Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 1776-1785.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.025
• Soil Fertilizer·Agricultural Equipment Engineering and Mechanization·Animal Husbandry Veterinarian·Prataculture • Previous Articles Next Articles
XIN Huinan1(), LAI Ning1, GENG Qinglong1(), CHEN Shuhuang1(), LI Na1, LI Yongfu1, ZHAO Haiyan2
Received:
2021-02-05
Online:
2022-07-20
Published:
2022-08-04
Correspondence author:
GENG Qinglong, CHEN Shuhuang
Supported by:
信会男1(), 赖宁1, 耿庆龙1(), 陈署晃1(), 李娜1, 李永福1, 赵海燕2
通讯作者:
耿庆龙,陈署晃
作者简介:
信会男(1994-),男,河南人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为农业大数据与农业遥感,(E-mail) 1509677813@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
XIN Huinan, LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, CHEN Shuhuang, LI Na, LI Yongfu, ZHAO Haiyan. Spatial Variability of Farmland Soil Nutrients in Ta'er Basin Based on GIS[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1776-1785.
信会男, 赖宁, 耿庆龙, 陈署晃, 李娜, 李永福, 赵海燕. 基于GIS的塔额盆地农田土壤养分空间变异特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1776-1785.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.025
指标 Index | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg) | 速效钾 Available Potassium (mg/kg) | 碱解氮 Alkaline Hydrolysis Nitrogen(mg/kg) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | |
最大值 Max | 54.000 | 125.541 | 2.650 | 6.728 | 153.8 | 457.3 | 25.0 | 443.6 | 389 | 1159 |
最小值 Min | 5.400 | 1.008 | 0.110 | 0.102 | 28.0 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 80 | 25 |
平均値 Mean | 13.970 | 17.368 | 0.773 | 0.942 | 63.1 | 74.0 | 11.3 | 22.8 | 166 | 280 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 4.895 | 8.759 | 0.274 | 0.478 | 19.1 | 36.6 | 4.8 | 19.6 | 65 | 123 |
极差 Range | 48.600 | 124.533 | 2.540 | 6.626 | 125.8 | 453.1 | 20.2 | 442.1 | 309 | 1 134 |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation | 35.04 | 50.43 | 35.49 | 50.76 | 30.30 | 49.52 | 42.31 | 85.79 | 39.05 | 43.98 |
Table 1 In 2010 and 2018 tower basin characteristics of the soil nutrient content
指标 Index | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg) | 速效钾 Available Potassium (mg/kg) | 碱解氮 Alkaline Hydrolysis Nitrogen(mg/kg) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | |
最大值 Max | 54.000 | 125.541 | 2.650 | 6.728 | 153.8 | 457.3 | 25.0 | 443.6 | 389 | 1159 |
最小值 Min | 5.400 | 1.008 | 0.110 | 0.102 | 28.0 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 80 | 25 |
平均値 Mean | 13.970 | 17.368 | 0.773 | 0.942 | 63.1 | 74.0 | 11.3 | 22.8 | 166 | 280 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 4.895 | 8.759 | 0.274 | 0.478 | 19.1 | 36.6 | 4.8 | 19.6 | 65 | 123 |
极差 Range | 48.600 | 124.533 | 2.540 | 6.626 | 125.8 | 453.1 | 20.2 | 442.1 | 309 | 1 134 |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation | 35.04 | 50.43 | 35.49 | 50.76 | 30.30 | 49.52 | 42.31 | 85.79 | 39.05 | 43.98 |
年份 Year | 指标 Index | 模型 Model | 块金值 Co | 基台值 Co+C | 变程 A | 块金系数 (C/Co) | Moran'sⅠ | 标准Z值 Standard Z value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010年 | 有机质 | E | 15.15 | 30.31 | 17 850 | 0.500 | 0.060 | 4.689 |
全氮 | E | 0.04 | 0.08 | 18 600 | 0.501 | 0.060 | 4.673 | |
碱解氮 | E | 51.90 | 358.00 | 4 590 | 0.855 | 0.044 | 3.422 | |
有效磷 | E | 1.49 | 22.38 | 3 960 | 0.933 | 0.027 | 2.136 | |
速效钾 | E | 359.00 | 3 185.00 | 6 120 | 0.887 | 0.076 | 5.818 | |
2018年 | 有机质 | E | 31.00 | 66.54 | 59 850 | 0.534 | 0.134 | 20.287 |
全氮 | E | 0.10 | 0.21 | 66 180 | 0.502 | 0.168 | 25.377 | |
