化学封顶剂不同浓度处理对棉花农艺及产量性状的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.08.003

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (8): 1392-1397.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.08.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培 • 上一篇下一篇

化学封顶剂不同浓度处理对棉花农艺及产量性状的影响

龚照龙¹, 于可可², 郑巨云¹, 杜明伟², 梁亚军¹, 王俊铎¹, 艾先涛¹, 李雪源¹, 郭江平¹, 莫明¹

1.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091;
2.中国农业大学农学院,北京 100193

收稿日期:2020-08-10 出版日期:2021-08-20 发布日期:2021-08-09
通信作者: 郑巨云(1981-),男,河北怀安人,研究员,博士,研究方向为陆地棉遗传育种与栽培,(E-mail)zjypp8866@126.com
作者简介:龚照龙(1988-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,助理研究员,研究方向为棉花育种与栽培,(E-mail)g15981775091@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0101601);天山雪松计划(2018XS14);新疆兵团科技攻关项目(2018AB039);新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所青年科技骨干培养项目

Effects of Different Concentrations of Chemical Topping on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Cotton

GONG Zhaolong¹, YU Keke², ZHENG Juyun¹, DU Mingwei², LIANG Yajun¹, WANG Junduo¹, AI Xiantao¹, LI Xueyuan¹, GUO Jiangping¹, Moming¹

1. Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;
2. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2020-08-10 Online:2021-08-20 Published:2021-08-09
Correspondence author: ZHENG Juyun(1981-), male, native place: Huaian, Hebei province; researcher,Ph.D., research interests: cotton genetics, breeding and cultivation, (E-mail)zjypp8866@126.com
Supported by:
National K & R Program Project (2017YFD0101601);The Tianshan Cedar Project (2018XS14);The Key Science and Technology Project of XPCC (2018AB039); The Youth Science and Technology Backbone Training Project of Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究新疆南疆棉区缩节胺(1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium chloride, DPC)化学封顶对棉花主要农艺性状及产量性状的影响,为新疆南疆棉花化学封顶技术提供理论支撑。【方法】于2019年在新疆南疆阿拉尔市16团开展田间试验,以人工打顶为对照,采用完全随机设计,研究不同DPC用量(0、90、180和270 g/hm²)对棉花株高、新生部分、产量及产量构成因素的影响。【结果】与人工打顶相比,DPC化学封顶处理的株高增加7.9~28.5 cm,新生主茎长度增加8.8~22.3 cm,新生果枝台数增加3.6~5.0台;高剂量DPC(270 g/hm²)处理可增加产量器官干物质积累量和积累速率。化学封顶不影响单铃重和衣分,高剂量DPC(270 g/hm²)处理与人工打顶的籽棉产量相当,降幅仅2.4%。【结论】新疆南疆棉区应用270 g/hm²的DPC进行化学封顶既可获得较好的封顶效果,也不会降低籽棉产量。

关键词: 棉花; 化学封顶; 农艺性状; 产量性状

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this research is to investigate the effects of chemical topping with mepiquat chloride(1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium chloride, DPC)on main agronomic and yield traits of cotton in the hope of providing theoretical support for the chemical topping technology in southern Xinjiang of China. 【Methods】 Field experiment was carried out in the 16 th regiment of Alar, southern Xinjiang during growing seasons of 2019. With manual topping as the control, a completely random design was adopted to study the effects of different concentrations of DPC (0, 90, 180 and 270 g/hm²) on cotton plant height, length of new main stem, number of new sympodials, yield and yield components. 【Results】 Compared with manual topping, the plant height of DPC chemical topping increased by 7.9-28.5 cm, the length of the new main stem increased by 8.8-22.3 cm, and the number of new fruit branches increased by 3.6-5.0. The high-rate of DPC (270 g/hm²) could increase the dry matter and accumulation rate of boll. Chemical topping did not affect boll weight and lint percentage. The high-dose of DPC (270 g/hm²) showed a slight decrease of 2.4% to the manual topping. 【Conclusion】 The application of DPC with 270 g/hm² for chemical topping in southern Xinjiang of China can not only obtain better consequent, but also will not reduce the yield of cotton.

Key words: cotton; chemical topping; agronomic trait; yield trait

中图分类号:

S562

龚照龙, 于可可, 郑巨云, 杜明伟, 梁亚军, 王俊铎, 艾先涛, 李雪源, 郭江平, 莫明. 化学封顶剂不同浓度处理对棉花农艺及产量性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1392-1397.

