CRISPR/Cas9技术在园艺作物中的研究进展

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.07.006

新疆农业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (7): 1223-1232.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.07.006

CRISPR/Cas9技术在园艺作物中的研究进展

黄少勇^1,2, 王娟², 王柏柯², 李宁², 唐亚萍², 杨生保², 杨涛², 张国儒², 帕提古丽·艾斯木托拉², 高杰¹, 余庆辉²

1.新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院,乌鲁木齐 830091;
2.新疆农业科学院园艺作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2020-02-15 出版日期:2020-07-20 发布日期:2020-06-22
通信作者: 高杰(1963-),男,天津人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜遗传育种,(E-mail) ofc@163.com余庆辉(1970-),男,广东大埔人,研究员,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜遗传育种,(E-mail) yuqinghui98@sina.com
作者简介:黄少勇(1984－ ),男,广西人,博士研究生,研究方向为蔬菜遗传育种,(E-mail) shaoyonghuang@sina.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFD0101906);新疆农业科学院重点项目前期预研专项(xjzdy-003);现代农业产业技术体系专项(CARS-23-G25)

Application Progress of CRISPR / Cas9 Technology in Horticultural Crops

HUANG Shaoyong ^1,2, WANG Juan², WANG Baike ², LI Ning ² , TANG Yaping² , YANG Shengbao², YANG Tao², ZHANG Guoru², Patiguli Aisimutuola², GAO Jie¹, YU Qinghui²

1. College of Forestry and Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
2. Institute of Horticulture Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2020-02-15 Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-06-22
Correspondence author: GAO Jie (1963-), male, native place: Tianjin, Professor, Postgraduate Tutor of Ph.D, research field: Vegetable Genetics and breeding, (E-mail) ofc@163.com ; YU Qinghui (1970-), male, native place: Dapu, Guangdong Province, Researcher, Postgraduate Tutor of Ph.D, research field: Vegetable Genetics and breeding, (E-mail) yuqinghui98@sina.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 回顾近年来基因编辑技术在园艺作物中的研究进展,为园艺作物的基础研究与品种培育提供参考。【方法】 从国内外文献资料中收集查阅CRISPR/Cas9技术在园艺作物研究中的研究报道,对其分析汇总。【结果】 传统育种手段难以满足园艺作物对产量和品质日益增长的需求,CRISPR/Cas9技术为其品种改良开辟新的道路,改变园艺作物育种格局,促进其在抵御生物胁迫,响应非生物胁迫,提高果实品质和作物驯化。【结论】 CRISPR/Cas9技术在园艺作物研究中是育种工作不可或缺的关键性技术。

关键词: CRISPR/cas9技术; 园艺作物; 研究进展

Abstract: 【Objective】 To review the application of gene editing technology in horticultural crops in recent years in the hope of providing a reference for the basic research and variety cultivation of horticultural crops. 【Methods】 The progress report of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in horticultural crops research was collected from domestic and foreign literature. After that the relevant analyses were summarized. 【Results】 Traditional breeding methods were difficult to meet the growing demand for yield and quality of horticultural crops, and CRISPR/Cas9 technology opened up a new way for its variety improvement, which would completely change the breeding pattern of horticultural crops, and make a significant breakthrough in resisting biological stress, responding to abiotic stress, improving fruit quality and crop domestication. 【Conclusion】 Great progress has been made in CRISPR/Cas9 technology in horticultural crop research and is an indispensable key technology for future breeding work.

Key words: CRISPR/Cas9 technology; horticultural crops; research progress

中图分类号:

S6-0

黄少勇, 王娟, 王柏柯, 李宁, 唐亚萍, 杨生保, 杨涛, 张国儒, 帕提古丽·艾斯木托拉, 高杰, 余庆辉. CRISPR/Cas9技术在园艺作物中的研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(7): 1223-1232.

