分析方法[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2006,(5):62-65. |
LIN Zhifeng, HUANG Zhongbo, LIU Changfeng. Chemical analysis method applying in determining organic fertilizer nitrogen phosphorus and potassium levels[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2006,(5):62-65. | |
[26] | 杨放, 李心清, 王兵, 等. 热解材料对生物炭理化性质的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(9):1822-1828. |
YANG Fang, LI Xinqing, WANG Bing, et al. Effects of Different Feed stocks on Physicochemical Characteristics of Pyrolyzed Biochars[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015, 34(9):1822-1828. | |
[27] |
CUI Hongbiao, LI Detian, LIU Xiaosheng, et al. Dry-wet and freeze-thaw aging activate endogenous copper and cadmium in biochar[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 288:125605.
DOI URL |
[28] |
Ameur Dominik, Zehetner Franz, Johnen Simone, et al. Activated biochar alters activities of carbon and nitrogen acquiring soil enzymes[J]. Pedobiologia, 2018, 69:1-10.
DOI URL |
[29] |
王朝旭, 陈绍荣, 张峰, 等. 老化玉米秸秆生物炭对碱性农田土壤氨氧化作用的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(1):31-39.
DOI |
WANG Chaoxu, CHEN Shaorong, ZHANG Feng, et al. Effects of Aged Maize Straw-derived Biochars on Ammonia Oxidation in An Alkaline Farmland Soil[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2018, 27(1):31-39. | |
[30] |
ZHANG Shiqiu, YANG Xue, JU Meiting, et al. Mercury adsorption to aged biochar and its management in China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(5):4867-4877.
DOI |
[31] | 刘艳, 王聪颖, 史志明, 等. 老化生物炭对小白菜积累重金属的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 39(3):58-64. |
LIU Yan, WANG Congyin, SHI Zhiming, et al. Effect of aged biochar on the accumulation of heavy metalsinpakchoi[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2019, 39(3):58-64. | |
[32] | 秦蓓. 棉秆炭对新疆灌耕灰漠土和风沙土pH值及氨挥发的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2018. |
QIN Bei. Influence of cotton stalk-char on pH and ammonia volatilization of Xinjiang cultivated gray desert soil and sandy soil[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[33] | LIU Guocheng, CHEN Lei, JIANG Zhixiang, et al. Aging impacts of low molecular weight organic acids (LMWOAs) on furfural production residue-derived biochars:Porosity, functional properties, and inorganic minerals[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 607- 608(12):1428-1436. |
[34] | 王朝旭, 陈绍荣, 张峰, 等. 玉米秸秆生物炭及其老化对石灰性农田土壤氨挥发的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2018, 37(10):2350- 2358. |
WANG Chaoxu, CHEN Shaorong, ZHANG Feng, et al. Effects of fresh and aged maize straw-derived biochars on ammonia volatilization in a calcareous arable soil[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018, 37(10):2350-2358 | |
[35] |
DONG Yubing, WU Zhen, ZHANG Xi, et al. Dynamic responses of ammonia volatilization to different rates of fresh and field-aged biochar in a rice-wheat rotation system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019, 241:107568.
DOI URL |
[36] | 张丰, 刘畅, 王喆, 等. 不同吸附特性的稻草生物炭对稻田氨挥发和水稻产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(9):100-109. |
ZANG Feng, LIU Chang, WANG Zhe, et al. Effects of rice straw biochar with different adsorption characteristics on ammonia volatilization from paddy field and rice yield[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(9):100-109. | |
[37] |
Esfandbod M, Phillips I R, Miller B, et al. Aged acidic biochar increases nitrogen retention and decreases ammonia volatilization in alkaline bauxite residue sand[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 98:157-165.
DOI URL |
[1] | 朱玉洁, 林玲, 唐光木, 张云舒, 徐万里. 改性棉秆炭对新疆灰漠土氮肥氨挥发特征的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2128-2137. |
[2] | 潘金龙, 唐光木, 徐万里, 马雪琴, 张云舒, 马海刚, 贾宏涛. 棉秆炭对灰漠土活性有机碳氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1615-1624. |
[3] | 邓晓娟, 苏秀娟, 玛依拉·依不拉音, 陆小双, 麦尔旦·图尔贡, 刘鹏飞. 人工老化和低温胁迫对陆地棉种子活力的影响和评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(6): 998-1005. |
[4] | 张云舒, 唐光木, 龙晓双, 葛春辉, 徐万里. 施用小麦秸秆炭对灌耕风沙土土壤养分含量及玉米产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(9): 1677-1683. |
[5] | 顾美英, 徐万里, 张志东, 唐光木, 刘洪亮, 李志强, 刘晓伟, 蒲胜海, 冯雷, 张计峰. 施用棉秆炭连作棉花根际土壤真菌多样性与土壤理化性质及黄萎病的相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(9): 1698-1709. |
[6] | 侯艳艳, 朱新萍, 徐万里, 顾美英, 廖娜, 唐光木, 王旭. 施用生物炭对灰漠土养分及棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(1): 24-32. |
[7] | 冯魁, 李琼, 贾永红, 王美, 田新年, 张金汕, 梁玉超, 迪里夏提·尔肯, 刘俊, 石书兵. 不同成熟度和老化时间对春小麦种子萌发及幼苗生长特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(10): 1813-1821. |
[8] | 王凤;齐军仓;郑许光;郭亚南;龚磊;王少玉;陈阿龙;黄湘怡;李忠豪;宋瑞娇. 人工老化对大麦种子活力及其萌发早期淀粉分解和内源激素的影响[J]. , 2017, 54(1): 33-42. |
[9] | 秦蓓;王雅琴;唐光木;刘会芳;徐万里. 施用棉秆炭对新疆盐渍化土壤理化性质及作物产量的影响[J]. , 2016, 53(12): 2290-2298. |
[10] | 唐光木;姚红宇;蒲胜海;刘易;张计峰;徐万里. 棉秆炭对灰漠土性质的影响[J]. , 2015, 52(9): 1680-1686. |
[11] | 李嘉怡;秦红;马彩雯. 新疆戈壁环境下日光温室保温被保温性能研究[J]. , 2015, 52(5): 931-939. |
[12] | 刘旭欢;加得拉·努尔兰;童婷;张峥嵘;贾永红;阿里别里根·哈孜太;卓方方;石书兵. 不同老化时间和收获期对春小麦种子活力的影响[J]. , 2014, 51(8): 1394-1399. |
[13] | 顾美英;徐万里;唐光木;葛春辉;马海刚. 生物炭对灰漠土和风沙土土壤微生物多样性及与氮素相关微生物功能的影响[J]. , 2014, 51(5): 926-934. |
[14] | 蔡洪江;司马义·努尔拉;张苏莉;杨家龙;买买提江·依米提. 农用地膜自然老化与人工老化相关性的研究[J]. , 2010, 47(8): 1580-1583. |
[15] | 孙九胜;王新勇;孔立明. 完全降解(Reverte添加剂)地膜在棉花中的应用与示范[J]. , 2010, 47(10): 1996-2000. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||