Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 1347-1355.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.006
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
Buhaliqem Abliz1(), YUAN Jie1, ZHANG Yanhong1, ZHAO Zhiqiang1, WEN Xiaorong2, JIA Chunping1, KANG Mintai2, TANG Fusen2, WANG Fengbin2,3()
Received:
2021-09-27
Online:
2022-06-20
Published:
2022-07-07
Correspondence author:
WANG Fengbin
Supported by:
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜1(), 袁杰1, 张燕红1, 赵志强1, 文孝荣2, 贾春平1, 康民泰2, 唐福森2, 王奉斌2,3()
通讯作者:
王奉斌
作者简介:
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜(1974-),女,新疆喀什人,副研究员,研究方向为水稻育种与栽培,(E-mail) 1787237708@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Buhaliqem Abliz, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Yanhong, ZHAO Zhiqiang, WEN Xiaorong, JIA Chunping, KANG Mintai, TANG Fusen, WANG Fengbin. Analysis of Rice Quality Traits of Different Japonica Rice Varieties (Lines)[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1347-1355.
布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 袁杰, 张燕红, 赵志强, 文孝荣, 贾春平, 康民泰, 唐福森, 王奉斌. 不同粳稻品种(系)稻米品质性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1347-1355.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.006
品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻42号 Xindao 42 | 81.1e | 68.00bc | 72.8ef | 3.0c | 23.3b | 7.38f | 15.6fg | 75.7de | 5.1f | 2.6bc | 2.0de |
新稻46号 Xindao 46 | 82.9bc | 40.97h | 73.9cd | 2.5d | 18.0c | 7.39f | 15.9fg | 71.7f | 5.4ef | 2.5bcd | 2.2d |
新稻47号 Xindao 47 | 81.5de | 46.5g | 71.6gh | 0.8fg | 6.3g | 8.12c | 18.2c | 68.7g | 5.3ef | 2.6bc | 2.0de |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 80.9e | 51.6f | 67.8k | 0.3h | 3.7h | 7.51f | 19.2ab | 75.7de | 6.3b | 2.2d | 2.8a |
农林315号 Nonglin 315 | 81.6de | 62.8d | 71.9fg | 0.8fg | 7.3fg | 7.38f | 18.4c | 76.7cd | 4.9g | 2.7ab | 1.8e |
GDY1 | 83.1b | 72.4a | 74.3bc | 2.3d | 15.0d | 7.95cd | 19.1ab | 77.7c | 5.6cd | 2.7ab | 2.1de |
GDY6 | 82.1cd | 47.8g | 72.3efg | 0.5g | 2.3i | 7.86de | 17.2d | 67.7g | 6.7a | 2.5bcd | 2.7b |
GDY8 | 81.0e | 57.3e | 70.9h | 0.1i | 2.0i | 8.73a | 18.9b | 71.7f | 5.6cd | 2.4cd | 2.3c |
新稻11号 Xindao 11 | 83.0b | 69.6bc | 73.1de | 0.1j | 1.0j | 7.22g | 15.4g | 77.0cd | 5.1f | 2.5bcd | 2.1de |
新稻36号 Xindao 36 | 81.0e | 69.9b | 75.6a | 0.8fg | 6.3g | 8.06c | 15.3g | 74.7e | 5.5de | 2.7ab | 2.1de |
新稻45号 Xindao 45 | 83.7ab | 67.3c | 74.3bc | 0.9f | 8.0f | 8.29b | 16.1ef | 80.0b | 4.8g | 2.8a | 1.8e |
新稻56号 Xindao 56 | 84.3a | 63.9d | 75.0ab | 10.3a | 41.6a | 7.79e | 17.5d | 85.0a | 5.5de | 2.5bcd | 2.2d |
新稻57号 Xindao 57 | 83.3b | 63.7d | 75.8a | 9.7b | 41.3a | 8.07c | 16.4e | 70.3f | 4.8g | 2.8a | 1.8e |