HUANG Shaoyong , WANG Juan, WANG Baike , LI Ning , TANG Yaping , YANG Shengbao, YANG Tao, ZHANG Guoru, Patiguli Aisimutuola, GAO Jie, YU Qinghui. Application Progress of CRISPR / Cas9 Technology in Horticultural Crops[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(7): 1223-1232.

参考文献

[1] Khoury C. K., Bjorkman A. D., Dempewolf H., et al. Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security[J]. PNAS, 2014, 111(11): 4001–4006.
[2] Oladosu Y., Rafii M. Y., Abdullah N., et al. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: A review[J]. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2015, 30(1):1-16.
[3] Wang H., Wu Y., Zhang Y., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based mutagenesis of starch biosynthetic genes in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas) for the improvement of starch quality[J]. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(19): 4702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194702.
[4] Osakabe Y., Liang Z., Ren C., et al. CRISPR–Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and grapevine[J]. Nature Protocols, 2018 (13): 2844–2863.
[6] Zhu C., Zheng X., Huang Y., et al. Genome sequencing and CRISPR /Cas9 gene editing of an early flowering Mini‐Citrus (Fortunella hindsii)[J]. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17(11): 2199–2210.
[7] Ye M., Peng Z., Tang D., et al. Generation of self-compatible diploid potato by knockout of S-RNase[J]. Nat. Plants 2018,(4): 651–654.
[8] Ishino Y., Shinagawa H., Makino K., et al. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product[J]. J. Bacteriol. 1987,(169): 5429–5433.
[9] Bolotin A., Quinquis B., Sorokin A., et al. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin[J]. Microbiology , 2005, 151(8): 2551–2561.
[10] Pourcel C., Salvignol G. & Vergnaud, G.. CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies [J]. Microbiology, 2005, 151(3):653-663.
[11] Mojica F. J., Díez-Villase?or C., García-Martínez J., et al. Intervening sequences of regularly spaced Prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements[J]. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 2005, 60(2):174-182.
[12] Hille F , Charpentier E . CRISPR-Cas: biology, mechanisms and relevance[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 371(1707):20150496.
[13] Gasiunas G., Barrangou R., Horvath P., et al. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(39): E2579-E2586.
[14] Wang M., Mao Y., Lu Y., et al. Multiplex gene editing in rice with simplified CRISPR-Cpf1 and CRISPR-Cas9 systems [J]. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018,(60): 626–631.
[15] Amitai G. & Sorek R. CRISPR-Cas adaptation: Insights into the mechanism of action [J]. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016(14): 67–76.
[16] Yin K., Gao C., Qiu J. L.. Progress and prospects in plant genome editing [J]. Nature Plants, 2017, 3:17107. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2017.107.
[17] Liu X., Xie C., Si H., et al. CRISPR / Cas9-mediated genome editing in plants[J]. Methods 2017, (121–122): 94–102.
[18] Donohoue P. D., Barrangou R. & May A. P. Advances in industrial biotechnology using CRISPR-Cas systems [J]. Trends Biotechnol. 2018,(36): 134–146.
[19] Liang W., Wersch S. Van, Tong M., et al. TIR-NB-LRR immune receptor SOC3 pairs with truncated TIR-NB protein CHS1 or TN2 to monitor the homeostasis of E3 ligase SAUL1[J]. New Phytologist, 2019, 221(4):2054-2066.
[20] Mao Y., Yang X., Zhou Y., et al. Manipulating plant RNA-silencing pathways to improve the gene editing efficiency of CRISPR / Cas9 systems[J]. Genome Biol. 2018,(19): 1–15.
[21] Chang H., Yi B., Ma R., et al. CRISPR/cas9, a novel genomic tool to knock down microRNA in vitro and in vivo[J]. Sci. Rep. 2016,(6): 1–12.
[22] Seth K. & Harish. Current status of potential applications of repurposed Cas9 for structural and functional genomics of plants [J]. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 480(4):499-507.
[23] Hess G. T., Tycko J., Yao D., et al. Methods and applications of CRISPR-mediated base editing in Eukaryotic genomes [J]. Mol. Cell , 2017, 68(1): 26–43.
[24] Brooks C., Nekrasov V., Lipppman Z. B., et al. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated9 system[J]. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166(3): 1292–1297.
[25] Zhou J., Wang G. & Liu Z. Efficient genome-editing of wild strawberry genes, vector development, and validation[J]. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16(11):1868-1877.
[26] Kaur N., Alok A., Shivani, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient editing in phytoene desaturase (PDS) demonstrates precise manipulation in banana cv. Rasthali genome[J]. Funct. Integr. Genomics, 2018, 18(1): 89–99.
[27] Ikuko N., Yusuke B., Akifumi A., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in grape [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(5): e0177966.