碱解氮 | E | 1.00 | 891.60 | 4 680 | 0.999 | 0.097 | 14.825 | |
有效磷 | E | 4.60 | 72.98 | 3 660 | 0.937 | 0.021 | 3.360 | |
速效钾 | E | 10.00 | 11 310.00 | 53 400 | 0.999 | 0.052 | 8.081 |
Table 2 Half variance model of soil nutrient type and parameter values
年份 Year | 指标 Index | 模型 Model | 块金值 Co | 基台值 Co+C | 变程 A | 块金系数 (C/Co) | Moran'sⅠ | 标准Z值 Standard Z value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010年 | 有机质 | E | 15.15 | 30.31 | 17 850 | 0.500 | 0.060 | 4.689 |
全氮 | E | 0.04 | 0.08 | 18 600 | 0.501 | 0.060 | 4.673 | |
碱解氮 | E | 51.90 | 358.00 | 4 590 | 0.855 | 0.044 | 3.422 | |
有效磷 | E | 1.49 | 22.38 | 3 960 | 0.933 | 0.027 | 2.136 | |
速效钾 | E | 359.00 | 3 185.00 | 6 120 | 0.887 | 0.076 | 5.818 | |
2018年 | 有机质 | E | 31.00 | 66.54 | 59 850 | 0.534 | 0.134 | 20.287 |
全氮 | E | 0.10 | 0.21 | 66 180 | 0.502 | 0.168 | 25.377 | |
碱解氮 | E | 1.00 | 891.60 | 4 680 | 0.999 | 0.097 | 14.825 | |
有效磷 | E | 4.60 | 72.98 | 3 660 | 0.937 | 0.021 | 3.360 | |
速效钾 | E | 10.00 | 11 310.00 | 53 400 | 0.999 | 0.052 | 8.081 |
指标 Index | 丰富 Abundant | 较丰富 Richer | 中等 Medium | 较缺乏 Less | 缺乏 Lack | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | ||||||
2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | ||||||
有机质 Organic matter | >25 | 0.90 | 6.43 | >20~25 | 1.28 | 12.86 | >15-20 | 17.47 | 35.39 | >10-15 | 63.72 | 32.07 | ≤10 | 16.63 | 13.25 |
全氮 Total nitrogen | >1.5 | 0.33 | 16.5 | >1.0-1.5 | 5.29 | 40.7 | >0.75~1.0 | 20.04 | 19.7 | >0.5~0.75 | 59.79 | 17.26 | ≤0.5 | 14.55 | 5.82 |
碱解氮 Alkaline Hydrolysis Nitrogen | >150 | 0.05 | 0.85 | >120~150 | 0.55 | 3.21 | >90~120 | 3.96 | 9.77 | >60~90 | 42.42 | 43.44 | ≤60 | 53.02 | 42.73 |
有效磷 Available phosphorus | >30 | 0 | 1.88 | >20~30 | 2.91 | 7.3 | >15~20 | 8.2 | 12.35 | 48.78 | 44.68 | 48.78 | ≤8 | 44.21 | 28.7 |
速效钾 Available phosphorus | >250 | 2.58 | 17.01 | >200~250 | 6.77 | 18.44 | >150~200 | 25.61 | 35.5 | >100~150 | 62.1 | 24.37 | ≤100 | 2.94 | 4.65 |
Table 3 Soil nutrient content classification and proportion statistics
指标 Index | 丰富 Abundant | 较丰富 Richer | 中等 Medium | 较缺乏 Less | 缺乏 Lack | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | 含量 Content | 比例/% Proportion | ||||||
2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | 2010 | 2018 | ||||||
有机质 Organic matter | >25 | 0.90 | 6.43 | >20~25 | 1.28 | 12.86 | >15-20 | 17.47 | 35.39 | >10-15 | 63.72 | 32.07 | ≤10 | 16.63 | 13.25 |
全氮 Total nitrogen | >1.5 | 0.33 | 16.5 | >1.0-1.5 | 5.29 | 40.7 | >0.75~1.0 | 20.04 | 19.7 | >0.5~0.75 | 59.79 | 17.26 | ≤0.5 | 14.55 | 5.82 |
碱解氮 Alkaline Hydrolysis Nitrogen | >150 | 0.05 | 0.85 | >120~150 | 0.55 | 3.21 | >90~120 | 3.96 | 9.77 | >60~90 | 42.42 | 43.44 | ≤60 | 53.02 | 42.73 |
有效磷 Available phosphorus | >30 | 0 | 1.88 | >20~30 | 2.91 | 7.3 | >15~20 | 8.2 | 12.35 | 48.78 | 44.68 | 48.78 | ≤8 | 44.21 | 28.7 |
速效钾 Available phosphorus | >250 | 2.58 | 17.01 | >200~250 | 6.77 | 18.44 | >150~200 | 25.61 | 35.5 | >100~150 | 62.1 | 24.37 | ≤100 | 2.94 | 4.65 |
[1] | 赵其国, 黄季焜, 段增强. 我国生态高值农业的内涵、模式及其研发建议[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(5): 705-711. |
ZHAO Qiguo, HUANG Jikun, DUAN Zengqiang. The connotation, model and research and development suggestions of my country's ecological high-value agriculture[J]. Soil, 2012, 44(5): 705-711. | |
[2] | 王珊, 廖桂堂, 熊鸿焰, 等. 川南丘陵区近30a来土壤养分时空变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(5): 289-295. |
WANG Shan, LIAO Guitang, XIONG Hongyan, et al. Spatiotemporal changes of soil nutrients in the hilly area of southern Sichuan in the past 30 years[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 35(5): 289-295. | |
