Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 1561-1572.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.001
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
TANG Jiyuan(), CHEN Minzhi, YAN Jiangwei, WANG Yunxuan, ZUO Wenqing, TIAN Jingshan, ZHANG Wangfeng()
Received:
2021-10-09
Online:
2022-07-20
Published:
2022-08-04
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Wangfeng
Supported by:
唐纪元(), 陈民志, 闫江伟, 王宇轩, 左文庆, 田景山, 张旺锋()
通讯作者:
张旺锋
作者简介:
唐纪元(1996-),男,江苏盐城人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物高产优质高效栽培,(E-mail) 215597178@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
TANG Jiyuan, CHEN Minzhi, YAN Jiangwei, WANG Yunxuan, ZUO Wenqing, TIAN Jingshan, ZHANG Wangfeng. Effects of Different Concentrations of Chemical Topping Agents on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of Cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1561-1572.
唐纪元, 陈民志, 闫江伟, 王宇轩, 左文庆, 田景山, 张旺锋. 化学封顶剂不同浓度对棉花农艺性状及产量、品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1561-1572.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.001
年份 Year | 品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 化学封顶剂用量 Amount of chemical topping agent |
---|---|---|---|
2019 | 新陆早72号 新陆早61号 | 不打顶(CK1) | |
人工打顶(CK2) | |||
DPC+ 低浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:90 g/hm2+60 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 中浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:180 g/hm2+120 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 高浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:270 g/hm2+180 ml/hm2 | ||
2020 | 新陆早67号 | 不打顶(CK1) | |
人工打顶(CK2) | |||
DPC+ 低浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:90 g/hm2+60 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 中浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:180 g/hm2+120 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 高浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:270 g/hm2+180 ml/hm2 |
Table 1 Experimental treatment and reagent dosage
年份 Year | 品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 化学封顶剂用量 Amount of chemical topping agent |
---|---|---|---|
2019 | 新陆早72号 新陆早61号 | 不打顶(CK1) | |
人工打顶(CK2) | |||
DPC+ 低浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:90 g/hm2+60 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 中浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:180 g/hm2+120 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 高浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:270 g/hm2+180 ml/hm2 | ||
2020 | 新陆早67号 | 不打顶(CK1) | |
人工打顶(CK2) | |||
DPC+ 低浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:90 g/hm2+60 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 中浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:180 g/hm2+120 ml/hm2 | ||
DPC+ 高浓度 | 缩节胺+助剂:270 g/hm2+180 ml/hm2 |
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 整株节间长度 Whole plant internode length (cm) | 上部节间长度 Upper internode length (cm) | 其余节间长度 Remaining internode length (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | ||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 6.45±0.54a | 6.58±0.17b | 6.45±0.89a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 6.44±0.58a | 6.77±0.38a | 6.30±0.86a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 6.29±0.48a | 5.82±0.13c | 6.55±0.98a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 6.16±0.41a | 5.62±0.16d | 6.39±0.72a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 6.14±0.50a | 5.39±0.1e | 6.43±0.79a | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 5.18±0.42a | 5.42±0.08b | 5.09±0.56a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 5.27±0.34a | 5.74±0.22a | 5.20±0.43a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 5.11±0.25a | 5.10±0.17c | 5.13±0.35a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 5.02±0.33a | 4.88±0.17d | 5.08±0.44a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 5.04±0.27a | 4.84±0.19d | 5.17±0.67a | |