[28] Nishitani C., Hirai N., Komori S., et al. Efficient genome editing in Apple using a CRISPR/Cas9 system[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 31481. DOI: 10.1038/srep31481.
[29] Tian S., Jiang L., Gao Q., et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based gene knockout in watermelon [J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2017, 36(3):399-406.
[30] Wang Z., Wang S., Li D., et al. Optimized paired-sgRNA/Cas9 cloning and expression cassette triggers high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in kiwifruit [J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2018, 16(8):1424-1433.
[31] Roque E., Serwatowska J., Cruz R. M., et al. Functional specialization of duplicated AP3-like genes in Medicago truncatula[J]. Plant J. 2013, 73(4): 663–675.
[32] Martín-Pizarro C., Trivi?o J. C. & Posé D. Functional Analysis of TM6 MADS-box gene in the Octoploid Strawberry by CRISPR/Cas9 directed mutagenesis[J]. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70(3):885-895.
[33] Feng J., Dai C., Luo H., et al. Reporter gene expression reveals precise auxin synthesis sites during fruit and root development in the wild strawberry[J]. J Exp Bot. 2019, 70(2):563-574.
[34]唐雨薇,刘丽萍,王若娴,等. 茶树咖啡碱合成酶CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑载体的构建[J]. 茶叶科学 2016, 36(4): 414–426.
TANG Yuwei, LIU Liping, WANG Ruoxian, et al. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9 constructed for genome editing of Caffeine synthase in Camellia sinensis [J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2016, 36(4): 414–426.
[35]贺晓东. 胡杨PeuAZF2基因的克隆和功能分析[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2017.
HE Xiaodong. Clong and Function Analysis of PeuAZF2 Encoding a C2H2-type zinc finger protein from Populus Euphratica Oliv [D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2017.
[36] Ma C., Liu M., Li Q., et al. Efficient BoPDS gene editing in Cabbage by the CRISPR/Cas9 system [J]. Hortic. Plant J. 2019, (5): 164–169.
[37] Munos S., Ranc N., Botton E., et al. Increase in tomato locule number is controlled by two single-nucleotide polymorphisms located near WUSCHEL[J]. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156(4): 2244–2254.
[38] Rodríguez-Leal D., Lemmon Z. H., Man J., et al. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing[J]. Cell, 2017, 171(2):470-480.
[39] Hayut S. F., Bessudo C. M. & Levy A. A. Targeted recombination between homologous chromosomes for precise breeding in tomato[J]. Nat. Commun. 2017,(8): 1–9.
[40] Deng L., Wang H., Sun C., et al. Efficient generation of pink-fruited tomatoes using CRISPR/Cas9 system [J]. J. Genet. Genomics , 2018, 45(1), 51–54.
[41] ermák T., Baltes N. J., egan R., et al. High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome[J]. Genome Biol. 2015, 16: 232.
[42] Ito Y., Nishizawa-Yokoi A., Endo M., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening [J]. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 467(1): 76–82.
[43] Lang Z., Wang Y., Tang K., et al. Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit [J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114(22): E4511–E4519.
[44] Uluisik S., Chapman N. H., Smith R., et al. Genetic improvement of tomato by targeted control of fruit softening[J]. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34(9): 950–952.
[45] Yu Q. H., Wang B. K., Li N., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-induced targeted mutagenesis and gene replacement to generate long-shelf life Tomato lines [J]. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7(1): 11874. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12262-1.
[46] Meng X., Yang D., Li X., et al. Plant physiology and biochemistry physiological changes in fruit ripening caused by overexpression of tomato SlAN2, an R2R3-MYB factor[J]. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, (89), 24–30.
[47] Nonaka S., Arai C., Takayama M., et al. Efficient increase of r-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in Tomato fruits by targeted mutagenesis[J]. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7(1):7057.
[48] Li X., Wang Y., Chen S., et al. Lycopene is enriched in Tomato fruit by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing [J]. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9: 559.
[49] Ye J., Wang X., Hu T. X., et al. An InDel in the Promoter of Al-activated malate transporter 9 selected during Tomato domestication determines fruit Malate contents and Aluminum tolerance [J]. Plant Cell, 2017, 29(9): 2249–2268.
[50] Arora L. & Narula A. Gene editing and crop improvement using CRISPR-cas9 system [J]. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8: 1932.
[51] Borrelli V. M. G., Brambilla V., Rogowsky P., et al. The enhancement of plant disease resistance using crispr/cas9 technology [J]. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9: 1245.