[3] | 于洋, 赵业婷, 常庆瑞. 渭北台塬区耕地土壤速效养分时空变异特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(6): 1251-1261. |
YU Yang, ZHAO Yeting, CHANG Qingrui. Temporal and Spatial Variability of Soil Available Nutrients of Cultivated Land in Weibei Platform[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(6): 1251-1261. | |
[4] | 王玉军, 欧名豪. 徐州农田土壤养分和重金属含量与分布研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(6): 1438-1450. |
WANG Yujun, OU Minghao. Study on the content and distribution of soil nutrients and heavy metals in farmland in Xuzhou[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(6): 1438-1450. | |
[5] |
李娜, 陈署晃, 赖宁, 等. 基于GIS和地统计的伊犁州农田土壤养分空间变异特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, (11): 2096-2103.
DOI |
LI Na, CHEN Shuhuang, LAI Ning, et al. Analysis of Spatial Variability Characteristics of Farmland Soil Nutrients in Yili Prefecture Based on GIS and Geostatistics[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, (11): 2096-2103.
DOI |
|
[6] | Bogunovic I, Mesic M, Zgorelec Z, et al. Spatial variation of soil nutrients on sandy-loam soil[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2014, 144:174-183. |
[7] |
Corwin D L, Lesch S M, Shouse P J, et al. Identifying soil properties that influence cotton yield using soil sampling directed by apparent soil electrical conductivity[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2003, 95: 352-364
DOI URL |
[8] |
Mueller T G, Hartsock N J, Stombaugh T S, et al. Soil electrical conductivity map variability in limestone soil overlain by loess[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2003, 95: 496-507.
DOI URL |
[9] | 江厚龙, 刘国顺, 杨夏孟, 等. 精准农业中不同取样间距下Kriging插值精度对比研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(4): 879-886. |
JIANG Houlong, LIU Guoshun, YANG Xiameng, et al. Comparison of Kriging interpolation accuracy under different sampling intervals in precision agriculture[J]. Soil Bulletin, 2011, 42(4): 879-886. | |
[10] | 刘庆, 夏江宝, 谢文军. 半方差函数与Moran's I在土壤微量元素空间分布研究中的应用-以寿光市为例[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2011, 36(9): 1129-1133. |
LIU Qing, XIA Jiangbao, XIE Wenjun. The application of semivariance function and Moran's I in the study of the spatial distribution of soil trace elements: Taking Shouguang City as an example[J]. Journal of Wuhan University (Information Science Ed.), 2011, 36(9): 1129-1133. | |
[11] | 赵伟, 谢德体, 刘洪斌, 等. 精准农业中土壤养分分析的适宜取样数量的确定[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008,(2): 318-322. |
ZHAO Wei, XIE Deti, LIU Hongbin, et al. Determination of suitable sampling quantity for soil nutrient analysis in precision agriculture[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008,(2): 318-322. | |
[12] | 龙军, 张黎明, 沈金泉, 等. 复杂地貌类型区耕地土壤有机质空间插值方法研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2014, 51(6): 1270-1281. |
LONG Jun, ZHANG Liming, SHEN Jinquan, et al. Research on Spatial Interpolation Method of Cultivated Soil Organic Matter in Complex Landform Regions[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2014, 51(6): 1270-1281. | |
[13] | 陈涛, 常庆瑞, 刘京, 等. 黄土高原南麓县域耕地土壤速效养分时空变异[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(2): 554-564. |
CHEN Tao, CHANG Qingrui, LIU Jing, et al. Temporal and spatial variability of soil available nutrients in cultivated land at the southern foot of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(2): 554-564.
