不同时间尺度土壤因子与柽柳液流速率关系的差异

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.016

新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (7): 1697-1707.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.07.016

• 园艺特产·林业·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同时间尺度土壤因子与柽柳液流速率关系的差异

黄雅茹¹(), 马迎宾¹, 李永华²^,³^,⁴(), 段瑞兵¹, 刘源¹, 董雪¹, 韩春霞¹, 郝需婷¹

1.中国林业科学研究院沙漠林业实验中心/内蒙古磴口荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站,内蒙古磴口 015200
2.中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所,北京 100091
3.库姆塔格荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站,甘肃敦煌 736200
4.甘肃敦煌荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站,甘肃敦煌 736200

收稿日期:2021-10-04 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-08-04
通信作者: 李永华
作者简介:黄雅茹(1987-),女,内蒙古呼和浩特人,工程师,研究方向为荒漠化防治,(E-mail) hu_angyaru@126.com
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2019MA004);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2020ZE005);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2021MA005)

Relationships between Soil Factors and Sap Flow of Tamarix chinensis Lour. at Different Time Scales

HUANG Yaru¹(), MA Yingbin¹, LI Yonghua²^,³^,⁴(), DUAN Ruibing¹, LIU Yuan¹, DONG Xue¹, HAN Chunxia¹, HAO Xuting¹

1. Experimental Center of Desert Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry/Dengkou Desert Ecosystem National Observation Research Station of Inner Mongolia, Dengkou, Inner Mongolia 015200, China
2. Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Beijing 100091,China
3. Kumtage Desert Ecosystem Location Research Station of State Forestry Bureau,Dunhuang Gansu 736200,China
4. Dunhuang Desert Ecosystem Location Research Station of State Forestry Administration,Dunhuang Gansu 736200,China

Received:2021-10-04 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-04
Correspondence author: LI Yonghua
Supported by:
Special fund project for basic scientific research business expenses of central-level public welfare scientific research institutes(CAFYBB2019MA004);Special fund project for basic scientific research business expenses of central-level public welfare scientific research institutes(CAFYBB2020ZE005);Special fund project for basic scientific research business expenses of central-level public welfare scientific research institutes(CAFYBB2021MA005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究土壤因子对柽柳液流的影响及存在时间尺度差异,为不同时间尺度下更为准确的分析柽柳液流的变化规律。【方法】利用PS-TDP8树木液流监测系统及5TM土壤温度与湿度传感器对库姆塔格沙漠东南部柽柳液流速率及土壤因子(土壤含水量SWC及土壤温度Ts)持续 5个月同步观测。【结果】月尺度下,Ts_20cm是液流速率变化的主要影响因子,单独能解释91.7%的液流速率变化;日尺度下,进入的土壤因子依次为Ts_20cm、Ts_200cm、SWC_50cm、SWC_150cm、SWC_20cm,Ts_20cm可以解释液流速率变化的72.1%,5个因子共同可以解释82.9%的液流速率变化,日尺度下对柽柳液流速率影响最大的也是20 cm层土壤温度;小时尺度下,对液流影响最大的是Ts_20cm,Ts_20cm可以解释液流速率变化的37.6%,6个因子共同可以解释55.9%的液流速率变化。随着时间尺度的扩大,与柽柳树干液流显著相关的土壤因子个数有减少的趋势,而对其解释程度则有增加的趋势。【结论】土壤因子模拟计算小时尺度柽柳液流速率需要的参数较多,预测月尺度液流速率需要的参数最少,可靠性最大,能够较好地解释柽柳液流速率变化,月尺度预测柽柳液流速率更加准确。

关键词: 柽柳; 液流; 库姆塔格沙漠; 土壤因子

Abstract:

【Objective】 To reveal whether there is a time-scale difference in the influence of soil factors on sap flow of Tamarix chinensis Lour in the hope more accurately analyzing the change law of tamarisk sap flow under different time scales.【Methods】 The PS-TDP8 tree sap flow monitoring system and 5TM soil temperature and humidity sensor were used to simultaneously observe the tamarisk sap flow rate and soil factors (soil water content SWC and soil temperature Ts) in the southeast of the Kumtag Desert for 5 months.【Results】 On the monthly scale, Ts_20cm, the main factor that influences the change of liquid flow rate, which could explain 91.7% of the change in flow rate alone. On the daily scale, the entered soil factors were Ts_20cm,Ts_200cm, SWC_50cm, SWC_150cm, SWC_20cm, Ts_20cm, which could explain 72.1% of the change in liquid flow rate, and all the five factors could explain 82.9% of the change in sap flow rate. The soil temperature in the 20cm layer had the greatest influence on the tamarisk sap flow rate on the daily scale. On the hour scale, Ts_20cm had the greatest impact on liquid flow. Ts_20cm could explain 37.6% of the change in liquid flow rate, and six factors together could explain 55.9% of the change in liquid flow rate.【Conclusion】 Numerous parameters are needed to calculate hourly tamarisk sap flow rate through soil factor simulation, and predicting the monthly sap flow rate requires the fewest parameters and has the greatest reliability. This can better explain the changes in the tamarisk sap flow rate with more accurate prediction.

Key words: Tamarix chinensis; sap flow; kumtag desert; soil factors

中图分类号:

S718.43
S58

黄雅茹, 马迎宾, 李永华, 段瑞兵, 刘源, 董雪, 韩春霞, 郝需婷. 不同时间尺度土壤因子与柽柳液流速率关系的差异[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1697-1707.

HUANG Yaru, MA Yingbin, LI Yonghua, DUAN Ruibing, LIU Yuan, DONG Xue, HAN Chunxia, HAO Xuting. Relationships between Soil Factors and Sap Flow of Tamarix chinensis Lour. at Different Time Scales[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1697-1707.

图/表 5

表1 柽柳形态参数

Table 1 Morphological parameters of Tamarix chinensis Lour.

指标 Index	柽柳1 Tamarix chinensis Lour. 1	柽柳2 Tamarix chinensis Lour. 2	柽柳3 Tamarix chinensis Lour. 3	柽柳4 Tamarix chinensis Lour. 4	柽柳5 Tamarix chinensis Lour. 5
高度 Height (cm)	345	334	375	365	340
冠幅 Crown (cm)	545×535	530×540	584×577	565×530	540×555
地径 Ground diameter (cm)	2.87	3.25	2.74	3.11	2.86

图1 液流速率与土壤含水量、土壤温度月均值变化

Fig.1 Monthly mean changes of sap flow velocity, soil water content and soil temperature

图2 液流速率与土壤含水量、土壤温度日均值变化

Fig.2 Daily mean changes of sap flow velocity, soil water content and soil temperature

图3 小时尺度上液流速率与土壤含水量、土壤温度变化

Fig.3 Changes of sap flow velocity, soil water content and soil temperature on the hourly scale

表2 月、日、小时尺度下液流速率与土壤因子多元线性回归

Table 2 Multiple linear regression of sap flow velocity and soil factors on monthly and daily and hourly scale

时间尺度 Time scale	进入顺序 Order	进入因子 Entry factor	R²	回归方程 Regressions equation
月尺度 Monthly scale	1	Ts_20cm	0.917	Y=0.335+0.110Ts_20cm
日尺度 Daily scale	1	Ts_20cm	0.721	Y=0.387+0.108Ts_20cm
	2	T $s 20 0 c m$	0.772	Y=1.235+0.111Ts_20cm-0.054Ts_200cm
	3	SWC_50cm	0.810	Y=7.699+0.199Ts_20cm-0.134Ts_200cm-159.598SWC_50cm
	4	SW $C 1 50 c m$	0.824	Y=3.024+0.170Ts_20cm -0.270Ts_200cm-157.881SWC_50cm+70.268SWC_150cm
	5	SWC_20cm	0.829	Y=4.248+0.199Ts_20cm -0.265Ts_200cm -143.267SWC_50cm+68.136SWC_150cm-61.665SWC_20cm
小时尺度 Hourly scale	1	Ts_20cm	0.376	Y=0.880+0.086Ts_20cm
	2	SWC_200cm	0.409	Y=5.922+0.092Ts_20cm -60.190SWC_200cm
	3	T $s 1 5 0 c m$	0.443	Y=25.673+0.058Ts_20cm-372.329SWC_200cm +0.383Ts_150cm
	4	SW $C 5 0 c m$	0.489	Y=44.132+0.121Ts_20cm-544.847SWC_200cm+0.538Ts_150cm -181.698SWC_50cm
	5	T $s 1 00 c m$	0.545	Y=29.525+0.124Ts_20cm-195.229SWC_200cm-0.443Ts_150cm -375.878SWC_50cm+0.578Ts_100cm
	6	T $s 2 0 0 c m$	0.559	Y=46.061+0.126Ts_20cm-438.446SWC_200cm-1.157Ts_150cm-422.071SWC_50cm+0.937Ts_100cm+0.740T $s 2 00 c m$