GDW1 | 83.3b | 31.6i | 69.1j | 0.7fg | 7.3fg | 8.11c | 16.0ef | 71.7f | 5.3ef | 2.5bcd | 2.1de |
GDW2 | 83.7ab | 67.7bc | 75.2ab | 1.0f | 10.0e | 7.87de | 19.5a | 76.3cd | 5.2f | 2.8a | 1.8e |
GDW9 | 81.2e | 50.4f | 70.0i | 1.5e | 7.3fg | 7.97cd | 19.9a | 81.0b | 5.8c | 2.7ab | 2.1de |
最小值 Min | 80.2 | 29.3 | 66.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 7.13 | 15.2 | 67.0 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
最大值 Max | 84.9 | 72.7 | 76.7 | 10.3 | 43.0 | 8.77 | 20.0 | 86.0 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
极差 Range | 4.7 | 43.4 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 42 | 1.64 | 4.8 | 19.0 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
平均值 Average | 82.4 | 58.2 | 72.7 | 2.0 | 12.6 | 7.86 | 17.4 | 75.1 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
标准差 SD | 1.2 | 11.8 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 12.5 | 0.40 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
变异系数(%) CV | 1.5 | 20.3 | 3.3 | 140.0 | 99.2 | 5.09 | 9.2 | 6.1 | 9.3 | 7.7 | 14.3 |
Table 1 Variation statistics on quality traits of different japonica rice varieties (lines)
品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻42号 Xindao 42 | 81.1e | 68.00bc | 72.8ef | 3.0c | 23.3b | 7.38f | 15.6fg | 75.7de | 5.1f | 2.6bc | 2.0de |
新稻46号 Xindao 46 | 82.9bc | 40.97h | 73.9cd | 2.5d | 18.0c | 7.39f | 15.9fg | 71.7f | 5.4ef | 2.5bcd | 2.2d |
新稻47号 Xindao 47 | 81.5de | 46.5g | 71.6gh | 0.8fg | 6.3g | 8.12c | 18.2c | 68.7g | 5.3ef | 2.6bc | 2.0de |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | 80.9e | 51.6f | 67.8k | 0.3h | 3.7h | 7.51f | 19.2ab | 75.7de | 6.3b | 2.2d | 2.8a |
农林315号 Nonglin 315 | 81.6de | 62.8d | 71.9fg | 0.8fg | 7.3fg | 7.38f | 18.4c | 76.7cd | 4.9g | 2.7ab | 1.8e |
GDY1 | 83.1b | 72.4a | 74.3bc | 2.3d | 15.0d | 7.95cd | 19.1ab | 77.7c | 5.6cd | 2.7ab | 2.1de |
GDY6 | 82.1cd | 47.8g | 72.3efg | 0.5g | 2.3i | 7.86de | 17.2d | 67.7g | 6.7a | 2.5bcd | 2.7b |
GDY8 | 81.0e | 57.3e | 70.9h | 0.1i | 2.0i | 8.73a | 18.9b | 71.7f | 5.6cd | 2.4cd | 2.3c |
新稻11号 Xindao 11 | 83.0b | 69.6bc | 73.1de | 0.1j | 1.0j | 7.22g | 15.4g | 77.0cd | 5.1f | 2.5bcd | 2.1de |
新稻36号 Xindao 36 | 81.0e | 69.9b | 75.6a | 0.8fg | 6.3g | 8.06c | 15.3g | 74.7e | 5.5de | 2.7ab | 2.1de |
新稻45号 Xindao 45 | 83.7ab | 67.3c | 74.3bc | 0.9f | 8.0f | 8.29b | 16.1ef | 80.0b | 4.8g | 2.8a | 1.8e |
新稻56号 Xindao 56 | 84.3a | 63.9d | 75.0ab | 10.3a | 41.6a | 7.79e | 17.5d | 85.0a | 5.5de | 2.5bcd | 2.2d |
新稻57号 Xindao 57 | 83.3b | 63.7d | 75.8a | 9.7b | 41.3a | 8.07c | 16.4e | 70.3f | 4.8g | 2.8a | 1.8e |