2020年 | ||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 4.63±0.17b | 4.99±0.52a | 4.39±0.24a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 4.88±0.26a | 5.04±0.22a | 4.56±0.35a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 4.48±0.08c | 4.15±0.24b | 4.52±0.26a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 4.46±0.06c | 4.17±0.21b | 4.48±0.36a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 4.35±0.10c | 4.13±0.34b | 4.54±0.31a |
Table 2 Effect of different treatments on internode length in cotton
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 整株节间长度 Whole plant internode length (cm) | 上部节间长度 Upper internode length (cm) | 其余节间长度 Remaining internode length (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | ||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 6.45±0.54a | 6.58±0.17b | 6.45±0.89a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 6.44±0.58a | 6.77±0.38a | 6.30±0.86a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 6.29±0.48a | 5.82±0.13c | 6.55±0.98a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 6.16±0.41a | 5.62±0.16d | 6.39±0.72a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 6.14±0.50a | 5.39±0.1e | 6.43±0.79a | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 5.18±0.42a | 5.42±0.08b | 5.09±0.56a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 5.27±0.34a | 5.74±0.22a | 5.20±0.43a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 5.11±0.25a | 5.10±0.17c | 5.13±0.35a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 5.02±0.33a | 4.88±0.17d | 5.08±0.44a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 5.04±0.27a | 4.84±0.19d | 5.17±0.67a | |
2020年 | ||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 4.63±0.17b | 4.99±0.52a | 4.39±0.24a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 4.88±0.26a | 5.04±0.22a | 4.56±0.35a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 4.48±0.08c | 4.15±0.24b | 4.52±0.26a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 4.46±0.06c | 4.17±0.21b | 4.48±0.36a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 4.35±0.10c | 4.13±0.34b | 4.54±0.31a |
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 整株 Whole plant | 上部 Upper | 中部 Middle | 下部 Lower |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | |||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 1.64±0.22c | 1.39±0.25b | 2±0.36a | 1.67±0.33c |
人工打顶(CK2) | 2.05±0.47a | 2.41±0.75a | 2.24±0.46a | 1.6±1.6c | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 1.84±0.18ac | 1.67±0.2b | 2.04±0.22a | 1.91±0.27b | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 1.89±0.16ab | 1.59±0.24b | 2.16±0.49a | 2.04±0.25ab | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 1.94±0.08b | 1.5±0.22b | 2.16±0.33a | 2.22±0.24a | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 1.64±0.21c | 1.44±0.24b | 2.02±0.48ab | 1.6±0.38cd |
人工打顶(CK2) | 2.02±0.26a | 2.97±0.63a | 1.89±0.41b | 1.4±0.34d | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 1.84±0.19b | 1.69±0.28b | 2.02±0.32ab | 1.84±0.35bc | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 1.86±0.20b | 1.56±0.19b | 2.11±0.35ab | 1.98±0.48b | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 1.97±0.11b | 1.5±0.22b | 2.2±0.33a | 2.31±0.34a | |
2020年 | |||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 1.54±0.1d | 1.27±0.09a | 2±0.16b | 1.7±0.33d |
人工打顶(CK2) | 2.04±0.07a | 1.72±0.24c | 2.23±0.22a | 2±0.31bc | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 1.82±0.04c | 1.47±0.1b | 2.07±0.14ab | 1.8±0.23cd | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 1.83±1.83c | 1.43±0.07b | 2.13±0.17ab | 2.1±0.16b | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 1.94±0.07b | 1.37±0.08bc | 2.17±0.24ab | 2.43±0.16a |
Table 3 Effect of different treatments on the ratio of fruit node/fruit branch in cotton