表2 月、日、小时尺度下液流速率与土壤因子多元线性回归

Table 2 Multiple linear regression of sap flow velocity and soil factors on monthly and daily and hourly scale

时间尺度 Time scale	进入顺序 Order	进入因子 Entry factor	R²	回归方程 Regressions equation
月尺度 Monthly scale	1	Ts_20cm	0.917	Y=0.335+0.110Ts_20cm
日尺度 Daily scale	1	Ts_20cm	0.721	Y=0.387+0.108Ts_20cm
	2	T $s 20 0 c m$	0.772	Y=1.235+0.111Ts_20cm-0.054Ts_200cm
	3	SWC_50cm	0.810	Y=7.699+0.199Ts_20cm-0.134Ts_200cm-159.598SWC_50cm
	4	SW $C 1 50 c m$	0.824	Y=3.024+0.170Ts_20cm -0.270Ts_200cm-157.881SWC_50cm+70.268SWC_150cm
	5	SWC_20cm	0.829	Y=4.248+0.199Ts_20cm -0.265Ts_200cm -143.267SWC_50cm+68.136SWC_150cm-61.665SWC_20cm
小时尺度 Hourly scale	1	Ts_20cm	0.376	Y=0.880+0.086Ts_20cm
	2	SWC_200cm	0.409	Y=5.922+0.092Ts_20cm -60.190SWC_200cm
	3	T $s 1 5 0 c m$	0.443	Y=25.673+0.058Ts_20cm-372.329SWC_200cm +0.383Ts_150cm
	4	SW $C 5 0 c m$	0.489	Y=44.132+0.121Ts_20cm-544.847SWC_200cm+0.538Ts_150cm -181.698SWC_50cm
	5	T $s 1 00 c m$	0.545	Y=29.525+0.124Ts_20cm-195.229SWC_200cm-0.443Ts_150cm -375.878SWC_50cm+0.578Ts_100cm
	6	T $s 2 0 0 c m$	0.559	Y=46.061+0.126Ts_20cm-438.446SWC_200cm-1.157Ts_150cm-422.071SWC_50cm+0.937Ts_100cm+0.740T $s 2 00 c m$