GDW1 | 83.3b | 31.6i | 69.1j | 0.7fg | 7.3fg | 8.11c | 16.0ef | 71.7f | 5.3ef | 2.5bcd | 2.1de |
GDW2 | 83.7ab | 67.7bc | 75.2ab | 1.0f | 10.0e | 7.87de | 19.5a | 76.3cd | 5.2f | 2.8a | 1.8e |
GDW9 | 81.2e | 50.4f | 70.0i | 1.5e | 7.3fg | 7.97cd | 19.9a | 81.0b | 5.8c | 2.7ab | 2.1de |
最小值 Min | 80.2 | 29.3 | 66.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 7.13 | 15.2 | 67.0 | 4.8 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
最大值 Max | 84.9 | 72.7 | 76.7 | 10.3 | 43.0 | 8.77 | 20.0 | 86.0 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
极差 Range | 4.7 | 43.4 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 42 | 1.64 | 4.8 | 19.0 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
平均值 Average | 82.4 | 58.2 | 72.7 | 2.0 | 12.6 | 7.86 | 17.4 | 75.1 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
标准差 SD | 1.2 | 11.8 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 12.5 | 0.40 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
变异系数(%) CV | 1.5 | 20.3 | 3.3 | 140.0 | 99.2 | 5.09 | 9.2 | 6.1 | 9.3 | 7.7 | 14.3 |
相关性 Correlation | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糙米率 Brown rice rate(%) | 1.000 | ||||||||||
整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 0.102 | 1.000 | |||||||||
精米率 Milled rice rate(%) | 0.48 | 0.62 | 1.000 | ||||||||
垩白度 Chalky degree(%) | 0.42 | 0.193 | 0.47 | 1.000 | |||||||
垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 0.457** | 0.217 | 0.521** | 0.877** | 1.000 | ||||||
蛋白质含量 Protein content (%) | 0.019 | -0.092 | -0.006 | -0.005 | -0.085 | 1.000 | |||||
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content (%) | -0.179 | -0.035 | -0.356* | -0.147 | -0.186 | 0.221 | 1.000 | ||||
胶稠度 Gel consistency (mm) | 0.259 | 0.480** | 0.163 | 0.128 | 0.248 | -0.171 | 0.187 | 1.000 | |||
粒长 Grain length (mm) | -0.334* | -0.342* | -0.419** | -0.302* | -0.334* | 0.014 | 0.319* | -0.193 | 1.000 | ||
粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 0.244 | 0.364* | 0.565** | 0.207 | 0.164 | 0.114 | -0.014 | 0.124 | -0.499** | 1.000 | |
长宽比 Aspect ratio | -0.349* | -0.392** | -0.559** | -0.297* | -0.301* | -0.063 | 0.224 | -0.202 | 0.904** | -0.805** | 1.000 |
Table 2 Correlation analysis of quality traits among different japonica rice varieties (lines)
相关性 Correlation | 糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency (mm) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糙米率 Brown rice rate(%) | 1.000 | ||||||||||
整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 0.102 | 1.000 | |||||||||
精米率 Milled rice rate(%) | 0.48 | 0.62 | 1.000 | ||||||||
垩白度 Chalky degree(%) | 0.42 | 0.193 | 0.47 | 1.000 | |||||||
垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 0.457** | 0.217 | 0.521** | 0.877** | 1.000 | ||||||
蛋白质含量 Protein content (%) | 0.019 | -0.092 | -0.006 | -0.005 | -0.085 | 1.000 | |||||
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content (%) | -0.179 | -0.035 | -0.356* | -0.147 | -0.186 | 0.221 | 1.000 | ||||
胶稠度 Gel consistency (mm) | 0.259 | 0.480** | 0.163 | 0.128 | 0.248 | -0.171 | 0.187 | 1.000 | |||
粒长 Grain length (mm) | -0.334* | -0.342* | -0.419** | -0.302* | -0.334* | 0.014 | 0.319* | -0.193 | 1.000 | ||
粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 0.244 | 0.364* | 0.565** | 0.207 | 0.164 | 0.114 | -0.014 | 0.124 | -0.499** | 1.000 | |
长宽比 Aspect ratio | -0.349* | -0.392** | -0.559** | -0.297* | -0.301* | -0.063 | 0.224 | -0.202 | 0.904** | -0.805** | 1.000 |
主成分 Principal component | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalues | 提取载荷平方和 Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | |
1 | 4.342 | 39.475 | 39.475 | 4.342 | 39.475 | 39.475 |
2 | 1.732 | 15.748 | 55.223 | 1.732 | 15.748 | 55.223 |
3 | 1.363 | 12.394 | 67.618 | 1.363 | 12.394 | 67.618 |
4 | 1.215 | 11.043 | 78.661 | 1.215 | 11.043 | 78.661 |
5 | 0.803 | 7.304 | 85.965 | |||
6 | 0.638 | 5.803 | 91.767 | |||
7 | 0.532 | 4.834 | 96.602 | |||
8 | 0.268 | 2.432 | 99.034 | |||
9 | 0.081 | 0.734 | 99.768 | |||
10 | 0.021 | 0.188 | 99.956 | |||
11 | 0.005 | 0.044 | 100.000 |
Table 3 Principal component eigenvalues
主成分 Principal component | 初始特征值 Initial eigenvalues | 提取载荷平方和 Extraction sums of squared loadings | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | 总计 Total | 方差百分比 Variance(%) | 累积 Cumulative(%) | |
1 | 4.342 | 39.475 | 39.475 | 4.342 | 39.475 | 39.475 |
2 | 1.732 | 15.748 | 55.223 | 1.732 | 15.748 | 55.223 |
3 | 1.363 | 12.394 | 67.618 | 1.363 | 12.394 | 67.618 |
4 | 1.215 | 11.043 | 78.661 | 1.215 | 11.043 | 78.661 |
5 | 0.803 | 7.304 | 85.965 | |||
6 | 0.638 | 5.803 | 91.767 | |||
7 | 0.532 | 4.834 | 96.602 | |||
8 | 0.268 | 2.432 | 99.034 | |||
9 | 0.081 | 0.734 | 99.768 | |||
10 | 0.021 | 0.188 | 99.956 | |||
11 | 0.005 | 0.044 | 100.000 |
品种 Variety | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 主成分 1 PC 1 | 主成分 2 PC 2 | 主成分 3 PC 3 | 主成分 4 PC 4 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻42号 Xindao 42 | 0.369 9 | 0.230 5 | -0.294 9 | -1.529 8 | 0.770 8 | 0.303 4 | -0.344 3 | -1.686 3 | 0.156 5 | 6 |
新稻46号 Xindao 46 | -0.027 4 | 0.674 2 | -1.542 0 | -0.657 9 | -0.057 1 | 0.887 3 | -1.800 3 | -0.725 2 | -0.236 5 | 10 |