[52] Tashkandi M., Ali Z., Aljedaani F., et al. Engineering resistance against Tomato yellow leaf curl virus via the CRISPR/Cas9 system in tomato[J]. Plant Signal. Behav. 2018, 13(10): 1-7.
[53] Chandrasekaran J., Brumin M., Wolf D., et al. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology[J]. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17(7): 1140–1153.
[54] Wang Z., Hardcastle T. J., Pastor A. C., et al. A novel DCL2-dependent miRNA pathway in tomato affects susceptibility to RNA viruses[J]. Genes Dev. 2018, 32: 1-6.
[55] Tripathi J. N., Ntui V. O., Ron M., et al. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of endogenous banana streak virus in the B genome of Musa spp. overcomes a major challenge in banana breeding[J]. Commun. Biol. 2019, 2(1): 1–11.
[56] Zeilmaker T., Ludwig N. R., Elberse J., et al. DOWNY MILDEW RESISTANT 6 and DMR6-LIKE OXYGENASE 1 are partially redundant but distinct suppressors of immunity in Arabidopsis [J]. Plant J. 2015, 81(2): 210–222.
[57] Thomazella D., Brail Q., Dahlbeck D., et al. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutagenesis of a DMR6 otology in tomato confers broad-spectrum disease resistance [J]. bioRxiv, 2016: 1–23.
[58] Nekrasov V., Wang C., Win J., et al. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion[J]. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7(1): 482.
[59] Mickael M., Roberto V., Min-Hee J., et al. DNA-free genetically edited Grapevine and Apple protoplast using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins[J]. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7: 1–9.
[60] Wang X., Tu M., Wang D., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient targeted mutagenesis in grape in the first generation[J]. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018, 16(4):844-855.
[61] Zhang S., Wang L., Zhao R., et al. Knockout of SlMAPK3 reduced disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants[J]. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66(34): 8949–8956.
[62] Peng A., Chen S., Lei T.. et al. Engineering canker-resistant plants through CRISPR/Cas9-targeted editing of the susceptibility gene CsLOB1 promoter in citrus[J]. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15: 1509–1519.
[63] Yin Y., Qin K., Song X., et al. BZR1 transcription factor regulates heat stress tolerance through FERONIA receptor-like kinases-mediated reactive oxygen species signaling in tomato[J]. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018. DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcy146.
[64] Li R., Zhang L., Wang L., et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SlCBF1 mutagenesis reduces Tomato plant chilling tolerance[J]. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66: 9042–9051.
[65] Wang L., Chen L., Li R., et al. Reduced drought tolerance by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SlMAPK3 mutagenesis in tomato plants[J]. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65(39): 8674–8682.
[66] Xu C , Park S J , Van Eck J , et al. Control of inflorescence architecture in tomato by BTB/POZ transcriptional regulators[J]. Genes & Development, 2016, 30(18):2048-2061.
[67] Klap C., Yeshayahou E., Bolger A. M., et al. Tomato facultative parthenocarpy results from SlAGAMOUS-LIKE 6 loss of function[J]. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15(5): 634–647.
[68] Hu J., Israeli A., Ori N., et al. The interaction between DELLA and ARF/IAA mediates crosstalk between Gibberellin and Auxin signaling to control fruit initiation in Tomato [J]. Plant Cell , 2018, 30(8): 1710–1728.
[69] Roldan M. V. G, Périlleux C., Morin H., et al. Natural and induced loss of function mutations in SlMBP21 MADS-box gene led to jointless-2 phenotype in tomato [J]. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7: 4402. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04556-1.
[70] Li T., Yang X., Yu, Y., et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing[J]. Nat. Biotechnol, 2018, 36: 1160–1163.
[71] Lemmon Z. H., Reem N. T., Dalrymple J., et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing [J]. Nat. Plants, 2018, 4(10): 766–770.
[72] Cong L., Ran F. A., Cox D., et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems [J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 819–824.
[73] Hu J. H., Miller S. M., Geurts M. H., et al. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity[J]. Nature, 2018, 556(7699): 57–63.
[74] Moradpour M. & Abdulah S. N. A. CRISPR/dCas9 platforms in plants: strategies and applications beyond genome editing[J]. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13232.
[75] Xu W., Yang Y., Liu Y., et al. Discriminated sgRNAs-based SurroGate system greatly enhances the screening efficiency of Plant Base-edited cells[J]. Mol. Plant, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.10.007.
[76] Bai M., Yuan J., Kuang H., et al. Generation of a multiplex mutagenesis population via pooled CRISPR‐Cas9 in soya bean [J]. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13239.