参考文献 46

[1]	康佳鹏, 马盈盈, 马淑琴, 等. 荒漠绿洲过渡带柽柳种群结构与空间格局动态[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1):269-280.
	KANG Jiapeng, MA Yingying, MA Shuqin, et al. Dynamic changes of spatial pattern and structure of the Tamarix ramosissima population at the desert-oasis ecotone of the Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(1):269-280.
[2]	陈有婷, 姚燕琴, 黄登艳, 等. 不同技术措施对柽柳林生长状况的影响[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 2014, 39(1):43-44.
	CHEN Youting, YAO Yanqin, HUANG Dengyan, et al. Effect of different technological measures on growth status of Tamarix chinensis[J]. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 2014, 39(1):43-44.
[3]	王勇, 赵成义, 王丹丹, 等. 塔里木河流域不同林龄胡杨与柽柳的水分利用策略研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(6):157-163.
	WANG Yong, ZHAO Chengyi, WANG Dandan, et al. Water use strategies of Populus euphratica and Tamarix ramosissima at different ages in Tarim River Basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(6):157-163.
[4]	孔庆仙, 夏江宝, 赵自国, 等. 不同地下水矿化度对柽柳光合特征及树干液流的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12):1298-1309. DOI
	KONG Qinxian, XIA Jiangbao, ZHAO Ziguo, et al. Effects of groundwater salinity on the characteristics of leaf photosynthesis and stem sap flow in Tamarix chinensis[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(12):1298-1309. DOI URL
[5]	迟琳琳, 韩辉, 党宏忠, 等. 彰武松树干液流特征及其与环境因子间的关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(1):186-191.
	CHI Linlin, HAN Hui, DANG Hongzhong, et al. Relationships between stem sap flow rate of Pinus densiflora Sieb.et Zucc.var.zhangwuensis and environmental factors[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(1):186-191.
[6]	Steppt K, Vandeghuchte M W, Tognetti R, et al. Sap flow as a key trait in the understanding of plant hydraulic functioning[J]. Tree Physiology, 2015, 35(4):341-345. DOI URL
[7]	Granier A. Sap flow measurements in douglas-fir tree trunks by means of a new thermal method[J]. Annales Des Sciences Forestieres, 1987, 44(1):1-14. DOI URL
[8]	Smith D M, Alien S J. Measurement of sap flow in plant stems[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1996, 47(12): 1833-1844. DOI URL
[9]	Lu P, Urban L, Zhao P. Granier's thermal dissipation probre (TDP) method for measuring sap flow in trees: theory and practice[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2004, 46(6):631-646.
[10]	黄雅茹, 辛智鸣, 罗红梅, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠中国沙棘果实成熟期茎干液流规律及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(11):3125-3131.
	HUANG Yaru, XIN Zhiming, LUO Hongmei, et al. Stem sap flow dynamics of Hippophae rhamnoides L.subsp.sinensis Rousi in relation to environmental factors in Ulan Buh Desert during fruit stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(11):3125-3131.
[11]	杨文新. 玛纳斯河流域典型荒漠植物光合蒸腾及耗水规律研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2014:22-23.
	YANG Wenxin. Study on the law of photosynthetic transpiration and water consumption of typical desert plants in the Manas River Basin[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2014:22-23.
[12]	刘华, 佘春燕, 白志强, 等. 喀纳斯保护区西伯利亚云杉树干液流动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(1):65-72.
	LIU Hua, YU Chunyan, BAI Zhiqiang, et al. Dynamic changes of trunk sap flow of Picea obovata in the Kanas National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Ed.), 2016, 40(1):65-72.
[13]	郝少荣, 裴志永, 段广东, 等. 不同时间尺度下环境因子与沙柳茎流关系的差异研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(3):152-158.
	HAO Shaorong, PEI Zhiyong, DUAN Guangdong, et al. Relationships between environmental factors and Salix psammophila's sap flow at different time scales[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(3):152-158.
[14]	姚依强, 陈珂, 王彦辉, 等. 华北落叶松树干液流速率主要影响因子及关系的时间尺度变化[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(2):155-161.
	YAO Yiqiang, CHEN Ke, WANG Yanhui, et al. Relationships between sap flow velocity of Larix principis-rupprechtii and environmental factors and their variation with time scales[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(2):155-161.
[15]	任启文, 张岩, 李联地, 等. 不同时间尺度下落叶松液流速率与森林小气候的关系[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(12):30-37, 44.
	REN Qiwen, ZHANG Yan, LI Liandi, et al. Relationship between sap flow velocity of Larix principis-rupprechtii and forest microclimate in different time scales[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(12):30-37, 44.
[16]	吴鹏, 杨文斌, 崔迎春, 等. 喀斯特区天峨槭(Acer wangchii)树干液流特征及其与环境因子的相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(22):7552-7567.
	WU Peng, YANG Wenbin, CUI Yinchun, et al. Characteristics of sap flow and correlation analysis with environmental factors of Acer wangchii in the karst area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(22):7552-7567.
[17]	陈新均, 王学全, 卢琦, 等. 季节性河道土壤水分及其渗漏特征初探[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(1):97-104.
	CHEN Xinjun, WANG Xuequan, LU Qi, et al. Soil moisture content and soil water infiltration in seasonal watercourse in arid area[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(1):97-104.
[18]	Huang J, Zhou Y, Yin L, et al. Climatic controls on sap flow dynamics and used water sources of Salix psammophila in a semi-arid environment in northwest China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73(1): 289-301. DOI URL
[19]	杨明杰, 杨广, 何新林, 等. 干旱区梭梭茎干液流特性及对土壤水分的响应[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(6):33-38.
	YANG Mingjie, YANG Guang, HE Xinlin, et al. Stem sap flowing characteristics of Haloxylon Ammodendron and its response to soil moisture in arid area[J]. Yangtze River, 2018, 49(6):33-38.
[20]	魏新光, 聂真义, 刘守阳, 等. 黄土丘陵区枣林土壤水分动态及其对蒸腾的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2015, 46(6):130-140.
	WEI Xinguang, NIE Zhenyi, LIU Shouyang, et al. Soil moisture characteristics and its influence on Jujube Tree transpiration in Loess Hilly Region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(6):130-140.
[21]	王玥, 鄢春华, 邱国玉. 土壤温度对油松树干液流启动与停止的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 55(3):580-586.
	WANG Yue, YAN Chunhua, QIU Guoyu. Soil temperature triggers sap flow onset and offset of Pinus tabulaeformis[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55(3):580-586.
[22]	党宏忠, 却晓娥, 冯金超, 等. 晋西黄土区苹果树边材液流速率对环境驱动的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3):823-831. DOI
	DANG Hongzhong, QUE Xiaoe, FENG Jinchao, et al. Response of sap flow rate of apple trees to environmental factors in Loess Platea of Western Shanxi Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(3):823-831. DOI
[23]	陈胜楠, 孔喆, 陈立欣, 等. 半干旱区城市环境下油松林分蒸腾特征及其影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4):1269-1280.
	CHEN Shengnan, KONG Zhe, CHEN Lixin, et al. The stand transpiration characteristics of Pinus tabulaeformis and its influential factors in a semi-arid urban environment[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(4):1269-1280.
[24]	吕金林, 何秋月, 闫美杰, 等. 黄土丘陵区辽东栎树干液流特征对边材面积和土壤水分的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3):725-731.
	LYU Jinlin, HE Qiuyue, YAN Meijie, et al. Sap flow characteristics of Quercus liaotungensis in response to sapwood area and soil moisture in the loess hilly region, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(3):725-731.
[25]	陈宝强, 张建军, 张艳婷, 等. 晋西黄土区辽东栎和山杨树干液流对环境因子的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3):746-754. DOI
	CHEN Baoqiang, ZHANG Jianjun, ZHANG Yanting, et al. Whole-tree sap flow of Quercus liaotungensis and Populus davidiana in response to environmental factors in the loess plateau area of western Shanxi Province, northern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(3):746-754. DOI
[26]	崔鸿侠, 唐万鹏, 胡文杰, 等. 神农架2树种树干液流特征及与环境因子关系[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(1):37-44.
	CUI Hongxia, TANG Wanpeng, HU Wenjie, et al. Characteristics of the sap flow and correlation analysis with environmental factors of two tree species in Shennongjia[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020, 35(1):37-44.
[27]	赵天宇, 关东海, 苏里坦, 等. 环境因子对胡杨树干液流动态的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015,(6):15-20.
	ZHAO Tianyu, GUAN Donghai, SU Litan, et al. Effects of environmental factors on trunk sap flow of Populus Euphratica[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,(6):15-20.
[28]	任冉冉, 夏江宝, 张淑勇, 等. 黄河三角洲柽柳光合作用及树干液流对潜水埋深的响应[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(12):2615-2628.
	REN Ranran, XIA Jiangbao, ZHANG Shuyong, et al. Response characteristics of photosynthesis and sap flow parameters in Tamarix chinensis leaves to depth of groundwater table in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(12):2615-2628. DOI URL
[29]	李双, 杜建括, 肖洪浪. 干旱区雨养多枝柽柳茎干液流动态及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(12):170-175.
	LI Shuang, DU Jiankuo, XIAO Honglong. Dynamics of sap flow rates in stems of typical desert shrub Tamarix ramosissima and its responses to the environmental factors[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(12):170-175.
[30]	徐先英, 孙保平, 丁国栋, 等. 干旱荒漠区典型固沙灌木液流动态变化及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2008,(3):895-905.
	XU Xianying, SUN Baoping, DING Guodong, et al. Sap flow patterns of three main sand-fixing shrubs and their responses to environmental factors in desert areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,(3):895-905.
[31]	梁凤超, 张新平, 张毓涛, 等. 干旱区荒漠梭梭柽柳蒸腾耗水对比分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2011, 48(5):962-967.
	LIANG Fengchao, ZHANG Xinping, ZHANG Yutao, et al. Contrastive analysis on transpiration water consumption between Haloxylon persicum and Tamarix elongate in Arid Regions[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(5):962-967.
[32]	何斌, 陈亚宁, 李卫红, 等. 塔里木河下游地区胡杨、柽柳液流变化研究--以英苏断面为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2007,(7):135-141.