新稻47号 Xindao 47 | -0.471 0 | -0.912 2 | -0.783 7 | 0.856 0 | -0.981 5 | -1.200 6 | -0.915 0 | 0.943 6 | -0.744 6 | 12 |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | -2.025 6 | 1.230 9 | 0.942 1 | -0.619 0 | -4.220 8 | 1.619 9 | 1.099 9 | -0.682 3 | -1.716 5 | 16 |
农林315号 Nonglin 315 | 0.198 9 | -0.852 5 | 0.601 8 | -0.995 8 | 0.414 5 | -1.122 0 | 0.702 6 | -1.097 7 | -0.060 1 | 7 |
GDY1 | 0.388 4 | 0.019 6 | 1.274 6 | 0.408 2 | 0.809 4 | 0.025 8 | 1.488 1 | 0.450 0 | 0.709 0 | 5 |
GDY6 | -1.397 7 | 0.531 4 | -0.726 9 | 0.316 6 | -2.912 5 | 0.699 3 | -0.848 7 | 0.348 9 | -1.406 3 | 15 |
GDY8 | -1.105 8 | -0.519 2 | 0.236 8 | 1.404 9 | -2.304 2 | -0.683 2 | 0.276 5 | 1.548 6 | -1.032 1 | 14 |
新稻11号 Xindao 11 | 0.201 1 | -0.250 6 | -0.134 7 | -2.191 5 | 0.419 1 | -0.329 8 | -0.157 3 | -2.415 7 | -0.219 7 | 9 |
新稻36号 Xindao 36 | 0.250 6 | -0.940 7 | -0.215 4 | -0.605 4 | 0.522 1 | -1.238 0 | -0.251 5 | -0.667 4 | -0.119 1 | 8 |
新稻45号 Xindao 45 | 1.044 3 | -1.172 8 | 0.200 4 | 0.185 3 | 2.176 0 | -1.543 5 | 0.234 0 | 0.204 2 | 0.848 6 | 4 |
新稻56号 Xindao 56 | 1.248 3 | 2.648 8 | 0.897 5 | 0.422 3 | 2.601 2 | 3.485 9 | 1.047 8 | 0.465 5 | 2.233 7 | 1 |
新稻57号 Xindao 57 | 1.713 4 | 0.672 7 | -1.249 0 | 1.160 0 | 3.570 3 | 0.885 4 | -1.458 2 | 1.278 7 | 1.918 8 | 2 |
GDW1 | -0.677 4 | -0.066 5 | -1.675 7 | 0.668 3 | -1.411 6 | -0.087 5 | -1.956 3 | 0.736 7 | -0.930 7 | 13 |
GDW2 | 0.845 7 | -0.988 2 | 0.974 3 | 0.516 9 | 1.762 2 | -1.300 6 | 1.137 5 | 0.569 7 | 0.883 2 | 3 |
GDW9 | -0.555 6 | -0.305 4 | 1.494 9 | 0.661 1 | -1.157 8 | -0.401 9 | 1.745 2 | 0.728 7 | -0.284 2 | 11 |
Table 4 Composite score of principal component and order of different japonica rice varieties (lines)
品种 Variety | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 主成分 1 PC 1 | 主成分 2 PC 2 | 主成分 3 PC 3 | 主成分 4 PC 4 | 综合得分 Composite score | 排序 Order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
新稻42号 Xindao 42 | 0.369 9 | 0.230 5 | -0.294 9 | -1.529 8 | 0.770 8 | 0.303 4 | -0.344 3 | -1.686 3 | 0.156 5 | 6 |
新稻46号 Xindao 46 | -0.027 4 | 0.674 2 | -1.542 0 | -0.657 9 | -0.057 1 | 0.887 3 | -1.800 3 | -0.725 2 | -0.236 5 | 10 |
新稻47号 Xindao 47 | -0.471 0 | -0.912 2 | -0.783 7 | 0.856 0 | -0.981 5 | -1.200 6 | -0.915 0 | 0.943 6 | -0.744 6 | 12 |
新稻50号 Xindao 50 | -2.025 6 | 1.230 9 | 0.942 1 | -0.619 0 | -4.220 8 | 1.619 9 | 1.099 9 | -0.682 3 | -1.716 5 | 16 |
农林315号 Nonglin 315 | 0.198 9 | -0.852 5 | 0.601 8 | -0.995 8 | 0.414 5 | -1.122 0 | 0.702 6 | -1.097 7 | -0.060 1 | 7 |
GDY1 | 0.388 4 | 0.019 6 | 1.274 6 | 0.408 2 | 0.809 4 | 0.025 8 | 1.488 1 | 0.450 0 | 0.709 0 | 5 |
GDY6 | -1.397 7 | 0.531 4 | -0.726 9 | 0.316 6 | -2.912 5 | 0.699 3 | -0.848 7 | 0.348 9 | -1.406 3 | 15 |
GDY8 | -1.105 8 | -0.519 2 | 0.236 8 | 1.404 9 | -2.304 2 | -0.683 2 | 0.276 5 | 1.548 6 | -1.032 1 | 14 |
新稻11号 Xindao 11 | 0.201 1 | -0.250 6 | -0.134 7 | -2.191 5 | 0.419 1 | -0.329 8 | -0.157 3 | -2.415 7 | -0.219 7 | 9 |
新稻36号 Xindao 36 | 0.250 6 | -0.940 7 | -0.215 4 | -0.605 4 | 0.522 1 | -1.238 0 | -0.251 5 | -0.667 4 | -0.119 1 | 8 |
新稻45号 Xindao 45 | 1.044 3 | -1.172 8 | 0.200 4 | 0.185 3 | 2.176 0 | -1.543 5 | 0.234 0 | 0.204 2 | 0.848 6 | 4 |
新稻56号 Xindao 56 | 1.248 3 | 2.648 8 | 0.897 5 | 0.422 3 | 2.601 2 | 3.485 9 | 1.047 8 | 0.465 5 | 2.233 7 | 1 |
新稻57号 Xindao 57 | 1.713 4 | 0.672 7 | -1.249 0 | 1.160 0 | 3.570 3 | 0.885 4 | -1.458 2 | 1.278 7 | 1.918 8 | 2 |
GDW1 | -0.677 4 | -0.066 5 | -1.675 7 | 0.668 3 | -1.411 6 | -0.087 5 | -1.956 3 | 0.736 7 | -0.930 7 | 13 |
GDW2 | 0.845 7 | -0.988 2 | 0.974 3 | 0.516 9 | 1.762 2 | -1.300 6 | 1.137 5 | 0.569 7 | 0.883 2 | 3 |
GDW9 | -0.555 6 | -0.305 4 | 1.494 9 | 0.661 1 | -1.157 8 | -0.401 9 | 1.745 2 | 0.728 7 | -0.284 2 | 11 |
类别 Category | 品种(系) Cultivar classifi cation | 碾磨品质 Milling quality | 外观品质 Appearance quality | 蒸煮品质 Cooking-quality | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency(mm) | ||
Ⅰ | GDY1 GDW2 新稻45号 新稻42号 新稻36号 新稻11号 新稻47号 GDY8 农林315号 GDW9 新稻46号 GDW1 | 82.27 | 58.71 | 72.72 | 1.20 | 9.32 | 5.30 | 2.63 | 2.03 | 7.87 | 17.36 | 75.24 |
Ⅱ | 新稻50号 GDY6 | 81.52 | 49.70 | 70.05 | 0.40 | 3.00 | 6.50 | 2.35 | 2.75 | 7.69 | 18.20 | 71.70 |
Ⅲ | 新稻56号 新稻57号 | 83.83 | 63.82 | 75.40 | 10.00 | 41.45 | 5.15 | 2.65 | 2.00 | 7.93 | 16.95 | 77.65 |
Table 5 Comparison of quality traits among different rice varieties
类别 Category | 品种(系) Cultivar classifi cation | 碾磨品质 Milling quality | 外观品质 Appearance quality | 蒸煮品质 Cooking-quality | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
糙米率 Brown rice rate (%) | 整精米率 Head rice rate (%) | 精米率 Milled rice rate (%) | 垩白度 Chalky degree (%) | 垩白率 Chalky rate (%) | 粒长 Grain length (mm) | 粒宽 Grain width (mm) | 长宽比 Aspect ratio | 蛋白质 含量 Protein content (%) | 直链淀 粉含量 Amylose content (%) | 胶稠度 Gel consis tency(mm) | ||
Ⅰ | GDY1 GDW2 新稻45号 新稻42号 新稻36号 新稻11号 新稻47号 GDY8 农林315号 GDW9 新稻46号 GDW1 | 82.27 | 58.71 | 72.72 | 1.20 | 9.32 | 5.30 | 2.63 | 2.03 | 7.87 | 17.36 | 75.24 |
Ⅱ | 新稻50号 GDY6 | 81.52 | 49.70 | 70.05 | 0.40 | 3.00 | 6.50 | 2.35 | 2.75 | 7.69 | 18.20 | 71.70 |
Ⅲ | 新稻56号 新稻57号 | 83.83 | 63.82 | 75.40 | 10.00 | 41.45 | 5.15 | 2.65 | 2.00 | 7.93 | 16.95 | 77.65 |
[1] |
Patel D P, Das Anup, Munda G C, et al. Evaluation of yield and physiological attributes of high-yielding rice varieties under aerobic and flood-irrigated management practices in mid-hills Ecosystem[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97:1269-1276.
DOI URL |
[2] | Zhang H M, Xu M G, Shi X J, et al. Rice yield, potassium uptake and apparent balance under long-term fertilization in rice-based cropping systems in Southern China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agro Ecosystems, 2010, 88: 341-349. |
[3] | 方福平, 程式华. 水稻科技与产业发展[J]. 农学学报, 2018, 8(1): 92-98. |
FANG Fuping, CHENG Shihua. The development of rice science, technology and industry in China[J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2018, 8(1): 92-98. | |
[4] | 马会珍, 陈心怡, 王志杰, 等. 中国部分优质粳稻外观及蒸煮食味品质特征比较[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1338-1353. |
MA Huizhen, CHEN Xinyi, WANG Zhijie, et al. Analysis on appearance and cooking taste quality characteristics of some high quality japonica rice in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1338-1353. | |
[5] | 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 袁杰, 朱小霞, 等. 新疆稻区优质丰产水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 1595-1605. |
BuhaliqiemuAbulizi, YUAN Jie, ZHU Xiaoxia, et al. Screening and evaluation of high-quality and high-yield rice varieties in ecological regions of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(9): 1595-1605. | |
[6] | 熊若愚, 解嘉鑫, 谭雪明, 等. 不同灌溉方式对南方优质食味晚籼稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1512-1524. |
XIONG Ruoyu, XIE Jiaxin, TAN Xueming, et al. Effects of irrigation management on grain yield and quality of high-quality eating late-season indica rice in South China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1512-1524. | |
[7] | 刘琳帅, 卞景阳, 孙兴荣, 等. 大庆地区粳稻品质性状分析与评价[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2019, 41(10): 1-3. |
LIU Linshuai, BIAN Jingyang, SUN Xingrong, et al. Analysis and evaluation of quality characters of japonica rice in Daqing area[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 41(10): 1-3. | |
[8] | 牛付安, 程灿, 周继华, 等. 上海市粳稻品种品质性状的主成分分析和聚类分析[J]. 上海农业学报, 2014, 30(1): 26-30. |
NIU Fuan, CHENG Can, ZHOU Jihua, et al. The principal component and cluster analyses of grain quality of keng rice cultivars in Shanghai[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2014, 30(1): 26-30. | |
[9] | 马静, 孙建昌, 安永平, 等. 宁夏育成粳稻品种(系)品质相关性及主成分分析[J]. 种子, 2011, 30(10): 89-91. |
MA Jing, SUN Jianchang, AN Yongping, et al. Correlation and principal components analyses of quality characteristics of Ningxia japonica varieties (lines)[J]. Seed, 2011, 30(10): 89-91. | |
[10] | 李新, 刘春玉, 夏卫红. 伊犁地区稻米品质的主成分聚类分析[J]. 现代农业科技, 2017, 46(18): 236-238. |
LI Xin, LIU Chunyu, XIA Weihong. Principal component cluster analysis of rice quality in Yili area[J]. Modern Agricultural Technology, 2017, 46(18): 236-238. | |
[11] | 刘秋员, 宋晓华, 段斌, 等. 豫南粳稻稻米品质的主成分聚类分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(6): 129-131. |
LIU Qiuyuan, SONG Xiaohua, DUAN Bin, et al. Principal component cluster analysis of rice quality of japonica rice in south Henan[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(6): 129-131. | |
[12] | 蒋小军, 周佳民, 黄敏, 等. 基于主成分和聚类分析的湖南省水稻新品种稻米品质评价[J]. 中国稻米, 2009, 14(2): 33-35. |
JIANG Xiaojun, ZHOU Jiamin, HUANG Min, et al. Evaluation of rice quality of rice varieties in Hunan province based on principal component and cluster J]. Chinese ice, 2009, 14(2): 33-35. | |
[13] | 荆瑞勇, 卫佳琪, 王丽艳, 等. 基于主成分分析的不同水稻品种品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 179-184. |
JING Ruiyong, WEI Jiaqi, WANG Liyan, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of different rice varieties based on principal component analysis[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(24): 179-184. | |
[14] | 张梅霞, 陈荣江. 基于主成分分析的粳稻品质评价及聚类分析[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(5): 1-6. |
ZHANG Meixia, CHEN Rongjiang. Japonica rice quality evaluation and cluster analysis based on principal component[J]. Journal of Henan Institute of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2016, 44(5): 1-6. | |
[15] | 黄文章, 赵正武, 严明建, 等. 稻米品质性状的变异性研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2005, 18(6): 871-873. |
HUANG Wenzhang, ZHAO Zhengwu, YAN Mingjian, et al. Studies on the variation of rice quality Characters[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 18(6): 871-873. | |
[16] |
毛红艳, 徐鑫, 于明. 新疆地区玉米品种营养品质主成分分析与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(10): 1909-1915.
DOI |
MAO Hongyan, XU Xin, YU Ying. Principal component analysis and evaluation of nutritional quality of maize cultivars in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(10): 1909-1915.
DOI |
|
[17] | 彭友林, 陈敬, 邹挺, 等. 杂交水稻亲本材料的产量主成分分析及品质鉴定[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(1): 181-193. |
PENG Youlin, CHEN Jing, ZOU Ting, et al. PCA analysis of yield-related quality characteristics in 76 hybrid rice parents[J]. Journal of Yunnan Universit (Natural Science), 2019, 41(1): 181-193. | |
[18] | LÜ Hongbin, QIAN Min, LI Chaohua, et al. The Principal Component Analysis on Yielding and Agronomic Traits of Hybrid Rice of Liangyou 2111[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18(3): 483-486. |
[19] | 于秋竹, 孔宇, 陈东升, 等. 基于主成分及聚类分析的黑龙江省水稻产量与品质的综合评价[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2015, 46(2): 219-224. |
YU Qiuzhu, KONG Yu, CHEN Dongsheng, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Quality of Rice Based on Principal[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2015, 46(2): 219-224. |
[1] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[2] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[3] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[4] | LIU Min, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, GENG Wenjuan. Evaluation of cold resistance of three fresh edible jujube cultivars in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 916-924. |
[5] | GUO Yang, GUO Junxian, SHI Yong, LIU Li, FANG Wenyan, LIU Yancen. Prediction of SPAD Value in Melon Leaves by Characteristic Wavelength Screening Combined with PCA-LSSVM [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 616-623. |
[6] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[7] | CAO Yijie, SHI Zhiyong, Yusup Ablitip, Aisajan Mamat. Analysis of Amino Acid and Mineral Elements in the Rough-skinned Fruits of Korla Pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 407-415. |
[8] | WANG Wei, XU Le, FAN Yanxing, WANG Fan, MA Yanming, TANG Zhonghua. Multivariable comparative analysis of chickpea seed metabolites based on GC-MS [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2962-2972. |
[9] | ZHAO Shuangyin, WANG Weiran, YAN Xuexue, Bimairemu Abuduaihaiti, DONG Jie, Tuerxon Tuerhong, Alip Aierxi. Analysis of Quality Traits and Genetic Diversity of 120 Cotton Germplasm Resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 17-24. |
[10] | YANG Minghua, WANG Qian, ZHOU Xinli, Aihemaitijiang Mahemuti, PEN Yuncheng, Aierjuma Tuluhan, Buayxam Namat, HOU Lili, LIU Qiang. Multiple Analysis on Character and Yield of Maize Hybrid Combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2114-2122. |
[11] | LI Yueyan, LI Yushan, WANG Fan, GUO Yawen, WANG Feiyan, GAO Jie, SONG Yu. Genetic Diversity and Cluster Analysis of Tomato Fruit Characters in Different Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2147-2157. |
[12] | LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, SHU Sheng, HE Tao, JIN Yujie, MA Xinchao, DU Jiageng, ZHANG Jing. The Influence of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on the Growth-development and Quality of Sand Culture Tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2158-2169. |
[13] | YOU Jiahui, GAO Lin, FENG Linjiao, Maimaiti Maidiniayi, ZHOU Long, LI Shude. Analysis of Leaf Anatomical Structure and Drought Resistance of 17 Grape Rootstock Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1896-1906. |
[14] | YUAN Lei, JI Xuehua, ZHANG Guoru, SHI Linyuan, GUO Heyao, TANG Yaping, YANG Tao, YANG Shengbao. Genetic Diversity and Cluster Analysis on the Main Fruit Characters of 52 Accessions of Capsicum [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1935-1944. |
[15] | FAN Dingyu, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, HAO Qing. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Quality Characteristics of 5 Fresh Jujube Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1956-1964. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||