DOI URL |
|
[14] | 赵业婷, 常庆瑞, 李志鹏, 等. 渭北台塬区耕地土壤有机质与全氮空间特征[J]. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(8): 140-148. |
ZHAO Yeting, CHANG Qingrui, LI Zhipeng, et al. Spatial characteristics of cultivated soil organic matter and total nitrogen in Weibei platform area[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2014, 45(8): 140-148. |
[1] | MA Mingjie, ZHAO Jinghua, LI Dongmin, YANG Shengchun, WANG Kexian, LI Chi. Effects of alflfa different irrigation methods on soil moisture and irrigation water use efficiency [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313. |
[2] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, LEI Junjie, LIU Changwen. Effects of combined application of nitrogen enhancer and nitrogen reduction on leaf physiology and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325. |
[3] | WANG Yan, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, MA Xiaoyan, CHEN Ruigang, HUANGFU Beijiong, KONG Depeng, GAO Haifeng. Assessment of Synergism of Florasulam Halauxifen-methyl Added with Three Synergists on Controlling Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1450-1457. |
[4] | FU Kaiyun, WANG Zhihui, DING Xinhua, Tursun Ahmat, WANG Xiaowu, JIA Zunzun, Arziguli Rouzi, GUO Wenchao. Influence of Pesticide Reduction and Synergist on Utilization Rates and Droplets Distribution in Corn Field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2675-2681. |
[5] | ZHANG Qian, WANG Yan, HUANG Shansong, DONG Ming, FENG Guoyi, WANG Yongqiang, LIU Xu, LIANG Qinglong, LIN Yongzeng, QI Hong, WANG Shulin. Effects of Synergist on Reduction and Synergism of Two Common Nicotine Insecticides to Control Cotton Aphids [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(8): 1435-1440. |
[6] | DING Shiqiang, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, HE Jiang, Tursun Ahmat, GUO Wenchao. Prevention and Control Techniques of Ragweed and Giant Ragweed Based on Synergistic Effect of Synergistic Agent and Herbicide [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(8): 1493-1500. |
[7] | LI Yongfu,GENG Qinglong,CHEN Shuhuang,LAI Ning,LI Na,XIN Huinan,ZHAO Haiyan. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Soil Nutrients in Agricultural Areas on the Southern Slope of Tianshan Mountain [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(2): 324-331. |
[8] | LAI Chengxia, Mayila Yusuyin, SHI Bixian, LI Chunping, JIANG Mengzhu, ZHENG Zipiao, YANG Dong. Application Study on the Adjuvant Jijian as Synergist for Cotton Verticillium Disease Control [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2220-2227. |
[9] | ZHANG Qian, WANG Shulin, QI Hong, LI Yan, WANG Yan, FENG Guoyi, LIANG Qinglong, LEI Xiaopeng, LIN Yongzeng. Effects of Spraying Adjuvants on Reduction and Synergism of Herbicides in Cotton Field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(6): 1159-1165. |
[10] | CAO Wei, Sawula Te wuhetamaiti, Rehanguli Shataer, XIONG Renci, YAO Yongsheng. Synergistic effects of Different Auxiliaries on the Control of Cotton Aphid by Matrine [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 623-629. |
[11] | DING Bangxin, LIU Xueyan, BAI Yungang, LIU Hongbo, DING Ping, XIAO Jun. Spatial Variation of Soil Salinity in the Typical Oasis Irrigation Area of the Lower Reaches of Tarim River [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2): 264-273. |
[12] | WANG Zhihui, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, FU Kaiyun, Tursun Ahmat, HE Jiang, GUO Wenchao. An Ultra Low Spray Control Technique for Corn Borer Based on Synergist and Insecticide [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(2): 311-318. |
[13] | WANG Ke-wen, YANG Peng, ZHAO Jie. Study on the Growth and Development Regularity of Jinghong Laying Hens [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(5): 945-954. |
[14] | LI Jian-feng , FAN Zhe-ru , ZHANG Yue-qiang , WANG Zhong , GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hong-zhi , ZHAO Qi. Studies on Grain Filling Dynamics of Spring Wheat in Xinjiang by Logistic Equation Fitting [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 2006-2014. |
[15] | LI Na, CHEN Shu-huang, LAI Ning, LI Yong-fu, GEN Qing-long. Spatial Variability Analysis of Soil Nutrients in Farmland of Yili Prefecture Based on GIS and Geostatistics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 2096-2103. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||