[1]	冯国郡, 胡相伟, 赵云, 于明, 张述功, 周道良. 新疆谷子种质资源评价及产业研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1887-1893.
[2]	赵玲;王登元;赵莉;肖宏伟. 新疆蝗虫的研究进展[J]. , 2012, 49(7): 1212-1223.
[3]	陈辉惶;李建贵;张俊;杜妍. 新疆红枣裂果机理研究进展[J]. , 2012, 49(6): 1066-1072.
[4]	郭文超;邓春生;李国清;邓建宇;姜卫华;吴家和;王佩玲;谭万忠;张青文. 我国马铃薯甲虫生物防治技术研究进展[J]. , 2011, 48(12): 2217-2222.
[5]	俞阗;张君萍;马洪雨;李建贵;麻浩. 梭梭抗逆相关研究进展[J]. , 2009, 46(4): 907-912.
[6]	赵晓梅;张谦;徐麟;过利敏;樊国全;何峰江. 杏贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J]. , 2008, 45(1): 38-41.
[7]	赵奇;陈兴武;雷钧杰;赛力汗;郭文超;许建军;何江;马兴旺;牛新湘;杨金钰. 新疆"十五"小麦栽培技术研究主要进展及"十一五"科研与生产建议[J]. , 2007, 44(z1): 5-9.
[8]	赵奇;陈兴武;雷钧杰;赛力汗;郭文超;许建军;何江;马兴旺;牛新湘;杨金钰. 新疆"十五"小麦栽培技术研究主要进展及"十一五"科研与生产建议[J]. , 2007, 44(6): 769-774.

CRISPR/Cas9技术在园艺作物中的研究进展

Application Progress of CRISPR / Cas9 Technology in Horticultural Crops

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics