深松对覆膜滴灌棉田根腐病害发生及根区环境的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.10.009

新疆农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (10): 1839-1848.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.10.009

• 植物保护·微生物·农产品分析检测 • 上一篇下一篇

深松对覆膜滴灌棉田根腐病害发生及根区环境的影响

徐高羽¹, 雷斌², 崔建平³, 李进², 王家勇¹, 雷蕾¹, 尔晨¹, 张昊¹, 汤秋香¹, 林涛^3,4

1.新疆农业大学农学院/棉花教育部工程研究中心,乌鲁木齐 830052;
2.新疆农业科学院核技术生物技术研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091;
3.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091;
4.农业部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2019-12-15 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-09-16
通信作者: 林涛(1981-),男,新疆人,研究员,博士,研究方向为作物生理生态,(E-mail)27427732@qq.com
作者简介:徐高羽(1994-),男,四川雅安人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农田生态环境,(E-mail)851536434@qq.com
基金资助:
公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503112);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503117);新疆维吾尔自治区天山英才人才培养项目;新疆维吾尔自治区基层骨干农牧人才培养项目

Effects of Subsoiling on Root Rot Diseases and Root Zone Environment

XU Gaoyu¹, LEI Bin³, CUI Jianping³, LI Jin², WANG Jiayong¹, LEI Lei¹, ER Chen¹, ZHANG Hao¹, TANG Qiuxiang¹, LIN Tao^3,4

1. Cotton Engineering Research Center, Ministry of Education/College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Uruqmi 830052, China;
2. Institute of Nuclear Technology and Biotechnology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;
3. Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Uruqmi 830091, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Desert-Oasis Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2019-12-15 Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-09-16
Correspondence author: LIN Tao(1981-), Male, Doctor, Associate Research Fellow,(E-mail)27427732@qq.com
Supported by:
Supported by Special Funds for Public Welfare Industry (Agriculture) Scientific R & D Program of Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China (201503112 and 201503117); the Tianshan Talent Training Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; Grass-roots Backbone Farming and Animal Husbandry Personnel Training Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 研究深松结合覆膜滴灌对绿洲棉田根区土环境与根腐病发生的影响。【方法】 在新疆阿克苏地区阿瓦提县设置深松30、40和50 cm(S₃₀、S₄₀和S₅₀)3种深松模式,以传统翻耕为对照(CK),研究深松对根腐病发病指数、土壤含水率、根系形态、根系活力及产量构成等影响。【结果】 与传统耕作相比,深松可有效降低耕层土壤容重,增加土壤储水能力,增加土壤扩库增容效果,病情指数的降低与土壤容重下降、土壤含水率的增加和根系活力增加具有显著的相关性。其中深松降低生育期根腐病发病指数7.0%～26.0%,以S₄₀处理效果最佳,发病指数较传统耕作相比降低26.0%。随着深松深度的增加土壤容重依次下降,与对照相比降低2.4%～10%。深松深度与根系主要形态指标与活力具有线性相关性,与传统耕作相比根系长度增加4%～34.6%,根系表面积增加13.1%～44.8%,根系体积增加9.2%～40.6%,根系活力增加7%～42.9%。根区环境的改善促进产量增加,S₄₀处理皮棉产量分别较CK、S₃₀、S₅₀增加了22.2%、15.7%和2.5%。【结论】 在新疆南疆棉区采用深松结合覆膜滴灌措施具有良好的蓄水保墒和防病增产效果,对棉花生长有利,深松40 cm处理可作为较为理想的根腐病农艺防治措施在生产中推广应用。

关键词: :深松; 根腐病; 根区环境; 棉花

Abstract: 【Objective】 The main reason for the aggravation of root rot disease is to increase the pathogenic microorganism in the plough layer in the long-term continuous cropping. Deep loosening can improve the structure of the plough layer and promote the root system to root down, so as to significantly reduce the occurrence of soil borne diseases. The purpose of this study is to study the effect of mulching drip irrigation combined with deep loosening on soil environment and root rot of cotton fields in oasis. 【Method】 Three patterns of subsoiling 30, 40 and 50 cm (S₃₀, S₄₀, S₅₀) were set up in Awati County of Akesu City, with traditional tillage as control (CK) to study the effects of root rot index, soil water content, root morphology, root activity and yield components on root rot. 【Result】 Compared with traditional tillage, subsoiling effectively reduced soil bulk density, increased soil water storage capacity, and increased soil storage capacity. The decrease of disease index was significantly related to the decrease of soil bulk density, the increase of soil moisture content and the increase of root activity. Among them, subsoiling decreased the incidence index of root rot by 7.0% - 26.0%, and S₄₀ treatment was the best, the incidence index decreased by 26.0% compared with traditional tillage. With the increase of the depth of subsoiling, the soil bulk density decreased in turn, 2.4%-10% lower than that of the control. There was a linear correlation between the depth of subsoiling and the main morphological indexes and vigor of roots. Compared with the traditional cultivation, the root length increased by 4%-34.6%, the root surface area increased by 13.1%-44.8%, the root volume increased by 9.2%-40.6%, and the root activity increased by 7%-42.9%. Finally, the lint yield of S₄₀ was 22.2%, 15.7% and 2.5% higher than those of CK, S₃₀ and S₅₀, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Based on the experimental study, the deep loosening combined with film mulching drip irrigation in the cotton area of southern Xinjiang had a good effect of water storage and moisture conservation, disease control and yield increase, which was beneficial to cotton growth. Considering the control effect and operation cost, the deep loosening 40 cm treatment was suggested to be used as an ideal agricultural control measure of root rot in production.

Key words: subsoiling; root rot disease; root zone environment; cotton

中图分类号:

S562
S435.62

徐高羽, 雷斌, 崔建平, 李进, 王家勇, 雷蕾, 尔晨, 张昊, 汤秋香, 林涛. 深松对覆膜滴灌棉田根腐病害发生及根区环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(10): 1839-1848.

XU Gaoyu, LEI Bin, CUI Jianping, LI Jin, WANG Jiayong, LEI Lei, ER Chen, ZHANG Hao, TANG Qiuxiang, LIN Tao. Effects of Subsoiling on Root Rot Diseases and Root Zone Environment[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(10): 1839-1848.

参考文献

[1]刘建国. 新疆棉花长期连作的土壤环境效应及其化感作用的研究 [D].南京;南京农业大学博士论文,2008.
LIU Jianguo. Effects on soil environments of long-term succession cropping and all allelopathy mechanism of cotton in Xinjiang [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2008.
[2] 张丽. 深松和培肥对旱地农田土壤水分保蓄能力及玉米生长的影响 [D]. 北京;中国农业大学博士论文, 2014.
ZHANG Li. Study on capacity of soil moisture conservation and the response of maize growth in dryland [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2014.
[3] 郑东辉,王保民,王雪峰.机械超深松的作用与发展 [J].农机化研究,2005,(5):294.
ZHENG Donghui, WANG Baomin, WANG Xuefeng. Function and development of mechanical ultra deep loosening [J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2005,(5):294.
[4] 尤垂淮. 不同耕作措施对消减烟草连作障碍的作用机制研究 [D].福州:福建农林大学,2012.
YOU Chuihuai. Researches on the mechanisms of different cultivation measures on relieving tobacco continuous monoculture problems [D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2012.
[5] 李彩红,王永波,张志刚,等.7种杀菌剂对环洞庭湖直播棉田苗期病害的防治效果 [J].中国棉花,2017,44(1):21-22.
LI Caihong, WANG Yongbo, ZHANG Zhigang, et al. Comparison on Field Efficacies of Seven Kinds of Fungicides against Seedling Diseases in Cotton Area [J]. China Cotton, 2017, 44(1):21-22.
[6] 董秀霞.棉花高产优质栽培技术与病虫害防治 [J].现代农业,2016,(8):42-43.
DONG Xiuxia. High yield and high quality cultivation techniques and pest control of cotton [J]. Modern Agriculture, 2016,(8):42-43.
[7] 薛磊. 棉花黄萎病生防链霉菌的抗病促生作用及其机制研究 [D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2013.
XUE Lei. Studies on mechanisms of disease resistance and growth promoting effect of Biocontrol streptomyces on verticillium wilt of cotton [D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2013.
[8] 陈喜凤,杨粉团,姜晓莉. 深松对玉米早衰的调控作用 [J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(12):82- 86.
CHEN Xifeng, YANG Fentuan, JIANG Xiaoli. Regulation of subsoiling on premature senescence of corn [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(12): 82- 86.
[9]晋鹏宇,任伟,陶洪斌,等.深松对夏玉米物质生产、光合性能及根系生长的影响 [J].玉米科学,2014,22(1):114-120.
JIN Pengyu, REN Wei, TAO Hongbin, et al. Effects of Subsoiling on Dry Matter Production, Photosynthetic Performance and Root Development of Summer Maize [J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014,22(1):114-120.
[10] 力谙.病情指数计算公式的错误及改正 [J].湖北农业科学,1987,(7):40.
LI An, Error and correction of disease index formula [J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 1987,(7):40.
[11] 袁久坤,周英.利用取土钻改进环刀法准确测定土壤容重和孔隙度 [J].中国园艺文摘,2014,30(3):25-26.
YUAN Jiukun, ZHOU Yin, Accurate determination of soil bulk density and porosity by improved ring knife method [J]. Chinese Horticulture Abstracts, 2014, 30(3):25-26.
[12] 王富贵. 18份苜蓿材料根系形态特征及与地上生物量关系的研究 [D].内蒙古:内蒙古农业大学,2011.
WANG Fugui. Root morphological Characteristics and the Relationship with Yield of 18 Alfalfa [D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2011.
[13] 张志勇,卜晶晶,王素芳,等.冠菌素对不同钾水平下TTC法测定的棉花根系活力的影响 [J].植物生理学报,2015,51(5):695-701.
ZHANG Zhiyong, BU Jingjing, WANG Sufang. et al. Effect of Coronatine on Cotton Root Activity Determined by TTC Assay at Different Levels of Potassium [J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2015, 51(5):695-701.
[14] 刘建国. 新疆棉花长期连作的土壤环境效应及其化感作用的研究 [D].南京:南京农业大学,2008.
LIU Jianguo. Effects on soil environments of long-term succession cropping and allelopathy mechanism of cotton in Xinjiang [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University,2008.
[15] 王慧杰,郝建平,冯瑞云,等.微孔深松耕降低土壤紧实度提高棉花产量与种籽品质 [J].农业工程学报,2015,31(8):7-14.
WANG Huijie, HAO Jianping, FENG Ruiyun, et al. Microhole subsoiling decreasing soil compaction, and improving yield and seed quality of cotton [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015,31(8):7-14.
[16] 崔建平,程强,陈平,等.深松条件下滴灌频次对土壤理化指标及棉花产量的调节效应 [J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):263-269,276.
CUI Jianping, CHENG Qiang, CHEN Ping, et al. Effects of drip Irrigation frequency on soil physical and chemical characteristics and cotton yield under subsoiling condition [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,33(1):263-269,276.
[17] 齐华, 刘明, 张卫建, 等. 深松方式对土壤物理性状及玉米根系分布的影响 [J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27(4): 191-196.
QI Hua, LIU Ming, ZHANG Weijian, et al. Effect of deep loosening mode on soil physical characteristics and maize root distribution [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2012, 27(4): 191-196.
[18] 孔凡磊, 陈阜, 张海林, 等. 轮耕对土壤物理性状和冬小麦产量的影响 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(8): 150-155.
KONG Fanlei, CHEN Fu, ZHANG Hailin, et al. Effects of rotational tillage on soil physical properties and winter wheat yield [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(8): 150-155.
[19] 于晓芳, 高聚林, 叶君, 等. 深松及氮肥深施对超高产春玉米根系生长、产量及氮肥利用效率的影响 [J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(1): 114-119.
YU Xiaofang, GAO Julin, YE Jun, et al. Effects of deep loosening with nitrogen deep placement on root growth, grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of super high-yield spring maize [J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2013, 21(1): 114-119.

深松对覆膜滴灌棉田根腐病害发生及根区环境的影响

Effects of Subsoiling on Root Rot Diseases and Root Zone Environment

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨川, 张凯, 陈冰, 张慧, 柳萍, 常松, 盛建东. 棉花植株形态特征对不同水分状况的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127.
[3]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[4]	李雪玲, 郭俊先, 陈莉, 宋鹤岭, 张众. 不同覆膜宽度对棉花农田环境的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847.
[5]	阳妮, 玛依拉·玉素音, 杨延龙, 李春平, 张大伟, 徐海江, 赖成霞. 黄萎病枯斑型与黄化型病症棉花叶片的植物挥发物对比[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986.
[6]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[7]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[8]	王文涛, 吴博, 邰红忠, 练文明, 戴翠荣, 李双江, 蒲艳梅. 新疆阿拉尔垦区不同播期对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422.
[9]	张国新, 宋单波, 刘保军, 王权, 白剑宇, 郭庆元. 文冠果根腐病主要生物学特性及室内药剂筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1523-1530.
[10]	桑志伟, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 陈全家. 不同陆地棉种质资源机采性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098.
[11]	逯涛, 曾庆涛, 张文, 王文博, 王政洋, 杨芮, 孙玉岩. 主成分分析及灰色关联度分析综合评价棉花产量与品质[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109.
[12]	朱宝国, 匡恩俊, 滕占林, 孟庆英, 王囡囡, 冯浩原, 邱磊, 高雪冬, 张春峰. 不同生物有机肥配施化肥对大豆植株生长、抗病及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1127-1133.
[13]	王宁, 史应武, 牛新湘, 杨红梅, 楚敏, 詹发强, 包慧芳, 杨蓉, 龙宣杞, 丁荣荣. 棉花根际溶磷菌WJP-7发酵培养基优化及防病增产效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1263-1270.
[14]	张泓, 吐尔逊江·买买提, 张少民, 张军高, 周小云. 近30 a全国棉花生产区域时空变化及区域优势分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 1028-1040.
[15]	代健敏, 张巨松, 徐新龙, 李始鑫, 翟梦华, 孙明辉. 氮肥运筹对雹后重播受旱棉花生长特性及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 798-809.