	HE Bin, CHEN Yaning, LI Weihong, et al. Analysis on the variation of sap flow of Populus euphratica Oliv. and Chinese Tamarisk at the Lower Reaches of Tarim River--a case study along Yinsu Section[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2007,(7):135-141.
[33]	许浩, 张希明, 闫海龙, 等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地多枝柽柳茎干液流及耗水量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007,(4):735-741. PMID
	XU Hao, ZHANG Ximing, YAN Hailong, et al. Stem sap flow and water consumption of Tamarix ramosissima in hinterland of Taklimakan Desert[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2007,(4):735-741. PMID
[34]	杨转玲, 钱广强, 董治宝, 等. 库姆塔格沙漠北部三垄沙地区风成沉积物粒度特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(3):589-596.
	Yang Zhuanling, Qian Guangqiang, Dong Zhibao, et al. Grain size characteristics of the aeolian sediments from sanlongsha area of the northern Kumtagh Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2016, 36(3):589-596.
[35]	肖洪浪, 肖生春, 董治宝, 等. 库姆塔格沙漠地区土壤及分布特征[J]. 中国沙漠, 2010, 30(4):837-843.
	XIAO Honglang, XIAO Shengchun, DONG Zhibao, et al. Soil types and their distribution pattern in the Kumtagh Desert[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2010, 30(4):837-843.
[36]	李浩, 胡顺军, 朱海, 等. 基于热扩散技术的梭梭树干液流特征研究[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(21):7187-7196.
	LI Hao, HU Shunjun, ZHU Hai, et al. Characterization of stem sap flow Haloxylon ammodendron by using thermal dissipation technology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(21):7187-7196.
[37]	张利刚, 曾凡江, 刘镇, 等. 极端干旱区3种植物液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 干旱区研究, 2013, 30(1):115-121.
	ZHANG Ligang, ZENG Fanjiang, LIU Zhen, et al. Sap flow characteristics of three plant species and their responses to environmental factors in an extremely arid region[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2013, 30(1):115-121.
[38]	刘延惠, 丁访军, 舒德远, 等. 茂兰喀斯特原生林细叶青冈树干液流环境响应特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(3):77-85.
	LIU Yanhui, DING Fangjun, SHU Ddeyuan, et al. Characteristics of sap flow of Cyclobalanopsis gracilis in Maolan Karst original forests and its response to environmental factors[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 41(3):77-85.
[39]	张晓艳, 褚建民, 孟平, 等. 民勤绿洲荒漠过渡带梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron(C.A.Mey)Bunge)树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(5):1525-1536.
	ZHANG Xiaoyan, CHU Jianming, MENG Ping, et al. The effect of environmental factors on stem sap flow characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron (C.A.Mey.) Bunge in Minqin oasis-desert[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(5):1525-1536.
[40]	张小由, 龚家栋, 周茂先, 等. 应用热脉冲技术对胡杨和柽柳树干液流的研究[J]. 冰川冻土, 2003, 25(5):585-590.
	ZHANG Xiaoyou, GONG Jjaidong, ZHOU Maoxian, et al. A study on the stem sap flow of Populus euphrtaicr and Tamaris spp. by heat pulse technique[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2003, 25(5):585-590.
[41]	徐军亮, 马履一. 土壤温度对油松(Pinus tabulaeformis)树干液流活动的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008,(12):326-331.
	XU Junliang, MA Lvyi. Influence of soil temperature on sap flow of Pinus tabulaeformis[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008,(12):326-331.
[42]	赵春彦, 司建华, 冯起, 等. 胡杨(Populus euphratica)树干液流特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 中国沙漠, 2014, 34(3):718-724.
	ZHAO Chunyan, SI Jianhua, FENG Qi, et al. Xylem sap flow of Populus euphratica in relation to environmental factors in the lower reaches of Heihe River[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2014, 34(3):718-724.
[43]	曹晓明, 陈曦, 王卷乐, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘非灌溉条件下梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)蒸腾耗水特征[J]. 干旱区地理, 2013, 36(2):292-302.
	CAO Xiaoming, CHEN Xi, WANG Juanle, et al. Water consumption and transpiration of non-irrigated Haloxylon ammodendron in hinterland of Taklimakan Desert[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2013, 36(2):292-302.
[44]	罗超, 查同刚, 朱梦洵, 等. 浅层地下水对华北地区河岸杨树林树干液流的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5):64-70.
	LUO Chao, ZHA Tonggang, ZHU Mengxun, et al. Influences of shallow groundwater on sap flow of riparian poplar plantations in northern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(5):64-70.
[45]	刘鑫, 张金池, 汪春林, 等. 长三角地区典型树种杉木液流速率变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(2):86-92.
	LIU Xin, ZHANG Jingchi, WANG Chunlin, et al. The variation characteristics of sap flow of Chinese fir in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Ed.), 2014, 38(2):86-92.
[46]	徐世琴, 吉喜斌, 金博文. 典型荒漠植物沙拐枣茎干液流密度动态及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(2):14-22.
	XU Shiqin, JI Xibin, JIN Bowen. Dynamics of sap flow density in stems of typical desert shrub Calligonum mongolicum and its responses to environmental variables[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(2):14-22.