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 整株 Whole plant | 上部 Upper | 中部 Middle | 下部 Lower |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | |||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 1.64±0.22c | 1.39±0.25b | 2±0.36a | 1.67±0.33c |
人工打顶(CK2) | 2.05±0.47a | 2.41±0.75a | 2.24±0.46a | 1.6±1.6c | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 1.84±0.18ac | 1.67±0.2b | 2.04±0.22a | 1.91±0.27b | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 1.89±0.16ab | 1.59±0.24b | 2.16±0.49a | 2.04±0.25ab | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 1.94±0.08b | 1.5±0.22b | 2.16±0.33a | 2.22±0.24a | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 1.64±0.21c | 1.44±0.24b | 2.02±0.48ab | 1.6±0.38cd |
人工打顶(CK2) | 2.02±0.26a | 2.97±0.63a | 1.89±0.41b | 1.4±0.34d | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 1.84±0.19b | 1.69±0.28b | 2.02±0.32ab | 1.84±0.35bc | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 1.86±0.20b | 1.56±0.19b | 2.11±0.35ab | 1.98±0.48b | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 1.97±0.11b | 1.5±0.22b | 2.2±0.33a | 2.31±0.34a | |
2020年 | |||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 1.54±0.1d | 1.27±0.09a | 2±0.16b | 1.7±0.33d |
人工打顶(CK2) | 2.04±0.07a | 1.72±0.24c | 2.23±0.22a | 2±0.31bc | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 1.82±0.04c | 1.47±0.1b | 2.07±0.14ab | 1.8±0.23cd | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 1.83±1.83c | 1.43±0.07b | 2.13±0.17ab | 2.1±0.16b | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 1.94±0.07b | 1.37±0.08bc | 2.17±0.24ab | 2.43±0.16a |
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 收获株数 Plant No. (104/hm2) | 单株铃数 Boll No. per plant (个/株) | 总铃数 Total boll No. (104/hm2) | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | ||||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 20.18±0.96a | 6.93±1.22b | 110.38±4.02c | 5.14±0.40b | 5 515±131c |
人工打顶(CK2) | 21.35±0.72a | 7.80±1.01a | 136.40±5.40b | 5.70±0.56a | 6 632±151b | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 20.61±0.92a | 8.33±0.62a | 141.84±6.29ab | 5.56±0.41ab | 7 055±104a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 20.61±1.07a | 8.47±0.52a | 144.74±4.23a | 5.66±0.56a | 7 134±126a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 20.18±1.11a | 8.4±0.83a | 140.64±4.92ab | 5.60±0.44ab | 6 877±253ab | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 20.76±1.20a | 7.00±1.13b | 114.91±5.08c | 4.82±0.42b | 5 433±141b |
人工打顶(CK2) | 21.20±1.03a | 7.53±1.19b | 129.68±6.78b | 5.31±0.37a | 6 475±270a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 20.03±0.66a | 8.40±0.83a | 139.77±5.57a | 5.08±0.44ab | 6 877±429a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 20.18±0.78a | 8.47±0.64a | 140.79±4.95a | 4.96±.41ab | 6 745±372a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 20.03±1.03a | 8.60±0.63a | 141.96±2.38a | 5.02±0.29ab | 7 120±128a | |
2020年 | ||||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 19.74±0.76a | 7.10±0.57b | 112.57±3.65b | 4.79±0.56b | 5 427±241b |
人工打顶(CK2) | 19.88±0.67a | 8.20±1.03a | 133.48±3.08ab | 5.25±0.37a | 6 657±56 a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 19.59±0.51a | 8.60±0.84a | 138.89±3.29ab | 5.04±0.34ab | 6 484±304a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 19.74±0.88a | 8.50±0.85a | 138.30±4.85ab | 5.02±0.27ab | 6 747±200a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 19.88±0.67a | 8.80±1.40a | 142.84±4.65a | 5.12±0.39ab | 6 743±167a |
Table 4 Effect of different treatments on yield and yield components in cotton
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatments | 收获株数 Plant No. (104/hm2) | 单株铃数 Boll No. per plant (个/株) | 总铃数 Total boll No. (104/hm2) | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | ||||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 20.18±0.96a | 6.93±1.22b | 110.38±4.02c | 5.14±0.40b | 5 515±131c |