GONG Zhaolong, YU Keke, ZHENG Juyun, DU Mingwei, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, AI Xiantao, LI Xueyuan, GUO Jiangping, Moming. Effects of Different Concentrations of Chemical Topping on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(8): 1392-1397.

参考文献

[1] 中国农业科学院棉花研究所.中国棉花栽培学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2013: 115-816.
Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Cotton Farming in China[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2013: 115-816.
[2] 赵强, 周春江, 张巨松, 等. 化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺和经济性状的影响[J].棉花学报, 2011, 23(4): 329-333.
ZHAO Qiang, ZHOU Chunjiang, ZHANG Jusong, et al. Effect of chemical topping on the canopy and yield of cotton(Gossypium hirsutum)in south Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(4): 329-333.
[3] Alain R, Idrissa T, Mamoutou T. Manual topping decreases bollworm infestations in cotton cultivation in Mali [J]. Crop Protection, 2011, 30: 1370-1375.
[4] Obasi M O, Msaakpa T S. Influence of topping, side branch pruning and hill spacing on growth and development of cotton (Gossypium barbadenseL.) in the southern guinea savanna location of Nigeria [J]. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 2005, 106(2): 155-165.
[5] 戴翠荣, 练文明, 李子, 等. 南疆棉区氟节胺化学打顶技术初探[J].中国棉花, 2013, 40(9): 31-33.
DAI Cuirong, LIAN Wenming, LI Zi, et al. Study on cotton chemical topping technology of flumetralin [J]. China Cotton, 2013, 40(9): 31-33.
[6] 娄善伟, 赵强, 朱北京, 等. 棉花化学封顶对植株上部枝叶形态变化的影响[J].西北农业学报, 2015, 24(8): 62-67.
LOU Shanwei, ZHAO Qiang, ZHU Beijing, et al. Effect of chemical topping on morphologic changes of leaves and branches in upper part of cotton [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2015, 24(8): 62-67.
[7] 毛树春. 我国棉花种植技术的现代化问题-兼论“十二五”棉花栽培相关研究[J].中国棉花, 2010, 37(3): 2-6.
MAO Shuchun. Modernization of cotton cultivation technology in China [J]. China Cotton, 2010, 37(3): 2-5.
[8] 何钟佩, 奚惠达, 杨秉芳, 等. DPC效应的定向、定量诱导及其在棉花丰产栽培中的应用[J].北京农业大学学报, 1984 (1): 19-28.
HE Zhongpei, XI Huida, YANG Bingfang, et al. The key to getgood yield of cotton by inducing the response to DPC towards aplanned direction and in planned strength [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1984(1): 19-28.
[9] 安静, 黎芳, 周春江, 等. 增效缩节安化学封顶对棉花主茎生长的影响及其相关机制[J].作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1837-1843.
AN Jing, LI Fang, ZHOU Chunjiang, et al. Morpho-physiological responses of cotton shoot apex to the chemical topping with fortified mepiquat chloride [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(12): 1837-1843.
[10] 黎芳, 王希, 王香茹, 等. 黄河流域北部棉区棉花缩节胺化学封顶技术[J].中国农业科学, 2016, 49(13): 2497-2510.
LI Fang, WANG Xi, WANG Xiangru, et al. Cotton chemical topping with mepiquat chloride application in the north of yellow river valley of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(13): 2497-2510.
[11] LIANG Fubin, YANG Chengxun, SUI Longlong, et al. Flumetralin and dimethyl piperidinium chloride alter light distribution in cotton canopies by optimizing the spatial configuration of leaves and bolls [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(7): 1777-1788.
[12] 杨成勋, 姚贺盛, 杨延龙, 等. 化学打顶对棉花冠层结构指标及产量形成的影响[J].新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(7): 1243-1250.
YANG Chengxun, YAO Hesheng YANG Yanlong, et al. Effect of chemical multi-topping on canopy structure index and yield formation in cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(7): 1243-1250.
[13] 赵强, 张巨松, 周春江, 等. 化学打顶对棉花群体容量的拓展效应[J].棉花学报, 2011, 23(5): 401-407.
ZHAO Qiang, ZHANG Jusong, ZHOU Chunjiang, et al. Chemical topping increases the optimum plant density in cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL) [J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(5): 401-407.
[14] 韩焕勇,杜明伟,王方永,等. 北疆棉区增效缩节胺应用剂量对棉花农艺和经济性状的影响[J].西南农业学报,2019, 32(2): 327-330.
HAN Huanyong, DU Mingwei, WANG Fangyong, et al. Effects of DPC+ application dose on agronomic and economic traits of cotton in northern Xinjiang[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(2): 327-330.
[15] 王香茹,张恒恒,庞念厂,等. 新疆棉区棉花化学打顶剂的筛选研究[J].中国棉花2018, 45(3): 7-12,31.
WANG Xiangru, ZHANG Hengheng, PANG Nianchang, et al. Screening for Suitable Cotton Topping Chemicals in the Xinjiang Region [J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(3): 7-12, 31.
[16] 白岩,毛树春,田立文,等. 新疆棉花高产简化栽培技术评述与展望[J].中国农业科学,2017, 50(1): 38-50.
BAI Yan, MAO Shuchun, TIAN Liwen, et al. Advances and Prospects of High-Yielding and Simplified Cotton Cultivation Technology in Xinjiang Cotton-Growing Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(1): 38-50.
[17] 武建设,陈学庚. 新疆兵团棉花生产机械化发展现状问题及对策[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(18): 6-11.
WU Jianshe, CHEN Xuegeng. Present situation, problems and countermeasures of cotton production mechanization development in Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(18): 6-11.
[18] 董合忠,杨国正,李亚兵,等. 棉花轻简化栽培关键技术及其生理生态学机制[J].作物学报, 2017, 43(5): 631-639.
DONG Hezhong, YANG Guozheng, LI Yabing, et al. Key technologies for light and simplified cultivation of cotton and their eco-physiological mechanisms [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinca, 2017, 43(5): 631-639.
[19] 孙莉,张清,陈曦,等.精准农业技术系统集成在新疆棉花种植中的应用[J].农业工程学报, 2005, 21(8): 84-88.
SUN Li, ZHANG Qing, CHEN Xi, et al. Application of the integrated precision farming systemof cotton growing in Xinjiang Region [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2005, 21(8): 84-88.
[20] 艾先涛,李雪源,王俊铎,等.新疆棉花植棉比较效益分析[J].新疆农业科学,2011, 48(12): 2183-2190.
AI Xiantao, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo, et al. Innovation of science & technology, and ascension of planting cotton comparative benefit in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(12): 2183-2190.
[21] 侯晓梦, 刘连涛, 李梦,等. 基于 iTRAQ 技术对棉花叶片响应化学打顶的差异蛋白质组学分析[J].中国农业科学,2017, 50(19):3665-3677.
HOU Xiaomeng , LIU Liantao , LI Meng, et al. Differential Proteomics Analysis of Cotton Leaf Response to Chemical Topping Based on iTRAQ Technique [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(19): 3665-3677.
[22] 黎芳, 王希, 王香茹, 等. 黄河流域北部棉区棉花缩节胺化学封顶技术[J].中国农业科学, 2016, 49(13): 2497-2510.
LI Fang, WANG Xi, WANG Xiangru, et al. Cotton chemical topping with mepiquat chloride application in the north of yellow river valley of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(13): 2497-2510.
[23] 董春玲, 罗宏海, 张亚黎,等.喷施氟节胺对棉花农艺性状的影响及化学打顶效应研究[J].新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(11): 1985-1990.
DONG Chunling, LUO Honghai, ZHANG Yali, et al. Research on cotton agronomic traits and chemical topping effect after spraying flumetralin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(11): 1985-1990.

