Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 1454-1460.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.06.019
• Plant Protection • Soil Fertilizero Water Saving Irrigation • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Xin1(), Adil Sattar1(
), LI Ziang1, JIN Yujie1, Baixianguli Tuohetuoerbayi1, MAO Wenbin2
Received:
2023-10-09
Online:
2024-06-20
Published:
2024-08-08
Correspondence author:
Adil Sattar
Supported by:
李欣1(), 阿地力·沙塔尔1(
), 李子昂1, 金玉杰1, 白先古丽·托合托尔巴依1, 毛文斌2
通讯作者:
阿地力·沙塔尔
作者简介:
李欣(1999-),女,新疆伊犁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林保护学,(E-mail)2906211613@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LI Xin, Adil Sattar, LI Ziang, JIN Yujie, Baixianguli Tuohetuoerbayi, MAO Wenbin. Occurrence and damage of two kinds of Hippophae rhamnoide pests[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1454-1460.
李欣, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 李子昂, 金玉杰, 白先古丽·托合托尔巴依, 毛文斌. 两种沙棘钻蛀性害虫发生与危害分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1454-1460.
Fig.2 Hazard characteristics of Cossus cossus (Linne) and Holcocerus Arenicola (Staudinger) Note:a.b.Egg clumps in cracks or bruises on bark; c.Hazard of the hatchlings burrowing under the bark; d.Damage to the roots of Hippophae rhamnoides L.by the mature larvae of the Cossus cossus (Linne); e.Harm of the old mature larvae of the Cossus cossus (Linne) in the cadre of Hippophae rhamnoides L.; f.g.Holcocerus Arenicola (Staudinger) is a hazard in Hippophae rhamnoides L.cadres; h.Cross section of the insect tract of infested Hippophae rhamnoides L.; i.Longitudinal section of the insect tract of damaged Hippophae rhamnoides L.; j.k.Fresh and old dung of the Cossus cossus (Linne); l.Damaged Hippophae rhamnoides L.withered and died
地区 Region | 调查株数(株) Plant number investigated (plant) | 被害株数(株) Number of killed plants(plant) | 有虫株率 Infestation rate (%) | 虫口密度 (头/株) Mouth density (head/plant) | 单株最高(头) Highest per plant (head) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
阿合奇县 Aheqi county | 沙棘 | 2 452 | 1 530 | 62.40 | 24.62 | 85 |
乌鲁木齐县 Urumqi County | 沙棘 | 682 | 287 | 42.10 | 100.62 | 288 |
榆树 | 337 | 72 | 21.40 | - | - |
Tab.1 Survey on Cossus cossus (Linne)'s infestation in Aheqi County and Urumqi County
地区 Region | 调查株数(株) Plant number investigated (plant) | 被害株数(株) Number of killed plants(plant) | 有虫株率 Infestation rate (%) | 虫口密度 (头/株) Mouth density (head/plant) | 单株最高(头) Highest per plant (head) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
阿合奇县 Aheqi county | 沙棘 | 2 452 | 1 530 | 62.40 | 24.62 | 85 |
乌鲁木齐县 Urumqi County | 沙棘 | 682 | 287 | 42.10 | 100.62 | 288 |
榆树 | 337 | 72 | 21.40 | - | - |
项目 Items | 分布区段Distribution area(cm) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根部 Root of the thigh | 0~30 | 31~60 | 61~90 | 91~120 | 121~150 | 151~180 | 181~210 | ||
虫态 Insect state | 每株卵块(个) | 0 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 4 | 1 |
当年生幼虫(只) | 39 | 261 | 665 | 456 | 203 | 448 | 70 | 0 | |
百分率 The percentage(%) | 卵块 | 0.00 | 11.48 | 13.11 | 13.11 | 26.23 | 27.87 | 6.56 | 1.64 |
当年生幼虫 | 1.82 | 12.18 | 31.05 | 21.29 | 9.48 | 20.92 | 3.27 | 0.00 |
Tab.2 Distribution position and number of egg mass and current larvae in the root and cadre of Hippophae rhamnoides
项目 Items | 分布区段Distribution area(cm) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根部 Root of the thigh | 0~30 | 31~60 | 61~90 | 91~120 | 121~150 | 151~180 | 181~210 | ||
虫态 Insect state | 每株卵块(个) | 0 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 4 | 1 |
当年生幼虫(只) | 39 | 261 | 665 | 456 | 203 | 448 | 70 | 0 | |
百分率 The percentage(%) | 卵块 | 0.00 | 11.48 | 13.11 | 13.11 | 26.23 | 27.87 | 6.56 | 1.64 |
当年生幼虫 | 1.82 | 12.18 | 31.05 | 21.29 | 9.48 | 20.92 | 3.27 | 0.00 |
项目 Items | 分布区段Distribution area(cm) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根部 Root of the thigh | 0~30 | 31~60 | 61~90 | 91~120 | 121~150 | 151~180 | 181~210 | |
非当年生幼虫(只) Non-current year larvae(bird) | 423 | 355 | 108 | 18 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 1 |
百分率 The percentage(%) | 45.58 | 38.25 | 11.64 | 1.94 | 0.11 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 0.11 |
Tab.3 Distribution position and number of non-current larvae in the root and cadre of Hippophae rhamnoides
项目 Items | 分布区段Distribution area(cm) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根部 Root of the thigh | 0~30 | 31~60 | 61~90 | 91~120 | 121~150 | 151~180 | 181~210 | |
非当年生幼虫(只) Non-current year larvae(bird) | 423 | 355 | 108 | 18 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 1 |
百分率 The percentage(%) | 45.58 | 38.25 | 11.64 | 1.94 | 0.11 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 0.11 |
[1] | 胡晓霞, 吉小敏, 梁康贤, 等. 沙棘产业与新疆区域经济的增长[J]. 干旱区研究, 2006, 23(1): 71-75. |
HU Xiaoxia, JI Xiaomin, LIANG Kangxian, et al. Industry of hippophatae rhamnoides and the regional economic increase in Xinjiang[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2006, 23(1): 71-75. | |
[2] | 刘菲, 王亚明, 侯军铭, 等. 芳香木蠹蛾生物学特性及综合防治对策[J]. 河北林业科技, 2013,(1): 80-81. |
LIU Fei, WANG Yaming, HOU Junming, et al. Biological characteristics and integrated control countermeasures of the aromatic codling moth[J]. The Journal of Hebei Forestry Science and Technology, 2013,(1): 80-81. | |
[3] | 韩丽娟, 张丽辉, 莫金钢. 树干注射技术防治芳香木蠹蛾的试验——不同药液浓度对相同树龄的影响[J]. 长春师范学院学报, 2003, 22(2): 48-51. |
HAN Lijuan, ZHANG Lihui, MO Jingang. Experiment of controlling Cossus cossus Orientalis gaede with trunk injection[J]. Journal of Changchun Teachers College, 2003, 22(2): 48-51. | |
[4] | 荆小院, 张金桐, 骆有庆, 等. 沙柳木蠹蛾性诱剂的化学合成与林间生物活性评价[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(4): 87-92. |
JING Xiaoyuan, ZHANG Jintong, LUO Youqing, et al. Synthesis and biological activity evaluation of sex attractant for Holcocerus arenicola (Lepidoptera: Cossidae)[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(4): 87-92. | |
[5] |
孙鹏举, 骆有庆, 姚东华, 等. 沙柳木蠹蛾幼虫危害特性及空间格局研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(10): 182-186.
DOI |
SUN Pengju, LUO Youqing, YAO Donghua, et al. Damage characteristic and spatial distribution of Holcocerus arenicola larvae[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(10): 182-186.
DOI |
|
[6] | 聂淑英. 芳香木蠹蛾的防治经验[J]. 吉林农业, 2015,(1): 89. |
NIE Shuying. Control experience of aromatic wood moth[J]. Agriculture of Jilin, 2015,(1): 89. | |
[7] | 程东周. 芳香木蠹蛾发生原因及综合防治技术研究[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2013,(1): 25-26, 38. |
CHENG Dongzhou. Reasons for damage strengthened by Cossus cossus Linnaeus and measures to control[J]. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 2013,(1): 25-26, 38. | |
[8] | 凤舞剑, 苏新林. 生物农药防治芳香木蠹蛾药效试验[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(27): 8528. |
FENG Wujian, SU Xinlin. Efficacy experiment in the control of Cossus orientalis gaede with biological pesticides[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 35(27): 8528. | |
[9] | 杨红娟, 李立国, 孙慧芳, 等. 芳香木蠹蛾生物学特性及打孔注药防控研究[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2009, 25(8): 57-58. |
YANG Hongjuan, LI Liguo, SUN Huifang, et al. Study on biological characteristics and prevention and control of perforation and injection of insecticides of Eupolyphaga aromatica[J]. Chinese Horticulture Abstracts, 2009, 25(8): 57-58. | |
[10] | 陈孝达. 沙棘木蠹蛾生物学习性及防治研究[J]. 沙棘, 2004,(2): 11-13. |
CHEN Xiaoda. Biological habit of wood beetle and its control[J]. Seabuckthorn, 2004,(2): 11-13. | |
[11] | 胡忠朗, 陈孝达, 杨鹏辉, 等. 沙柳木蠹蛾的研究[J]. 昆虫学报, 1987, 30(3): 259-265. |
HU Zhonglang, CHEN Xiaoda, YANG Penghui, et al. A study on the cossid holcocerus arenicola (staudinger) in Shaanxi[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 1987, 30(3): 259-265. | |
[12] | 宗世祥. 沙棘木蠹蛾生物生态学特性的研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2006. |
ZONG Shixiang. Studies on the Bio-ecological Characteristics of Seabuckthorn Carpenter Moth: Holcocerus Hippophaecolus (Lepidoptera: Cossidae)[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2006. | |
[13] | 成小芳, 张金桐. 沙棘木蠹蛾生物学特性及综合防治[J]. 林业科技开发, 2010, 24(6): 66-68. |
CHENG Xiaofang, ZHANG Jintong. Biological characteristics and integrated control of Holcocerus hippophaecolus Hua[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2010, 24(6): 66-68. | |
[14] | 景乐民, 谢一訢, 张程. 沙棘木蠹蛾的特征特性及防治措施[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018,(11): 133, 136. |
JING Lemin, XIE Yixi, ZHANG Cheng. Characteristics and control measures of Hippophae rhamnoides[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018,(11): 133, 136. | |
[15] | 谢文娟. 沙柳木蠹蛾的生物学特性及防治[J]. 青海农林科技, 2008,(4): 52-53. |
XIE Wenjuan. Biological characteristics and control on Holcocerus arenicola[J]. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, 2008,(4): 52-53. | |
[16] | 荆小院, 刘金龙, 张金桐. 沙柳木蠹蛾性行为的生物学特性[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 32(3): 240-244. |
JING Xiaoyuan, LIU Jinlong, ZHANG Jintong. A biological study on sexual behavior of Holcocerus arenicola[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 32(3): 240-244. | |
[17] | 荆小院, 刘金龙, 张金桐. 沙柳木蠹蛾性信息素的化学合成[J]. 山西农业科学, 2012, 40(6): 613-616, 690. |
JING Xiaoyuan, LIU Jinlong, ZHANG Jintong. Chemical synthesis of sex pheromone for Holcocerus arenicola[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(6): 613-616, 690. | |
[18] | Jing X Y, Zhang J T, Luo Y Q, et al. Identification and field evaluation of the female sex pheromone of the sand Salix carpenterworm, Holcocerus arenicola staudinger (Lepidoptera: Cossidae)[J]. Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung C, 2010, 65(5/6): 403-411. |
[19] |
Tian B, Xu L L, Zhang M, et al. Supercooling capacity and cryoprotectants of overwintering larvae from different populations of Holcocerus hippophaecolus[J]. Cryo Letters, 2016, 37(3): 206-217.
PMID |
[20] | Zong S X, Luo Y Q, Wang T, et al. Developmental threshold temperature and effective accumulative temperature of pupae and eggs of Holcocerus hippophaecolus[J]. Forestry Studies in China, 2004, 6(4): 34-38. |
[21] | 杨帆, 宋钢, 特木钦, 等. 白僵菌及其微胶囊剂孢子活力及对沙棘木蠹蛾幼虫的侵染[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 31(2): 179-182. |
YANG Fan, SONG Gang, TE Muqin, et al. Activity of microencapsulation of beauveria bassiana and its infection on the larvae of holcocerus hippophaecolus[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 31(2): 179-182. | |
[22] | 花保祯, 周尧, 方德志, 等. 中国木蠹蛾志(鳞翅目:木蠹蛾科)[M]. 陕西: 天则出版社, 1990: 21-46. |
Hua Baozhen, Zhou Yao, Fang Dezhi, et al. Chinese Cossidae (Lepidoptera: Cossidae)[M]. Shaanxi: Tianzule Press, 1990:21-46. | |
[23] | 花保祯. 芳香木蠹蛾中国亚种应提升为种(鳞翅目: 木蠹蛾科)[J]. 昆虫分类学报, 1986, 8(S1): 43-44. |
HUA Baozhen. China subspecies of the aromatic codling moth should be upgraded to species (Lepidoptera: Codiidae)[J]. Entomotaxonomia, 1986, 8(S1): 43-44. |
[1] | WANG Kai, CHENG Ping, Manafu Saiyiti, ZHANG Sen, AN Yuguang, LI Hong. Research on Hippophae rhamnoides L. Afforestation Techniques in the Piedmont Zone on the Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 368-377. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 27
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 113
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||