不同时间尺度土壤因子与柽柳液流速率关系的差异

Relationships between Soil Factors and Sap Flow of Tamarix chinensis Lour. at Different Time Scales

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈乙煌, 邢利, 东珍珍, 马小梅, 黄建军, 罗晓霞. 柽柳根际土壤放线菌的分离及拮抗活性筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1790-1797.
[2]	赛丽塔娜提·赛达克拜尔, 钟问, 余润泽. 盐地柽柳(Tamarix karelinii Bunge)的传粉生物学特征及传粉能力差异[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1756-1765.
[3]	李丰, 赖刚刚, 赵志惠, 陈小飞, 朱天生. 柽柳丛枝植原体鉴定及16S rRNA基因多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2551-2557.
[4]	何权, 蒋瑞娟, 朱军, 石书兵, 李晓瑾. 新疆不同地区梭梭种子活力与土壤因子分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(4): 667-677.
[5]	苏杰;李婷;刘彤;蒋瑞旭;韩国栋;张建萍. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘柽柳节肢动物群落结构及时序动态研究[J]. , 2016, 53(9): 1659-1666.
[6]	李雯雯;魏雅君;冯贝贝;牛莹莹;徐业勇;王明;杨红丽;廖康. 杏李树干液流变化与环境因子的关系研究[J]. , 2016, 53(12): 2194-2202.
[7]	杨帆;张绘芳;李霞;周艳飞;丁程锋. 基于QuickBird数据的塔里木河下游荒漠林地上生物量估测[J]. , 2014, 51(11): 2066-2072.
[8]	陈加利;姜喜;周禧琳;庞新安. 塔里木河上游多枝柽柳地上部分生物量模型研究[J]. , 2014, 51(10): 1893-1899.
[9]	廖菁;孙宇;卿德刚;张娟;倪慧;贾晓光. RP-HPLC法测定多花柽柳中没食子酸含量[J]. , 2013, 50(7): 1310-1313.
[10]	王文栋;张毓涛;芦建江;李翔. 新疆乌拉泊库区3种灌木树干液流对比研究[J]. , 2012, 49(11): 2035-2041.
[11]	张绘芳;李霞;高亚琪. 基于Quick Bird数据的胡杨、柽柳种群格局分析[J]. , 2012, 49(11): 2029-2034.
[12]	梁凤超;张新平;张毓涛;安文明;师庆东. 干旱区荒漠梭梭柽柳蒸腾耗水对比分析[J]. , 2011, 48(5): 962-967.
[13]	占东霞;庄丽;王仲科;徐智全;田中平;孙书秒. 准噶尔盆地南缘干旱条件下胡杨、梭梭和柽柳水势对比研究[J]. , 2011, 48(3): 544-550.
[14]	何静;高翔;吕光辉;傅德平;杨军. 艾比湖自然保护区植物群落的数量分类及土壤环境解释[J]. , 2010, 47(5): 1030-1035.
[15]	包慧芳;王宁;龙宣杞;王炜. 塔里木盆地一处柽柳林土壤细菌多样性分析[J]. , 2010, 47(11): 2234-2237.