化学封顶剂不同浓度处理对棉花农艺及产量性状的影响

Effects of Different Concentrations of Chemical Topping on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Cotton

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[5]	马青山, 杜霄, 陶志鑫, 韩万里, 龙遗磊, 艾先涛, 胡守林. 陆地棉种质材料机采农艺性状鉴定分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1830-1839.
[6]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[7]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.
[8]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[9]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[10]	时晓磊, 丁孙磊, 丛花, 张金波, 曲可佳, 王兴州, 韩岱, 严勇亮. 夏播大豆产量相关性状灰色关联度分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1641-1652.
[11]	严勇亮, 张恒, 曲可佳, 时晓磊, 王兴州, 张金波, 丛花. 大豆不同品种农艺性状及产量的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1653-1662.
[12]	陆晏天, 桑志勤, 徐灿, 张力, 夏春兰, 王友德, 李伟, 陈树宾. 历年新疆和宁夏审定玉米品种主要性状的演化及品种审定现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1379-1388.
[13]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[14]	王文涛, 吴博, 邰红忠, 练文明, 戴翠荣, 李双江, 蒲艳梅. 新疆阿拉尔垦区不同播期对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422.
[15]	黄倩楠, 马尔合巴·艾司拜尔, 邹辉, 王彩荣, 艾力买买提·库尔班, 孙娜, 雷钧杰. 新疆冬小麦种质资源主要农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1050-1058.