人工打顶(CK2) | 21.35±0.72a | 7.80±1.01a | 136.40±5.40b | 5.70±0.56a | 6 632±151b | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 20.61±0.92a | 8.33±0.62a | 141.84±6.29ab | 5.56±0.41ab | 7 055±104a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 20.61±1.07a | 8.47±0.52a | 144.74±4.23a | 5.66±0.56a | 7 134±126a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 20.18±1.11a | 8.4±0.83a | 140.64±4.92ab | 5.60±0.44ab | 6 877±253ab | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 20.76±1.20a | 7.00±1.13b | 114.91±5.08c | 4.82±0.42b | 5 433±141b |
人工打顶(CK2) | 21.20±1.03a | 7.53±1.19b | 129.68±6.78b | 5.31±0.37a | 6 475±270a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 20.03±0.66a | 8.40±0.83a | 139.77±5.57a | 5.08±0.44ab | 6 877±429a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 20.18±0.78a | 8.47±0.64a | 140.79±4.95a | 4.96±.41ab | 6 745±372a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 20.03±1.03a | 8.60±0.63a | 141.96±2.38a | 5.02±0.29ab | 7 120±128a | |
2020年 | ||||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 19.74±0.76a | 7.10±0.57b | 112.57±3.65b | 4.79±0.56b | 5 427±241b |
人工打顶(CK2) | 19.88±0.67a | 8.20±1.03a | 133.48±3.08ab | 5.25±0.37a | 6 657±56 a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 19.59±0.51a | 8.60±0.84a | 138.89±3.29ab | 5.04±0.34ab | 6 484±304a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 19.74±0.88a | 8.50±0.85a | 138.30±4.85ab | 5.02±0.27ab | 6 747±200a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 19.88±0.67a | 8.80±1.40a | 142.84±4.65a | 5.12±0.39ab | 6 743±167a |
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatment | 上半部平均长度 Upper half mean length(mm) | 整齐度指数 Uniformity index(%) | 断裂比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 马克隆值 Micronaire | 伸长率 Elongation (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | ||||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao 72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 31.37±0.85a | 86.59±0.54a | 31.13±0.83b | 3.39±0.32a | 6.62±0.58a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 31.39±1.34a | 86.46±1.21a | 32.09±0.73a | 3.57±0.32a | 6.51±0.79a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 31.69±1.16a | 86.76±1.08a | 31.63±0.91ab | 3.52±0.40a | 6.54±0.42a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 31.86±0.74a | 86.78±0.88a | 31.57±1.14ab | 3.73±0.53a | 6.43±0.45a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 32.00±1.05a | 86.67±1.12a | 32.23±0.70a | 3.58±0.47a | 6.54±0.36a | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao 61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 30.58±1.24a | 85.57±1.56a | 28.74±1.14c | 3.36±0.56b | 6.71±0.58a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 30.64±0.79a | 85.86±1.11a | 29.69±1.09bc | 3.81±0.36a | 6.58±0.63a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 30.93±1.03a | 85.74±1.19a | 29.99±1.18ab | 3.56±0.42ab | 6.62±0.51a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 30.87±0.66a | 85.97±1.22a | 31.11±1.67a | 3.74±0.40ab | 6.84±0.52a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 30.82±0.66a | 86.16±0.64a | 30.6±0.96ab | 3.56±0.21ab | 6.69±0.40a | |
2020年 | ||||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao 67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 28.71±0.68a | 84.13±1.05a | 28.09±1.26a | 4.92±0.23a | 6.42±0.97a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 28.25±1.24a | 83.66±1.37a | 26.94±2.42a | 4.94±0.28a | 6.19±0.86a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 28.51±0.87a | 84.44±1.60a | 28.07±1.27a | 4.91±0.30a | 6.47±0.88a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 28.52±0.63a | 84.01±0.92a | 27.78±1.42a | 5.08±0.19a | 6.36±0.81a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 28.72±0.90a | 84.32±1.42a | 28.12±1.54a | 4.98±0.28a | 6.29±1.02a |
Table 5 Effect of different treatments on fiber quality in cotton
品种 Cultivars | 处理 Treatment | 上半部平均长度 Upper half mean length(mm) | 整齐度指数 Uniformity index(%) | 断裂比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 马克隆值 Micronaire | 伸长率 Elongation (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019年 | ||||||
新陆早72号 Xinluzao 72 | 不打顶(CK1) | 31.37±0.85a | 86.59±0.54a | 31.13±0.83b | 3.39±0.32a | 6.62±0.58a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 31.39±1.34a | 86.46±1.21a | 32.09±0.73a | 3.57±0.32a | 6.51±0.79a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 31.69±1.16a | 86.76±1.08a | 31.63±0.91ab | 3.52±0.40a | 6.54±0.42a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 31.86±0.74a | 86.78±0.88a | 31.57±1.14ab | 3.73±0.53a | 6.43±0.45a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 32.00±1.05a | 86.67±1.12a | 32.23±0.70a | 3.58±0.47a | 6.54±0.36a | |
新陆早61号 Xinluzao 61 | 不打顶(CK1) | 30.58±1.24a | 85.57±1.56a | 28.74±1.14c | 3.36±0.56b | 6.71±0.58a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 30.64±0.79a | 85.86±1.11a | 29.69±1.09bc | 3.81±0.36a | 6.58±0.63a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 30.93±1.03a | 85.74±1.19a | 29.99±1.18ab | 3.56±0.42ab | 6.62±0.51a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 30.87±0.66a | 85.97±1.22a | 31.11±1.67a | 3.74±0.40ab | 6.84±0.52a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 30.82±0.66a | 86.16±0.64a | 30.6±0.96ab | 3.56±0.21ab | 6.69±0.40a | |
2020年 | ||||||
新陆早67号 Xinluzao 67 | 不打顶(CK1) | 28.71±0.68a | 84.13±1.05a | 28.09±1.26a | 4.92±0.23a | 6.42±0.97a |
人工打顶(CK2) | 28.25±1.24a | 83.66±1.37a | 26.94±2.42a | 4.94±0.28a | 6.19±0.86a | |
DPC+ 低浓度 | 28.51±0.87a | 84.44±1.60a | 28.07±1.27a | 4.91±0.30a | 6.47±0.88a | |
DPC+ 中浓度 | 28.52±0.63a | 84.01±0.92a | 27.78±1.42a | 5.08±0.19a | 6.36±0.81a | |
DPC+ 高浓度 | 28.72±0.90a | 84.32±1.42a | 28.12±1.54a | 4.98±0.28a | 6.29±1.02a |
[1] | 赵强, 周春江, 张巨松, 等. 化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺和经济性状的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(4): 329-333. |
ZHAO Qiang, ZHOU Chunjiang, ZAHNG Jusong, et al. Effect of chemical detopping on the canopy and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)in southern Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(4): 329-333. | |
[2] | 何磊, 周亚立, 刘向新, 等. 浅谈新疆兵团棉花打顶技术[J]. 中国棉花, 2013, 40(4): 5-6. |
HE Lie, ZHOU Yali, LIU Xiangxin, et al. Discussion of cotton-topping technology in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps[J]. China Cotton, 2013, 40(4): 5-6. | |
[3] | 毛树春. 我国棉花种植技术的现代化问题-兼论“十二五”棉花栽培相关研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2010, 37(3): 2-6. |
MAO Chunshu. Modernization of China's cotton planting technology - and on the "12th Five Year Plan" cotton cultivation related research[J]. China Cotton, 2010, 37(3): 2-6. | |
[4] | 王刚, 张鑫, 陈兵, 等. 棉花化学打顶剂在新疆的推广应用现状及发展策略[J]. 中国植保导刊, 2016, 36(1): 76-80+75. |
WANG Gang, ZHANG Xin, CHEN Bing, et al. The popularization and application of cotton chemical topping agent in Xinjiang and its development strategy[J]. China Plant Protection, 2016, 36(1): 76-80+75. | |
[5] | 赵强, 张巨松, 周春江, 等. 化学打顶对棉花群体容量的拓展效应[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(5): 401-407. |
ZHAO Qiang, ZAHNG Jusong, ZHOU Chunjiang, et al. Chemical detopping increases the optimum plant density in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(5): 401-407. | |
[6] | 董春玲, 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 等. 喷施氟节胺对棉花农艺性状的影响及化学打顶效应研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(11): 1985-1990. |
DONG Chunling, LUO Honghai, ZHANG Yali, et al. Research on cotton agronomic traits and chemical topping effect after spraying flumetralin[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(11): 1985-1990. | |
[7] | 杨成勋, 姚贺盛, 杨延龙, 等. 化学打顶对棉花冠层结构指标及产量形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(7): 1243-1250. |
YANG Chengxun, YAO Hesheng, YANG Yanlong, et al. Effect of chemical multi-topping on canopy structure index and yield formation in cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(7): 1243-1250. | |
[8] | 杨成勋, 张旺锋, 徐守振, 等. 喷施化学打顶剂对棉花冠层结构及群体光合生产的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(9):1672-1684. |
YANG Chengxun, ZHANG Wangfeng, XU Shouzhen, et al. Effects of spraying chemical topping agents on canopy structure and canopy photosynthetic production in cotton[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(9): 1672-1684. | |
[9] | 杜刚锋, 杨成勋, 田景山, 等. 棉花化学打顶对机采棉脱叶催熟效果的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46(8):19-21, 32. |
DU Gangfeng, YANG Chenxun, TIAN Jingshan, et al. Effect of chemical topping on ripening and defoliation of machine-picked cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(8):19-21, 32. | |
[10] | 刘涛荣, 马海英, 蒋桂英. 喷施氟节胺对棉花农艺性状及产量的影响研究[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2018, 41(3):38-40. |
LIU Taorong, MA Haiying, JIANG Guiying. Study on the effect of spraying fluorine on agronomic characters and yield of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2018, 41(3):38-40. | |
[11] | 徐守振, 左文庆, 陈民志, 等. 北疆植棉区滴灌量对化学打顶棉花植株农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(4):345-355. |
XU Shouzhen, ZUO Wenqing, CHEN Minzhi, et al. Effect of drip irrigation amount on the agronomic traits and yield of cotton grown with a chemical topping in northern Xinjiang, China[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(4): 345-355. | |
[12] |
Siebert J D, Stewartd A M. Influence of plant density on cotton response to mepiquat chloride application[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2006, 98(6): 1634-1639.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Wang L, Mu C, Du M W, et al. The effect of mepiquant chloride on elongation of cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) internode is associated with low concentration of gibberellic acid[J]. Plant Science, 2014, 225: 15-23.
DOI PMID |
[14] | 李雪, 朱昌华, 夏凯, 等. 辛酸辛酯、癸酸甲酯和6-BA对棉花去顶的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2009, 21(1): 70-80. |
LI Xue, ZHU Changhua, XIA Kai, et al. Effects of methyl octanoate methyl decanoate and 6-BA on topping in cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2009, 21(1): 70-80. | |
[15] | 李新裕, 陈玉娟. 新疆垦区长绒棉化学封顶取代人工打顶试验研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2001, 28(1): 11-12. |
LI Xinyu, CHEN Yujuan. Experimental study on chemical topping of long-staple cotton instead of artificial topping in Xinjiang reclamation area[J]. China Cotton, 2001, 28(1): 11-12. | |
[16] | 徐守振, 杨延龙, 陈民志, 等. 北疆棉区滴水量对化学打顶棉花冠层结构及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(6):988-997. |
XU Shouzhen, YANG Yanlong, CHEN Minzhi, et al. Effect of Drip Irrigation Amount on Canopy Structure and Yield of Chemical Topping Cotton in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(6):988-997. | |
[17] |
崔延楠, 韩文婷, 聂志勇, 等. 不同密度下三种打顶方式对棉花株型结构及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(11):1968-1976.
DOI |
CUI Yannan, HAN Wenting, NIE Zhiyong, et al. Effects of three topping methods on cotton plant type structure and yield at different densities[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(11):1968-1976.
DOI |
|
[18] |
娄善伟, 阿尔曼·阿不利米提, 姜婷婷, 等. 不同复水时间对化学封顶棉花的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(8):1400-1405.
DOI |
LOU Shanwei, Aerman Abulimiti, JIANG Tingting, et al. Effects of different rehydration Time on chemical detopping cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(8):1400-1405.
DOI |
|
[19] |
蔡晓虎, 史亚辉, 林萍, 等. 氟节胺与缩节胺联合使用对棉花生长发育调控的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(11):1997-2005.
DOI |
CAI Xiaohu, SHI Yahui, LIN Ping, et al. Study on the regulation of cotton plant shape by mixing flumetralin and mepiquat[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 1997-2005.
DOI |
|
[20] |
Liang F, Yang C, Sui L, et al. Flumetralin and dimethyl piperidinium chloride alter light distribution in cotton canopies by optimizing the spatial configuration of leaves and bolls[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(7):1777-1788.
DOI URL |
[21] | 祝令晓, 刘连涛, 张永江, 等. 化学封顶对棉花株型的调控及评价指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(20):4152-4163. |
ZHU Lingxiao, LIU Liantao, ZHANG Yongjiang, et al. The regulation and evaluation indexes screening of chemical topping on cotton's plant architecture[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20):4152-4163. | |
[22] | 齐海坤, 王赛, 徐东永, 等. 不同棉区棉花DPC化学封顶技术研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(5):425-437. |
Qi Haikun, Wang Sai, Xu Dongyong, et al. Cotton chemical topping by applying DPC in different cotton-growing regions[J]. Cotton Science, 2020, 32(5):425-437. | |
[23] | 黎芳, 王希, 王香茹, 等. 黄河流域北部棉区棉花缩节胺化学封顶技术[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(13): 2497-2510. |
LI Fang, WANG Xi, WANG Xiangru, et al. Cotton chemical topping with mepiquat chloride application in the north of Yellow River Valley of China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(13): 2497-2510. | |
[24] | 安静, 黎芳, 周春江, 等. 增效缩节胺化学封顶对棉花主茎生长的影响及其相关机制[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1837-1843. |
AN Jing, LI Fang, ZHOU Chunjiang, et al. Morpho-physiological responses of cotton shoot apex to the chemical topping with fortified mepiquat chloride[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1837-1843.
DOI URL |
|
[25] | 汤庆峰, 文启凯, 田长彦, 等. 棉花纤维品质的形成机理及影响因子研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2003, 40(4): 206-210. |
TANG Qingfeng, WEN Qikai, TIAN Changyan, et al. A Study process on formation mechanism of cotton fiber quality and its affecting factors[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2003, 40(4): 206-210. |
[1] | LIU Haijun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yifan, CHEN Maoguang, WU Fengquan, LIN Tao, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of different mulching materials and irrigation on yield formation and effective accumulated temperature production efficiency of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | CHEN Maoguang, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, LIU Haijun, WANG Yifan, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of mulch film types on cotton growth and analysis of self-degradation recycling characteristics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[3] | WANG Hui, GUO Jincheng, SONG Jia, ZHANG Tingjun, He Liangrong. Physiological and biochemical analysis of transgenic offspring of upland cotton GhCIPK6 under high temperature Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119. |
[4] | YANG Chuan, ZHANG Kai, CHEN Bing, ZHANG Hui, LIU Ping, CHANG Song, SHENG Jiandong. Responses of morphological characteristics of cotton to different water conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127. |
[5] | ZHU Yujie, LIN Ling, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Effect of modified cotton straw charcoal on ammonia volatilization characteristics of nitrogen fertilizer in grey desert soils of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2128-2137. |
[6] | YANG Guojiang, CHEN Yun, LIN Xiangqun, HE Jiangyong, LIU Shenglin, QU Yongqing. Effects of organic fertilizer replacement on the yield and nutrient absorption of cotton and nitrate nitrogen under chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[7] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHNAG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, KONG Depeng, Sailihan Sai, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effects of biomass charcoal application rate on the growth, development, and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[8] | WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang, LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru. Analysis of dry matter production, transport and nitrogen fertilizer utilization caused by yield Gap at different yield levels of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[9] | WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaoping, SHI Wenyu, LIU Meiyan, MA Jian, GUO Yunpeng, SONG Ruixin, WANG Qingtao. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[10] | XIANG Li, WANG Xian, DONG Yusheng, GUO Xiaoling, FANG Furong, CHEN Zhijun, MA Yanming, MIAO Yu. Effects of exogenous butyric acid on yield and quality of barley under drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181. |
[11] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[12] | LIU Yufang, ZHANG Zhigang, LI Changcheng, LI Hong, CHENG Ping, YANG Lu. Effects of different temperature and maturity on rot rate and quality of apricot during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2189-2197. |
[13] | GONG Duorui, YANG Liling, HAN Jiang, YANG Zhongqiang, LIU Jia, WEN Yu, ZHU Zhanjiang, CUI Kuanbo. Effects of simulated cold chain transport on cell membrane lipid peroxidation and quality of apricot fruit during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2198-2207. |
[14] | LI Ziqin, CHEN Ya, LI Wenqi, JIA Wenting, GUO Huijing, SONG Fangyuan, ZHAO Zhiyong, LIU Chengjiang. Effects of different precooling methods combined with H2O2 treatment on the quality of lvtangxin winter jujube during storage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2208-2215. |
[15] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||